KingKhanWC
World Star
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2010
- Runs
- 50,455
I already stated in my original post (#12) that I disagree with de Villiers and the World Cup is definitely bigger than the IPL. However, it is certainly comparable to bilateral T20 cricket, and I would argue that it is actually superior.
Bilateral cricket is usually time pass for neutral fans anyway. When Pakistan play Sri Lanka, do people in India, Australia, England, South Africa, New Zealand etc. care? Of course they don't.
Moreover, if a neutral is given a chance between watching a match between two mediocre international teams lacking world class stars (e.g. Pakistan or Sri Lanka) or an IPL match between RCB and MI featuring the likes of Kohli, de Villiers, Steyn, Rohit, de Kock etc., which one are they likely to prefer?
How can the quality of cricket be superiour? IPL has featured some young hacks, young trundlers and old aged retired cricketers.