What's new

"I was all at sea against Wasim and Waqar" : Sachin Tendulkar

aukhan

T20I Debutant
Joined
Oct 16, 2013
Runs
8,052
New Delhi: International Test debuts can be intimidating and Sachin Tendulkar could not have imagined a tougher one when he padded up against pace legends Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis in 1989, the experience leaving him so scarred that he doubted his ability to continue at the highest level.

In his just-released autobiography 'Playing It My Way', Tendulkar reveals how he found it tough in his very first Test innings.

"It was baptism by fire. So much so that after my very first innings in Test cricket, during which I was all at sea against Wasim and Waqar, I began to doubt my ability to bat and question whether I was ever going to be good enough to play at international level," Tendulkar writes in the book.

"What made it (my debut) more significant was that we were playing against Pakistan in Pakistan and their bowling attack included fast bowlers of the quality of Imran Khan, Wasim Akram, Waqar Younis and Aaqib Javed, not to mention the leg-spinners Mushtaq Ahmed and Abdul Qadir - quite a test for any debutant," he wrote.

Writing about his first tour in Chapter 3, the maestro recalled how the fiery Wasim, then in his prime, welcomed the youngster to Test cricket.

"I was on strike to him for the third ball of the over, which turned out to be a vicious bouncer. Having studied Wasim's bowling, I was convinced the next ball would be yorker and was mentally prepared for it," he said.

"It turned out to be another bouncer, which I left. While I kept expecting a fiery yorker, balls five and six also turned out to be bouncers, and at the end of the over I said to myself, 'Welcome to Test Cricket'."

Getting used to the pressures of international cricket against arch-rivals Pakistan, Tendulkar also recalled the rising ball from Waqar in the fourth Test in Sialkot, which left him bloodied.

"I had just scored my first run when Waqar bowled a short delivery, which I expected would rise chin-high. I misjudged the bounce of the ball. It rose six inches higher than expected and hit me on the flap of the helmet before deflecting and hitting my nose.

'Never felt comfortable with lighter bats'

His heavy bat was a major talking point whenever Sachin Tendulkar battled injuries in his over-two-decade-long career but the iconic cricketer said he was never convinced about giving it up for a lighter one as his timing got affected everytime he tried the change.

In his autobiography 'Playing It My way', Tendulkar wrote he was asked several times to try a lighter bat but it never worked for him.

"I used a pretty heavy bat and I was sometimes encouraged to move to a lighter one. Again, I did try but I never felt comfortable, as my whole bat swing depended on that weight. When I was hitting a drive, I needed the weight to generate the power. It was all to do with the timing," he explains.

The all-time leading scorer in the game also offered an interesting take on how to hold the bat.

"To me the bat should be an extension of your arm, and if you've reached the stage where it's become an extension of your arm, why do you need to change? What mattered to me most when I was batting was feeling comfortable.

"As long as I felt comfortable, it didn't matter where I was playing or who I was playing against. If you make technical adjustments, such as moving to a lighter bat, to cope with different conditions, there's a risk of making yourself feel uncomfortable and of thinking too much about your technique," he says.

Tendulkar has advised budding batsmen against too much experimentation, saying the "bat should be an extension of your arm" and there is no need for a change in technique if "you have reached that stage".

The master blaster also talks about the intricacies of his batting.

Sources: http://www.deccanchronicle.com/1411...nnings-test-cricket-i-doubted-my-ability-bat’
 
Last edited:
Sachin and Wasim always have massive respect for each other. Not so much with Waqar though.
 
It's a very interesting autobiography. For those of you who haven't read it yet and whichever country you're from, forget about the little tidbit about Chappell - which is 1% of the entire thing - and pick it up.
 
Must have been some debut - he was knocked over by bouncers from the Ws
 
imagine throwing in a 16 year old against the likes of steyn right now or johnson...... only someone like sachin could have come through that and built such an amazing career
 
"It was baptism by fire. So much so that after my very first innings in Test cricket, during which I was all at sea against Wasim and Waqar, I began to doubt my ability to bat and question whether I was ever going to be good enough to play at international level," Tendulkar writes in the book.

Very honest comments.

Good good.
 
It was baptism by fire. So much so that after my very first innings in Test cricket, during which I was all at sea against Wasim and Waqar, I began to doubt my ability to bat and question whether I was ever going to be good enough to play at international level," Tendulkar writes in the book.

Wow we need to salute this legend... very very honest comments.... Tendulkar's avg was only 32 against Pakistan in tests when the WWs are steaming in... the two Ws kept him quiet especially in tests though he played only 2 series against them..
 
Great batsmen.
And a great debut.

Waqar troubled him more then Wasim i think
 
imagine throwing in a 16 year old against the likes of steyn right now or johnson...... only someone like sachin could have come through that and built such an amazing career

You're clearly underestimating Asad Shafiq.
 
Some people say that sachin didnt have a great debut series.Well to avg 35 in 1989 as a 16yr old vs Wasim Waqar Imran Qadir Mushy is good enough for me.
 
W's were brutal back then and IK probably over the hill was still good enough to trouble any batsman. If they get tired, Qadir was there to torture the batsman. You have to feel for the batsman facing such a bowling attack. Not for the weak minded. Some can never recover from the torture that W's can inflict.

No wonder Pak were a great a team back in 80's and 90's.
 
It was Pakistan pace battery that troubled the Indians. Even Mushtaq to an extent was effective. But Qadir was never a problem. Even a Sachin in his teens was hitting him for sixes as Qadir himself claims.

IK also regards him as pretty brave. IK deliberately wanted him roughed up by constant bouncers and near-bodyline bowling. Unsurprisingly, Sachmeister stepped up and then some.
 
Last edited:
Imran, Wasim, Waqar, Qadir, Mushy..


Yeah.. thats a bowling line up I dont think anybody would enjoy batting against.
 
Must have been some debut - he was knocked over by bouncers from the Ws

I remember catching some description in newspaper. IK was like who is this kid coming out to bat, let's blow his head off ;)
 
Another thing to remember - Wasim and Waqar were several yards quicker than the fastest bowler debuting SRT might have faced in India. I don't think that bowling Machine were used at that time.
 
Legends always have respect for each other. It's the fans that have trouble respecting some legends.
 
It was Pakistan pace battery that troubled the Indians. Even Mushtaq to an extent was effective. But Qadir was never a problem. Even a Sachin in his teens was hitting him for sixes as Qadir himself claims.

IK also regards him as pretty brave. IK deliberately wanted him roughed up by constant bouncers and near-bodyline bowling. Unsurprisingly, Sachmeister stepped up and then some.

Sachin never hit a Six to any of Pakistani bowler in tests. What are you talking about?
 
Wasim praising any indian player -> to make his bosses happy, money talks

Sachin praising pakistani players -> honest man, great man, humble man
 
Always bowled well to Tendulkar.

Aqib was unplayable in Sharjah in early 90's. He bowled sharp incutters at good speed and also got ball to reverse. Torture days for Indian fans watching our batsmen crumble to pieces against Pak bowling. I was a kid back then and my elder brother used to feel happy if India lost the match with respect in tact.
 
Straight from the horse's mouth....the batsmen who was at the other end.
Navjot Sidhu recounts the bloody incident here. :waqar :srt

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/n1cXX4ERy2Y" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Last edited:
imagine throwing in a 16 year old against the likes of steyn right now or johnson...... only someone like sachin could have come through that and built such an amazing career

Add to that green pitch. That pitch in Pakistan where Sachin debut was so green that it was difficult to distinguish between outfield and the pitch.
 
Add to that green pitch. That pitch in Pakistan where Sachin debut was so green that it was difficult to distinguish between outfield and the pitch.

Yes, Imran Khan had told the groundsman, "If you cut the grass, I will cut you" :p
 
Must have been some debut - he was knocked over by bouncers from the Ws

watched it on TV. Indians were peppered with bouncers in that match and we dropped 10 catches including a dolly from miandad. we should have won the first match easily. dodgy fielding let us down.
 
It was Pakistan pace battery that troubled the Indians. Even Mushtaq to an extent was effective. But Qadir was never a problem. Even a Sachin in his teens was hitting him for sixes as Qadir himself claims.

IK also regards him as pretty brave. IK deliberately wanted him roughed up by constant bouncers and near-bodyline bowling. Unsurprisingly, Sachmeister stepped up and then some.

err not in the first match, he was brave but ultimately it was Sanjay who stole the headlines for India. Tendu wasn't a problem.
 
"I was all at sea against Wasim and Waqar" : Sachin Tendulkar
Yeah we know. That's why you only played 4 tests and 16 ODIs against Wasim+Waqar in your career, and hid behind political excuses during their peak.
 
What did sachin say about the Rawalpindi Express in his autobiography. That would be quite an interesting read.
 
He was 16 at that time and spare a thought for the same guy at 15 wanting to be picked for the West Indies tour. Sachin had some guts.
 
It was a completely different story when these legends played against each other in 2003 wc in their last match. wasn't it? :D
 
Last edited:
Yep, refer to the SRT Ultimate Discussion thread for some thoughts (and pages).

Does it have a mention of his early years and the adulation he got and his best knocks?Or is it mostly about controversial incidents?

If the former I will buy:)
 
Does it have a mention of his early years and the adulation he got and his best knocks?Or is it mostly about controversial incidents?

If the former I will buy:)

A mix of everything, really.
 
I think India boycott of not playing Pakistan team during Wasim & Waqar's peak really saved lot of Indian batsmen's international career.
 
I think India boycott of not playing Pakistan team during Wasim & Waqar's peak really saved lot of Indian batsmen's international career.

POTW.

Completely agree.

Many blind Indians don't realize that if India had toured Pakistan then, a lot of these Indian batsmen would have been selling Papads on the street.
 
Last edited:
watched it on TV. Indians were peppered with bouncers in that match and we dropped 10 catches including a dolly from miandad. we should have won the first match easily. dodgy fielding let us down.

err not in the first match, he was brave but ultimately it was Sanjay who stole the headlines for India. Tendu wasn't a problem.

Thanks for the insight tGK - sounds like typical overhype of "God" Sachin then, as per usual? Averaging 30s in a Test series for a specialist Test batsman - meh.
 
I think India boycott of not playing Pakistan team during Wasim & Waqar's peak really saved lot of Indian batsmen's international career.
How many times do i have to tell that it was PCB who boycotted Asia cup and 1991 and 1992-3 tour of India.
 
Gavaskar was a better test player than Tendulkar. He had 13 hundreds against Windies, 5 against Pakistan and 8 against Australia, the best attacks of his time. Bloody hell this guy is impressive and yet so humble. No wonder Imran rates him so highly.
 
You're clearly underestimating Asad Shafiq.

lol i guess you are trying to be facetious but that is just in poor taste. i dont think one person in his right mind would even think of equating shafiq to tendu.....and i am a dravid fan :)
 
Absolutely. Anotger good thing about Gavaskar is his humility. He faced some of the greatest fast bowlers of all time and states that amongst all Imran troubled him the most and for Sachin; he will never take Shoaib's name
 
Gavaskar was a better test player than Tendulkar. He had 13 hundreds against Windies, 5 against Pakistan and 8 against Australia, the best attacks of his time. Bloody hell this guy is impressive and yet so humble. No wonder Imran rates him so highly.

Fully Agreed what you have said about gavaskar, he was best Test batsman India have ever produced. Talking about 'humbleness', Indian trio- sachin, Dravid and laxman are equally humble. Sachin never said anything against any player or team through out his career.
Even if he is criticizing someone in his autography, I think he should be given that leeway, as i feel it is the perfect forum to vent one's frustration.
 
Absolutely. Anotger good thing about Gavaskar is his humility. He faced some of the greatest fast bowlers of all time and states that amongst all Imran troubled him the most and for Sachin; he will never take Shoaib's name



Sachin rates bowlers, not who had a suspected bowling action.
 
Absolutely. Anotger good thing about Gavaskar is his humility. He faced some of the greatest fast bowlers of all time and states that amongst all Imran troubled him the most and for Sachin; he will never take Shoaib's name

Shoaib was hardly in the same class as Imran. There is a gulf of class.
Sachin faced the likes of Mcgrath, Ambrose, Walsh, Donald, Pollock, Wasim, Waqar, Steyn etc over his career. Why would he specifically name Shoaib who was quite inferior to all of these?
 
A mix of everything, really.

Does it come across as a Peter Pan 'child without a childhood' story? I find that element of his life the most intriguing.
 
Absolutely. Anotger good thing about Gavaskar is his humility. He faced some of the greatest fast bowlers of all time and states that amongst all Imran troubled him the most and for Sachin; he will never take Shoaib's name

Because Shoaib didn't trouble Sachin the most. He did but not the most. It was probably McGrath or Anderson. Sachin felt Wasim and Waqar troubled him and hence he mentioned it. Just because Sachin doesn't take Shoaib name, doesn't mean he doesn't have enough humility.

People find new ways to put him down. Right in a thread where he talks about how he found the going tough against certain Pak legends. Poor guy. :))

If you wanna praise Gavaskar, you praise him. Bringing Sachin in and implying he doesn't have the same humility is not cool. And then when someone responds to posts like this, someone (not you bro) would say Sachintards can't take criticism. Haha.

This isn't criticism. This is just unnecessary nitpicking.
 
Shoaib was hardly in the same class as Imran. There is a gulf of class.
Sachin faced the likes of Mcgrath, Ambrose, Walsh, Donald, Pollock, Wasim, Waqar, Steyn etc over his career. Why would he specifically name Shoaib who was quite inferior to all of these?
Well anybody with little bit of cricketing sense would know who troubled Sachin the most.
 
Absolutely. Anotger good thing about Gavaskar is his humility. He faced some of the greatest fast bowlers of all time and states that amongst all Imran troubled him the most and for Sachin; he will never take Shoaib's name

Shoaib was hardly in the same class as Imran. There is a gulf of class.
Sachin faced the likes of Mcgrath, Ambrose, Walsh, Donald, Pollock, Wasim, Waqar, Steyn etc over his career. Why would he specifically name Shoaib who was quite inferior to all of these?

Well anybody with little bit of cricketing sense would know who troubled Sachin the most.
Only Dr.Ischaemia has cricketing sense.Sachin should name Shoaib because Dr.Ischaemia feels Shoaib troubled him.Thats a big joke.May be he can name a few great batsmen of Shoaibs time who have named him as the bowler who trouble them most.Most have named Wasim followed by Mcgrath etc.

Shoaib was a good bowler but his record is not exceptional when compared to 2Ws Mcgrath Donald Ambrose etc neither are his perfromances.Its foolishness to think that any batsman who faced these bowlers will name Shoaib as the most difficult bowler.

Regarding SRT being arrogant.Well if arrogance means pissing off people like you i am glad that he is arrogant.
 
No he didnt. Infact it was Hansi Cronje and Mcgrath and during his career twilight Anderson who troubled him the most.
Why will Sachin rate him when he phaintified him at Centurion or when most of the Indian team Phantified him in 2004 test series.
 
Only Dr.Ischaemia has cricketing sense.Sachin should name Shoaib because Dr.Ischaemia feels Shoaib troubled him.Thats a big joke.May be he can name a few great batsmen of Shoaibs time who have named him as the bowler who trouble them most.Most have named Wasim followed by Mcgrath etc.

Shoaib was a good bowler but his record is not exceptional when compared to 2Ws Mcgrath Donald Ambrose etc neither are his perfromances.Its foolishness to think that any batsman who faced these bowlers will name Shoaib as the most difficult bowler.

Regarding SRT being arrogant.Well if arrogance means pissing off people like you i am glad that he is arrogant.
Boss, you are taking me wrong. I admire Sachin as a person and as a cricketer. Just wanted to say that Shoaib had his moments against him just as sachin had over Shoaib.
And please dont get personal.
 
Boss, you are taking me wrong. I admire Sachin as a person and as a cricketer. Just wanted to say that Shoaib had his moments against him just as sachin had over Shoaib.
And please dont get personal.
Sir

I am not getting personal.Good bowlers will have their moments.But when a legend like SRT is says he was troubled doesnt mean odd events.He is talking about bowlers who would do it most.Thats why he mentions legends like Wasim or Mcgrath etc.

So calling him arrogant because he doesnt rate a particular bowler as not the most difficult is wrong.
 
Sir

I am not getting personal.Good bowlers will have their moments.But when a legend like SRT is says he was troubled doesnt mean odd events.He is talking about bowlers who would do it most.Thats why he mentions legends like Wasim or Mcgrath etc.

So calling him arrogant because he doesnt rate a particular bowler as not the most difficult is wrong.
Boss, I may be wrong at times or may have difference of opinion. You gave quite good justifications in your answer that convinced me somewhat that why Shoaib was not mentioned by sachin.
That was all that was needed not words like ****** of etc.
 
Boss, I may be wrong at times or may have difference of opinion. You gave quite good justifications in your answer that convinced me somewhat that why Shoaib was not mentioned by sachin.
That was all that was needed not words like ****** of etc.
It was a mere use of term.I apologise for the same.
 
Take a look at how many times Sachin has got out to Wasim or Waqar in test matches IIRC its only one each. No Doubt Wasim and Waqar were great bowlers but Sachin is also a cricketing great. When other players can score against PAkistani attack there is no reason why Sachin will shy away from Wasim and Waqar.
We need to come out this theory that everyone is scared of us. Sachin opting not to face Wasim and Waqar and his legs shaking against Shoaib
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/OnThisDay?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#OnThisDay</a> in 1989. Two all-time greats took their bows in the drawn Test match between Pakistan and India in Karachi. Sachin Tendulkar aged just 16 years 205 days was bowled for 15 by Waqar Younis who was making his Test debut at the age of 17 years 364 days <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Cricket?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Cricket</a> <a href="https://t.co/9UVNT8MZAb">pic.twitter.com/9UVNT8MZAb</a></p>— Saj Sadiq (@SajSadiqCricket) <a href="https://twitter.com/SajSadiqCricket/status/1460203212691156992?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 15, 2021</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
What an occasion - if we only knew then that these 2 would be legends one day
 
He is very lucky he didn’t play another test vs Pakistan until 1999. Waqar would have finished him
 
Sachin definitely looks like a 16 year old. Waqar must have been 20-21 instead of 17. And Aaqib was 16 when he debuted in 1988, he too used to look much older.
 
Legendary duo, sad that probably never see the likes again.
 
Must have been some debut - he was knocked over by bouncers from the Ws

Saw it on PTV back in the day..we peppered them with bouncers but dropped about 10 catches..the fuelding was atrocious. Pace bowling was top class..
 
Over 34k runs, 100 centuries from 664 international matches

2011 ODI World Cup Winner

On this day in 1973, the little master, The guy who made batting look easy, Sachin Ramesh Tendulkar was born.

Happy Birthday.
 
Truly a Master Blaster he was... I have never seen any batsman play a straight drive with such ease it's as if he's playing in slow motion. A very Happy Birthday from one of your biggest fans.
 
Tendulkar only started to deliver in International Cricket from 1992 onwards and by 1994 he had become a superstar in India and by 1995-1996 had the reputation for being the best batsman in the world.
 
Tendulkar only started to deliver in International Cricket from 1992 onwards and by 1994 he had become a superstar in India and by 1995-1996 had the reputation for being the best batsman in the world.
Definitely one of the greatest of all time. One of his records that might remain unbroken for many years to come is 100 centuries. Kohli came close but still too far.
 
Tendulkar only started to deliver in International Cricket from 1992 onwards and by 1994 he had become a superstar in India and by 1995-1996 had the reputation for being the best batsman in the world.
How do you think prime tendu would fare vs prime wasim prime Waqar and prime qadir
 
Back
Top