I am so happy to see that this pitch backfired badly and SA lost this match Hilarious
I doubt it was intentional, CSA will be fuming at the lost income.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I am so happy to see that this pitch backfired badly and SA lost this match Hilarious
Of course they never thought that it was going to be this bad, but this only happened because they tried to prepare a pitch where they wanted to surprise India and finish a match within 3 or 4 days.I doubt it was intentional, CSA will be fuming at the lost income.
Not sure if they really care because the first test match also finished within 3 days.I doubt it was intentional, CSA will be fuming at the lost income.
Nothing wrong with a pitch where it turns from ball one, but India created pitches against South Africa where you could see the puffs of dust from ball one. Those were horrible pitches and should have never been allowed to play cricket on.
WHat? The bounce was both steep AND inconsistent. Rearing up to head from full length. SOme kept unusually low like the one to Gill. Nobody is going to play that ball.The crucial point we're overlooking is that the pitch was excessively grassy, which favoring bowlers with extra movement. It wasn't a poor pitch, instead Indian bowlers utilized the conditions well.
Even in 2015, 2/4 pitches were fair. Rahane in fact scored 2 100s in the Delhi test and India won by 350 runs in the final 30 minutes of day 5. In 2019, all 3 tests had fantastic pitches, extremely pace friendly (Umesh, Shami, Nortje all did well), lots of runs, as can be seen from the charts.That was way back in 2015. When South Africa last played in India in 2019, the wickets were some of the best I've ever seen in the subcontinent.
Preparing extreme pitches is always a stupid exercise unless your team is a minnow. Because it narrows the skill gap, on rank turners visiting spinners will close down the gap with Ashwin/Jadeja as compared to a traditional Indian pitch. On green tops, visiting bowlers close gap with Rabada, Cummins, Anderson, Boult etc. That is why India has lost on a few rank turners and also won on green carpets, same with other teams.
But dangerous pitches is a no go, inconsistent bounce should never go unpunished, especially when variance ranges from going 10 feet above batsman's head to scooting along the ground. Some of the balls Mukesh bowled in this match were scary viewing experience and he is just a harmless trundler. Facing Cummins in WACA or Gabba is less scary than facing Mukesh here.
3 days match, went to 4th day because of rain on first 3 days.IIRC the Jo'Burg pitch back in 2018/19 was far more dangerous even though oddly it lasted for 4 days.
Rohit still feeling bad that ICC rated the pitch for the final as average because he was fully involved in the pitch tampering in all world cup games. Otherwise there's no reason to be upset about it.Rohit wants match referees to 'keep eyes and ears open' while rating pitches
India captain Rohit Sharma 'doesn't mind' playing on pitches like the one in Cape Town, where the fastest ever Test result was achieved, but there's a caveat. He wants the critics of Indian pitches to just 'shut up' after what transpired at Newlands.
"We all saw what happened in this Test match and how the pitch played. I honestly don't mind playing on pitches like these as long as everyone keeps their mouth shut in India and don't talk about Indian pitches," said Rohit after India's seven-wicket win at Newlands, where all it took the visitors were 107 overs and a little over four sessions to level the series.
"You come here to challenge yourself. Yes, it is dangerous but it is challenging. When people come to India, it is challenging as well. When you're here to play Test cricket, we talk about Test cricket being the ultimate prize, Test cricket being the pinnacle and all. We also stand by it. When you're put up against a challenge like that, you come and face it. That's what happens in India, but when the pitch starts turning on Day 1 in India, people start talking 'puff of dust, puff of dust, there are so many cracks on the pitch'. It's important that we stay neutral wherever we go."
Rohit spoke of how different and uncomfortable the narrative is when the pitch starts taking turn from Day 1 in India, and called upon the ICC to stay 'neutral' when it comes to rating pitches.
"Honestly, I would like to see how the pitches are rated. Mumbai, Bangalore, Cape Town, Centurion are all quite different. The overhead conditions are different. The pitches deteriorate fast when the sun is beating down that hard on the pitch. The conditions in India also - we know the pitch will spin. But people don't like it because the pitch spins from Day 1," Rohit pointed out.
"If the ball seams from ball 1, it's fine for everyone. That's not fair. If the ball starts spinning from ball 1, it should be okay. Otherwise, you stay neutral and start rating these pitches also as bad. If you want the ball only to seam and not to turn, in my opinion that's absolutely wrong. That's my judgement, my opinion and I'll stick by it. I've seen enough cricket and enough of how these match referees and ICC looks into these ratings. I don't have an issue on how you rate, but stay neutral."
Rohit expressed surprise at the World Cup final pitch in Ahmedabad being rated 'below average' and urged the match referees to keep their 'eyes and ears open' when making their assessment.
"Some of these match referees need to keep their eye on how they rate pitches. I still can't believe the World Cup final pitch was rated 'below average'. A batsman got a hundred there. How can that be a poor pitch? The ICC, the match referees need to start rating pitches based on what they see, not based on countries. That's very important. I hope they keep their ears open, they keep their eyes open and look into those aspects of the game.
"I'm all for pitches like these, we want to challenge ourselves playing on pitches like these, we pride ourselves playing on pitches like these. But all I want to say is, be neutral."
Couldn't have summarized better. Especially the second paragraph. " Glues together" part. It was like paddy field. It caused dramatic and unpredictable behavior. In the hands of world class bowlers it became near u playable. They were lucky nobody got injured badly.
Good from Gawaskar .these Sena Country media ,ex cricketers were crying so much about Indian pitches always .Sunil Gavaskar lambasted Media in SENA countries on Newland Pitch coverage :
“These kind of excuses that the curator got it wrong is typical of the SENA countries,When our curators make a dry pitch then it’s ‘chicanery’, as a former Australian skipper said last year after the Aussies had been walloped in the first two Test matches. So our groundsmen do it deliberately, but their groundsmen just get it wrong. It’s like before the third country umpires came in, where decisions by their umpires were excused as ‘human error’ while our umpires were cheats and ‘Delhi Butchers’ and all such derogatory headlines.”
“In about three weeks time another Test series starts with a country that has the biggest whingeing and moaning media in sport. Anything that doesn’t suit their team will be criticised and allegations will fly thick and fast,”
Rohit whining in the media about people criticising Indian pitches and saying he didn't mind this pitch only to then go and criticise the pitch to the match referee is hilarious.
He didnt criticise the pitch at all. He said he's OK with such pitches and simply called out the double standards of the ICC.
This was a pathetic pitch and deserved the lowest rating possible . It was the 3rd worst pitch for batting after North Sound, 2019 and Wanderers , 2018.
It's about maintaining parity. If rank turners are going to be rated as poor, then these sorta pitches should be rated even worse since they can pose a physical threat as well
The ICC statement literally says that Rohit told the match referee that he didn't believe the pitch was up to standard, which is ironic after his claims that he was fine with the pitch whilst going off on his whine about people criticising certain Indian pitches
It's not. He clearly said that issue was the double standards. The Ahmedabad pitch in 2021 was rated a poor pitch when it was nowhere near as bad as this pitch.
Why would Rohit complain about a pitch on which we thrashed SA?
It's about ensuring there are no double standards at play.
Unlike certain other teams, their supporters and ex cricketers who whine only after losing on said pitches. .
And the double standards exist whether you acknowledge them or not.
ENG vs SA in 2022 had one particular pitch that was seaming excessively and it did not even get a mention from the Match Referee , lol.
What was the level of variable bounce on that pitch? What did the broadcaster show?Rohit is the one complaining to the match referee about the pitch, you'd have to ask him.
Ahmedabad 2021 didn't receive a poor rating. It didn't even receive a below average rating. That was despite the game finishing in 2 days, the broadcaster showing clear proof of significant variable bounce on day 1, and the game having to be delayed regularly so the groundsmen could repair the dangerous ankle-breaker sized footholes from the very first session. You're right there's a clear double standard, but it isn't the way round you seem to think.
Just unsatisfactory?NEWLANDS PITCH RATED AS 'UNSATISFACTORY'
The International Cricket Council (ICC) today announced that the pitch for the second Test of the ICC World Test Championship series between South Africa and India at Newlands in Cape Town has been rated as “unsatisfactory” under the ICC Pitch and Outfield Monitoring Process.
ICC Match Referee Chris Broad submitted his report expressing the concerns of the match officials and after consulting with captains Dean Elgar and Rohit Sharma, both of whom felt that the pitch was below standard. Following the assessment, the venue has received one demerit point.
The report has been forwarded to Cricket South Africa, who have 14 days to appeal against the sanction.
Mr Broad said: “The pitch in Newlands was very difficult to bat on. The ball bounced quickly and sometimes alarmingly throughout the match, making it difficult to play shots. Several batters were hit on the gloves and many wickets also fell due to the awkward bounce.”
Since India is the beneficiary, nobody is going to complain about the pitch
The pitch today was too quick and the batsmen from both teams had no idea about that. I feel whether any sanction call will be made against it or not depends on the result of the match. If India wins then everything will be brushed under the carpet. But if not, then expecting a great hue and cry over it.
Yeah, since they have won this test match so they are okay with that sort of wicket. But what if they had lost this match? Then the story could have been totally opposite.Rohit wants match referees to 'keep eyes and ears open' while rating pitches
India captain Rohit Sharma 'doesn't mind' playing on pitches like the one in Cape Town, where the fastest ever Test result was achieved, but there's a caveat. He wants the critics of Indian pitches to just 'shut up' after what transpired at Newlands.
"We all saw what happened in this Test match and how the pitch played. I honestly don't mind playing on pitches like these as long as everyone keeps their mouth shut in India and don't talk about Indian pitches," said Rohit after India's seven-wicket win at Newlands, where all it took the visitors were 107 overs and a little over four sessions to level the series.
"You come here to challenge yourself. Yes, it is dangerous but it is challenging. When people come to India, it is challenging as well. When you're here to play Test cricket, we talk about Test cricket being the ultimate prize, Test cricket being the pinnacle and all. We also stand by it. When you're put up against a challenge like that, you come and face it. That's what happens in India, but when the pitch starts turning on Day 1 in India, people start talking 'puff of dust, puff of dust, there are so many cracks on the pitch'. It's important that we stay neutral wherever we go."
Rohit spoke of how different and uncomfortable the narrative is when the pitch starts taking turn from Day 1 in India, and called upon the ICC to stay 'neutral' when it comes to rating pitches.
"Honestly, I would like to see how the pitches are rated. Mumbai, Bangalore, Cape Town, Centurion are all quite different. The overhead conditions are different. The pitches deteriorate fast when the sun is beating down that hard on the pitch. The conditions in India also - we know the pitch will spin. But people don't like it because the pitch spins from Day 1," Rohit pointed out.
"If the ball seams from ball 1, it's fine for everyone. That's not fair. If the ball starts spinning from ball 1, it should be okay. Otherwise, you stay neutral and start rating these pitches also as bad. If you want the ball only to seam and not to turn, in my opinion that's absolutely wrong. That's my judgement, my opinion and I'll stick by it. I've seen enough cricket and enough of how these match referees and ICC looks into these ratings. I don't have an issue on how you rate, but stay neutral."
Rohit expressed surprise at the World Cup final pitch in Ahmedabad being rated 'below average' and urged the match referees to keep their 'eyes and ears open' when making their assessment.
"Some of these match referees need to keep their eye on how they rate pitches. I still can't believe the World Cup final pitch was rated 'below average'. A batsman got a hundred there. How can that be a poor pitch? The ICC, the match referees need to start rating pitches based on what they see, not based on countries. That's very important. I hope they keep their ears open, they keep their eyes open and look into those aspects of the game.
"I'm all for pitches like these, we want to challenge ourselves playing on pitches like these, we pride ourselves playing on pitches like these. But all I want to say is, be neutral."
What was the level of variable bounce on that pitch? What did the broadcaster show?
Just unsatisfactory lol. When will the match ref Broad retire? He always covers up for SENA teams, and becomes ruthless, biased against the Asians.
Just unsatisfactory?
So Broad plays true to his form!