What's new

ICC Tournaments - Teams with the most trophies

Ali Bohra

Debutant
Joined
Jan 16, 2015
Runs
120
#Aus
#Ind
#WI
#SL
#Pak
#SA
#NZ
#Eng
#Ban
f7368e831db300094ad634490916f936.jpg
5db7e06880b5290f44894a41c5524578.jpg


Sent from my Micromax AQ4501 using Tapatalk
 
#Aus 7
#Ind 5
#WI 5
#SL 3
#Pak 2
# SA 1
# NZ 1
#Eng 1
# Ban 0

Sent from my Micromax AQ4501 using Tapatalk
 
B'desh became a decent team only in the last few years so it's silly to mock them even ZIM haven't won anything.
 
We need to win a champions trophy, badly.

Is Pak the only full member nation without a champions trophy?

Win it and rename it cornered tiger trophy :virat
 
dont really need to attach ANY importance to CT
 
Does Benson & Hedges World Championship of Cricket count?

IIRC India defeated Pak in the finals in 1985.
 
And? Winning the wc and i mean the 50 over wc is still the best. Winning ct is nice but what is the value? Its like a multi team tourney.

It is an ICC trophy, Top 8 teams play this tournament, so it is a very important trophy, way greater than all the bilaterals, 2nd greatest trophy in odis
 
And? Winning the wc and i mean the 50 over wc is still the best. Winning ct is nice but what is the value? Its like a multi team tourney.

Yeah just saying its more competitive I obviously feel more for a loss in WC than have for CT ,its important ICC tourney nevertheless and much more than a multi team tourney.
 
sri lanka were incredibly lucky to share that Champions Trophy with us . Sehwag was in top form and on his way to smash that small target .
 
One serious question when the trophy is shared at the end after the chinky photoshot who takes the trophy? No one or just the hosts grab it

Play 4 Pakistan Dont Play with Pakistan...
 
Does Benson & Hedges World Championship of Cricket count?

IIRC India defeated Pak in the finals in 1985.

Those days that was biggest tournament after world cup and introduced color clothing and stump mic. It was equal to champions trophy as all top teams participated
 
I dont see pak in the pic though...

Play 4 Pakistan Dont Play with Pakistan...
 
I have always said this India is the most cruch team from Asia followed by SL. These 2 teams always turn up in ICC events.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
 
Why is the champions trophy counted in world tournament victories, but our victories against Indian in the CT aren't counted in the streak?

Interesting.
 
Why is the champions trophy counted in world tournament victories, but our victories against Indian in the CT aren't counted in the streak?

Interesting.

That's highly selective picking from the Indian posters. They have been fed this by their media. You have to forgive them, not very good with logic.
 
No way .. Australia was a far better team. Delusional stuff from some Pakistanis here.
Just saying the tournament should've won by Pak but they played the final poorly

Play 4 Pakistan Dont Play with Pakistan...
 
Top 4 Asian teams in this order:

India - 2 World cups, 1 WT20, 1 CT, 1 shared CT, 6 Asia cups, twice no.1 test ranking.

SriLanka - 1 World cup, 1 WT20, 1 shared CT, 5 Asia cup.

Pakistan - 1 World cup, 1 WT20, 2 Asia cups, once no.1 ranked test team.

Bangladesh - None

So based on accolades above,

1)India

Distance

2)Srilanka

Closely followed by

3)Pakistan

Huge distance

4)Bangladesh


P.s - We should hv won 2014 T20 WC...why Yuvi why :(

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
 
Globally most successful teams:

1) Australia
2) West Indies
3) India
4) SA (purely based on number of years they were no.1 test team)
5) Srilanka
6) Pakistan
7) England
8) New Zealand
9) Bangladesh


Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
 
Top 4 Asian teams in this order:

India - 2 World cups, 1 WT20, 1 CT, 1 shared CT, 6 Asia cups, twice no.1 test ranking.

SriLanka - 1 World cup, 1 WT20, 1 shared CT, 5 Asia cup.

Pakistan - 1 World cup, 1 WT20, 2 Asia cups, once no.1 ranked test team.

Bangladesh - None

So based on accolades above,

1)India

Distance

2)Srilanka

Closely followed by

3)Pakistan

Huge distance

4)Bangladesh


P.s - We should hv won 2014 T20 WC...why Yuvi why :(

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

Sorry, it just made me laugh :))
 
Top 4 Asian teams in this order:

India - 2 World cups, 1 WT20, 1 CT, 1 shared CT, 6 Asia cups, twice no.1 test ranking.

SriLanka - 1 World cup, 1 WT20, 1 shared CT, 5 Asia cup.

Pakistan - 1 World cup, 1 WT20, 2 Asia cups, once no.1 ranked test team.

Bangladesh - None

So based on accolades above,

1)India

Distance

2)Srilanka

Closely followed by

3)Pakistan

Huge distance

4)Bangladesh


P.s - We should hv won 2014 T20 WC...why Yuvi why :(

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

Aise to Pakistan ko bhi 2010 WT20 winners tha, why hussey why ?
 
Aise to Pakistan ko bhi 2010 WT20 winners tha, why hussey why ?
Yes but I didnt include that 2014 win. Without that only India is wayyyyy ahead than Pak based on number of trophies. You just need to see without those green sunglasses.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
 
I will bump this thread after 10 years..

And I guarantee you Bangladesh will be at five of this list.
 
Yes but I didnt include that 2014 win. Without that only India is wayyyyy ahead than Pak based on number of trophies. You just need to see without those green sunglasses.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

But you mentioned that as a passing reference, without mentioning Pakistan chances which amounts to cheating with words. Pakistan performed much better than India in WCT20. India failed to get past group stages in 3 consecutive tourneys. You should have mentioned that.
 
But you mentioned that as a passing reference, without mentioning Pakistan chances which amounts to cheating with words. Pakistan performed much better than India in WCT20. India failed to get past group stages in 3 consecutive tourneys. You should have mentioned that.
Dosent matter who performed better or not. Head to head in terms of number of major trophies won, India >>>> SL > Pak

In that order. Rest all subjective.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
 
Dosent matter who performed better or not. Head to head in terms of number of major trophies won, India >>>> SL > Pak

In that order. Rest all subjective.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

Then you should not have mentioned "we should have won in 2014" reference. Be consistent. For all the hoopla, India has won only 1 WCT20 and Pakistan has also won 1.
 
Then you should not have mentioned "we should have won in 2014" reference. Be consistent. For all the hoopla, India has won only 1 WCT20 and Pakistan has also won 1.
But who is talking about WT20 only? Did you read my post and the OP. We are talking about all ICC trophies. And India is easily ahead (by huge margin) compared to Pakistan. I know its tough for you to digest but its a fact bro.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
 
But who is talking about WT20 only? Did you read my post and the OP. We are talking about all ICC trophies. And India is easily ahead (by huge margin) compared to Pakistan. I know its tough for you to digest but its a fact bro.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

Let us take each one by one, and I will tear apart the theories. First you have to retract "we should have won" comment because that makes someone believe India performed so much better than Pakistan in WT20.

Now coming back to CT, if you think CT is a global coveted tournament, what is your comment on h2h poor record against Pakistan. Pakistan leads 2-1 in h2h in CT. Got ya ?
 
Let us take each one by one, and I will tear apart the theories. First you have to retract "we should have won" comment because that makes someone believe India performed so much better than Pakistan in WT20.

Now coming back to CT, if you think CT is a global coveted tournament, what is your comment on h2h poor record against Pakistan. Pakistan leads 2-1 in h2h in CT. Got ya ?
Not sure about you tear apart or not :91: and neither I care. But this thread was who won more ICC trophies. So based on that:

India - 2 WC's, 1 CT, 1 shared CT, 1 WT20.

SL - 1 WC, 1 shared CT, 1 WT20

Pak - 1 WC & 1 WT20

Now if you include Number of Asia cup titles too India is significantly higher than Pakistan. So its not a ricket science that who is the most successful cricket team in Asia.

As far as Pak's 2 win in ICC Champions trophy over India who denied that?? We all give credit to that but it was champions trophy. No one said India has streak over Pakistan on ICC events. India's streak over Pakistan is on WORLD CUPs and WORLD T20s.

Sighhh... :91:

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
 
CT is pointless tournament should be replaced by Test Championship

Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk
 
Not sure about you tear apart or not :91: and neither I care. But this thread was who won more ICC trophies. So based on that:

India - 2 WC's, 1 CT, 1 shared CT, 1 WT20.

SL - 1 WC, 1 shared CT, 1 WT20

Pak - 1 WC & 1 WT20

Now if you include Number of Asia cup titles too India is significantly higher than Pakistan. So its not a ricket science that who is the most successful cricket team in Asia.

As far as Pak's 2 win in ICC Champions trophy over India who denied that?? We all give credit to that but it was champions trophy. No one said India has streak over Pakistan on ICC events. India's streak over Pakistan is on WORLD CUPs and WORLD T20s.

Sighhh... :91:

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

The argument is inclusion of CT because India won it twice. I am sure you wouldn't include it had India failed.

The hypocrisy is evident. Why not include Australasia cups in Sharjah ?
 
The argument is inclusion of CT because India won it twice. I am sure you wouldn't include it had India failed.

The hypocrisy is evident. Why not include Australasia cups in Sharjah ?
Cant help if you think hypocracy. OP asked who won most number of ICC trophies and I just posted the numbers. Not sure what hypocracy did you see.

The reason I didnt include Australasia cup (:))) ) because that ain't an ICC trophy :danish

You can open a thread na who won most amount of trophies in Sharjah and then we all might praise Pakistan? No honestly..pls do :)

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
 
Cant help if you think hypocracy. OP asked who won most number of ICC trophies and I just posted the numbers. Not sure what hypocracy did you see.

The reason I didnt include Australasia cup (:))) ) because that ain't an ICC trophy :danish

You can open a thread na who won most amount of trophies in Sharjah and then we all might praise Pakistan? No honestly..pls do :)

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

Bhai .. everyone knows the numbers. The point we are discussing is inclusion of CT in the coveted tournament list.

I have been involved in 100s of arguments with Indian posters who claim ki Pakistan gets their pants in knots against India in "tournaments that matter". When I point out CT results, they say CT is not a coveted tournament.

Now when talking about winning it, suddenly the Indian posters keep it's count.

This is hypocrisy. Don't hide behind the word "ICC".
 
Bhai .. everyone knows the numbers. The point we are discussing is inclusion of CT in the coveted tournament list.

I have been involved in 100s of arguments with Indian posters who claim ki Pakistan gets their pants in knots against India in "tournaments that matter". When I point out CT results, they say CT is not a coveted tournament.

Now when talking about winning it, suddenly the Indian posters keep it's count.

This is hypocrisy. Don't hide behind the word "ICC".
Not sure with which Indian you argued with and what that had to do with this thread. If anyone says CT is not a coveted tournament...ofcourse its a lie. But that is not this thread all about. Read the OP. Its not about what is India's record against Pakistan etc. Its about how many ICC trophies teams have won. Since CT is an ICC trophy and hence everyone included it. Simple :)

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
 
Not sure with which Indian you argued with and what that had to do with this thread. If anyone says CT is not a coveted tournament...ofcourse its a lie. But that is not this thread all about. Read the OP. Its not about what is India's record against Pakistan etc. Its about how many ICC trophies teams have won. Since CT is an ICC trophy and hence everyone included it. Simple :)

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

Don't act innocent now.. you derived the conclusion of "successful team in Asia".. based on this. Don't say you just posted the numbers.
 
Don't act innocent now.. you derived the conclusion of "successful team in Asia".. based on this. Don't say you just posted the numbers.
Most successful team in Asia is given. What that got to do with Pak beaten us twice in Asia cup? They didnt go on to win the event. If you consider the number of trophies, its:

India >>>> SL > Pak

Sorry bruv...harsh fact :(

:asif

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
 
No one literally no one should care about the Champions trophy.
 
No one literally no one should care about the WT20.
Fixed.

The format is such that any team can win on any day, at least in ODI's you have a far better chance of the better team winning.
 
Lol posters including Champions trophies just because India has won it. Bhai when you look at the most successful teams in the world then the only thing that needs to be looked at is the World Cup. That's what counts in every sport. World Cup. Be it 50 over or 20 over.

1) Australia (5)
2) Westindies (4)
3) India (3)
4) Sri Lanka and Pakistan (2)
 
Why group the Champions Trophy with the World Cup? The World Events are the only ones that matter and Australia and the Windies have won most of those.
 
australia - 7
India - 5.5 : 1 CT shared and 1 benson & hedges (equivalent to champions trophy)
windies - 5
sri lanka - 2.5
pak - 2
eng - 1
s africa - 1
NZ - 1
BD - 0

ps: india missed in 2000 2002 2003 2014
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What matters most is the real WC which is the 50overs. Rest are just comes along. World T20 is not WC its world T20, there is only one WC that's played in 50 over format. Asia cup is not ICC Tournament its ACC.

Australia are the real KINGS of ODI. 3 WC in a row, 5 times in total (7finals wining 5times) - thats what proper real champion team! No on will ever repeat what Aus has done in winning 3 WC in a row.
 
CT should not be counted, The Saffers are still called chokers despite winning a CT, same goes for NZ on a smaller scale.
 
OP should change the title to World cups because everyone is having issue digesting the words "ICC tournaments".
 
Pakistani logic: don't count Champions Trophy because we haven't won it. As long as we don't win one, it will remain a useless trophy, but the narrative will change if we manage to win it eventually.
 
sri lanka were incredibly lucky to share that Champions Trophy with us . Sehwag was in top form and on his way to smash that small target .

they were lucky to be in the final - they tailor made a super spin friendly pitch to edge out australia.
 
CT should not be counted, The Saffers are still called chokers despite winning a CT, same goes for NZ on a smaller scale.

they did surrender one CT semifinal to india when they needed only 60 odd in the last 10 overs with 9 wickets in hand - gibbs collapsed like the sad, weak sack of fail that he was, and thereafter bhajji and zaheer shreded the rest.
 
yep. no one will win 3 on a trot, but their dominance of world cricket coincided with rebuilding phases of their three biggest opponents - india, england and south africa. only sri lanka appeared to have any answers for them in the age of ponting, mcgrath and hayden.
 
Pakistani logic: don't count Champions Trophy because we haven't won it. As long as we don't win one, it will remain a useless trophy, but the narrative will change if we manage to win it eventually.

Not really, nobody actually cares about them. If they did, then why would SA players be crying every-time they get knocked out in the SF's? :amla
 
Not really, nobody actually cares about them. If they did, then why would SA players be crying every-time they get knocked out in the SF's? :amla

That is because World Cups matter more, but that doesn't mean the Champions Trophy has no value. If we ever win one, people will make a big deal out of it.
 
Pakistani logic: don't count Champions Trophy because we haven't won it. As long as we don't win one, it will remain a useless trophy, but the narrative will change if we manage to win it eventually.

It's not Pakistani logic. It's pretty much world logic apart from some petty people. No one gives a damn about that trophy and no self respecting nation points to it as an indicator of success when counting their achievements and you know it. Even South Africa has won it and you don't hear a peep from them
 
OP should change the title to World cups because everyone is having issue digesting the words "ICC tournaments".

ICC tournaments would also include Under 19 world cups, Women's world cups among others so OP should add a few more qualifications if the aim is to narrow it down to men's CT, WT20 and ODI WC
 
ICC tournaments would also include Under 19 world cups, Women's world cups among others so OP should add a few more qualifications if the aim is to narrow it down to men's CT, WT20 and ODI WC

Saying the "world cup" would also include women's world cup, U19 world cup etc. It is obvious that the OP is only talking about mens world cups.
 
I do agree with Texaco's logic here. Indian fans are first to shove their so called streak on us while totally disregarding the fact that we have beaten them in the CT. However, when it comes to counting 'coveted' trophies; CT automatically comes up in their enumeration.

Same way Indians try to disregard the Head to Head by undermining it by using words like Kitply Cup, Pepsi cup etc. These are just coping tactics.
 
AB and Co. do need to take the count higher than 1. It's poor to win only one ICC tournament despite having good team in most tournaments.
 
Let us take each one by one, and I will tear apart the theories. First you have to retract "we should have won" comment because that makes someone believe India performed so much better than Pakistan in WT20.

Now coming back to CT, if you think CT is a global coveted tournament, what is your comment on h2h poor record against Pakistan. Pakistan leads 2-1 in h2h in CT. Got ya ?

If 2-1 is poor record what's 10-1 called?
 
Interesting that in Asia at least, the order is reversed when you consider trophy wins and overall games won.

Trophies, it is India, Sri Lanka, Pakistan. Matches, it is Pakistan, India, Sri Lanka.

Implies what we all knew, Pakistan has failed to win big matches against opponents it otherwise holds a superior record against. The time horizon is now long enough to conclude that there is something chronic about Pakistan's underperformance in major events.
 
It's not Pakistani logic. It's pretty much world logic apart from some petty people. No one gives a damn about that trophy and no self respecting nation points to it as an indicator of success when counting their achievements and you know it. Even South Africa has won it and you don't hear a peep from them

Indeed. If we win the Champions Trophy, people will not celebrate and if we crash out, people will not be disappointed.

I'm sure you were still here in 2013.
 
Back
Top