jnaveen1980
ODI Captain
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2016
- Runs
- 45,642
NZ vs SL match is probably the first match that will be impacted completely by rain. That in itself is a blessing. But NZ always attracts rain. They attracted rain in 2019 as well.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Only the first four matches on your list were entertaining.Most entertaining matches of this tournament :-
Aus vs Afg
SA vs Pak
Pak vs NZ
Aus vs NZ
Ind vs NZ
BD vs SL
That's the top 6. NZ finds a spot in three of them, Pak two, SA will probably produce one in semis too. These three teams produce most thrillers in WC.
No results due to rain is such a tournament spoiler.So far not a single match got cancelled due to rain which is incredible.
So you only want t20?Have cricket be enjoyable to a greater audience which t20 provides
Eventually it will happenSo you only want t20?
Won't happen, Test and odi aren't going anywhere irrespective of what fans think. This odi is dying drama has been around since 2007 lolEventually it will happen
Not about me or you wanting/not wanting it
Please, please do whatever possible to keep ODI cricket alive and thriving.Speaking on the milestone, ICC Head of Events Chris Tetley said, “With over 1 million attendees and record-breaking viewership, the ICC Men’s Cricket World Cup 2023 has reminded cricket fans around the world of the support and interest in the ODI format that highlights how much world cup cricket is valued. As we look ahead to the knockout stages, we look forward to this event breaking more records and showcasing the best about cricket in one day.”
ICC
Proves that it's a myth that Indian pitches don't suit fast bowling.2015 and 2019 world cups were terrible for spinners. This somewhat has restored the balance. Also provides help to seamers
![]()
yes. World cup is not over yet. Let us see if pace unit breaks the 700 barrier.Proves that it's a myth that Indian pitches don't suit fast bowling.
They 100% do. You just need to be skilled in terms of having the ability to intimidate batsmen via bounce and seam movement. You also need 135 to 145 pace. You don't need to be express.
What a great World Cup. Much more bowler friendly than any World Cup since 2011 which was also in India. No wonder this World Cup feels so retro. Much closer to the other World Cups with both pacers and spinners coming into play.2015 and 2019 world cups were terrible for spinners. This somewhat has restored the balance. Also provides help to seamers
![]()
Given that we started using 2 new balls in the last 3 world cup these are good numbers.What a great World Cup. Much more bowler friendly than any World Cup since 2011 which was also in India. No wonder this World Cup feels so retro. Much closer to the other World Cups with both pacers and spinners coming into play.
2019 was a terrible tournament with spinners being absolute cannon fodder.
How else can England win? Infact they dint even deserve to win in 2019. It was a farceWhat a great World Cup. Much more bowler friendly than any World Cup since 2011 which was also in India. No wonder this World Cup feels so retro. Much closer to the other World Cups with both pacers and spinners coming into play.
2019 was a terrible tournament with spinners being absolute cannon fodder.
How else can England win? Infact they dint even deserve to win in 2019. It was a farce
India should have played vijay shankar in that game along with pandya shami bumrah and buvanesh. Maybe another AR like shardul. No need for spin there. Eng would have lost I am sure.When England was in a must win situation they altered the boundaries as well. This is what Kohli had to say. That match was not a must win match for India. But for England it was a must win.
Kohli said: "The toss was vital, especially since the boundary was that short.
"It's a coincidence that it just falls under the limitation of the shortest you can have in the tournament. Quite bizarre on a flat pitch. It's the first time we've experienced that. It is crazy things fall in place randomly.
"If batsmen are able to reverse sweep you for six on a 59-metre boundary there is not much you can do as a spinner. One side was 82 metres.
But they can bid for the World Cup themselves, no? I agree that everyone should have the right to host a World Cup. But India is big enough to host one by itself.It is not about BCCI everytime. Other asian nations also deserve to host tournaments.![]()
A 3D projection was showcased by the ICC and the BCCI to mark the beginning of Diwali, the festival of lights, and celebrate the ongoing ICC Men's Cricket World Cup on the historical Gateway of India in Mumbai tonight.
Looks like that BCCI and ICC already know that Pakistan stands no chance and is not going to qualify for the Semis.
View attachment 138956
View attachment 138957
View attachment 138958
We have some very good games in this World Cup but there should be more last over thrillers in the World Cup. There have been too many one-sided games that were not the ideal for the tournament.
Pakistan vs South Africa was also a good one.Yup.
I think this World Cup only had one last over thriller (Australia-NZ). Rest were either one-sided or finished way before last overs.
It has been an okay World Cup. I have seen better World Cups (1999 and 2019).
This is how much each team has traveled in this World Cup.
![]()
Great call by OP.
Appreciate you
2019 group games were meh, Goat final though.2019 WC final was possibly the best World Cup match of all time.
2019 group stage matches were entertaining. There weren't many one-sided games. Also, crowds seemed more engaged.
I think 2019 WC was pretty good.
2019 group games were meh, Goat final though.
2011 was good throughout.
1999 awesome group games with absolute garbage final.
1987 was actually very interesting , so many close games.
India Vs Aussie final!! Should be epic.
Any tournament with 40 50 games is bound to give a couple of close ones. That is not a big deal.
This world cup has had the worst crowd, no ounce of neutrality whatsoever, barely any interest in any other team but the host. Last minute scheduling changes, and entries denied to genuine fans of the participating countries. Two sided wickets with Wankhede getting a reputation that it does 'something' for the first 10 overs in 2nd innings, albeit at the convenience of the hosts making use of this strange phenomenon by batting first all the time.
Pitches being tampered, coins being thrown out of eyeline, this world cup has definitely been a sight to behold for the hosts.
Not seen this level of bias for a world tournament and the ICC will need to do something special next time to top their current efforts of pleasing the BCCI in a much more innovative way.
Bad outfields at Wankhede and Dharamshala . Where else?Bad outfield through out the tournament so an average one..
Nowhere near GOAT. This was a pretty average world cup. I have seen better World Cups than this.![]()
2003 World CupIn your opinion. Which world cup is the GOAT?
2003 World Cup![]()
This is actually the least toss dependent World Cup in history.Terrible world cup where most games were decided at the toss and there were not too many close games. most of them were one sided including the final.
No it is not. Let us compare the stats of evenly matches teams and win/loss ratio after winning hte toss. Even Wasim Akram and Misbah were concerned that the toss decided all of the games here.This is actually the least toss dependent World Cup in history.