What's new

If you had to pick one out of WTC Final win or England series win: what would you choose?

Which victory will be more significant for the legacy of the Indian team?


  • Total voters
    36
  • Poll closed .
The world doesn't work on would haves.

You've been humbled in so many ICC events and still the excuses.

Accept you were beaten by a better team and move on instead of trying to justify your past failures.

24NZTeamPhoto.ashx
Better team as in those conditions, who is disputing that? The conditions were as cozy for you as you find at home.

A Kiwi should be the last person to lecture any other fan about being humbled in ICC events!
 
You keep your WTC, we're happy with series wins in alien conditions.
 
You keep your WTC, we're happy with series wins in alien conditions.
Match could have been played on Mars, like I care.

Bottom line is we're world champions :tb
 
Last edited:
How so? Truth as defined as the quality or state of being true. Are you saying that New Zealand didn't beat India at a neutral venue to lift the WTC?

Nope I am saying NZ beating India in a "neutral" venue like England doesn't mean they are better than India.

Why?

Cos had the match happened in say Asia or WI or even Aus...India would have won.

This isn't to say NZ can't be the best team or eventually prove themselves to the undisputed best team in the future.

Just that an isolated fact cannot be equated to truth.
 
Nope I am saying NZ beating India in a "neutral" venue like England doesn't mean they are better than India.

Why?

Cos had the match happened in say Asia or WI or even Aus...India would have won.

This isn't to say NZ can't be the best team or eventually prove themselves to the undisputed best team in the future.

Just that an isolated fact cannot be equated to truth.

The difference between your argument and my argument is that while you're arguing on the basis of hypotheticals, I am arguing on the basis of concrete, undisputable facts.

I never said New Zealand is unquestionably the better test team. Just that at present they are the best test team. Why? Because they are the number one ranked side in the world. Because they have been the most dominant side at home in the last 5 years. Because they thrashed India when India last came to their shores. And because they beat India mano a mano at a neutral venue and lifted the ICC WTC.

Till these very basic and concrete facts change, India cannot call itself a better test side than New Zealand.
 
The difference between your argument and my argument is that while you're arguing on the basis of hypotheticals, I am arguing on the basis of concrete, undisputable facts.

I never said New Zealand is unquestionably the better test team. Just that at present they are the best test team. Why? Because they are the number one ranked side in the world. Because they have been the most dominant side at home in the last 5 years. Because they thrashed India when India last came to their shores. And because they beat India mano a mano at a neutral venue and lifted the ICC WTC.

Till these very basic and concrete facts change, India cannot call itself a better test side than New Zealand.

Everything is not black and white. There are some wins where you cant help but attach a stigma/asterisk to it. Ask some of our esteemed friends here, they are expert in adding asterisks.

For example, India's test series win in Australia 2018 was always downplayed bcoz Aussies were missing their 2 key players. Similarly, the WTC win by NZ has lots of eye brows and question marks since they played a full series in Eng just before that WTC finals. Ofcourse history books will have NZ beat India in WTC finals but there is more to the story than it meets the eye. That one off game which was heavily favoured towards NZ dont get to decide who is the better team.

:kp
 
Everything is not black and white. There are some wins where you cant help but attach a stigma/asterisk to it. Ask some of our esteemed friends here, they are expert in adding asterisks.

For example, India's test series win in Australia 2018 was always downplayed bcoz Aussies were missing their 2 key players. Similarly, the WTC win by NZ has lots of eye brows and question marks since they played a full series in Eng just before that WTC finals. Ofcourse history books will have NZ beat India in WTC finals but there is more to the story than it meets the eye. That one off game which was heavily favoured towards NZ dont get to decide who is the better team.

:kp
More excuses.

You got beaten by a team that has a population that is a third of Mumbai's and infrequently tours England while India basically tours every 2 years with 4 Tests minimum.

Have some sharam, you've been our whipping boys in ICC tournaments for a while.

Indian fans really have shown a lack of class and humility, which makes their upcoming phaintys in ICC tournaments all the better. You'll be the first to start abusing your players.
 
Last edited:
Nope I am saying NZ beating India in a "neutral" venue like England doesn't mean they are better than India.

Why?

Cos had the match happened in say Asia or WI or even Aus...India would have won.

This isn't to say NZ can't be the best team or eventually prove themselves to the undisputed best team in the future.

Just that an isolated fact cannot be equated to truth.
Your hypothetical world doesn't change the fact we're World Champions or the fact India was unable to bat out a day to share honors when it mattered most. India have proven they're specialists in failing miserably when it matters most.
 
Last edited:
Better team as in those conditions, who is disputing that? The conditions were as cozy for you as you find at home.

A Kiwi should be the last person to lecture any other fan about being humbled in ICC events!
Have some sharam, you've been taking Ls from us in ICC events for a decade and you're talking about lectures and humblings in ICC events.

I can't even remember the last time India didn't take a big fat L in an ICC event. Next humiliations and reality check is due December it seems. Wonder who will inflict it this time - Pakistan, Aus, England or will it be us again to make it the trifecta of phaintys from the country that is a third of size of Mumbai.

Have you already thought of your excuse for this WT20? "Should have been played in India. Would have won if it was in India :rondu
 
Last edited:
More excuses.

You got beaten by a team that has a population that is a third of Mumbai's and infrequently tours England while India basically tours every 2 years with 4 Tests minimum.

Have some sharam, you've been our whipping boys in ICC tournaments for a while.

Indian fans really have shown a lack of class and humility, which makes their upcoming phaintys in ICC tournaments all the better. You'll be the first to start abusing your players.

That is a silly analogy. Population does not guarantee success. Too many cooks spoils the broth as they say. Cricket is a niche sport and 90% people of Mumbai you are talking about cant even afford to play it.

Everyone is aware NZ has upper hand against India in ICC events...no one is discrediting them. But this WTC Finals was a farce simply bcoz NZ got to play a full series on the same venue where as India got only 1 shot. Any amount of debate will not change the fact that the scheduling was heavily biased towards Kiwis.

We need best of 3 finals from next cycle to decide which is the best team so that people dont have to add asterisk and raises doubt like they do for this NZ win.
 
Last edited:
That is a silly analogy. Population does not guarantee success. Too many cooks spoils the broth as they say. Cricket is a niche sport and 90% people of Mumbai you are talking about cant even afford to play it.

Everyone is aware NZ has upper hand against India in ICC events...no one is discrediting them. But this WTC Finals was a farce simply bcoz NZ got to play a full series on the same venue where as India got only 1 shot. Any amount of debate will not change the fact that the scheduling was heavily biased towards Kiwis.

We need best of 3 finals from next cycle to decide which is the best team so that people dont have to add asterisk and raises doubt like they do for this NZ win.
No one is adding an asterisk except salty Indian fans. NZ are world champions, India can take their faux hypothetical titles that their deluded fans have created to make themselves feel better.

NZ are world champions. N E W Z E A L A N D ARE W O R L D C H A M P S.

The funniest thing about these excuses is that the move to Southampton was supposed to favor India but mighty bharat failed
spectacularly still could salvage a draw despite a lot of the game being rained out and the game headed to a draw on the last day :)))

First it was downplaying the title, now it's the venue, the series before. Loser mentality, not surprising from fans of a country who have won close to nothing in the sporting field.

Beet in the world my foot. Bottle jobs 444 life.
 
Last edited:
No one is adding an asterisk except salty Indian fans. NZ are world champions, India can take their faux hypothetical titles that their deluded fans have created to make themselves feel better.

NZ are world champions. N E W Z E A L A N D ARE W O R L D C H A M P S.

The funniest thing about these excuses is that the move to Southampton was supposed to favor India but mighty bharat failed
spectacularly still could salvage a draw despite a lot of the game being rained out and the game headed to a draw on the last day :)))


Beet in the world my foot. Bottle jobs 444 life.

They moved the match to Southampton bcoz Covid was rampant in London back in June. Also, Southampton has stadium build hotel where players can stay in covid secure environment and need not commute. Have you thought on these terms?

If you are implying ICC intentionally moved the game out of Lords, you cant be more mistaken. How would moving the game out of Lords would help India since we have won 2 of our last 3 tests there? Compare that to Southampton where our record is poor.

Ofcourse no one would speak about asterisks openly as win is a win. Just like BD beating NZ currently is also a win. But that dont stop fans to question the pitches and rightly so. So there is an asterisk on BD winning these matches. Similarly, since NZ got to play 2 test matches prior on the same venue and the scheduling was heavily favoured them, WTC finals win just dont feel right. It feels like an unclosed chapter and hence we need best of 3 finals from next time to crown deserving WTC winners.
 
They moved the match to Southampton bcoz Covid was rampant in London back in June. Also, Southampton has stadium build hotel where players can stay in covid secure environment and need not commute. Have you thought on these terms?

If you are implying ICC intentionally moved the game out of Lords, you cant be more mistaken. How would moving the game out of Lords would help India since we have won 2 of our last 3 tests there? Compare that to Southampton where our record is poor.

Ofcourse no one would speak about asterisks openly as win is a win. Just like BD beating NZ currently is also a win. But that dont stop fans to question the pitches and rightly so. So there is an asterisk on BD winning these matches. Similarly, since NZ got to play 2 test matches prior on the same venue and the scheduling was heavily favoured them, WTC finals win just dont feel right. It feels like an unclosed chapter and hence we need best of 3 finals from next time to crown deserving WTC winners.
Whatever the reason, if it was at Lords, we would have won more convincingly than 8 wickets. Lords would have suited us more than Southampton.

But whatever, we still won, made history and are world champions :D
 
Last edited:
Keep putting your asterixis to things and declaring the Indian team Bharat's champions while the Test mace goes on a tour around NZ.
 
The best thing about this all is how Indian fans all downplayed the WTC and here we are 2 months later and they're still talking about it :)))

NZ fans have moved on but reveal in the fact that they're WORLD CHAMPIONS. Inaugural as well, absolutely crushed India in the Final and coasted to victory :)
 
Last edited:
The best thing about this all is how Indian fans all downplayed the WTC and here we are 2 months later and they're still talking about it :)))

NZ fans have moved on but reveal in the fact that they're WORLD CHAMPIONS. Inaugural as well, absolutely crushed India in the Final and coasted to victory :)

congrats,NZ are deserving champs and are better team until India beats them in NZ or neutral venue :)
 
Have some sharam, you've been taking Ls from us in ICC events for a decade and you're talking about lectures and humblings in ICC events.

I can't even remember the last time India didn't take a big fat L in an ICC event. Next humiliations and reality check is due December it seems. Wonder who will inflict it this time - Pakistan, Aus, England or will it be us again to make it the trifecta of phaintys from the country that is a third of size of Mumbai.

Have you already thought of your excuse for this WT20? "Should have been played in India. Would have won if it was in India :rondu
There isn't a bigger rondu than you. Equating excellence in sports with population of a country shows your literacy levels. Keep revelling in your illiteracy, suits you well.

As I said, there aren't bigger losers than Kiwis as far as ICC tourneys are concerned. That's a fact.
 
The world doesn't work on would haves.

You've been humbled in so many ICC events and still the excuses.

Accept you were beaten by a better team and move on instead of trying to justify your past failures.

24NZTeamPhoto.ashx

LOL, you will be thrashed badly anywhere in the world except NZ, Eng. Be grateful to ICC and ECB for having the finals there with a preparatory 2 test series before WTC as practise.
 
Everything is not black and white. There are some wins where you cant help but attach a stigma/asterisk to it. Ask some of our esteemed friends here, they are expert in adding asterisks.

For example, India's test series win in Australia 2018 was always downplayed bcoz Aussies were missing their 2 key players. Similarly, the WTC win by NZ has lots of eye brows and question marks since they played a full series in Eng just before that WTC finals. Ofcourse history books will have NZ beat India in WTC finals but there is more to the story than it meets the eye. That one off game which was heavily favoured towards NZ dont get to decide who is the better team.

:kp

Sounds like you're making excuses and having trouble admitting that India were beaten and thoroughly outclassed by New Zealand.

And downplaying New Zealand's win, which was massive and monumental especially considering the small number of test matches they play in comparison to Big 3 teams is a pretty classless thing to do.
 
NZ won the WTC final fair and square. They also won their 2 match series against England. They were a team in good form. We haven't beaten NZ in NZ and they haven't beaten India in India but both teams have beaten each other's neighbours. :inti
 
NZ won the WTC final fair and square. They also won their 2 match series against England. They were a team in good form. We haven't beaten NZ in NZ and they haven't beaten India in India but both teams have beaten each other's neighbours. :inti

When did NZ beat Pak away? 🤔
 
LOL, you will be thrashed badly anywhere in the world except NZ, Eng. Be grateful to ICC and ECB for having the finals there with a preparatory 2 test series before WTC as practise.
And the excuses continue.

Funny thing is you play way more Test cricket in those alien conditions and still you got thrashed in the Final.

No sharam.
 
There isn't a bigger rondu than you. Equating excellence in sports with population of a country shows your literacy levels. Keep revelling in your illiteracy, suits you well.

As I said, there aren't bigger losers than Kiwis as far as ICC tourneys are concerned. That's a fact.
Population certainly helps just look at the recent Olympics where China and America dominated. Compare this to India who despite a population of close to 1.5 billion only managed 1 Olympic gold medal.

When sporting success is that sparse, no wonder their fans cling to the very rare success they have and they fail as much as this Indian team do, they cannot accept reality and make excuses like poor sports.
 
Last edited:
Nope I am saying NZ beating India in a "neutral" venue like England doesn't mean they are better than India.

Why?

Cos had the match happened in say Asia or WI or even Aus...India would have won.

This isn't to say NZ can't be the best team or eventually prove themselves to the undisputed best team in the future.

Just that an isolated fact cannot be equated to truth.

Conditions in England are most similar to NZ outside of NZ. If game was played in Asia or Australia, then India would be favorite.

I think NZ and India are top teams tied at no. 1 for me. Both are condition dependent. Don’t see India winning in NZ anytime soon. Conversely NZ would be out of their depth if playing in SC.
 
Conditions in England are most similar to NZ outside of NZ. If game was played in Asia or Australia, then India would be favorite.

I think NZ and India are top teams tied at no. 1 for me. Both are condition dependent. Don’t see India winning in NZ anytime soon. Conversely NZ would be out of their depth if playing in SC.

I think condition dependency is far greater for NZ due to the lack of bowlers who can do well in all conditions.

I don't recall NZ winning even a single test in Aus, SA, or Ind in the last 5 years. If I am wrong then someone can correct me. The reverse is not true. Indians have pulled a test wins in pretty much every away series except NZ in the last 5 years.

I think SA and Aus have won test series in NZ in the last 5 years as well. So even home domination is not really comparable.

I personally don't think that both teams are at the same level. NZ can prove me wrong in the next 3-4 years and I will be delighted. 5 years of any time frame gives enough time to have some series in all countries.
 
I think condition dependency is far greater for NZ due to the lack of bowlers who can do well in all conditions.

I don't recall NZ winning even a single test in Aus, SA, or Ind in the last 5 years. If I am wrong then someone can correct me. The reverse is not true. Indians have pulled a test wins in pretty much every away series except NZ in the last 5 years.

I think SA and Aus have won test series in NZ in the last 5 years as well. So even home domination is not really comparable.

I personally don't think that both teams are at the same level. NZ can prove me wrong in the next 3-4 years and I will be delighted. 5 years of any time frame gives enough time to have some series in all countries.

A lot of that is because we rarely tour those countries, and when we do we get 2-3 matches compared to India who tour every 2-3 years. If we toured as frequently as they did, no doubt we'd improve. It's safe to assume that as our players would only get more experience on how to play in those countries, need to remember before the last few tours, India were known to be pathetic away and generally got hammered and swept in humiliating fashion, now they're competing and winning despite being weaker (although a lot of that does have to do with Aus, England and SA declining big time).

Edit:
We've played a total of 5 games in Aus, Eng and Sa in the last 5 years, compared to the 20 India have...

They're going to play the same number of games we've played against those teams in this series alone than we have against all 3 teams in 5 years.

Your point is complete and utter nonsense.

kTPiRqA.png
 
Population certainly helps just look at the recent Olympics where China and America dominated. Compare this to India who despite a population of close to 1.5 billion only managed 1 Olympic gold medal.

When sporting success is that sparse, no wonder their fans cling to the very rare success they have and they fail as much as this Indian team do, they cannot accept reality and make excuses like poor sports.

The population is useless unless money is spent on infrastructure. China spends a lot on Olympic sports.

Now for cricket, Indians can't use the excuse about money not being used. BCCI spends lots of money. There is no reason for Indians to not do well. A large talent pool and large money available.
 
The population is useless unless money is spent on infrastructure. China spends a lot on Olympic sports.

Now for cricket, Indians can't use the excuse about money not being used. BCCI spends lots of money. There is no reason for Indians to not do well. A large talent pool and large money available.

kTPiRqA.png


Care to comment?
 
NZ are not even a team to be compared with, for India....show me a single victory they achieved outside NZ and England.....India won everywhere except NZ....India are No.1 test team....NZ can't even reach finals of the next WTC which is scheduled to happen in next two years.....India has skillset for all different conditions in test cricket....they have bowlers for bouncy, swing and spin....all different conditions....even Bangladesh are bullying NZ when NZ came out of their comfort zone.
 
NZ are not even a team to be compared with, for India....show me a single victory they achieved outside NZ and England.....India won everywhere except NZ....India are No.1 test team....NZ can't even reach finals of the next WTC which is scheduled to happen in next two years.....India has skillset for all different conditions in test cricket....they have bowlers for bouncy, swing and spin....all different conditions....even Bangladesh are bullying NZ when NZ came out of their comfort zone.
More tears :sree


Loving it, from two months ago when the WTC was nothing and series wins meant more to this :)))
 
Last edited:
A lot of that is because we rarely tour those countries, and when we do we get 2-3 matches compared to India who tour every 2-3 years. If we toured as frequently as they did, no doubt we'd improve. It's safe to assume that as our players would only get more experience on how to play in those countries, need to remember before the last few tours, India were known to be pathetic away and generally got hammered and swept in humiliating fashion, now they're competing and winning despite being weaker (although a lot of that does have to do with Aus, England and SA declining big time).

Edit:
We've played a total of 5 games in Aus, Eng and Sa in the last 5 years, compared to the 20 India have...

They're going to play the same number of games we've played against those teams in this series alone than we have against all 3 teams in 5 years.

Your point is complete and utter nonsense.

kTPiRqA.png

NZ needs to win in different conditions against strong teams. Yes, NZ does not play enough and you are hoping that things will improve, but let's see if it improves and results in actually NZ winning something in Aus, Ind etc.

Playing more won't result in improving unless you have a team to do well in different conditions. Indians were useless earlier, but right now they have the bowling to do well in every single condition. I am not sure NZ has great spinners or bowlers who can do well in bouncy tracks in Aus. Jamie looks like a good prospect to actually do well in all conditions, but let's see how he does.

Bottom line - teams need to have bowling for all conditions. That's how you take 20 wickets cheaply. Unless that happens, it's perfectly logical to not put teams in the top tier. Yes, things can improve, but let's see the evidence first.
 
The population is useless unless money is spent on infrastructure. China spends a lot on Olympic sports.

Now for cricket, Indians can't use the excuse about money not being used. BCCI spends lots of money. There is no reason for Indians to not do well. A large talent pool and large money available.
One Olympic gold for a country the size of India is down right pathetic irrespective of money spent. There are countries much smaller and with far, far less investment who have done better.

I mean India won the same number of gold medals as Bermuda....
 
Last edited:
NZ needs to win in different conditions against strong teams. Yes, NZ does not play enough and you are hoping that things will improve, but let's see if it improves and results in actually NZ winning something in Aus, Ind etc.

Playing more won't result in improving unless you have a team to do well in different conditions. Indians were useless earlier, but right now they have the bowling to do well in every single condition. I am not sure NZ has great spinners or bowlers who can do well in bouncy tracks in Aus. Jamie looks like a good prospect to actually do well in all conditions, but let's see how he does.

Bottom line - teams need to have bowling for all conditions. That's how you take 20 wickets cheaply. Unless that happens, it's perfectly logical to not put teams in the top tier. Yes, things can improve, but let's see the evidence first.
India sent over better squads when they got hammered, difference now is key players have had experience in those countries and those teams are a lot weaker than they were back then.

NZ doesn't have the same luxury, it's sill to think our players wouldn't improve from playing in those conditions. Experience and knowledge is critical when playing in those conditions, without it you'll get crushed, like us and many other teams have in Aus.
 
Here is away from home since 2016, not just Aus, Ind or SA.
..
..

NZ.jpg

If NZ was playing more tests in India, Aus, etc then I am not sure that W/L would have gone up or gone down. But NZ can prove me wrong in the future and it will be great to see.

Simply said, let results talk and it will be great if NZ can compete in Aus, India etc. It will make for great viewing.
 
Here is away from home since 2016, not just Aus, Ind or SA.
..
..

View attachment 111679

If NZ was playing more tests in India, Aus, etc then I am not sure that W/L would have gone up or gone down. But NZ can prove me wrong in the future and it will be great to see.

Simply said, let results talk and it will be great if NZ can compete in Aus, India etc. It will make for great viewing.
Too late for it now, the ground work for these tours is done in earlier tours. By the time we get the experience, our golden generation will be gone and Aus, Eng and Sa will rebuilt.

Either way, I'm not fussed. We already won the biggest prize in the format and the second biggest prize in the sport.
 
Last edited:
India sent over better squads when they got hammered, difference now is key players have had experience in those countries and those teams are a lot weaker than they were back then.

NZ doesn't have the same luxury, it's sill to think our players wouldn't improve from playing in those conditions. Experience and knowledge is critical when playing in those conditions, without it you'll get crushed, like us and many other teams have in Aus.

Nah, I agree that you can surely get better and familiar if you play in the same conditions. There is no disputing that.

I was making a different point. You need to have players who can play well in different conditions.

Eng has been playing long series in India, but they simply lack quality spin to do well there. You may or may not win, but that's a basic minimum requirement to take 20 cheap wickets. Bumrah & Co and world-class spin attacks allow Indians to have to bowling for all conditions. Indians have played in Aus and Eng for ages without improving. They lacked bowling despite having a gun batting earlier. Now they have the bowling to take 20 wickets in any conditions and despite batting being fragile, they can compete.

So playing can help, but that's a small part. The main thing is having bowlers who have the skills to do well in the green, bounce, and spinning tracks. Some bowlers can play 50 tests, and they will be useless. Bumrah has not played in Aus, Eng, SA etc before and has only 20 odd tests. But he has the skills to do well in all conditions. That doesn't mean that he is second coming to Marshall or anything like that. Simply means that just having experience is not enough.
 
For example, SA lacked spin but Steyn was there to pull the team up when others were simply green track bowlers. So you need someone or bowlers for all conditions.

I don't follow NZ domestic, but NZ has not produced spin to really do well in India. NZ also lacked bowlers to do well in Aus flat tracks. Jamie looks like someone who can do well in Aus.
 
Don't forget how NZ qualified for the WTC final, Australia had docked some points. NZ was number 3 after the play of 2 years.
 
When would we hear:
" Grandhomme clips it towards square leg.It goes as far as fence, NZ wins in gabba.With that they have won the series and have won hearts of cric fans all over the world".
Or
" Santner to Umesh, this one takes an outer edge and Kane grabs it in first slip. Nz wins Chennai test by 164 runs and with that wins a series 2-1".
 
When would we hear:
" Grandhomme clips it towards square leg.It goes as far as fence, NZ wins in gabba.With that they have won the series and have won hearts of cric fans all over the world".
Or
" Santner to Umesh, this one takes an outer edge and Kane grabs it in first slip. Nz wins Chennai test by 164 runs and with that wins a series 2-1".

Whips that one away, how appropriate Ross Taylor and Kane Williamson are there for this moment, for this team. A story akin to David vs Goliath.

NZ are World Champions.
 
Don't forget how NZ qualified for the WTC final, Australia had docked some points. NZ was number 3 after the play of 2 years.
Everyone knew the rules before hand and where the Finals was going to be played. Coming off like massive sore losers.

India were BEATEN. VICTIMIZED. CONQUERED in the WTC Final.

Their fans still haven't recovered it seems.
 
One Olympic gold for a country the size of India is down right pathetic irrespective of money spent. There are countries much smaller and with far, far less investment who have done better.

I mean India won the same number of gold medals as Bermuda....

India is not a physically strong, they do not have the athletic/robust body! Their meat consumption is very minimum. (Only in last 20-30 years that it has raised to some level) To be honest, if you want to excel in modern sports, you got to be like an "Animal". Most modern sports are inspired on "Wild Animal" activities!

Indian strength lies in philosophy, lifestyle, intelligence & mental strength. That's why even in Olympics they tend to do well in skill-based shooting, archery, chess AND other elephant (veggie) style physical games like Boxing, Weight-lifting, etc. No surprise that we are very poor in athletics!
 
India is not a physically strong, they do not have the athletic/robust body! Their meat consumption is very minimum. (Only in last 20-30 years that it has raised to some level) To be honest, if you want to excel in modern sports, you got to be like an "Animal". Most modern sports are inspired on "Wild Animal" activities!

Indian strength lies in philosophy, lifestyle, intelligence & mental strength. That's why even in Olympics they tend to do well in skill-based shooting, archery, chess AND other elephant (veggie) style physical games like Boxing, Weight-lifting, etc. No surprise that we are very poor in athletics!
That's a fair enough justification, as is my explanation of some Indian fans being sore losers.

When you don't have success in the sporting field, you cling to the only thing you do have, and when that fails you cling to excuses to explain your failures and shortcomings rather than accepting you were beaten.
 
NZ since 2000:
Wins CT 2000( Cairns individual brilliance)
WTC Finals 2021( Rain affected 6 day encounter).
Test series win Eng.
Ind since 2000:
Test series in Pak.
Test series in Eng.
Test series in Nz.
2 Test series wins in Aus.
Series draw in Aus.
Series draw in SA.
WC 2011.
T20 WC 2007.
CT 2013.
Counting....
 
There is a Greece fan who still taunts Spain fans for not winning in 2004. Apparently for him, the world stopped in 2004
Good thing is Spain fans don't cry about it and have accept their defeat.

Good thing they're not serial bottlers either who fail time and time again despite having advantage over their opponents in terms of talent and resources.
 
Last edited:
Good thing is Spain fans don't cry about it and have accept their defeat.

Good thing they're not serial bottlers either who fail time and time again despite having advantage over their opponents in terms of talent and resources.
Nice tactics avoiding Greece fans
 

Jokes apart. I dint have a chance to congratulate you NZ fans. So well done. Only our captain can select 2 spinners in cloudy conditions. Not that otherwise would have helped. We choked as usual.
NZ won that match fair and square.

Not being a case of sour grapes, but personally i did not see a case for a WTC and is against it. Cycle is not fair for everyone. The argument here was started because somebody mentioned Eng as a neutral venue which might be technically correct but we all know it is similar to NZ.
 
Jokes apart. I dint have a chance to congratulate you NZ fans. So well done. Only our captain can select 2 spinners in cloudy conditions. Not that otherwise would have helped. We choked as usual.
NZ won that match fair and square.

Not being a case of sour grapes, but personally i did not see a case for a WTC and is against it. Cycle is not fair for everyone. The argument here was started because somebody mentioned Eng as a neutral venue which might be technically correct but we all know it is similar to NZ.
Yeah all good, just some banter here and there but it does get annoying when people try to downplay our win. This is our first world championship and what that team accomplished is special for NZ cricket fans, it's something a lot of fans thought they'd never see.
 
Everyone knew the rules before hand and where the Finals was going to be played. Coming off like massive sore losers.

India were BEATEN. VICTIMIZED. CONQUERED in the WTC Final.

Their fans still haven't recovered it seems.

Irony is Fans lecturing India to accept the defeat in WTC final are the same who stil crying rivers for the rule which denied them WC title..

New Zealand were BEATEN. VICTIMIZED. CONQUERED in the World Cup Final...and it will haunt them for the ages
 
Irony is Fans lecturing India to accept the defeat in WTC final are the same who stil crying rivers for the rule which denied them WC title..

New Zealand were BEATEN. VICTIMIZED. CONQUERED in the World Cup Final...and it will haunt them for the ages

That loss hurt, but I got over it. Winning a world championship a few years later helped :)
 
NZ are a good team. Their trundlers are exceptional in NZ, English conditions and are even superior to the English trundlers in such conditions as we saw recently.
But in places like Australia, you require a bit of pace and that's where they got destroyed like minnows. They cant bat against genuine pace either. But no team has maximised their very limited talent like NZ and gor that they deserve a world of credit.
 
NZ are a good team. Their trundlers are exceptional in NZ, English conditions and are even superior to the English trundlers in such conditions as we saw recently.
But in places like Australia, you require a bit of pace and that's where they got destroyed like minnows. They cant bat against genuine pace either. But no team has maximised their very limited talent like NZ and gor that they deserve a world of credit.
Can't wait to see Lockie bowl at your batsmen again.

 
I'm talking about tests. Lockie will never be a test class bowler.
We don't need fast bowlers, 140kph + swing is enough. Jamieson ran through India multiple times with 135kph, his height and ability to move the ball both ways.

Even then we have Ben Sears coming through who reportedly bowls as quick as Lockie.

 
Last edited:
India is not a physically strong, they do not have the athletic/robust body! Their meat consumption is very minimum. (Only in last 20-30 years that it has raised to some level) To be honest, if you want to excel in modern sports, you got to be like an "Animal". Most modern sports are inspired on "Wild Animal" activities!

Indian strength lies in philosophy, lifestyle, intelligence & mental strength. That's why even in Olympics they tend to do well in skill-based shooting, archery, chess AND other elephant (veggie) style physical games like Boxing, Weight-lifting, etc. No surprise that we are very poor in athletics!

So why have 'strong, meat eating' countries like Pakistan with 200 million+ strong populations performed so pathetically and got a grand total of zero medals in the Olympics?

It has nothing to do with any bl**dy meat eating! What has improved in India in the last 30 years is the quality of the sporting facilities and the exposure the youngsters are getting to sport. Diet has nothing to do with it.
 
We don't need fast bowlers, 140kph + swing is enough. Jamieson ran through India multiple times with 135kph, his height and ability to move the ball both ways.

Even then we have Ben Sears coming through who reportedly bowls as quick as Lockie.


Very similar action to Dion Nash.. If anyone remembers him.
More pace though. Looks sharp.
 
Your hypothetical world doesn't change the fact we're World Champions or the fact India was unable to bat out a day to share honors when it mattered most. India have proven they're specialists in failing miserably when it matters most.

India are chokers no doubt.

Tu rakh le bhai tera world champions title.

Doesn't matter.
 
So why have 'strong, meat eating' countries like Pakistan with 200 million+ strong populations performed so pathetically and got a grand total of zero medals in the Olympics?

It has nothing to do with any bl**dy meat eating! What has improved in India in the last 30 years is the quality of the sporting facilities and the exposure the youngsters are getting to sport. Diet has nothing to do with it.

Of course everything counts! Problem with Pakistan is they don't have any sporting culture at all...! They probably played Cricket, Hockey, etc, because India played it... Give the same facilities and infrastructure that India has to Pakistan, they can definitely excel in some sports better than us!

Another problem with India is not much interest in sports as most youngsters are inclined towards settling in a job career. Population also play a role here (I know you will give example of China for this. But there are so many problems interlinked with each other)
 
Inhone last time ICI trophy 2000 me jeeti thi wo bhi Cairns k individual brilliance se.
Unko trophy rakhne do. Hum Aus, Eng, Sa test series wins rakh lete hai.
 
Very similar action to Dion Nash.. If anyone remembers him.
More pace though. Looks sharp.

Those batsmen look very ordinary though, had already been frightened by his run up and delivery that they are in a funny position after the bowl is delivered. International class batsmen would be another level all together.
 
Those batsmen look very ordinary though, had already been frightened by his run up and delivery that they are in a funny position after the bowl is delivered. International class batsmen would be another level all together.

Yeah i guess he is still raw. Will develop more skills in NZ's robust first class system.
 
Very similar action to Dion Nash.. If anyone remembers him.
More pace though. Looks sharp.
Don't think so. Nash looked much fluent in his bowling action while this guy's action and bowling stride look like a joke.
 
England series. WTC is overrated. A series win in England on the other hand would show that our team is of a high quality.

Reiterating this. WTC is a bit of a joke. A poor effort by the ICC to somehow be seen as doing something for Test cricket. It would have been nice to win that but ultimately the format is extremely flawed and test cricket can never really have a tournament like that.

The only silverware that really matters is the 50 over World Cup
 
Can't wait to see Lockie bowl at your batsmen again.


You seem to be unaware that NZ was not just beaten but thrashed 5 Tests in a row in India and Australia. Believe me, you really don’t want to see Lockie bowl to Indian batsmen in India.
 
It is a good win by New Zealand. I will not undermine that win. Anyone winning against the greatest Asian test team in neutral venue must be appreciated.

But let me tell you one thing.

India won the World Cup in 1983 and then won the World Championship in 1985. Based on that, does it make India the best team in the world during that period?
 
England series win and it's not even close.

Even if India loses WTC final, and it does not matter how kuch one hates to hear it but they sit clearly at the top of world cricket in their sheer overall dominance across last decade, especially in last 5-6 years under Kohli.

WTC or no WTC, India's overall hold on Cricket is superpower level strong.

A test series win is hugely anticipated since 2008, since the time we have got consistently violated in England except last time where despite being down 1-4, India fought tremendously in first 4 test and should have actually won 2 more tests if they held their nerves.

Sticking to my opinion on 6th of June (before the WTC Final)
 
On topic, difficult to choose. However if push comes to shove, will go with England series win as they've been our nemesis for last 14 years and have always thrashed us!

WTC is still a novel concept and could won in latter editions.
Would still want to win England series.
 
Reiterating this. WTC is a bit of a joke. A poor effort by the ICC to somehow be seen as doing something for Test cricket. It would have been nice to win that but ultimately the format is extremely flawed and test cricket can never really have a tournament like that.

The only silverware that really matters is the 50 over World Cup
It is.

Considering pitch and ground conditions impact test cricket far more than they do LoI cricket, its too simplistic and naïve of ICC to schedule the WTC final in only one set of conditions. Why not play 1 test each at home and away?
 
Back
Top