More like West Indies is just at best a club level team
They beat England.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More like West Indies is just at best a club level team
Its actually 44.35 now. Where were you when his fans were overhyping him to be the next big thing after every inning and claiming he will average 50 in test cricket?
When this series started he was averaging 49 something. You call that improvement? Only a biased fan will say that this is a good tour for him.![]()
Again questioning a youngster, who barely played 11 tests, every single match or series is extremely biased. Even some of our so called stalwart dont have 2 100s in SENA in their entire careers. And it's even more pathetic when the questioning is done because people are blind fans of players who are now over the hill and defend them only because of emotional attachment
Your wish is likely to come true.Bumrah should take all 10 wkts in his 10 overs.![]()
Same clubl level who won against Australia?
I would like to see how many batsmen could play some of those balls at that pace. Quite a biased statement here
Now who is this 'we' here? Are you afraid of going into discussion with me alone now? Which 'we' gang are you leading here? When I am talking to you and about one player just stick to that only without bringing others into discussion.
Regarding Pant, only a delusional fan like you will defend Pant here. This has been a pretty pathetic tour for him. Look how you are looking for a 50-run partnership as some kind of achievement here. That means nothing. Poor tour for him so far. Get over it. He is not above criticism. Only a f@nboy can get hurt like this. You surely are one of his f@nboy. And if he plays a good inning I will appreciate him just like I did in the World Cup. But you won't criticise him if he plays poorly thats the difference between you and me.![]()
Bumrah Is Amazing but no other team would be reeling like this except minnow teams like windies other teams would have definitely done better
Pant's noncontribution affected India no way. Nobody is above criticism But you are targeting failures. If you had raised the same concern about pUjara i would have agreed you are neutral. Rahane brought his average from 50 to 40. Until this tour where he got a bit of luck against the "average team" to make some runs he was sucking balls. You had nothing to say about that. Somehow designated wicket keeper's failure is the only that catches your attention. Ya we believe you are "unbiased'.
Pant's noncontribution affected India no way. Nobody is above criticism But you are targeting failures. If you had raised the same concern about pUjara i would have agreed you are neutral. Rahane brought his average from 50 to 40. Until this tour where he got a bit of luck against the "average team" to make some runs he was sucking balls. You had nothing to say about that. Somehow designated wicket keeper's failure is the only that catches your attention. Ya we believe you are "unbiased'.
Man anyone here’s praising pant seriously need a reality check he’s nothing better than a Umar akmal at best tons of potential and talent but zero performance to back that up it’s not even an argument I won’t even bother his last six innings from every format are a proof of that
Why should I raise a concern about Pujara? Why should I raise a concern about Rahane?
If you have nothing else to describe Pant's poor performance then just keep quiet and don't quote me. All you do is bring other players into discussion and try to divert the debate.
Had I talked or raised concerns about Pujara and Rahane you would have complained about me not saying anything about Murali Vijay and Mohit Sharma then lol. Just goes to show that you have nothing to debate about and are just beating the dead horse as always.
Quote me when you have something to show for Pant. I will praise him when he does that.![]()
Man anyone here’s praising pant seriously need a reality check he’s nothing better than a Umar akmal at best tons of potential and talent but zero performance to back that up it’s not even an argument I won’t even bother his last six innings from every format are a proof of that
Why should I raise a concern about Pujara? Why should I raise a concern about Rahane?
If you have nothing else to describe Pant's poor performance then just keep quiet and don't quote me. All you do is bring other players into discussion and try to divert the debate.
Had I talked or raised concerns about Pujara and Rahane you would have complained about me not saying anything about Murali Vijay and Mohit Sharma then lol. Just goes to show that you have nothing to debate about and are just beating the dead horse as always.
Quote me when you have something to show for Pant. I will praise him when he does that.![]()
Thing is they will tag you when Pant scores a fifty but will push the ignore button for you when he fails miserably. They will try to run away from the debate, call you a troll and attention seeker lol. I find it funny when some noobs who haven't spend even a month here call a guy who has actively participated here for the last 6 years an attention seeker.Man anyone here’s praising pant seriously need a reality check he’s nothing better than a Umar akmal at best tons of potential and talent but zero performance to back that up it’s not even an argument I won’t even bother his last six innings from every format are a proof of that
That was just to expose your bias. You are clearly proud of it apparently lol
He is a wicket keeper. He didn't exactly replace Adam Gilchrist. He replaced Saha an average batsman. Dhoni could never score a 100 either in England or Australia.
Saha was never hyped to be the next big thing. Pant was. Next...![]()
Yeah its pretty clear who is biased here. So what's your opinion about Pant on this tour? Kindly don't bring others into this now.![]()
DId Pant hype himself in the press? You have to look at Pant as a player, not as someone who was "hyped by fans". Just because his fans hype doesn't mean he is hyping himself. Basically an impaired judgement based on his fan following.
Am I talking to Pant or you guys? You guys hyped him. Whenever I criticise his performance without even tagging single one of you, you guys come in his defence and act like his PPG(Poor Performance Guards).![]()
Am I talking to Pant or you guys? You guys hyped him. Whenever I criticise his performance without even tagging single one of you, you guys come in his defence and act like his PPG(Poor Performance Guards).![]()
All the noobs , especially those who age 21 deserve backing. Karthik made debut when he was 19, Parthiv when he was 16. They had their run before they got replaced. 21 is also very young. He didn't rob anyone's place. He came through merit. He averages 53 in domestic. In his very first tour he was selected as ICC wicket keeper. He broke wicket keeping record for India. Not getting nitpicked. All youngsters deserve backing.
Are you confusing tests with ODIs here?
It doesn’t matter regardless I don’t ever want to see dhoni being compared to any new comer that has not even achieved a shoe lace of dhoni being compared to him regardless of the format. Pant could barely finish matches in IPL and we’re talking about international cricket here. Ishan Kishan is the man if you ask me but again everyone loves pant in India for no reason. Don’t worry he will score another hundred soon than flop for the next 10 innings.
Pant is averaging 45 now with 2 100s in Aus and England (that Aus was 159 not out). To compare, Laxman has never scored a single 100 in England in his entire career. Sehwag has 1 100 in England and Dravid and Ganguly have 1 100 each in Australia in their entire career. Pant has done this in 10 matches
Compare with how his keeping has improved and how well he keeps against pacers and you can see how people criticizing him are obviously biased
Pant is averaging 45 now with 2 100s in Aus and England (that Aus was 159 not out). To compare, Laxman has never scored a single 100 in England in his entire career. Sehwag has 1 100 in England and Dravid and Ganguly have 1 100 each in Australia in their entire career. Pant has done this in 10 matches
Compare with how his keeping has improved and how well he keeps against pacers and you can see how people criticizing him are obviously biased
What are West Indies doing? This is their home ground and they seem completely lost.
Outrageous performance.
Wi is a embarrassment to world cricket
Luckily archer got out of that rubble
West Indies have lots of talents but their players seem to care more about money than national team.
T20 has ruined West Indies the most.
Yes. There is no real logic behind dismissing a 21 year old. Hey i think so, so it must be true. He is still evolving. Even Virat Kohli failed in his first tour to Windies. Then he even got dropped from Test squad. He had to make a come back. Pant is not even a specialist bat. A keeper.
True. 4th innings chases are a nightmare for us.
Why do WI even bother to play Test cricket? I bet if WI had a choice, they would choose to not to play any Test cricket.
Rahul out.
Agarwal and Rahul, none of the two, have still established them. Both are 27-28 age old and should start performing on consistent basis.
Agarwal has played just 4 tests
Rahul has played 36
Agarwal was brilliant on Aus tour,he should be backed.Rahul needs to be dropped
Agarwal has played just 4 tests
Rahul has played 36
Agarwal was brilliant on Aus tour,he should be backed.Rahul needs to be dropped
High time they draft Subhman Gill in. He outperformed his captain Vihari in that A team series against WI A team.
Gill can't bowl
Vihari has been perfered over Rohit because of his part time bowling ablity so team doesn't fall behind over rate and give more rest to fast bowlers during the innings. It was stated by Virat Kohli himself
Gill can't bowl
Vihari has been perfered over Rohit because of his part time bowling ablity so team doesn't fall behind over rate and give more rest to fast bowlers during the innings. It was stated by Virat Kohli himself
High time they draft Subhman Gill in. He outperformed his captain Vihari in that A team series against WI A team.
No one gives a damn about A team and B team matches. Shubman Gill, notwithstanding all the songs of praise that his fan club sings about him, is still very untested at the international level. The only time we've seen him is in those two ODIs against NZ where he turned out to be total failure.
High time they draft Subhman Gill in. He outperformed his captain Vihari in that A team series against WI A team.
Agarwal has played just 4 tests
Rahul has played 36
Agarwal was brilliant on Aus tour,he should be backed.Rahul needs to be dropped
We don't need his bowling, if he can do his primary role well. Finally we've quite a few good bowling options, so don't think we'll be needing his bowling at least in tests.Gill can't bowl
Vihari has been perfered over Rohit because of his part time bowling ablity so team doesn't fall behind over rate and give more rest to fast bowlers during the innings. It was stated by Virat Kohli himself