JaDed
Test Star
- Joined
- May 5, 2014
- Runs
- 37,247
Rohit and Kohli should just be dropped, there is no point playing them.
Pant is a mistake to be in main squad for now.
Pant is a mistake to be in main squad for now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Yes he is. Rohit should have remembered that one time India won the T20 World Cup was back in 2007 with bold selections like dropping off big name and out of the form players like Dravid himself. But instead he picked most of the players on reputation here. What has Pandya done lately to deserve selection but instead they have made him VC. Jadeja? Siraj? Kohli?Rohit is an inaugural World Cup winner.
Pant was not needed when we already have Samson. He should be the first choice keeper.Rohit and Kohli should just be dropped, there is no point playing them.
Pant is a mistake to be in main squad for now.
Kristen won with Pandya. I dont why you keep on associating Gill with him. Illogical.Shubman Gill on the bench m
GT’s captain and Kirsten’s boy.
Pakistan should do the same with Babar!
Its not that bad, Jaiswal alone can take the match away. For Pakistan you just need to pray Kohli does not get out and that alone is enough lolthis time non of this going to happen Ireland might beat india
We have a dud as a captain, its a battle between who is less worse.These are the squads we select and they are rightly trashed by Ppers. But when India crashes out , they'll call us chokers.
Make up your minds, brothers. It's either one or the other , it can't be both
If caste was an issue Gill wouldn’t be kept as a reserve.Terrible terrible squad. Somehow indian selectors and team management always manage succesfully to botch their squad selection.
You cannot keep on selecting Chahal, Jadeja and expect different results, thats insanity.
Not selecting top talents like Rinku is an absolute travesty. One could have the caste angle, since its a big thing in india and Rinku is a lower caste player. Jaiswal is also a shudra but got selected (maybe because they couldnt justify keeping him out) however since casteism is deeply ingrained in Indian society i wouldnt eliminate that as a factor.
Players like Abhishek and Natranjan who one could take a gamble on also miss the boat as well. Always playing safe, non imaginative pathetic approach from Agarkar and Rohit.
Pant is a great bat but his t20I record is terrible (SR of 125) over a sample size of 66 match, which is substantial.
Bishnoi misses the boat again, does Rohit have some personal issue with him?
If caste was an issue Gill wouldn’t be kept as a reserve.
Indian selectors are just dumb, the only good thing is Rahul didn’t make it.
It's not a factor at all.i find it hard to take this out as a factor, even though i would add that its not the ONLY factor.
Didn't get much opportunity tbh..Has Rinku not been able to perform in IPL this season?
If caste was an issue Gill wouldn’t be kept as a reserve.
Indian selectors are just dumb, the only good thing is Rahul didn’t make it.
My original post was nuked and edited to this. So no point in discussing.It's not a factor at all.
Yes there's no point because it's not a factor at allMy original post was nuked and edited to this. So no point in discussing.
India's excluded XI has a better chance of winning this World Cup.Rinku and Bishnoi should not have been on this list. So unfortunate for them.
Tbf caste is an essential aspect of Indian society which is usually overlooked by non indians when discussing matters related to India. I can understand why you think this way since caste does not come into our consideration set. My original post was connecting that factor to cricket with multiple examples of unfairness done to cricketers because of their lower caste. However if derails the thread then i would avoid expanding on my points.This thread is not to discuss caste and religion kind of stuff. So not point in discussing those thing and derail the thread.
Terrible terrible squad. Somehow indian selectors and team management always manage succesfully to botch their squad selection.
You cannot keep on selecting Chahal, Jadeja and expect different results, thats insanity.
Not selecting top talents like Rinku is an absolute travesty. One could have the caste angle, since its a big thing in india and Rinku is a lower caste player. Jaiswal is also a shudra but got selected (maybe because they couldnt justify keeping him out) however since casteism is deeply ingrained in Indian society i wouldnt eliminate that as a factor.
Players like Abhishek and Natranjan who one could take a gamble on also miss the boat as well. Always playing safe, non imaginative pathetic approach from Agarkar and Rohit.
Pant is a great bat but his t20I record is terrible (SR of 125) over a sample size of 66 match, which is substantial.
Bishnoi misses the boat again, does Rohit have some personal issue with him?
BCCI and Cricket is one place where Caste and Religion does not matter.Tbf caste is an essential aspect of Indian society which is usually overlooked by non indians when discussing matters related to India. I can understand why you think this way since caste does not come into our consideration set. My original post was connecting that factor to cricket with multiple examples of unfairness done to cricketers because of their lower caste. However if derails the thread then i would avoid expanding on my points.
Its a flawed team. Too many one trick ponies and that too some are badly out of form or past their expiration date.I'm not feeling particularly confident about India's squad and their chances this time around.
What combination he is talking about? Picking similar players in the form of Axar and Jaddu?Rohit Sharma explains rationale behind India's T20 World Cup 2024 squad selection
The India captain and chief selector discussed the omission of Shubman Gill and Rinku Singh from the 15-member squad, among other decisions.
India named their 15-member squad and four travelling reserves for the ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2024 this week and skipper Rohit Sharma and chief selector Ajit Agarkar addressed a press conference to reveal the thinking behind the selection choices made.
While most of India's squad picked itself, there were a few surprising calls, with the omission of Shubman Gill and Rinku Singh prominent among them.
Calling it one of the "toughest decisions" the selectors had to make, Agarkar explained that the duo had done "nothing wrong" and the choice was due to combinations that the team wanted.
India announce squad for Men's T20 World Cup 2024
"It [Rinku Singh's omission from the first 15] is probably the toughest thing we have had to discuss," Agarkar said.
"He has done nothing wrong, not even Shubman Gill for that matter. It’s about combinations. There are a couple of wrist spinners included to give Rohit more options. It’s just unfortunate. He's in the reserves, so that tells you how close he came to being in the 15.
"But at the end of the day you can only pick 15 players in the squad."
Source: ICC
Chahal is a liability period. How rinku is not picked is a mystery. Rohit is done in t20s and should not have been picked. Another t20wc gone for Ind with these outdated seniors in the teamRohit preferred sky over Samson and sky costed the wc.but rohit was not answerable and responsible for the damning loss.Again rohit picks chahal foolishly over rinku and supports his decision by saying games starts at early morning (knowing chahal won't be the 3rd spinner in any team due to his atrocious capability in other departments).
India really hit the jackpot with Virat Kohli and Hardik Pandya showing up on time for the World Cup.According to reports, Virat Kohli and Hardik Pandya will join the team later, as the second batch departs for the T20 World Cup. Contrary to earlier expectations, not only Hardik Pandya but also former captain Virat Kohli will arrive late to the tournament. However, Kohli is expected to join the team in time for the warm-up match against Bangladesh on June 1, with plans to depart by the end of May
I'm pretty sure if you were Hugh Jackman or Nicole Kidman, you would get mobbed by Australians. Australia has a population of 26 million. And cricket is not their No. 1 sport. India is a country of 1.4 billion where cricket is the No. 1 sport. So obviously there is a difference in the perception of the sport in both countries.Irfan Pathan replied:
"Australia doesn't have a celebrity culture. Fortunately or unfortunately, we have that. Ideally I would want a nice balance between Australian culture and Indian culture, where we come in between. Sometimes having that kind of a culture doesn't help us. But at the same time, we are what we are. We are not Australians. We are Indians. Our emotions, ethics and mindsets are different."