What's new

"IPL is much better than PSL": Sikandar Raza

Do you agree with Sikandar Raza statement?


  • Total voters
    63

The Bald Eagle

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 25, 2023
Runs
25,265
Sikandar Raza in a recent interview said, "I just think that the availability of all the players for one tournament makes IPL really special. In most of the matches we play, the crowd comes and supports their teams. That’s something that’s really different in IPL. The only other league when it comes to crowds that comes close to IPL is PSL. So, I think IPL definitely stands out with a couple of factors, yes."

So do you agree with Sikandar Raza thoughts or you think he made that statement to appease his IPL bosses.?

https://www.india.com/sports/ipl-or-psl-kings-xi-punjabs-sikandar-raza-gives-his-verdict-6721270/
 
There are two factors because of which PSL has faced criticism recently one unavailability of a number of overseas players initially signed by teams owing to their duties with their national side.

Other being inability to fetch big names this year. I think it was result of poor planning. But if you ask me the PSL occurrence window of February to March is much much better than IPL window of May to June.
 
Indians and Pakistanis keep debating which is better between IPL and PSL, while the Aussies usually walk away with the trophies that matter.
Very well said. IPL and PSL both are franchise cricket leagues and they are just a means to entertain fans, the only thing that matters is the World Cups and trophies and Australia is winning in that line instead of hyping BBL.
 
Very well said. IPL and PSL both are franchise cricket leagues and they are just a means to entertain fans, the only thing that matters is the World Cups and trophies and Australia is winning in that line instead of hyping BBL.
Apart from trophies, the Aussies are also the ones who walk away with the most money from the IPL. 😆 😆
 
Sikandar Raza in a recent interview said, "I just think that the availability of all the players for one tournament makes IPL really special. In most of the matches we play, the crowd comes and supports their teams. That’s something that’s really different in IPL. The only other league when it comes to crowds that comes close to IPL is PSL. So, I think IPL definitely stands out with a couple of factors, yes."

So do you agree with Sikandar Raza thoughts or you think he made that statement to appease his IPL bosses.?

https://www.india.com/sports/ipl-or-psl-kings-xi-punjabs-sikandar-raza-gives-his-verdict-6721270/
And who are Sikandar Raza’s IPL bosses?

But he’s right, there is no comparison between IPL and PSL overall, money spent, player salary, crowd, player participation, or anticipation. IPL definitely would have been enhanced by Pakistan players’ participation I feel, become a truly global event without reservation. But it’s excellent nevertheless, even though I might not be a fan of it or T20 in general.
 
Aussies are also the ones who walk away with the most money from the IPL.
You are right here as well. They leech out a lot of money as well from IPL and also take home the trophies when it comes to the big event. Greatest team for me in cricket history.
 
He is wrong......if he said that IPL is much better than PSL...
........ instead
He should have said that one match of IPL is more worth than whole PSL tournament....
 
And who are Sikandar Raza’s IPL bosses?

But he’s right, there is no comparison between IPL and PSL overall, money spent, player salary, crowd, player participation, or anticipation. IPL definitely would have been enhanced by Pakistan players’ participation I feel, become a truly global event without reservation. But it’s excellent nevertheless, even though I might not be a fan of it or T20 in general.
Punjab Kings in general, and the BCCI in particular including likes of J shah.

I can just say one thing about it, the guy is heaping praise on IPL just because he is earning more bucks from IPL than compared to any other league and about crowd it's just a no brainer that the country with the most populace will win here. But if you talk about viewership than that would be a more appropriate criteria.
 
I can just say one thing about it, the guy is heaping praise on IPL just because he is earning more bucks from IPL than compared to any other league

Yes definitely JUST BECAUSE IPL pays him more. Nothing to do with the fact that IPL is actually a miles better league than PSL in terms of ..... well every parameter.
 
Yes definitely JUST BECAUSE IPL pays him more. Nothing to do with the fact that IPL is actually a miles better league than PSL in terms of ..... well every parameter.
Do have a look on the articles below. And you know what Dale Steyn had to apologize for his comments later. This shows how much IPL mafia gets pissed when player acknowledge PSL to be better. So I guess Sikandar is just securing future IPL contracts.


 
To me it just shows the fickle nature of franchise cricket. Sikandar is playing in the UAE. Next he will jet off to Pakistan to play for Lahore yet here he is giving an interview lauding India and his 3rd franchise. Just a couple of days before he was posting about Lahore Qalandar.

What really was the need to take the bait and give such an answer that denigrates your next employer?

There was a recent article that showed how many players actually financially benefit when their teams leave a competitions early, because they can jet off to a new tournament while still recieving their full pay. There is a complete and utter lack of loyalty and I genuinley wonder who/what is propping up this leagues and when this bubble will burst ( barring the IPL). There is zero chance that the IL20 is raking in any money.

Sadly Franchise cricket seems to be the way forward for the sport. But it is very obviously artificial - especially to someone who comes from a country where football is the dominant sport. Can you imagine a scenario where a player dons 3 shirts in 3 months, claims to love each team he plays and compares the standards of the leagues happening in football. That player would get chased out of the stadium.
 
Yes definitely JUST BECAUSE IPL pays him more. Nothing to do with the fact that IPL is actually a miles better league than PSL in terms of ..... well every parameter.
The main parameter that matters to the players is money.

Of course the other parameters need to be better for the league to be more proposperous. But ultimately these guys go for the money.
 
IPL is better in quality because of foreign players. When it comes to domestic T20 talent, not much to choose between India and Pakistan, in fact Pakistan may be slightly better, Pakistanis also understand T20 format better.

What Sikandar should have said is IPL has more money and hence able to attract the best talent from outside India. IPL is better not because of Indian cricketers but in spite of so many low quality Indians.
 
Do have a look on the articles below. And you know what Dale Steyn had to apologize for his comments later. This shows how much IPL mafia gets pissed when player acknowledge PSL to be better. So I guess Sikandar is just securing future IPL contracts.

Steyn or any other players never claimed PSL to a better overall league than IPL. Saying "PSL is more rewarding" is a whole lot different from saying the above. Learn to comprehend better..

IPL franchises don't give a crap about what their players think or say about the PSL. They probably won't even treat it as a competition to them in any way. Ofcourse it's convenient to just say "Oh they're just saying because of the money" but common sense states that franchise owners pick players based on their performances and not on a random media quote.
 
The main parameter that matters to the players is money.

Of course the other parameters need to be better for the league to be more proposperous. But ultimately these guys go for the money.

Ofcourse they go for the money. When did I say otherwise?

But when a random Lithuanian basketball player says that the NBA is a better league than the Chinese League, it'd be plain stupid to say that he's saying that JUST BECAUSE of the money when all he's saying is an undeniable fact..
 
Ofcourse they go for the money. When did I say otherwise?

But when a random Lithuanian basketball player says that the NBA is a better league than the Chinese League, it'd be plain stupid to say that he's saying that JUST BECAUSE of the money when all he's saying is an undeniable fact..

Cricket leagues are different to Basketball. Sikandar is just saying it for the money man. There is no harm in it. He needs to secure his future.

This is hypothetical - but just imagine that china started a cricket league at the same time as the IPL and the PSL and it paid double the IPL money. Where do you think a 37 year old player like Sikandar would go?

* this a purely hypothetical question. When I have raised similar questions before then Indians claim I am anti ipl etc. Let's not go down that route.
 
He is only stating the obvious isn't it? Given a choice most Pakistani players themselves would prefer to play in IPL over PSL.

The only selling point PSL had over the years is that it produces superior local fast bowlers compared to IPL. However that myth has also been debunked in the recently concluded Asia Cup's and World Cup's.
 
He is in some serious match winning form at the moment, he played out of his skin to take Dubai capitals out of the last position to a semi final of the ILT20 btw
 
Sikandar is just saying it for the money man.

This is such an obvious and a lame cope usually used by Pakistanis. Let me ask you some hypothetical questions in return.

Do you think IPL franchises are that stupid to base their player recruitment based on whether they're licking IPL's backside or not?

Do you think that a seasoned international cricketer like Sikander Raza is that stupid to think that IPL franchises are that gullible?

I know seeing a Pakistan-born international player picking IPL over PSL is not quite a pleasant feeling for Pakistanis but to just use the "money" argument each and every time in these situations just comes off as desperate and salty.
 
Sikander is right. The PSL isn’t on the level of IPL. We all acknowledge that.
 
This is such an obvious and a lame cope usually used by Pakistanis. Let me ask you some hypothetical questions in return.

Do you think IPL franchises are that stupid to base their player recruitment based on whether they're licking IPL's backside or not?

Do you think that a seasoned international cricketer like Sikander Raza is that stupid to think that IPL franchises are that gullible?

I know seeing a Pakistan-born international player picking IPL over PSL is not quite a pleasant feeling for Pakistanis but to just use the "money" argument each and every time in these situations just comes off as desperate and salty.
Your questions are irrelevant to what is being discussed ( which, for your reference, is the conduct of Sikandar Raza, not the intelligence of IPL franchise owners), so I won't bother answering them.

You have run away from a very simple question
 
Steyn or any other players never claimed PSL to a better overall league than IPL. Saying "PSL is more rewarding" is a whole lot different from saying the above. Learn to comprehend better..

IPL franchises don't give a crap about what their players think or say about the PSL. They probably won't even treat it as a competition to them in any way. Ofcourse it's convenient to just say "Oh they're just saying because of the money" but common sense states that franchise owners pick players based on their performances and not on a random media quote.
Lol... They don't give a crap but then poor Steyn had to apologize for it. BBL and PSL are much better than IPL quality wise.
 
Lol... They don't give a crap but then poor Steyn had to apologize for it. BBL and PSL are much better than IPL quality wise.

I hope you keep repeating that people will forget and start believing IPL is better.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Your questions are irrelevant to what is being discussed ( which, for your reference, is the conduct of Sikandar Raza, not the intelligence of IPL franchise owners), so I won't bother answering them.

You have run away from a very simple question

Lol how are they irrelevant? You are basically implying that Raza made these comments just to appease his IPL owners/franchise and save his contract. That means you actually believe that IPL owners pay more attention to what their players are saying about the league than their actual performances which is as they come...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lol... They don't give a crap but then poor Steyn had to apologize for it.

Steyn apologized because he got clowned all over social media by the Indian fans. And just for your info, he also used Lankan Premier League along with PSL in that "more rewarding" statement..so you're saying LPL too is better than IPL? :)

BBL and PSL are much better than IPL quality wise.


What quality? :yk

BBL atleast has better stadiums and good innovations but PSL? It's just a poor man's version of IPL with inferior teams, players, broadcast and absolutely nothing to set it apart.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lol how are they irrelevant? You are basically implying that Raza made these comments just to appease his IPL owners/franchise and save his contract. That means you actually believe that IPL owners pay more attention to what their players are saying about the league than their actual performances which is as they come...
No, I didn't say that or imply that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Quality wise nope, Money wise yes. IPL attracts more foreign players because it has more money to offer to them. BCCI is a strong and rich board, they can afford it.

What is that quality that PSL has which IPL doesn't?

:murali
 
BBL atleast has better stadiums and good innovations but PSL?

LMAO yes. BBL has that glamor and glitz of top class stadium and production quality.

PSL, the highlights I have seen, reminds me of poverty days of Indian cricket in 1990s. Everything in PSL looks shabby and worn down.
 
no comparison , IPL is huge but then me not a T20 League fan - imo should be restricted to a 60 day bracket - we need & want more TEST matches - mind you , not on the Ramiz Raja type o pitches (y)
 
LMAO yes. BBL has that glamor and glitz of top class stadium and production quality.

PSL, the highlights I have seen, reminds me of poverty days of Indian cricket in 1990s. Everything in PSL looks shabby and worn down.

Thats an interesting observation. I've not seen much IPL but curious to see what year of poverty did the bird poo stained seats, chemical fume pollution and lack of facilities during the recently concluded world cup in India remind you of?
 
Sikandar Raza is Pakistan's new Public Enemy No 1.
Isn't he of Pakistani descent? He should possibly watch out the next time he travels to Pak for any cricket related event. The media and fans won't be very kind to him.
 
Do have a look on the articles below. And you know what Dale Steyn had to apologize for his comments later. This shows how much IPL mafia gets pissed when player acknowledge PSL to be better. So I guess Sikandar is just securing future IPL contracts.



We have some articles like that, just providing a few samples for you.

IPL bigger than PSL: Wasim Akram


PSL Is Like Mini IPL Of Pakistan": Wasim Akram Gives Blockbuster Verdict


Hands down the strongest league in the world': Khawaza gives his verdict on IPL vs PSL debate; 'No contest there'



IPL Is The Best League In The World': Simon Doull Puts IPL Ahead Of BBL, PSL


AB De Villiers Hails Progress Of SAT20, Calls It Second Best Paid League After IPL - WATCH

 
We have some articles like that, just providing a few samples for you.

IPL bigger than PSL: Wasim Akram


PSL Is Like Mini IPL Of Pakistan": Wasim Akram Gives Blockbuster Verdict


Hands down the strongest league in the world': Khawaza gives his verdict on IPL vs PSL debate; 'No contest there'



IPL Is The Best League In The World': Simon Doull Puts IPL Ahead Of BBL, PSL


AB De Villiers Hails Progress Of SAT20, Calls It Second Best Paid League After IPL - WATCH

West Indian star's stated the fact without mincing words.

And billings skipped the national duty for it.
 
Ranji trophy created Bumrah, he himself said so many times. IPL hasn't created one semi decent player for India.
 
Ranji trophy created Bumrah, he himself said so many times. IPL hasn't created one semi decent player for India.
Thanks for countering the disinformation here. Indians dont realize IPL is the reason behind their downfall. Remember they played IPL in UAE in 2021 and lost badly too in the T20 WC that year on the same location.
 
who honestly cares, these leagues are nothing but money spinners, if u enjoy them fair enough, but lets not pretend that these leagues have any actual significance of who wins or loses.
 
who honestly cares, these leagues are nothing but money spinners, if u enjoy them fair enough, but lets not pretend that these leagues have any actual significance of who wins or loses.
Chennai Super Kings and Dhoni disagree

He ascended to divinehood cos of his IPL trophies long after retirement from Internationals
 
Indians and Pakistanis will keep fighting about PSL, IPL. Aussies will keep winning ICC trophies, notice how not one Aussie gets involved in these stupid discussions, they aren't emotionally attached to BBL the way desis are to our stupid leagues. Perils of one sport countries I guess.
 
India won world cup and CT when we had IPL. It is not the IPL that is causing the problem.
Those players came up the ranks due to domestic. You think IPL made Sachin, Sehwag, Gambhir, Zaheer, Yuvraj, Dhawan, Jadeja, Kohli in 2011, 2013?
 
Those players came up the ranks due to domestic. You think IPL made Sachin, Sehwag, Gambhir, Zaheer, Yuvraj, Dhawan, Jadeja, Kohli in 2011, 2013?


Leagues do not "make" players. 99% of the players come through domestic cricket, which acts as a feeder system of local players in franchise cricket.

IPL or any other league for that matter do not have a football style scouting system where you'd randomly pick semi- professional players from the streets.
 
Those players came up the ranks due to domestic. You think IPL made Sachin, Sehwag, Gambhir, Zaheer, Yuvraj, Dhawan, Jadeja, Kohli in 2011, 2013?

Agree.

Players like Kohli, Rohit etc. are products of pre-IPL era.

Once these big guns retire, we may see true worth of IPL.
 
Why do we have to compare IPL which is older than India's last World Cup win in 2011 whereas PSL started in 2016 after that Pakistan won the champions trophy in 2017. This is not a fair comparison, as I said earlier, IPL is All about money for Sikander Raza so he is praising it.
 
Thats an interesting observation. I've not seen much IPL but curious to see what year of poverty did the bird poo stained seats, chemical fume pollution and lack of facilities during the recently concluded world cup in India remind you of?

That's quality pearl clutching lmao

Sadly, it cannot detract from the ramshackle stadium we see in pakistan with architecture and build from 1950s, concrete slabs, dusty, ragged outfields and what have you.
 
Why does it not detract? Perhaps you are comfortable sitting on poo while throwing stones at others. However it does say a lot about you.

Lmao, are you not the guy who used the slur pa***t for Indians a few weeks back? DOn't think you are in any position to assume a righteous posture here.

Sure, nobody said Indian stadiums are perfect in every way. But the opposite of third rate, ancient, ramshackle venues with dusty concrete slabs for stands. And freestanding plastic chairs.

No idea why you are getting so worked up about it though. Posters from paksitan on this very forum speak about the deplorable state of stadiums in pakistan so no idea why you are so touchy about it coming from me.
 
Lmao, are you not the guy who used the slur pa***t for Indians a few weeks back? DOn't think you are in any position to assume a righteous posture here.

Sure, nobody said Indian stadiums are perfect in every way. But the opposite of third rate, ancient, ramshackle venues with dusty concrete slabs for stands. And freestanding plastic chairs.

No idea why you are getting so worked up about it though. Posters from paksitan on this very forum speak about the deplorable state of stadiums in pakistan so no idea why you are so touchy about it coming from me.
I think if you asked most sensible people if they would rather sit on plastic chair on poo they will stick with plastic.
 
IPL is expected to be better. More money is poured into IPL than in PSL.

I think best league is BBL though.
 
IPL is better but fails to add that it's also a discriminatory league, surprised ole Sikander gets a visa for it.
 
Chennai Super Kings and Dhoni disagree

He ascended to divinehood cos of his IPL trophies long after retirement from Internationals
playing for india made dhoni a god in india, take all his ipl achievements away and he'd still be universally respected in the cricket fraternity.
 
Indians and Pakistanis keep debating which is better between IPL and PSL, while the Aussies usually walk away with the trophies that matter.
I can't even remember when was the last time all Aussie main stars played the BBL together? Australia don't give two hoots about their own premier T20 competition. They in fact schedule it right in the middle of their home summer with the majority of their stars unavailable due to international duty.
 
Quality wise nope, Money wise yes. IPL attracts more foreign players because it has more money to offer to them. BCCI is a strong and rich board, they can afford it.

Players make the quality of the teams. No?

So if IPL attracts better players, how is PSL better in quality?
 
Indians and Pakistanis will keep fighting about PSL, IPL. Aussies will keep winning ICC trophies, notice how not one Aussie gets involved in these stupid discussions, they aren't emotionally attached to BBL the way desis are to our stupid leagues. Perils of one sport countries I guess.
I can't even remember when was the last time all Aussie main stars played the BBL together? Australia don't give two hoots about their own premier T20 competition. They in fact schedule it right in the middle of their home summer with the majority of their stars unavailable due to international duty.
This is because the premier T20 competition for the main Aussie stars isn't the BBL, it's the IPL.
 
So if IPL attracts better players, how is PSL better in quality?

The argument was that PSL has "better bowlers" which makes it a balanced context but in reality it was only down to the tacky UAE wickets.

The moment it was moved back to Pakistan, the very same bowlers began to get shellacked by some of the most mediocre hacks ever to grace the game. :)
 
I can't even remember when was the last time all Aussie main stars played the BBL together? Australia don't give two hoots about their own premier T20 competition. They in fact schedule it right in the middle of their home summer with the majority of their stars unavailable due to international duty.
They only care about ICC trophies, team wins, legacy. Greatest cricket team, and will remain so forever.
 
The argument was that PSL has "better bowlers" which makes it a balanced context but in reality it was only down to the tacky UAE wickets.

The moment it was moved back to Pakistan, the very same bowlers began to get shellacked by some of the most mediocre hacks ever to grace the game. :)

Pakistan has better bowlers? In which world?
 
IPL is two orders of magnitude better than the PSL and there's simply no comparison at this point.

But @Hitman rightly pointed out that Australia has won the World Cup which is the most important prize in cricket.

Even in T20's, our selections are driven more by brand value of the Kohli's and Rohit's rather than by IPL performances .

Neither Kohli nor Rohit are the most impactful T20 batters in the IPL and neither have been for the last 4 seasons and yet they played 2 World T20's.

It can be the greatest league in the world , but unless BCCI themselves back those players in T20Is and win something, it doesnt do Indian cricket any favours.
 
IPL is two orders of magnitude better than the PSL and there's simply no comparison at this point.

But @Hitman rightly pointed out that Australia has won the World Cup which is the most important prize in cricket.

Even in T20's, our selections are driven more by brand value of the Kohli's and Rohit's rather than by IPL performances .

Neither Kohli nor Rohit are the most impactful T20 batters in the IPL and neither have been for the last 4 seasons and yet they played 2 World T20's.

It can be the greatest league in the world , but unless BCCI themselves back those players in T20Is and win something, it doesnt do Indian cricket any favours.

How many IPL teams are exclusively coached by Indians?

There is your answer.
 
Back
Top