Tbh, I follow your posts a lot but it seems nowadays you give too much attention to height. I mean, ok, a fast-medium bowler must have height but there are other things to consider as well like swing, seam, variation, changes in pace, avg. pace, bounce generated etc etc.
Would you care to explain why you give such importance to height??
With pleasure, thanks for asking.
Seam, swing and pace are very useful. But in reality, overs 20-80 with each ball in a Test match - and the whole of ODI's - are played in unhelpful bowling conditions with a soft ball with a flat seam being bowled on a grassless wicket.
There may be brief periods of reverse swing, but closer scrutiny of ball tampering has minimised such opportunities.
So bowlers have to build pressure with their line and length.
The target for a quick bowler is the top of off-stump.
For a tall bowler, he can bowl a full length and get lift which makes him impossible to drive off the front foot or cut or pull off the back foot. The likes of Hazelwood, McGrath or Broad are difficult to score off. They have around 12 inches of leeway in length. If they can land the ball consistently on an open handkerchief one foot long and one foot wide, they will be fine.
The same is not true of short bowlers like Hasan Ali or Aamer Yamin. A fraction too full and they will be driven. A fraction short and they will be cut or pulled. Rather than an open handkerchief, they have to be able to hit a twelve inch ruler, every single ball.
It means that they have to justify their position in the top six (Yamin) or top seven (Hasan Ali) or else they don't merit a place in the team.
Waqar Younis took a lot of wickets in the West Indies in 92-93. But the opposition scored so freely due to his shortness (6'0) that he single-handedly lost Pakistan the world championship season.