OmarKhan99
Tape Ball Regular
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2015
- Runs
- 495
- Post of the Week
- 1
You cannot establish standards when you are scraping at the bottom of the barrel. ECB could discard Hales because they are overloaded with batting talent in the shorter formats. They have more than a dozen modern batsmen.
"Standards" isn't the right word, it's principles. If your principles, or your code, is dependent on resources available then they aren't principles by definition.
Stokes did worse things than Hales but ECB did not pull the plug on his career because he is legendary material.
Did he repeatedly get involved in activities that genuinely break the trust of his teammates? That's what Hales' exclusion was cited to.
There are only 2-3 quality ODI batsmen in Pakistan and Haris is one of them. Pakistan cannot keep selecting inferior players just for the sake of team culture etc.
First, I don't actually believe Haris is disinterested, I was using your assessment as a hypothetical scenario. Second, yes you can keep selecting players who might be "inferior" in terms of "talent" but in practicality are better team players. In the long-term, they will actually produce more meaningful results. A perfect example of this are Umar Akmal and, to an extent, Mohammad Amir. What good came about from the fact that PCT supported someone like an Umar Akmal, much more than they ever did someone like a Fawad?
If NZ's recent Test Championship is anything to go by: Long-reigning/consistent collective good > short-term and individual brilliance.
Last edited: