Bro lets not clutch at straws and deal in facts.
In T20s, the wickets are conducive for high scoring and therefore suit "flat track bullies" like Jason Roy, Alex Hales, Guptill and etc.
There isn't much lateral movement in T20s. In this format pitches are prepared in favour of the batsmen. The only real difference between the surfaces you find across the globe is the pace of the wicket. Some are fast, some are slow and most are somewhere in between.
Yes India lost that game in Nottingham but that's because he literally had no support! Literally none whatsoever.
View attachment 117529
For him to score a ton and at a 200+ strike rate on his own actually makes his innings even more impressive.
India did however win the series and win the other two games. He made an excellent contribution in one of these matches, where he scored 39 off 19 balls. He was also the second highest run scorer in that contest.
England may not have a good pace bowling attack, but that's not even relevant because the question that needs to be asked is why was he so far ahead of everyone else who batted in that series? - which included Rohit, Kohli, Roy, Buttler and Livingstone. They're all world class T20I batsman.
View attachment 117530
Finally, if he's so overrated, how do you average near 40 and maintain a 170+ strike rate after 35 matches? If that's so easy, why hasn't anyone in the Pakistan team come near to these stats.
That strike rate as a number 4 batsman is no joke. It's actually amazing and no one can deny that.
Bro lets be honest, you came up with this thread without doing your research and decided to base your views on a few Pakistan v India encounters right?