What's new

Jos Buttler sees Twenty20 eclipsing Tests as dominant format in future

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
Jos Buttler feels the appetite for Twenty20 could see cricket become a "one-format game" in the future.

England's wicketkeeper-batsman - speaking to Sky Sports' Ian Ward in an interview you can see during coverage of the T20 Tri-Series game against New Zealand from 5.30am on Sky Sports Cricket on Tuesday - believes the Test and ODI games could be phased out "soon or in 15 to 20 years".

However, Buttler, who played the last of his 18 Tests to date against India in December 2016, says the five-day arena remains the "pinnacle" and that he would be "sad" if it was jettisoned.

"I feel cricket could become a one-format game in the future - whether that's soon or in 15 to 20 years," said Buttler, who talks more about the T20 Tri-Series in his latest Sky Sports column.

"Test cricket is still, for me, the pinnacle of cricket but T20 fills out stadiums and is easy to keep up with and follow.

"Everyone wants things faster these days and things evolve so maybe Twenty20 could have a monopoly on cricket.

"We all love the history of Test cricket - you will never have situations thrown up in T20 that Test cricket can do to you and you will never be tested as a player as you would in Test cricket.

"It's a complete test of everything and it would be sad (if it went), but as a product T20 is going from strength to strength.

"Hopefully the administrators can find a way of making the Test game more popular - it's awesome and I'd love to be playing in it.

"[Not making the Ashes squad] was a wake-up call that I have slipped down the ladder in red-ball cricket and white-ball cricket is obviously my strength.

"I thought if I'm serious about playing red-ball cricket I could give up the white-ball stuff for two years and spend winters playing red ball, but I feel like there are too many opportunities to go down that route."

http://www.skysports.com/cricket/ne...-t20-could-see-cricket-become-one-format-game
 
T20 is great in terms of bringing the wider public into cricket, but Tests is where the true skills of cricket are.
 
T20 is great in terms of bringing the wider public into cricket, but Tests is where the true skills of cricket are.

Perhaps. But, only two countries actually sustain playing tests. The rest are all losing money. They need the shorter formats to pay for the tests. The reason - no fans. Empty stadiums and no eyeballs on TV.

What worth is someone's skill when you cannot make a living out of it?
 
He’s right.Tests simply are not economically feasible for countries other than England,Australia and India.
 
Perhaps. But, only two countries actually sustain playing tests. The rest are all losing money. They need the shorter formats to pay for the tests. The reason - no fans. Empty stadiums and no eyeballs on TV.

What worth is someone's skill when you cannot make a living out of it?

This man gets it!
 
What worth is someone's skill when you cannot make a living out of it?

The worth to your community. The worth to your own spiritual growth. The worth to your mental health.
 
The worth to your community. The worth to your own spiritual growth. The worth to your mental health.

That is why we have a world tournament in yoga and meditation
 
The worth to your community. The worth to your own spiritual growth. The worth to your mental health.

It's sad that all most people care about nowadays is money.

Also, this "making a living" argument is pretty false. Test cicketers all make very good money relative to the average joe from their own countries.

However, guys like Buttler were never really cut out for test cricket anyways.
 
Test cricket should be reduced to four days and bring on regular d/n matches.
 
The worth to your community. The worth to your own spiritual growth. The worth to your mental health.

Will this put food on the table? You need a marketable skill. Sure a player can make a living in Tests that too only in Aus and Eng. What about the rest?

The test only players get a pittance. But when he sees several of his peers become multi-millionaires, I can only imagine what goes through his mind. Everyone is human and almost all of us want more, bigger and better things. Only $$ can make that happen.
 
Perhaps. But, only two countries actually sustain playing tests. The rest are all losing money. They need the shorter formats to pay for the tests. The reason - no fans. Empty stadiums and no eyeballs on TV.

What worth is someone's skill when you cannot make a living out of it?

Here’s the irony.
You don’t need that many skills to play T20!!
 
Ofcourse you do! I dont see any Tom, Dick or Harry excelling in T20s.

See the ball, smash the ball and only twenty overs to do it in.

Don’t get me wrong, I enjoy watching the international games but the mindset and skill level required for it is several notches lower then the longer formats.

T20 also leading to bowlers skill levels dropping. Containment leading to wickets rather then a bowler using his skills to get out a batsman.
 
See the ball, smash the ball and only twenty overs to do it in.

Don’t get me wrong, I enjoy watching the international games but the mindset and skill level required for it is several notches lower then the longer formats.

T20 also leading to bowlers skill levels dropping. Containment leading to wickets rather then a bowler using his skills to get out a batsman.

If it didn't require skill, batsmen like Pujara would be able to survive in T20. They can't. Tests anyone can survive by tuk-tuking.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If it didn't require skill, batsmen like Pujara would be able to survive in T20. They can't. Tests anyone can survive by tuk-tuking.

Pujara scoring a test match century at a strike rate of 50 is far more skilful then someone scoring a 30 at 200 strike rate...

It’s just the way it is...

Similarly Javed Miandad scoring a 100 at 65 on a belter shows far more skill then say Shoiab Mohammad scoring a hundred in the same game with a strike rate of 35..

For bowlers, Gul can take a 5’for in a T20 bowling yorkers against batsmen looking to score and fail in a test match because you need more skills to get the batsmen out..
 
Here’s the irony.
You don’t need that many skills to play T20!!

First of all, you do. Because if you don't several test specialist would find a place in the roster.

Secondly, it is not how many/much skill is required. It is the market value of the skill you posses that counts. That is what makes the $$.
 
Back
Top