remember all the noise about ajmal in england
he has a kink bla bla even though he had been cleared
if this junaid kid plays there will be massive pressure to get him banned.
there will be noises coming from england, india, australia, newzealand, south africa that he chucks it.
umpires will have no option but to report him
icc will be under pressure and prevent the kid from playing until action has been cleared.
what if junaid khan gets a fiver against england in semi-final and pakistan goes into final .
then strauss starts moaning about his action or someone like botham.
then he is reported and when he gets finally tested month or so later he is found that he chucks.
imagine the uproar from england and media
the icc wouldn't risk controvery like this.
i think thats why pakistan are reluctant to play junaid. they didn't play him against south africa, didn't play him against new zealand, and wasn't playing against bangladesh.
i think coaches know there is doubt with his action , doubt that can only be cleared if he is tested.
a thing pcb should have done half a year ago if they really think this lad is a future prospect.
Btw, Akhtars action is dodgy ...
i think he has been tested and cleared , his is a case of hyperextension
on the other hand shabbir and malik were banned and deemed illegal in maliks case it was the doosra not his normal offspinner i think.