What's new

Kevin Pietersen predicts Test cricket’s imminent death

Aman

Test Captain
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Runs
47,061
TEST cricket, as we know it, has a shelf life of five years.

That’s the alarming assessment of cricket’s traditional format handed down by England great Kevin Pietersen, who believes within five-to-ten years there will be no Test cricket played outside of the major rivalries.

Pietersen enjoyed a colourful but undeniably successful career across 104 Tests for England, plundering 8181 runs at an average of 47.28 with 23 centuries.

If Pietersen’s premonitions prove correct, it is unimaginable that a young cricketer would get anywhere near those numbers in the future.

The South African-born star listed the Ashes and Tests between South Africa and England alongside the Pakistan-India series – which hasn’t been contested since 2007 due to the volatile political divide between the two nations – as the three which would survive the looming cull.

But it’s likely that group could be expanded to include the lucrative Test series between superpowers Australia and India, and perhaps a handful of others.

But the rest? There’s no future, according to the big-hitting right-hander.

“I think that the major Test rivalries – the Ashes, Pakistan vs. India, South Africa vs. England – I think those will really, really stay and will stand the test of time,” said Pietersen.

“But all the other ones, I’m afraid to say, I don’t think will be in existence in the next five-to-ten years.

“It’ll just be franchise T20s. And that’s just the way it is. Everyone is fast-paced.

“And people will shoot me down for saying it. But watch. I’ve said a lot of things in my life.”

Pietersen made the comments at the launch of South Africa’s new Twenty20 competition, the Global League, at the luxurious Bulgari Hotel in the affluent London area of Knightsbridge.

The money on show said everything you need to know about the future of cricket, Pietersen said.

“There’s a lot of money that’s been driven into launches like this,” he said.

“We’re in the Bulgari hotel in Knightsbridge. They paid a lot of money for it. You don’t launch a Test series at the Bulgari.”

Pietersen was on Monday announced as one of eight overseas marquee players for the Global League, alongside the likes of fellow T20 specialists Chris Gayle, Kieron Pollard, Lasith Malinga and Brendon McCullum.

Those big names are in addition to the likes of AB de Villiers, Hashim Amla and Quinton de Kock, who take their places as marquee local players in the eight-team competition.

“For me it’s an exciting opportunity because of South Africa now taking their T20 cricket to the next level,” Pietersen said.

“To participate in a tournament where all the South African players will play, you’ll have a lot of the marquee players coming over – it means the standard will be raised and it’s going to be a fantastic, fantastic four or five weeks.”

http://www.foxsports.com.au/cricket...t/news-story/444294429d711290a5b13c5e9dbe92a9
 
For those of you who think I may trying to push an agenda.. this what comes up when you see cricket news on an Australian sports site.

un1OTUR.png


qzl7ddB.png
 
Last edited:
Test cricket's demise has been discussed since 1800.
 
Test cricket will survive because of Ashes and also because Saffers will give competition to the two Ashes team.

The fans of Ashes will keep calling LOI as Mickey Mouse league,not realizing everyday South Asia(and Afghanistan) ,JUST keeps adding more and more number of fans to the format.
 
It will survive, by the money generated from LOIs. T20 is the future of cricket.
Looks to be going that way.

I'd be interested to see how a T20 league would fare in NZ, the crowds might be decent if they market it well enough and get some stars from India, Aus and England to play.
 
The key is that Cricket needs to be curated - like a museum!

The primitive Indian capitalist system doesn't work in sport.

Consider English football. Burnley, Crystal Palace and Stoke have small, poor home towns and get around 5% of the Matchday stadium revenue of Arsenal or Manchester United.

But they get about 85% of the domestic TV revenue of those clubs, and consequently have budgets around five times as big as the Indian cricket team - or the fourth strongest Spanish or Italian football club.

Cricket is no different. Different markets are different: T20 Big Bash only survives in Australia due to subsidies from TV revenue from Test cricket.

But the key is to curate the sport, so that every format can survive.
 
You have to give meaning to the test matches. People will stop following them if you dont. People need to feel their teams are playing a crucial test match for a greater goal. Idea of a test championship should not be discarded completely.
 
The key is that Cricket needs to be curated - like a museum!

The primitive Indian capitalist system doesn't work in sport.

Consider English football. Burnley, Crystal Palace and Stoke have small, poor home towns and get around 5% of the Matchday stadium revenue of Arsenal or Manchester United.

But they get about 85% of the domestic TV revenue of those clubs, and consequently have budgets around five times as big as the Indian cricket team - or the fourth strongest Spanish or Italian football club.

Cricket is no different. Different markets are different: T20 Big Bash only survives in Australia due to subsidies from TV revenue from Test cricket.

But the key is to curate the sport, so that every format can survive.

Whats with the Hate for India ? Did some Indian steal your Goat ? ... give it a rest and the sooner you realize that without India cricket as a sport wouldn't be where it is today the better it will be for you :(
 
I agree it will die and keep dying. It's going to be interesting how England handle it. Atm most cricket fans belong to the older generation which is propping test cricket up. England will probably be faced with the choice for the younger generation when the older generation retire. Push the heck out of LOI (which will be the most likely option, it's already slowly happening in UK). Or cricket will die completely in UK.

I've always advocated for drastic change in test cricket, make it suit the time constraints and needs of the masses. The number of days needs to be cut badly, ideally three days so it can be held at the weekend. People want to see matches in their entirety these days. Pitches need to be bowler friendly, totals lower in order to increase the excitement in tests, no one really wants to see batsmen piling on the runs and declaring anymore. While the exciting points of LOI arguably are the boundaries, in tests is more about fighting it out for survival, so when a wicket goes down that tends to be the exciting point.
 
Whats with the Hate for India ? Did some Indian steal your Goat ? ... give it a rest and the sooner you realize that without India cricket as a sport wouldn't be where it is today the better it will be for you :(

Sorry I should clarify - usually for me "Indian" refers to the whole subcontinent.

The point is that equitable financial distributions mean that Arsenal v Stoke is competitive and compelling viewing in a way in which Barcelona v Ecija is not.

I would add that there are too many results in modern Test cricket.

In ODI and T20 cricket the weaker team often wins - as Pakistan just showed. But Test cricket is best when the weaker team can scrap out a draw. There are nowhere near enough draws currently in Test cricket: in 1976 even England drew two of the Tests while the West Indies were slaughtering them.
 
Doubt whether the coming generations will care for Test cricket like the way we do.
 
There would be few people who would still watch test cricket but outside the major test series it will be a dull affair.. I would think newer generation of fans are more inclined towards T20's so yes in 10-20 years when the current generation becomes too old or don't watch cricket much test cricket would reduce a lot of fan following..
 
Test cricket will survive but it will be played for the media and players as the spectators in most countries dont find it entertaining. I would:
A) Reduce the maximum overs in the first innings to 125.
B) A new ball after 55 overs as it brings wickets and runs.
C) Have more bounce to encourage both the batsman and Bowlers.
D) Make entry free for the children to create atmosphere( but i am not sure how many children would want to watch.
 
People watch test matches on tv especially nail biters but it is hard to watch 5 days in the stadium, it has always been that way in the past as well.
 
It depends a lot on the SC and specially India.

There is a possibility that India will get consistently better at tests and become a more all round team. Virat is pushing things in that direction.Even the arrival of video streaming apps has added a lot of new fans for tests.

That will keep people in India interested. But it won't survive as the premier format anymore. It'll be like [MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION] said, a well curated museum of artifacts, which people visit occasionally and kept up for nostalgic reasons.

Bangladesh beating Australia in a test will push the cases for more tests against bangladesh from the big teams. Their rise could compensate for revenue losses due to decline of both Sri Lanks and WI.

Pakistan I feel was even less test oriented than India since the 80's (for fans), so I don't know what could happen.

England has made tests some sort of elitist sport already, and Australia still draws strong crowds.

In a sense I feel India becoming stronger in tests over Odi's is actually going to do the test format a world of good.
 
Only KP's test cricket has died

Every test match I attended at Newlands was a sellout on the first day and near capacity full on the other days.

I don't think that KP ever visited Cape Town

 
Sorry I should clarify - usually for me "Indian" refers to the whole subcontinent.

Naaah ... certainly not when we take your past posting pattern into consideration.

The point is that equitable financial distributions mean that Arsenal v Stoke is competitive and compelling viewing in a way in which Barcelona v Ecija is not.

No idea about football situation ... don't really care how they operate.

I would add that there are too many results in modern Test cricket.

In ODI and T20 cricket the weaker team often wins - as Pakistan just showed. But Test cricket is best when the weaker team can scrap out a draw. There are nowhere near enough draws currently in Test cricket: in 1976 even England drew two of the Tests while the West Indies were slaughtering them.

Quite amazing that you say Results in Test matches as being detrimental. You need more draws .. Seriously ??? Testmatches have become so much more exciting because of positive batting (thanks to ODIs) which invariable produce results. If teams batted like Boycott and Tavare today test cricket will die a horrible death in no time.

And the worst thing is for all the praise you have for the 70s and 80s era you are yet to provide a proper technical explanation of why that style of cricket is sooo superior to the current style for which you have so much disdain. Last time you posted a clip from a super test and then promptly side stepped my questions to explain why the Cricket on display was of high quality.

And no ... weaker teams don't beat stronger teams in Test Cricket today. Its still a rare occurrence. Example SL are yet to win a test in India , Aus and they are hardly a weak team.
 
Test cricket on its last legs?

I’m really disappointed with Amir’s comment on cutting down playing Test Cricket. For me this is the best form of the game and this shouldn’t even be a consideration. Rules needs to be put in place to stop this now before it destroys the game further.

The coach should be able to pick the best 11 to represent the country at all times. If good enough for the test team you play, if you want to rest then don’t play through t20 leagues or have a roatation policy for the ODI/T20 series that follow the test series.

Test - Best 11 (if series is won then rotate last game)

World Events WC/CT - Best 11..!!

Any other series - I don’t really care unless it’s India

Thoughts?

Side note on Amir... I would consider dropping him anyway due to form or rather lack of, I think he is under pressure to perform hence looking for a way out. He needs to remember that he is representing the Country, the same country that supported him when no one else did so he needs to keep quiet and show some pride.
 
I have been hearing this ever since i started watching cricket and it is still here. So no, it is not on its last legs.
 
It wont ever die off completely contrary to what people say because of its historical significant to the game of cricket and the fact that without it, some of the key skills of cricket, the art of the defence and the art of setting batsmen up, would die.

NZ are showing us how it will be in future for the non Big 3 sides. Handful of Tests a year, a low key domestic FC comp which keeps the players playing between the LO and T20 stuff. Its not what it used to be but those days arent ever returning really. That doesnt mean Tests will ever be abandoned totally though either.

If Test matches obtain a genuine league system involving all teams playing one another I could definitely foresee some Test matches in future, provided they took place in a crunch league scenario, even becoming somewhat popular. In the current state they they'll just continue as they are on, on life support with little context or care.
 
I hope you’re right but I do think that if the main players of a team start giving it less importance then the standard of the game will fall... Test are enthralling because of the quality on display, sub standard tests filled with squad players is not the same
 
You can't force someone to play who doesn't want to, helps literally no one in the entire equation - not the fans, not the team, not the coach, not the player...
 
I have been hearing more like this from pak fans since India became no 1 and their team went below 6. Maybe it’s a coincidence. Situation currently is same as how it was 2 yrs ago. Why we are hearing these stuff more from pak fans only in last few months.
 
The number of three game series or higher will be drastically reduced in upcoming years. So yeah, we are witnessing the genuine death of this format..
 
I have been hearing more like this from pak fans since India became no 1 and their team went below 6. Maybe it’s a coincidence. Situation currently is same as how it was 2 yrs ago. Why we are hearing these stuff more from pak fans only in last few months.

Vaguely alarmist stuff from some people. India and other major sides like Aus and Eng have in fact started playing *more* Tests among each other. Earlier, India used to play 3 Test series against Eng and Aus; nowadays it's 4 or 5.

Lower ranked teams are struggling to organize more Tests, but that doesn't mean the game itself is at risk.
 
Back
Top