The only facts we have are the statements made by the KP information minister, posted by [MENTION=146141]Hermoine Green[/MENTION] above. These pour water over your claims:
•He was not a post matriculation drop out, as you continue to insinuate. Rather he was studying at grade 12 when an opportunity arose overseas which he took up.
I am not sure if you have trouble following this straightforward discourse or if you are feigning ignorance, but either way, I will repeat:
In the Pakistani education system, there is no worth/significance of grade 11 unless you complete grade 12. hence, a person who drops out of grade 12 has a Matric certification ONLY.
For argument’s sake, even if we accept the dumb grade 12 premise, he is still critically and hilariously under-qualified to be an education minister.
He has experience as a minister is a skilled individual with the required capabilities to run the institute in question.
Another empty statement that is not backed by a shred of evidence.
What skills does he have?
What required capabilities does he have?
Is he the only candidate who possesses these uniquely special skills and capabilities that candidates with higher degrees seemingly don’t?
What sets him apart from candidates with higher degrees and makes him the best candidate for the role?
Don’t most Pakistani institutions have highly educated individuals at the helm/in senior management (FBR, NAB, judiciary etc) what good are these guys doing aside from acting like a mafia to protect their personal and collective interests? An honest individual who is passionate and driven will provide real change as opposed to the aforementioned corrupted.
This is where you are wrong and this is where PTI members and cult-followers lose the script. Honesty does not compensate for incompetence, inexperience and inadequate qualifications. You can make the most pious man in the world your Finance Minister but if he doesn’t understand finance and economics he will have no clue what he is doing.
Just because qualified and competent people have not delivered in other departments because of corruption and other interests does not mean that you should not employ qualified and competent people.
A competent but corrupt person will still bring more value than an honest but incompetent and clueless person, simply because the latter has absolutely no credentials to do justice to the job.
Furthermore, are you implying that there are no honest candidates who have higher degrees? Is there a link between corruption and higher education?
Unless and until Ayub demonstrates his incompetence and/or dishonesty I have no issues with his selection for this position.
His incompetency is already clear by the fact that he is laughably under-qualified and he has no relevant experience of working in the education sector. Moreover, the justification provided by PTI so far is that his English is the best which is so ridiculous that it is not even funny.
His honesty/dishonesty is completely irrelevant because he has zero credentials for the job in the first place. As I stated above, honesty is good for nothing when you are not qualified to do a job and do not possess the relevant expertise.
If honesty was everything people would get jobs solely based on their character. They would not need to go to universities and get the necessary skills. Just be an honest person and everything will fall in place. Do you think the world works that way?
You have no issues with his selection because your first and immediate reaction is to believe that Imran Khan is always right, and in spite of the fact that you have not made a single sound argument in his favor, you are still clinging on to your original position because you cannot acknowledge that this is a completely idiotic appointment.
Imran Khan can kill a puppy in broad daylight and you will still defend him.