Man, 22, killed by his brothers for bringing chicken home in Bhopal

DeadlyVenom

Senior ODI Player
Joined
Jul 17, 2010
Runs
24,778
Post of the Week
1
Two brothers, under the influence of alcohol, strangled their own brother over a dispute about bringing chicken home in Indira Nagar in Bhopal's Bairagarh area. The crime, which occurred on November 9, took a sinister turn when the mother attempted to conceal the murder weapon - a rope used in the act.

The victim, identified as 22-year-old Anshul Yadav, reportedly had an argument with his elder brother Kuldeep and younger brother Aman.

According to Bairagarh police station officials, the three brothers were intoxicated when Anshul insisted on buying chicken for a party. Kuldeep and Aman, who were against bringing non-vegetarian food into the house, objected, leading to a heated argument. The dispute escalated, and in a fit of rage, the two brothers strangled Anshul with a rope.
After the incident, Kuldeep, Aman, and their mother Anita took Anshul to the hospital, claiming he had fallen unconscious upon returning home.

However, police grew suspicious after noticing rope marks on Anshul's neck.

When questioned, Anita initially tried to mislead the investigators, claiming Anshul lost consciousness after coming back from outside. It was later discovered that Anita had hidden the rope to protect her sons.

"The argument about non-veg food escalated to the point where Kuldeep and Aman killed their brother in a drunken state. The mother has also been made an accused for attempting to hide the crime," Bairagarh police station in-charge Kamaljeet Randhawa said.

The family hails from Kheri in Vidisha district, where they own farmland.

Anshul and his brothers worked at a shop in Bairagarh.

The market was closed on the day of the incident, which is why Anshul was adamant about hosting a party at home.



Listen to the latest songs, only on JioSaavn.com


According to the police, the three brothers frequently fought, often fueled by their addiction to alcohol and drugs.

Post a commentThe police have arrested the two brothers and filed a case against them and their mother for hiding evidence and culpable homicide.




A very sad tale but most sad is how the mother act this way too. One chicken caused a family to fall apart.
 
First over cows, now chickens.

The only country in the world where animals have more rights than humans.

Totally lost the plot

The west will also be happy with indias they love animals over humans too

That's why in the UK you will have people sleeping on the streets even ex soldiers in shop doorways but dogs will be In warm kennels run by charities and take millions in donations .
 
Totally lost the plot

The west will also be happy with indias they love animals over humans too

That's why in the UK you will have people sleeping on the streets even ex soldiers in shop doorways but dogs will be In warm kennels run by charities and take millions in donations .
People sleep on the streets of USA and Europe too, and it's not because of the love for animals, but yes, in the UK, a Dog is considered man's best friend.
 
Sad news.

Although I'm curious. What happens to the family now in terms in terms of a legal proceedings? Cause family is the one that killed him so can they forgive themselves legally?
 
Totally lost the plot

The west will also be happy with indias they love animals over humans too

That's why in the UK you will have people sleeping on the streets even ex soldiers in shop doorways but dogs will be In warm kennels run by charities and take millions in donations .

In most Western countries, it is often, if not always, the case that a dog is put down whenever it bites a human.

It seems you never understood the plot.
 
Sad news.

Although I'm curious. What happens to the family now in terms in terms of a legal proceedings? Cause family is the one that killed him so can they forgive themselves legally?
In India there is no forgiveness concept in legal matters. It's only an Islamic concept I believe. Since it's not cold blooded murder but alcohol effect, they may get 7 to 10 years of imprisonment
 
Chicken is an excuse. The brothers had other things going on for sure. Should be investigated for property disputes.

Yadavs are meat eaters. At least the ones I know are heavy non veg eaters. Some may not cook meat at home. That does not mean they are vegetarian.
 
Disagreements are the cost of an open society or one can simply root out dissenting or free thoughts by making little 3 years rot memorize 1400 year old texts even before they develop their capacity to think and question on their own.
 
Sad news.

Although I'm curious. What happens to the family now in terms in terms of a legal proceedings? Cause family is the one that killed him so can they forgive themselves legally?

No.
If the murder is proven they will be prosecuted and will spend the rest of their life in jail.
 
In India there is no forgiveness concept in legal matters. It's only an Islamic concept I believe. Since it's not cold blooded murder but alcohol effect, they may get 7 to 10 years of imprisonment

I doubt even cheapest alcohol can bring this out in people. There may be other reasons. This seems like a cover.
 
I doubt even cheapest alcohol can bring this out in people. There may be other reasons. This seems like a cover.
But issue will be to find out the motive and pre planned coordination/efforts. If the victim was a bad guy, police may not press strongly. As the mom herself sided with murderer's no one will know I think as no money/ women involved
 
But issue will be to find out the motive and pre planned coordination/efforts. If the victim was a bad guy, police may not press strongly. As the mom herself sided with murderer's no one will know I think as no money/ women involved

My guess is that the murderers made a plan to drink alcohol and probably made him drink a lot more so that they could finish him off. The chicken excuse is just to make a fool of the police.
 
My guess is that the murderers made a plan to drink alcohol and probably made him drink a lot more so that they could finish him off. The chicken excuse is just to make a fool of the police.
Yeah bhai that's perfectly logical and fact too.but to prove it's not alcohol effect is difficult as the defence lawyer will say its moment of anger and chickened out later
 
This is why i am always keeping a close eye on my drinking companions, always wait till the other members have had a sip of the alcohol first before i do, avoid being close to cliffs and terraces etc , and never sit on the front seats after too many drinks. You never know when a killer attack might come from behind. Always staying a couple of steps ahead of my potential killers. Thanks to watching a lot of mob mafia movies, i have developed effective defensive psychology.
 
My guess is that the murderers made a plan to drink alcohol and probably made him drink a lot more so that they could finish him off. The chicken excuse is just to make a fool of the police.
They should have tried a better excuse and claimed that victim wanted to order beef. That would have set cat among the pigeons on the internet forums. Alas, we get a chicken story instead of beef.
 
They should have tried a better excuse and claimed that victim wanted to order beef. That would have set cat among the pigeons on the internet forums. Alas, we get a chicken story instead of beef.
Some homes in that state got razed to the ground for having beef in the fridges so they wouldn't want to go far down that route.
 
Some homes in that state got razed to the ground for having beef in the fridges so they wouldn't want to go far down that route.
They would have got the automatic backing of the RSS cow vigilante brigade and hailed as the Champions of Hinduism who were willing to kill their own brother. Similar to what we get with blasphemy cases in Pakistan. These drunk druggies were not smart enough to pull this off.
 
In India there is no forgiveness concept in legal matters. It's only an Islamic concept I believe. Since it's not cold blooded murder but alcohol effect, they may get 7 to 10 years of imprisonment
What? There should be even more severe sentence when there is alcohol involved.
 
What? There should be even more severe sentence when there is alcohol involved.
Normally it's less for moment of anger crimes than cold blooded ones.so defence lawyer will argue alcohol had acted as catalyst .Pak may have different constitution when alcohol is involved as its an Islamic country. But india have inherited British constitution in the matters if alchohol(due to its muti religion) is involved.
 
In India there is no forgiveness concept in legal matters. It's only an Islamic concept I believe. Since it's not cold blooded murder but alcohol effect, they may get 7 to 10 years of imprisonment

So in India killing someone while being drunk gives you a reduced sentence? :sachin
 
I was expecting BJP lunatics to defend this. LOL.

Senseless murder. Killer should get maximum punishment.
 
I doubt even cheapest alcohol can bring this out in people. There may be other reasons. This seems like a cover.
Since it involves killing by one's own siblings, the issue is most likely something related to property or inheritance. India is possibly the biggest consumer of chicken in the world. It is not taboo by any means
 
Since it involves killing by one's own siblings, the issue is most likely something related to property or inheritance. India is possibly the biggest consumer of chicken in the world. It is not taboo by any means

Hindus are allowed chicken in the open? I cant imagine 200 million Muslims eating so much chicken.
 
This is why i am always keeping a close eye on my drinking companions, always wait till the other members have had a sip of the alcohol first before i do, avoid being close to cliffs and terraces etc , and never sit on the front seats after too many drinks. You never know when a killer attack might come from behind. Always staying a couple of steps ahead of my potential killers. Thanks to watching a lot of mob mafia movies, i have developed effective defensive psychology.
Aren’t your drinking companions just as "kattar Sanatani" as you, or do they only worship the bottle? :inti
 
Those two brothers could easily escape this case by simply claiming that the brother they killed brought beef into the house, and as "kattar Sanatanis," they were saving Hindus from an "evil" sibling. The media would paint them as heroes, Modi might hand them a Bharat Ratna, and the 'andhbhakts' would elevate them to the status of new gods. :inti
 
RIP!

Some strange people exist in this world. By the way, anyone who brings chicken for free to my house would receive plenty of blessings from me. In fact I'd invite him everyday.
 
Hindus are allowed chicken in the open? I cant imagine 200 million Muslims eating so much chicken.
Most Indians, irrespective of religion, are actually non-vegetarian. The non-vegetarian hindus avoid only beef, but even that is consumed in some hindu communities.

The strict vegetarians who don't consume even egg are only about 25% of Indias' population now.
 
Most Indians, irrespective of religion, are actually non-vegetarian. The non-vegetarian hindus avoid only beef, but even that is consumed in some hindu communities.

The strict vegetarians who don't consume even egg are only about 25% of Indias' population now.

So, why is there so much fuss about meat? Hypocrisy or India has too many extremist Hindus now?
 
Why do some people in India act like it’s rare for discrimination, violence, or even lynching to target Muslims and meat eaters?


The incident mentioned here might be unique and may not really be about chicken or meat. But the fact that the murderer tried to justify his actions by saying it was because “chicken and meat” were brought into the house is telling. It shows he believed this excuse could somehow make his actions acceptable. This reflects a larger issue in India, where discrimination and religious superiority often play into such incidents.
 
Most Indians, irrespective of religion, are actually non-vegetarian. The non-vegetarian hindus avoid only beef, but even that is consumed in some hindu communities.

The strict vegetarians who don't consume even egg are only about 25% of Indias' population now.
Its hilarious as well as shocking for Indians to know that people like KKWC think that all Indians are vegetarians and they cannot eat chicken in open. :facepalm

Just because beef is banned they think no other meat is allowed :vk2
 
So, why is there so much fuss about meat? Hypocrisy or India has too many extremist Hindus now?
There is no fuss about meat.

Meat is avoided in temples(though some do animal sacrifice and consume its meat) in villages. Certain Castes like Brahmins and religions like Jains and certain sects of Hinduism avoid meat. Majority of Indians are meat eaters and chicken is the main source of protein when it comes to meat.

Only beef is banned because it is considered sacred and cows and bulls have elevated status in Hindu religion. A cow is given mother status because its milk is think enough even for infants and toddlers to digest.

Dog meat is consumed in all of Asia. But it is banned in most western nations. Why? Because Dogs are considered part of human families. They have an elevated status. Whether they are revered or not, it does not matter. But their meat is banned.
Try eating the dog of an American and see how he reacts.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why do some people in India act like it’s rare for discrimination, violence, or even lynching to target Muslims and meat eaters?


The incident mentioned here might be unique and may not really be about chicken or meat. But the fact that the murderer tried to justify his actions by saying it was because “chicken and meat” were brought into the house is telling. It shows he believed this excuse could somehow make his actions acceptable. This reflects a larger issue in India, where discrimination and religious superiority often play into such incidents.
They would have got the automatic backing of the RSS cow vigilante brigade and hailed as the Champions of Hinduism who were willing to kill their own brother. Similar to what we get with blasphemy cases in Pakistan. These drunk druggies were not smart enough to pull this off.

People are so predictable.

So a "supposed chicken lover", alcoholic druggie Hindu victim earns more sympathies on a Pakistani forum than fellow Pakistanis killed in a brutal terror attack in Balochistan. Why?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Its lovely watching amateurish take on common law thats followed around the world. :ROFLMAO:
Please enlighten us oh wise Legal luminary, what is done in other countries?

in the UK you do not get a discount on jail time because you've drank Indian daru like an Indian elephant. Hope thats easy enough to understand.
 
There is no fuss about meat.

Meat is avoided in temples(though some do animal sacrifice and consume its meat) in villages. Certain Castes like Brahmins and religions like Jains and certain sects of Hinduism avoid meat. Majority of Indians are meat eaters and chicken is the main source of protein when it comes to meat.

Only beef is banned because it is considered sacred and cows and bulls have elevated status in Hindu religion. A cow is given mother status because its milk is think enough even for infants and toddlers to digest.

Dog meat is consumed in all of Asia. But it is banned in most western nations. Why? Because Dogs are considered part of human families. They have an elevated status. Whether they are revered or not, it does not matter. But their meat is banned.
Try eating the dog of an American and see how he reacts.

Leave Islam out of this thread , esp as you are clueless as with most subjects.

What meat do you eat?
 
Leave Islam out of this thread , esp as you are clueless as with most subjects.

What meat do you eat?
Feelings are mutual.

At least I provide references. Your criticism of Hinduism & beef provides no evidence. You just make sweeping statements. :rolleyes:
 
Feelings are mutual.

At least I provide references. Your criticism of Hinduism & beef provides no evidence. You just make sweeping statements. :rolleyes:

I criticise Hindu extremists. Sure

But im interested in your personal experience as daily strong supporter of RSS. What meat do you eat and why not others?
 
Most Indians, irrespective of religion, are actually non-vegetarian. The non-vegetarian hindus avoid only beef, but even that is consumed in some hindu communities.

The strict vegetarians who don't consume even egg are only about 25% of Indias' population now.

Why has vegetarian diet declined so much? is it because Hindus no longer believe animal consumption is sinful now?
 
Don't forget the complaint to #10 Downing Street!

When Hindus themselves cannot agree to even the basics - then what chance to other have!

Exactly my point. They cant even agree on what to eat, let alone what their faith is.

Go to answer.. Hinduism or Dharma is whatever you want to be . But if a 10 year old is eating a cheeseburger, all hell breaks loose. . Oh they dont believe in hell or do they?
 
Vesay I must say it's great that our Indian friends are always quick to add context or provide clarification that a crime commited by Hindus in the name of religion are never really in the name of religion but just misreported.
 
It's same in most countries. Cold blooded and calculated murder while always get sentenced more than drunk.

Not in the UK. Its pretty stupid as it allows people to drink and kill knowing they may get away it or do a holiday for a few years.
 
There is no fuss about meat.

Meat is avoided in temples(though some do animal sacrifice and consume its meat) in villages. Certain Castes like Brahmins and religions like Jains and certain sects of Hinduism avoid meat. Majority of Indians are meat eaters and chicken is the main source of protein when it comes to meat.

Only beef is banned because it is considered sacred and cows and bulls have elevated status in Hindu religion. A cow is given mother status because its milk is think enough even for infants and toddlers to digest.

Dog meat is consumed in all of Asia. But it is banned in most western nations. Why? Because Dogs are considered part of human families. They have an elevated status. Whether they are revered or not, it does not matter. But their meat is banned.
Try eating the dog of an American and see how he reacts.

You say there is no fuss about meat, but I remember Shabana Azmi was quoted in an article that even film stars weren't allowed to rent or buy accomodation in some sections of Mumbai if they were Muslim. If I recall correctly, @cricketjoshila defended this by declaring Hindu vegetarians didn't want the air polluted by the smell of meat cooking.

So I would say it is still quite a contentious topic if there are tacit agreements not to sell to Muslim buyers in a property market in suce a major city of India.
 
I criticise Hindu extremists. Sure

But im interested in your personal experience as daily strong supporter of RSS. What meat do you eat and why not others?
About my diet, I eat Chicken and Fish on a 3-4 times a week. I avoid red meat. Hence Beef and Pork are off my menu.

My wife is a practicing Hindu and she follows the same diet as me. My kids eat Hot dogs, peperoni Pizza and cheese burgers. I did not put any diet restrictions on them yet. However, I tell them to avoid red meat as much as possible. My kids are Americans and they will follow the culture of the West.
 
Why has vegetarian diet declined so much? is it because Hindus no longer believe animal consumption is sinful now?
The notion that Hindus are primarily vegetarian is completely incorrect. Only some higher caste Hindus like Brahmins are traditionally vegetarian, and these account for barely 10% of the Hindu population. Most mid- and lower caste Hindus, who form the majority of Indians, have always consumed meat although there are some communities among these that are purely vegetarian as well. Even Brahmins in some part of India like Bengal and Orissa eat fish.There are also several hindu communities who sacrifice animals in temples and eat the meat as God's offering (Prasad).
India has never been a predominantly vegetarian country, even if it has had the largest population of vegetarians in the world.

However, there are some rules that are based in the Hindu religion that are followed by most Hindus across caste lines. For example, eating beef is frowned upon and non-vegetarian food is avoided during religious festivals. But there are exceptions to these as well.

Hinduism is a very complex and diverse religion with numerous communities and castes, all following different rules. It is not a monolithic or homogeneous entity.

These days many younger Hindus, even from traditionally vegetarian families, are taking to eating meat and chicken as they have become conscious of the need to put more protein into their bodies. Many parents are encouraging this too.

And alongside these meat eating Hindus, we have always had the hard core vegetarian ones who will kick up a row if any non-vegetarian food is brought or consumed in front of them. It is these types who complained about meat dishes that were allegedly served in the Diwali party in 10 Downing street, for instance.
 
That is why Alcohol is not good. People under the influence of alcohol have done various bad things.
People have killed when stone cold sober too.

This is not about alcohol, this is about the Indian psyche, a psyche that does not value human life - irrespective of religion.
 
? Im asking if its correct, in India you get a reduced sentence for murder if you are intoxicated? I dont know
I think any where in the world (where alchohol/ drugs /weed usage is permitted in the country) it's the case. any crime committed in a spur of moment will cost you less than the cold blooded ones.so excess use of alcohol/drugs/weed is one of the reasons to create a unstable mind momentarily .so in that exact uncontrolled state, if someone commits a crime and hands himself to the police voluntarily .There after that attacker should show remorse for his action immediately as soon as he got his consciousness/stable mind back and display history of no enmity with the victim for any kind of less punishment. It's a complicated stuff to show an attack as genuine mistake as police and courts are normally unforgiving, so it's a difficult task for anyone to get away but provision is there.its a Hitchcock kind of stuff to get away like that
 
Last edited by a moderator:
People are so predictable.

So a "supposed chicken lover", alcoholic druggie Hindu victim earns more sympathies on a Pakistani forum than fellow Pakistanis killed in a brutal terror attack in Balochistan. Why?
No one is defending the terrorist for terrorism on that thread nor no one was trying to find any excuse for the religious extremist.

Since you all pretend to not care about Pak and their opinion then why does it matter?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
People are so predictable.

So a "supposed chicken lover", alcoholic druggie Hindu victim earns more sympathies on a Pakistani forum than fellow Pakistanis killed in a brutal terror attack in Balochistan. Why?
You don't have sympathy with that guy does not mean that the whole world has to be blind.

these drunk Indians are so pathetic that they can kill for 1 chicken??? that was not even beef bruh. How pathetic and shameful incident is that?

It is not about India Pakistan so no point in making it one.
 
Poor brother, probably a family feud, happened over Parking spot too in Delhi.

Anyhow seems like a drunk chicken family beef in India is really triggering for everyone on this forum.
 
First over cows, now chickens.

The only country in the world where animals have more rights than humans.
You don't have sympathy with that guy does not mean that the whole world has to be blind.

these drunk Indians are so pathetic that they can kill for 1 chicken??? that was not even beef bruh. How pathetic and shameful incident is that?

It is not about India Pakistan so no point in making it one.
For your kind reference please, this was the first comment in this thread followed by a series of comments in the similar vein. 🙏
 
The notion that Hindus are primarily vegetarian is completely incorrect. Only some higher caste Hindus like Brahmins are traditionally vegetarian, and these account for barely 10% of the Hindu population. Most mid- and lower caste Hindus, who form the majority of Indians, have always consumed meat although there are some communities among these that are purely vegetarian as well. Even Brahmins in some part of India like Bengal and Orissa eat fish.There are also several hindu communities who sacrifice animals in temples and eat the meat as God's offering (Prasad).
India has never been a predominantly vegetarian country, even if it has had the largest population of vegetarians in the world.

However, there are some rules that are based in the Hindu religion that are followed by most Hindus across caste lines. For example, eating beef is frowned upon and non-vegetarian food is avoided during religious festivals. But there are exceptions to these as well.

Hinduism is a very complex and diverse religion with numerous communities and castes, all following different rules. It is not a monolithic or homogeneous entity.

These days many younger Hindus, even from traditionally vegetarian families, are taking to eating meat and chicken as they have become conscious of the need to put more protein into their bodies. Many parents are encouraging this too.

And alongside these meat eating Hindus, we have always had the hard core vegetarian ones who will kick up a row if any non-vegetarian food is brought or consumed in front of them. It is these types who complained about meat dishes that were allegedly served in the Diwali party in 10 Downing street, for instance.

I think that makes more sense, I was unaware that different diet restrictions applied according to caste status, probably outside of India that is not common knowledge. This also somewhat negates the arguments that caste is a vocation and not a status which has been made by the likes of @Champ_Pal but of course he is not a practising Hindu and so his views should probably be taken less seriously on these issues.
 
I love how everyone has better explanation for the motives of the murderers than the murderers themselves :ROFLMAO:

I hope the killers didn't pay for lawyers. They could have got a whole legal defence for free here.
 
For your kind reference please, this was the first comment in this thread followed by a series of comments in the similar vein. 🙏
That’s usually the case with US puppets, they have an identity crisis.
Thanks a lot for the compliments! Coming from an East Pakistani, it means a lot to me. What gets on my nerve is a society that the world is sick and tired of, someone that has bought nothing but pain, misery and sufferings for the world, have the nerve to mock my country for no reason other than their hate. When in fact their own country is the butt of jokes in the world surviving on handouts and bailouts.

If you have a problem with my posts, why don't you first advise someone of the esteemed Pakistani posters spreading hate for us in the first place which gets on my nerve and makes me post equally insensitive things? None of us would say a word about Pakistan and Muslims if the same courtesy is shown for us.​
Some posters spread anti-american propaganda 24 7 and surely use an American phone or comp or operating system to spew hatred against them.

And not even constructive criticism lol, random posts.
 
That’s usually the case with US puppets, they have an identity crisis.

Some posters spread anti-american propaganda 24 7 and surely use an American phone or comp or operating system to spew hatred against them.

And not even constructive criticism lol, random posts.
:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: Kya sahi pakda aapne!
 
People have killed when stone cold sober too.

This is not about alcohol, this is about the Indian psyche, a psyche that does not value human life - irrespective of religion.
People are not allowed to drive when drunk , do you know the reason? Even in modern day progressive countries.
 
People are not allowed to drive when drunk , do you know the reason? Even in modern day progressive countries.
What are you on about?

Everyone knows why people are not allowed to drink and drive, I was just saying alcohol is not always the cause of crime in this case murder.

Poverty, anger, desperation, and even hunger and religious hatred are enough to commit murders.
 
What are you on about?

Everyone knows why people are not allowed to drink and drive, I was just saying alcohol is not always the cause of crime in this case murder.

Poverty, anger, desperation, and even hunger and religious hatred are enough to commit murders.
Did you read my initial comment ? I said under the influence of alcohol people have done bad things. I no where said that only alcohol is responsible for all crimes. At least accept the fact that Islam prohibiting alcohol does good for the society.
 
Back
Top