What's new

"Mohammad Amir hasn't found any decent support from the other end" : Mohammad Asif

giri26

T20I Debutant
Joined
Apr 1, 2009
Runs
8,440
Post of the Week
1
Pakistan will be looking to finally register a win on their so-far dismal tour of New Zealand as they go into the second T20I against the Black Caps on the back of six consecutive defeats.

Five defeats in the ODI series were followed by a similarly one-sided seven-wicket loss in the opening T20I game, with the batsmen especially to blame.

Former Pakistan pacer Muhammad Asif, though, believes the bowlers also need to up the ante; especially improving the way they work in pairs.

Munro, Southee star as New Zealand thrash Pakistan in first T20I

“A bowler is usually only successful when he is being supported from the other end,” he said. “The combination of bowlers and the understanding between partners is really important for any bowler to succeed in difficult conditions, and Pakistan have not able to get that right.”

Asif believes his former new-ball partner Muhammad Aamir is being let down by those who are bowling from the other end.

“Aamir has the potential to take wickets and he impressed during the last year,” said Asif. “However, he hasn’t been among the wickets here because he hasn’t found any decent support from the other end.
Batsmen blamed once again for Pakistan’s failures

The 35-year-old right-arm pacer said the key is to ensure that the bowlers know their roles and that if one bowler is unable to take wickets from one end but is restricting runs then the other bowler should either do the same or take wickets, otherwise it will just undermine the work done by the first bowler.

“Amir is a key bowler but he is unable to perform well these days,” said Asif. “The bowlers should combine in such a way that ideally if there is a left-arm pacer from one end then a right-armer should be operating from the other end; especially if they both operate with the same level of aggression. If they do that then they will eventually be able to take wickets. If they get the bowling combinations right in the second T20I then they can win it.”

Batting to blame, says Sallu

Former Pakistan chief selector Salahuddin Sallu, on the other hand, believes the batsmen are to blame for the failures of the team.

“If the batsmen are unable to put up a good total then all the pressure shifts onto the bowlers to restrict runs and take wickets at the same time,” said Sallu. “That leads to mistakes and poor balls since the bowlers don’t have much margin of error. The batsmen need to put up a good total or chase down whatever they are set if Pakistan are to have any success in the upcoming two games.”

The 70-year-old urged the batsmen to ensure that there is no batting collapse. “The problem with the Pakistani batsmen is that they lose wickets one after the other,” he said. “If New Zealand claim one wicket then they are usually able to take two or three more soon after. This not only lifts up the bowling team but also hampers the entire batting effort. At least one batsman needs to anchor the innings and the other batsmen need to play around him.”

https://tribune.com.pk/story/1616963/7-asif-urges-bowlers-provide-amir-support/
 
Last edited:
Just goes to show how important Junaid when both of them were playing in the CT. Yet we have boneheaded fans who can't fathom this simple concept
 
Amir is the one who should be providing support to the other bowlers.
 
Why is it always about Amir? Is not Amir’s job to give support too?
 
Is Asif currently the best right arm medium pacer in Pakistan?

Pretty sure he's just medium now (a'la Ganguly and Chris Harris), not a medium pacer (Pollock, McGrath). His effort balls were barely touching 130-132 eight years ago.
 
Even though Amir doesn't get wickets but he does his job by keeping one end tight. Its the other end which is the problem. The other end should either pick up wickets or keep their end tight too...
 
Amir needs to be our strike bowler. He needs to be the attacker. We need a bowler on the other end to be the economical one. Junaid does work well with Amir. Rumman was expected of this role but alas didn't happen. Hasan Ali is also a strike bowler and comes in when during the middle overs of the game(ODI). Faheem showed what he can do but he's quite inconsisent.
 
Amir in ODI - 26th rank
Amir in Test - 43rd rank

Threads after Threads comes on Amir as if he is a gun bowler in any format. He has been playing for enough time now to stop hyping. Actual consistent performance is needed to go with hype.
 
Amir in ODI - 26th rank
Amir in Test - 43rd rank

Threads after Threads comes on Amir as if he is a gun bowler in any format. He has been playing for enough time now to stop hyping. Actual consistent performance is needed to go with hype.

Exactly. People still giving him a free ride though.
 
Exactly. People still giving him a free ride though.

Don't get me wrong. He is a decent bowler, but too much focus and energy is spent on Amir and he hasn't really done anything. PPers started calculating his hypothetical average if catches were taken and all that sometime back. If he swung ball 2-3 times in a match then suddenly many PPers started praising him as if it's something unique. Giving credit to win defending 340 in finals took the cake in my opinion. He bowled well, but match was won by batsmen.

These are all example of hyping a bowler and then coming up with narrative to defend him.

Now not having support is a bunch of non-sense. Amir simply doesn't pitch it up to pick up wickets. Even when he got green pitch in NZ in test series, he still bowled defensive.

No need to criticize him too much and no need to praise him too much. Criticism usually comes due to so many PPers hyping him. He is a decent bowler, nothing more and nothing less. He should be treated as any regular bowler and that will probably even help Amir in the long term.
 
Last edited:
Don't get me wrong. He is a decent bowler, but too much focus and energy is spent on Amir and he hasn't really done anything. PPers started calculating his hypothetical average if catches were taken and all that sometime back. If he swung ball 2-3 times in a match then suddenly many PPers started praising him as if it's something unique. Giving credit to win defending 340 in finals took the cake in my opinion. He bowled well, but match was won by batsmen.

These are all example of hyping a bowler and then coming up with narrative to defend him.

Now not having support is a bunch of non-sense. Amir simply doesn't pitch it up to pick up wickets. Even when he got green pitch in NZ in test series, he still bowled defensive.

No need to criticize him too much and no need to praise him too much. Criticism usually comes due to so many PPers hyping him. He is a decent bowler, nothing more and nothing less. He should be treated as any regular bowler and that will probably even help Amir in the long term.

He's decent, but decent won't win games. I'd rather try out a youngster like Shaheen Shah or any other young domestic bowler who'll at least view his position in the team as a privilege, not a right.
 
He's decent, but decent won't win games. I'd rather try out a youngster like Shaheen Shah or any other young domestic bowler who'll at least view his position in the team as a privilege, not a right.

Competition will be also good for Amir.
 
Back
Top