CricketCartoons
Senior T20I Player
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2014
- Runs
- 17,584
It flatters Muralitharan to even be compared to Warne.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you are in an average team, you still have to be mighty good to be taking 800 bloody test wickets at 20 odd runs. If the absence of good bowlers could help people taking more wickets, the likes of Mushfiqur Raheem and Raymond Price would have been the record holders. lol
How about giving same percentage of matches to both players? Warne's numbers are inflated by playing against Eng, SAF and NZ. Murali has better away averages than Warne against them. If he played them as regularrly as Warne, his away stats would have been even better.Also, why shouldn't the stats of minnows be taken out? It is quite obvious that is a sad attempt to justify Murali racking up the wickets against them and thus lowering his average to what is an amazing 22 but in actuality close to 24.5 (still amazing by the way but not as great as 22)
Minnows are ruining test cricket with their appearances in it and padding a good number of people's statistics. They should definitely be removed or at least heavily discounted (exceptions can be made for "matchwinning performances" a la Inzi in his 138* against BD though I wouldn't mind removing that as well) in any sort of intellectual debate on cricket where statistics are coming into play.
Anyways, my opinions may never be validated by cricketing commissions unwilling to take real action but the point is that Warne is the superior spinner to me. He could have used every type of delivery yet was amazing even with just his stock delivery. He showed that you don't need to necessarily bowl mystery deliveries like Murali to get wickets but instead just fool batsmen in the flight, trajectory, and changes of pace to get wickets. A truly brilliant bowler.
What seals it for me though is the percentage of away wickets for the respective bowlers.
Murali:
298 of Murali's 783 wickets are away from home. His average rises from inhuman 22 to a good but not great 26.65 away from home (this is including BD and ZIM just to "make it fair" for the posters who have complained about it. His average, in fact, rises to an even more ordinary 27.41 excluding BD and ZIM away from home)
Warne:
362 of 708 wickets are away from home. His average stays basically the same as his career average with 25.50. This is, of course, including his aberration that is India which makes it all the more amazing. In fact, it only gets better if you remove his visits to Bangladesh and Zimbabwe which makes his average go to an amazing 24.56 away from home!
Conclusion:
Murali clearly enjoys the tailor made wickets for spin at home which afford him his incredible home record. When only 38% (in about half your career matches being away as well) of your wickets are taken abroad you definitely are not something special. Murali chucks and has an unfair advantage (without a doubt in my opinion) yet is still nothing compared to warne away from home
Warne 9 times out of 10...mainly because of his mental strength. I am not saying Murli didn't possess that but Warne have won multiple battles by just playing with batsman's mindset.
Only one of them is a bowler. So no comparison really.
Warne. I would take the best ever leg spinner any day over best ever finger spinner