Your self-constructed metrics to judge a captain cannot be universally accepted. Imran Khan with a Mickey Mouse tally of 14 Test wins does not deserve to be mentioned in the same vein as Kohli.
History will remember Kohli as the Test captain with most Test wins in history, while Imran has less Test wins than Misbah.
Sports is all about winning and not drawing matches.
As far as losing is concerned, Kohli loses matches at the same rate as Imran in a result oriented era.
You’re sounding like an American. They consume their sports in an “only winning counts” way, which is why the North American Soccer League had shootouts from 25 yards out to “settle” drawn matches.
Cricket is a sport of British origin, and a very large part of what Test cricket is is about turning a probable defeat into a brave draw - like Khawaja and Paine did in one Test v Pakistan last year. I don’t remember who won the next Test for Pakistan - I only remember Khawaja and Paine saving that one.
Sports of British origin value draws as an important part of eventual victory. It’s why Away Goals count double the in the UEFA Champions League: if you lose 1-0 at home but win 2-1 in the away leg you prevail.
I can’t emphasise strongly enough the following results of 3 consecutive 1980’s series against the West Indies:
Australia: Lost 3-1, Lost 3-0, Lost 3-1.
England: Lost 5-0, Lost 5-0, Lost 4-0.
Pakistan: Drew 1-1, Drew 1-1, Drew 1-1.
Pakistan went unbeaten against Greenidge, Haynes, Richards, Richardson, Dujon, Marshall, Ambrose, Walsh.
India’s claim to fame is winning an away series against a Test team featuring a batting order of Harris, Finch, S Marsh, Khawaja, Handscomb, Head and M Marsh.
Is that something to boast about?
No Smith.
No Warner.
A youthful Labuschagne played 1 Test, and topped the batting averages by scoring 38 runs.