What's new

New Zealand v Pakistan | 1st ODI | Wellington | Jan 25, 2016 | New Zealand innings

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wow what a pathetic show. Wahab and anwar terrible stuff

Sent from my 0PM92 using Tapatalk
 
Elliot might end up getting a 5 fer today. If Henry can score 48 (30), Eliiot is better with ball & he is likely to bowl 10 overs. Hope Mac is fine, my hunch is hair-line fracture in eyebrow.
 
98/6 to 280... This is epic phanti!!! - Aik Amir Kaya Kaya karay gha :(
 
bad bowling performance but that has less to do with lack of talent than just having a bad day
 
Wahab has gone into Pre 2014 comeback mode. When he was the most expensive bowler of all time vs SA in 2013.
 
Lol you're not making sense kiddo. You clearly didn't watch the match. Of course Wahab bowled bad but we wouldn't be in that position had we pressured NZ when we were on top at 99/6.

So Wahab can bowl rubbish because Azhar made some reta rded decisions earlier? Brilliant logic.
 
Lol you're not making sense kiddo. You clearly didn't watch the match. Of course Wahab bowled bad but we wouldn't be in that position had we pressured NZ when we were on top at 99/6.

Irfan was done with 8 overs. Amir done with 8 overs. Wahab and Anwar both bowled 5. Even the commentators said its a worry who would AA bowl from 28 to 40 overs.
 
Hafeez needs to make up for that drop of Nicholls.

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
 
So Wahab can bowl rubbish because Azhar made some ******** decisions earlier? Brilliant logic.
Dude when did I excuse Wahab? I said we wouldn't be in this position had Azhar bowled the pacers when we were on top. Now off you go, don't wanna waste my time.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Worst part is, I picked almost all the batsman that New Zealand had ....

Everyone failed except Santner and Nichols.

Way to go NZ ....
 
Irfan was done with 8 overs. Amir done with 8 overs. Wahab and Anwar both bowled 5. Even the commentators said its a worry who would AA bowl from 28 to 40 overs.

One wicket would've collapsed NZ, they were under a lot of pressure and had no momentum which Azhar's brainless captaincy gave them.
 
Poor captaincy and as always brainless bowling from Wahab and Anwar "Allrounder" Ali will cost us this match. The last 5 overs went for about 70+ which is absolutely pathetic. Please ignore Anwar "mein khelta rahunga" Ali's 3 wickets (2 were off inside edges) and send him back to domestic cricket FOREVER.
 
Irfan was done with 8 overs. Amir done with 8 overs. Wahab and Anwar both bowled 5. Even the commentators said its a worry who would AA bowl from 28 to 40 overs.

Seeing how Irfan picked up a wicket off of his first over back, NZ wouldn't have gone past 40 overs had the pacers been persisted with.
 
I'm pretty happy with the surprisingly big total.

It exposes Azhar Ali's unimaginative captaincy and also means that the top order will be seen to either succeed or fail. A target of 150 would have provided no real test.
 
Dude when did I excuse Wahab? I said we wouldn't be in this position had Azhar bowled the pacers when we were on top. Now off you go, don't wanna waste my time with a dumbass.

You didn't criticise him either. Getting bashed (bowling filth) by a #9 and #10 isn't worthy of severe criticism? Gotcha, your criticism is based on how much you like or dislike a certain player.
 
One wicket would've collapsed NZ, they were under a lot of pressure and had no momentum which Azhar's brainless captaincy gave them.

I don't think that was his fault... He knew Imad and Anwar cannot bowl in death, as you can see... He could not finish off Amir and Irfan at that point...
 
One wicket would've collapsed NZ, they were under a lot of pressure and had no momentum which Azhar's brainless captaincy gave them.

I disagree. We are looking in hindsight. Azhar used fast bowlers as long as her could. Then turned to spin in the middle overs. Its another thing the spinners couldn't contain. We had them 193-7 at 40. Then Amir got injured. Not azhars fault tbh.. A team that bats that deep, 220 would've been good had we stopped them there. But our bowlers bowled poorly at the end,
 
Lol you're not making sense kiddo. You clearly didn't watch the match. Of course Wahab bowled bad but we wouldn't be in that position had we pressured NZ when we were on top at 99/6.
You should have bowled out Amir, Anwar, Irfan and Wahab then and there. It would have been very unlikely Nicolls and Santner would have survived till the 35th if you did.
 
I disagree. We are looking in hindsight. Azhar used fast bowlers as long as her could. Then turned to spin in the middle overs. Its another thing the spinners couldn't contain. We had them 193-7 at 40. Then Amir got injured. Not his fault tbh.. A team that bats that deep, 220 would've been good had we stopped them there. But our bowlers bowled poorly at the end,

It was definitely his fault. You can make all the excuses.
 
When you bowl like Street bowlers, what can the captain do ---- Wahab & Anwar tried to bully NZ tailenders and got phantified.
 
You should have bowled out Amir, Anwar, Irfan and Wahab then and there. It would have been very unlikely Nicolls and Santner would have survived till the 35th if you did.

You can't seriously be thinking of bowling Azhar and Imad in the death overs. Results would've been calamitous had NZ survived.
 
Blaming the captain is absurd, 280 is still better than 340-350 which was very much in the card if Guptill and Anderson would have stayed longer
 
You should have bowled out Amir, Anwar, Irfan and Wahab then and there. It would have been very unlikely Nicolls and Santner would have survived till the 35th if you did.

That's what I'm saying man, you understand cricket but these chumps don't have a clue, just wasting my time explaining it to them.
 
You can't seriously be thinking of bowling Azhar and Imad in the death overs. Results would've been calamitous had NZ survived.
It would have been very unlikely we'd be batting in the 40th if you bowled your fast bowlers till then.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top