PlanetPakistan
Senior ODI Player
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2006
- Runs
- 23,460
even with 130 they will have a 'chance'Hash said:Lead of 112 at the moment.
If they can get it up to 150 then they have a chance.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
even with 130 they will have a 'chance'Hash said:Lead of 112 at the moment.
If they can get it up to 150 then they have a chance.
PlanetPakistan said:even with 130 they will have a 'chance'
yea the NZ batting lineup is such that the tail comes before the real batsmen like Vettori and Maccallum. So basically they have the tail at the front instead of the rearHash said:well, they would even have a chance if they had a lead of 20.
PlanetPakistan said:yea the NZ batting lineup is such that the tail comes before the real batsmen like Vettori and Maccallum. So basically they have the tail at the front instead of the rear
yea with the exception of Captain +bond...Hash said:NZ are basically a team of 11 bits and pieces cricketers.
PlanetPakistan said:well no....we defended 127...
http://www.cricinfo.com/link_to_database/ARCHIVE/1992-93/PAK_IN_NZ/PAK_NZ_T_02-05JAN1993.html
for now just enjoy this....Hash said:I remember that match.
If someone could upload it they would be my hero.
Nice to see Pakora fail in both innings.
it isn't over yetMedic said:Sri Lanka are getting banged![]()
hmm, I remember a while back the Indians nominated him as their entry for match referee. I wonder how many matches he's had.PlanetPakistan said:Did anyone notice this.......
Match referee: J Srinath (India)![]()
just looked it up. He was match referee for 2 tests this summer in Sri Lanka when they played SA. This is his third test as match referee.kablooee87 said:hmm, I remember a while back the Indians nominated him as there entry for match referee. I wonder how many matches he's had.
this is not his debut....someone told me that was the refree in 2 matches in SL SA series.PlanetPakistan said:i think this is his debut....it's a nice way to make your debut because with these 2 teams he wont have to worry about things like over appealing, overrates,sledging etc....
PlanetPakistan said:only 21 to win....so can we now call it a day? or still premature?
New Zealand 2nd innings (target: 127 runs) R M B 4 6
BR Hartland b [B]Wasim Akram[/B] 9 79 62 0 0
MJ Greatbatch c Aamer Sohail b [B]Wasim Akram[/B] 8 50 30 0 0
AH Jones c Asif Mujtaba b [B]Waqar Younis[/B] 19 92 59 0 0
DK Morrison lbw b [B]Wasim Akram[/B] 0 2 3 0 0
+AC Parore c Rashid Latif b [B]Wasim Akram [/B] 13 69 37 1 0
RT Latham b [B]Waqar Younis[/B] 0 16 6 0 0
*KR Rutherford c Aamer Sohail b [B]Wasim Akram[/B] 9 37 22 1 0
CZ Harris b [B]Waqar Younis[/B] 9 35 15 1 0
DN Patel b [B]Waqar Younis[/B] 4 34 25 0 0
ML Su'a lbw b [B]Waqar Younis[/B] 0 2 3 0 0
MB Owens not out 0 25 11 0 0
Extras (b 1, lb 11, nb 10) 22
Total (all out, 43.3 overs) 93
'that is a true'abdul9383 said:as long as ttheres murali anything is possible.
Yes...i forgot about him!abdul9383 said:why wasn't dilshan playing considering lack of options in terms of experience?
Yeah i remember Su'a, he was just OK bowler of Maori origin, not sure about the other guy though.PlanetPakistan said:Da*n right.....2 Ws at their best vs the timid kiwis was always a great sight!
Waisay i don't recognize 2 of them(Hartland and Su'a)....Do you guys know anything about them?
Bowling around the sticks to the right handers nullifies the 'doosra'ggm said:I have never seen Murali bowl as much around the wicket to the right handers as he did in this match.
It is probably something that he should have done more often earlier in his career.
He went up to congratulate Sangakarra for his 100 but apparently the ball wasn't 'dead' so the kiwis ran him outWaseem said:Yeah i remember Su'a, he was just OK bowler of Maori origin, not sure about the other guy though.
By the way, how did Murali get out?? i heard Fleming defending what his team did and commentator said that Kiwis should have appealed for that, what was that all about???
Waisay i don't recognize 2 of them(Hartland and Su'a)....Do you guys know anything about them?
Bowling around the sticks to the right handers nullifies the 'doosra'
Not really...While bowling over the wicket he can get people out LBW with both a conventional off-spinner(batsman playing right back) or with a doosra. So now if he comes around the stumps then there is a fair chance of an LBW but it is almost impossible for him to get an LBW via doosra.ggm said:It brings LBW into play more though. From over the wicket he finds it hard to get LBWs unless the batsman is playing right back.
And his doosra can still be effective from around the wicket, as it can still get that outside edge, although the angle is not as disconcerting for the batsmen.
While bowling over the wicket he can get people out LBW with both a conventional off-spinner(batsman playing right back) or with a doosra
In this particular case it might have been a good move. How ever in general if you are getting so much turn that you are getting people LBW from bowling around and on top of that you have an excellent doosra then i suggest you should bowl from over the sticks....because it just opens up a lot more options of dismissing a batsman.ggm said:The technique of the New Zealand batsmen were to play him off the front foot. Indeed most of his LBWs in this match came from around the wicket to the right handers who were playing off the front foot. Had he been bowling over the wicket I doubt he would have got the same number of LBWs.
True...when he didn't have a doosra then bowling around the wics would have been a very good option.ggm said:I am not saying he should convert full time to bowling around the wicket. Bowling over the wicket is still the main line of attack.
The point is that there times in the past that he would get stuck against a batsman, but he would not change the angle. There were times when players would thrust their front foot forward and survive for a long period and yet he would not try a few overs around the wicket.
I reckon he would have a lot more LBWs had he bowled a bit more around the wicket earlier in his career, especially to those that played him a lot of the front foot.
what happened to Hariharan? he was a good findPlanetPakistan said:Did anyone notice this.......
Match referee: J Srinath (India)![]()