On This Day: December 1, 1996 - Lance Klusener takes 8-64 on Test debut against India

WebGuru

Senior ODI Player
Joined
Mar 4, 2013
Runs
21,339
Post of the Week
3
032897.jpg

Scorecard: http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63725.html


South Africa levelled the series in an invigorating Test watched by an estimated 50,000 people each day. Their batsmen found form on a true pitch and fast outfield and, for the first time, scored four hundreds in one Test. Two came from Kirsten - the third South African to achieve twin centuries, after Alan Melville and Bruce Mitchell - and there was one each for Hudson and Cullinan. The most sensational century, however, came from Azharuddin. He reached it in 74 deliveries, equalling the fourth-quickest Test hundred recorded in terms of balls.

Azharuddin hit debutant Lance Klusener for five successive fours. But Klusener rebounded in remarkable fashion, taking 8 for 64 in the second innings, the third-best bowling for South Africa in Tests and the best on debut. He said afterwards he had lacked rhythm in the first innings and, in an unsuccessful team strategy, had peppered Azharuddin with short balls. His triumph came after he shortened his run-up by half a yard and bowled to a fuller length. Klusener had been a surprise selection ahead of De Villiers, and South Africa also introduced 22-year-old Herschelle Gibbs to replace the injured Rhodes. India dropped Manjrekar as Calcutta-born Ganguly returned after a leg injury.

Winning the toss for the first time in eight international fixtures, Cronje chose to bat. There was assistance for the fast bowlers early on, when Hudson was dropped twice off Srinath's bowling. He and Kirsten took full advantage, piling up 236, the second-highest opening stand in South Africa's history. Though Kirsten began more fluently, Hudson gradually found superlative timing. But from 339 for two overnight, South Africa were pegged back to 428, thanks to outstanding pace bowling, especially from Prasad, who was unchanged throughout the second morning and returned a career-best six for 104.

India opened well through Mongia and the promoted Dravid, then slumped, partly due to two good run-outs from Gibbs. Meanwhile, Azharuddin had retired, hit on the elbow by McMillan. But he returned next morning when India slipped to 161 for seven and, with Kumble, managed to double that, setting an Indian record for the eighth wicket. Kumble showed up his team-mates by playing straight for his best Test score, and Azharuddin simply hammered the bowling. He scored his fifty off 35 balls, his century off 74, and pulled Adams for a six to go with his 18 fours before hitting him a return catch.

Kirsten and Cullinan then added 212 to put their team firmly on top again and raise South Africa's second-wicket record. India's eventual target was 467 in just over four sessions. With Donald off the field nursing a severely bruised left heel, Klusener seized the moment. He picked up three wickets by the fourth-day close and the final day was almost all his: he claimed the last five, three of them caught by McMillan at second slip.
 
Klusener, man! An absolute beast in his prime. Tenacious as hell and a true fighter!
 
One of the fav player from that era.
Zulu warrior surely left his impact.
 
<iframe width="640" height="480" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/re2w51AuENA?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

That crowd is just so good
 
<iframe width="640" height="480" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/re2w51AuENA?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

That crowd is just so good

The 90's crowd in India was the most passionate cricket crowd we have had in our history (and unruly) as well.
Damn, just wish we had a better cricket team who also din't indulge in match fixing :(
 
Klusener was genuinely quick when he started out. Consistently bowled around 145K mark and sometimes into 150K's too. He made batsmen hop.

I was in awe of him and jealous of SA as to how could they produce a super quick bowler that can bat like a beast.
 
The 90's crowd in India was the most passionate cricket crowd we have had in our history (and unruly) as well.
Damn, just wish we had a better cricket team who also din't indulge in match fixing :(


I've said it a few times, I wish I had been able to watch a test in the 80s or 90s in a packed Eden Gardens. Legendary venue
 
Zulu was a lethal ODI cricketer. South Africa lost a lot of swagger with his retirement.

He'd have been even more phenomenal in this era. Definitely the most favorite Saffer for any non-Saffer growing up in the 90's.
 
Klusner is under rated as a bowler in ODI , can easily be part of any ODI XI of modern era.

Just imagine SA batting with Pollock / Klusner / Kallis playing together.
 
When he was really batting well, he reminded me of Botham or Kapil. Such a clean striker!
 
The beast of limited overs cricket. He was so much fun to watch. He is what Afridi wished he could be in terms of an explosive allrounder.
 
Fantastic ODI player and good test player. Yes he is little underrated. His batting was amazing and won many games for SA from nowhere.
 
Grossly underrated. Better than Stokes . Brilliant finisher and dangerous bowler.

Stokes is already a better Test cricketer than him. Well behind in ODIs so far, but he has potential to surpass him in the future.
 
Fantastic all-rounder in ODIs and probably in the top five of all time.
 
Zulu was a lethal ODI cricketer. South Africa lost a lot of swagger with his retirement.

He'd have been even more phenomenal in this era. Definitely the most favorite Saffer for any non-Saffer growing up in the 90's.

But by your logic - isn't he also a choker? :13:
 
But by your logic - isn't he also a choker? :13:

He didn’t choke in the SF, Donald did. I feel sorry for him - he was one run away from probably winning the World Cup for South Africa.
 
He didn’t choke in the SF, Donald did. I feel sorry for him - he was one run away from probably winning the World Cup for South Africa.

Oh buddy he choked big time!

Ran a suicidal / high risk run when there were still 3 balls to face. Donalds near run out in the previous ball clearly unsettled his nerves.
 
Oh buddy he choked big time!

Ran a suicidal / high risk run when there were still 3 balls to face. Donalds near run out in the previous ball clearly unsettled his nerves.

I think we have had this discussion before - has Donald not pulled of the Mannequin Challenge while watching the ball for like 10 mins, he could have made the other end.

While Klusener made an error of judgment by going for a risky single when he still had deliveries left, we also need to think from his perspective - there was an opportunity for a run and he took it, because he could have been dismissed the next ball.

90% of the blame goes to Donald, and it is incredibly harsh to say that Klusener choked.
 
I think we have had this discussion before - has Donald not pulled of the Mannequin Challenge while watching the ball for like 10 mins, he could have made the other end.

While Klusener made an error of judgment by going for a risky single when he still had deliveries left, we also need to think from his perspective - there was an opportunity for a run and he took it, because he could have been dismissed the next ball.

90% of the blame goes to Donald, and it is incredibly harsh to say that Klusener choked.

Klusener should have realized that the chances of getting out on a very risky single was much higher than the upcoming deliveries - esp considering he was well set and already hit two boundaries off that Damien Fleming over.

Anyway - no point debating over the past. What is done is done and we cannot change history. Klusener deserved more and had a very fine tournament in 1999 but he was just as much to blame for that runout as A. Donald was.
 
Back
Top