What's new

One in five of Pakistan’s more than 200 million people are malnourished

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
Karachi: A frantic mother cradling her seven-month-old baby rushes towards the special paediatric ward in a desolate Pakistan town, his eyes are blank and he is smaller than most newborns.

He is starving in a country that has no shortage of food, but which has one of the highest infant mortality rates in the world and where malnutrition is rife.

The infant weighs just 2.5kg — the average for a healthy child of that age is almost three times that.

His case is not unique for the doctors at the Mithi Civil Hospital in hunger-stricken Sindh province where millions survive on less than $1 a day.

Of the 150-250 patients who come in each day, roughly one fifth are suffering from malnutrition, Dr Dilip Kumar, head of the paediatric department, tells AFP.

Inside the ward, nine other malnourished infants are crying inside glass incubators. A young mother, Nazeeran, clutches the hand of her toddler.

“Her weight is dropping, even though we consulted many doctors,” the 25-year-old says.

The International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), a poverty and hunger watchdog, estimates around one in five of Pakistan’s more than 200 million people are malnourished.

And yet, the nation is not short of food — in fact, according to the US Department of Agriculture, it is projected to export 500,000 tons of wheat from May 2018 until April 2019, and 7.4 million tons of rice in the same period.

Dawn, the English-language daily newspaper, even reported a potato glut earlier this month.


Extreme deprivation

The issues, experts say, are socioeconomic — that is, just because food is available, does not mean people can access it.

“There are four key pillars of food security in Pakistan: The first is availability, then accessibility, utilisation and stability,” says Dr Ambreen Fatima, senior research economist at the Applied Economic Research Centre of the Karachi University.

In Tharparkar, where Mithi Civil Hospital is, all four are lacking, she explains, adding that in other parts of the country they are present only to varying degrees.

“Pakistan is quite well off in wheat production,” comments Dr Kaiser Bengali, a veteran economist, who has done field research on poverty and hunger in the country, but adds that much of it is sold for export.

This means ordinary people in the country may not have access to it, and if they do they may not have the resources to pay for it.

“Affordability is the biggest challenge here in Pakistan,” he says.

Karachi is Pakistan’s financial capital, but Bengali says he has seen alarming examples of poverty and deprivation there.

“In our surveys we came across the kids who had never eaten an apple, and when we offered him an apple he was reluctant to take the bite wondering whether it was an edible thing or not,” Bengali reveals.

“In another case a family had never had eggs in their whole lives,” he adds.

A survey of the state-run Planning Division in 2017 found that 40 per cent of Pakistan’s population lives in multi-dimensional poverty.

That means they are not just short of money, but are also facing a shortage of basic needs, including health, clean water, and electricity, among other factors — all of which can impact their access to food.


Cycle of malnutrition

“Poor physical infrastructure, particularly in the remote rural areas throughout Pakistan is also a limitation on access to food and influences market prices,” according to a recent statement from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).

“This is also linked to inadequate water and sanitation, education and health service delivery, which together with the lack of awareness of appropriate dietary intake contributes to greater food insecurity and malnutrition.”

Tharparkar district is frequently highlighted in Pakistan’s media because of its high rate of child deaths, with politicians blaming the situation on drought — but economists and physicians say that is not the sole explanation.

“Causes of malnutrition are multiple pregnancies, young-aged marriage, iron deficiency in mothers, (lack) of breastfeeding, weak immunisation, and early weaning,” Dr Kumar insists.

Bearing large numbers of children from a young age takes its toll on women’s health, but also impacts the well-being of the foetus and ability to breastfeed a newborn.

In Pakistan, only 38 per cent of babies are fed breast milk exclusively during their first six months in line with UN recommendations.

This low figure is blamed on local traditions, the heavy workloads of mothers and powerful marketing by the milk industry.

Many mothers are told to feed their newborns tea, herbs, which can stunt growth. Some are unnecessarily persuaded to use formula instead of breastmilk by doctors.

This can introduce health problems if the water use to make it is unclean, or if poor families scrimp on the amount of powder to create the drink.

Sindh’s high number of child deaths are the result of a vicious poverty cycle that begins with malnourished mothers, agrees Bengali.

He adds: “An infant is not fed with wheat or solid food.”

https://gulfnews.com/world/asia/pak...00-million-people-are-malnourished-1.62882527
 
Given the pittance Pakistan - they're not alone, neighbouring countries are just as bad - spends on healthcare this isn't really surprising. The long term ramifications of this are scary - a massive proportion of children will be stunted and there's also a correlation between malnutrition and a decreased in IQ. All of this will lead to a big loss to the economy - healthcare spending really is an investment.
 
? how the hell is this better???? are you insane?

WHo the hell does comparison on Malnutrition

The worst is the province your lovely party has been ruling for last 10 years and has ruled over for 30+ years cumulative. Keep voting for looters and plunderers.



Kal bhi Bhutto zinda tha
Aj bhi Bhutto zinda hai
 
Frankly, better than 1 in 2 in India.

You really feel a need to drag India in to feel better. Sorry, but the comparison will only make you feel worse, your delusion is strong.

India though it certainly needs improvement, is better not worse than Pakistan.

https://www.globalhungerindex.org/results/

Also, according to UNICEF, Pakistan has the highest rate of infant mortality in the world:

https://tribune.com.pk/story/163944...t-countries-still-face-alarming-risks-unicef/

India is growing at a rate of 7%+, so we can hope that democratic impulses will make more money available to the various social security schemes in India and make the lot of the poor better.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Social_security_in_India

Instead of constantly thinking about India to feel better, you would serve your country better if you figured out why Punjab, Delhi, Himachal, and Gujrat in India has 3 times the per cap GDP of Pakistan. Pakistan needs to develop modern industries to get out of poverty. Thinking that pressing a button to fire an American made AMRAAM missile from an American built F-16 to shoot down a 1960s era Indian Mig-21(which anyway keep crashing all the time without Pakistani help) makes your country great is delusional.

Find the reason why your top exports are textiles and wheat (which a large proportion of your population starves) while India's top exports are software, pharma and automobiles (now over hundreds of billions a year). Wishful thinking is not the way forward.

Malnourished children are a tragedy, whether they be Pakistani, Indian or African. The reason your country is poor is not India. Only a brutal self-assessment will enable you to find the way forward. The dominant power in the last 70 years since the British left is your military.

And as usual, no replies unless I see something sensible.

[MENTION=2099]Cricket[/MENTION]joshilla [MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION] @trodoon [MENTION=139108]Sachin136[/MENTION] [MENTION=134809]sensible-indian-fan[/MENTION]
 
Last edited:
You really feel a need to drag India in to feel better. Sorry, but the comparison will only make you feel worse, your delusion is strong.

India though it certainly needs improvement, is better not worse than Pakistan.

https://www.globalhungerindex.org/results/

Also, according to UNICEF, Pakistan has the highest rate of infant mortality in the world:

https://tribune.com.pk/story/163944...t-countries-still-face-alarming-risks-unicef/

India is growing at a rate of 7%+, so we can hope that democratic impulses will make more money available to the various social security schemes in India and make the lot of the poor better.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Social_security_in_India

Instead of constantly thinking about India to feel better, you would serve your country better if you figured out why Punjab, Delhi, Himachal, and Gujrat in India has 3 times the per cap GDP of Pakistan. Pakistan needs to develop modern industries to get out of poverty. Thinking that pressing a button to fire an American made AMRAAM missile from an American built F-16 to shoot down a 1960s era Indian Mig-21(which anyway keep crashing all the time without Pakistani help) makes your country great is delusional.

Find the reason why your top exports are textiles and wheat (which a large proportion of your population starves) while India's top exports are software, pharma and automobiles (now over hundreds of billions a year). Wishful thinking is not the way forward.

Malnourished children are a tragedy, whether they be Pakistani, Indian or African. The reason your country is poor is not India. Only a brutal self-assessment will enable you to find the way forward. The dominant power in the last 70 years since the British left is your military.

And as usual, no replies unless I see something sensible.

[MENTION=2099]Cricket[/MENTION]joshilla [MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION] @trodoon [MENTION=139108]Sachin136[/MENTION] [MENTION=134809]sensible-indian-fan[/MENTION]

These are eye-opening facts, but they are useless when people don't make an effort to open their eyes. India have raced ahead of Pakistan in the last three decades because of the development of modern industries and conglomerates. For example, no Pakistani company is remotely comparable to Tata, Reliance, Cipla, Infosys etc. Economically, Pakistan is still living in the 60s and 70s, largely relying on non-tech, seasonal exports.
 
Maybe we could spend less on defence and more on healthcare? Just a thought.
 
Illiteracy is one of the biggest reason behind this. People spend a lot of money on pan gutka cigarettes etc etc but never spend on quality food and good education of their children.
 
These are eye-opening facts, but they are useless when people don't make an effort to open their eyes. India have raced ahead of Pakistan in the last three decades because of the development of modern industries and conglomerates. For example, no Pakistani company is remotely comparable to Tata, Reliance, Cipla, Infosys etc. Economically, Pakistan is still living in the 60s and 70s, largely relying on non-tech, seasonal exports.

If Pakistan had more people like you, it would have developed world leading modern industries ages ago. Instead we have jokers who suggest that Bangladesh follow Pakistan's lead so that India gets squeezed between hostile neighbors.

As an Indian, it gives me no joy that a Pakistani infant is malnourished. I would rather that every child in the world was well fed, loved and secure. Yet, the dominant thinking in Pakistan seems to be that as long as India is worse (which in reality it is not) there is no need for change.

Though India has many corrupt politicians, 70 years of almost uninterrupted democracy has enabled the poor to influence government policy. Much more needs to be done, but there are in place a variety of government projects to help the poor:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_alleviation_programmes_in_India
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integrated_Child_Development_Services
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pradhan_Mantri_Matritva_Vandana_Yojana
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Health_Mission#Janani_Suraksha_Yojana
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midday_Meal_Scheme
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pradhan_Mantri_Bhartiya_Jan_Aushadhi_Yojana_Kendra

Let us hope for a better future for both our countries.
[MENTION=76058]cricketjoshila[/MENTION] [MENTION=141520]troodon[/MENTION]
 
You really feel a need to drag India in to feel better. Sorry, but the comparison will only make you feel worse, your delusion is strong.

India though it certainly needs improvement, is better not worse than Pakistan.

https://www.globalhungerindex.org/results/

Also, according to UNICEF, Pakistan has the highest rate of infant mortality in the world:

https://tribune.com.pk/story/163944...t-countries-still-face-alarming-risks-unicef/

India is growing at a rate of 7%+, so we can hope that democratic impulses will make more money available to the various social security schemes in India and make the lot of the poor better.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Social_security_in_India

Instead of constantly thinking about India to feel better, you would serve your country better if you figured out why Punjab, Delhi, Himachal, and Gujrat in India has 3 times the per cap GDP of Pakistan. Pakistan needs to develop modern industries to get out of poverty. Thinking that pressing a button to fire an American made AMRAAM missile from an American built F-16 to shoot down a 1960s era Indian Mig-21(which anyway keep crashing all the time without Pakistani help) makes your country great is delusional.

Find the reason why your top exports are textiles and wheat (which a large proportion of your population starves) while India's top exports are software, pharma and automobiles (now over hundreds of billions a year). Wishful thinking is not the way forward.

Malnourished children are a tragedy, whether they be Pakistani, Indian or African. The reason your country is poor is not India. Only a brutal self-assessment will enable you to find the way forward. The dominant power in the last 70 years since the British left is your military.

And as usual, no replies unless I see something sensible.

[MENTION=2099]Cricket[/MENTION]joshilla [MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION] @trodoon [MENTION=139108]Sachin136[/MENTION] [MENTION=134809]sensible-indian-fan[/MENTION]

Excellent post.

We are happy as long as we are better than India will do a nation no good.

In many indicators Pak is not better than India anyway.

Sadly we too have people here in this side of the border who are happy as long as we do better than Pak.

----

Another thing is that India ALSO inherited a lot of issues. Some states are hopeless, we have 100+ million tribals....so per capita stats take a severe hit.

Not being cold hearted...but just stating the facts.

It's like feeding a family of 40. Every member is important but even if you earn high, you have a LOT of mouths to feed.
 

This was your attempt to prove 1 in 2 is better than 1 in 5? Good lord.

Your first mistake is comparing - and equating - infant mortality with malnutrition. Your second mistake is ignoring the fact India has a far higher malnutrition rate than Pakistan.

Despite pontificating over GDP of India [we all know GDP is not everything, maybe for you as it is a new concept], India is still in the dumps when it comes to the most important social factors.

The rest of your post was just irrelevant babble.
 
You really feel a need to drag India in to feel better. Sorry, but the comparison will only make you feel worse, your delusion is strong.

India though it certainly needs improvement, is better not worse than Pakistan.

https://www.globalhungerindex.org/results/

Also, according to UNICEF, Pakistan has the highest rate of infant mortality in the world:

https://tribune.com.pk/story/163944...t-countries-still-face-alarming-risks-unicef/

India is growing at a rate of 7%+, so we can hope that democratic impulses will make more money available to the various social security schemes in India and make the lot of the poor better.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Social_security_in_India

Instead of constantly thinking about India to feel better, you would serve your country better if you figured out why Punjab, Delhi, Himachal, and Gujrat in India has 3 times the per cap GDP of Pakistan. Pakistan needs to develop modern industries to get out of poverty. Thinking that pressing a button to fire an American made AMRAAM missile from an American built F-16 to shoot down a 1960s era Indian Mig-21(which anyway keep crashing all the time without Pakistani help) makes your country great is delusional.

Find the reason why your top exports are textiles and wheat (which a large proportion of your population starves) while India's top exports are software, pharma and automobiles (now over hundreds of billions a year). Wishful thinking is not the way forward.

Malnourished children are a tragedy, whether they be Pakistani, Indian or African. The reason your country is poor is not India. Only a brutal self-assessment will enable you to find the way forward. The dominant power in the last 70 years since the British left is your military.

And as usual, no replies unless I see something sensible.

[MENTION=2099]Cricket[/MENTION]joshilla [MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION] @trodoon [MENTION=139108]Sachin136[/MENTION] [MENTION=134809]sensible-indian-fan[/MENTION]

“ As usual, no replies unless I see something sensible”

Means no replies unless y’all agree with me.

Why would anyone debate ?
 
[MENTION=142162]Napa[/MENTION] clearly doesn’t know the difference between malnutrition and infant mortality it seemsz
 
Quite a sharam ka muqaam for a certain "Pakistani" that Indian chest thumpers tag him for support when putting Pakistan down.
 
All of the Pak people I have met looked well fed. Never met a slim Pakistani.

I have seen so many underweight tiny Indians. Its like every other Indian guy is malnourished.
 
Last edited:
Excellent post.

We are happy as long as we are better than India will do a nation no good.

In many indicators Pak is not better than India anyway.

Sadly we too have people here in this side of the border who are happy as long as we do better than Pak.

----

<b>Another thing is that India ALSO inherited a lot of issues. Some states are hopeless, we have 100+ million tribals....so per capita stats take a severe hit.</b>

Not being cold hearted...but just stating the facts.

It's like feeding a family of 40. Every member is important but even if you earn high, you have a LOT of mouths to feed.

Exactly! Rankings of India which are for the entire country miss this fact.

As Indians, we should try to improve the condition of all Indians including our vast tribal population. However, ranking the entire country without taking into account the variability that exists leads to spurious conclusions. (Surely the stupidest rankings are those based on some western researchers definition of "happiness"!)

As one can see from the list below, the states with large tribal populations usually lag others in terms of per capita GDP.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Indian_states_and_union_territories_by_GDP_per_capita

In comparison, the regional differences in Pakistan are less as it doesn't have the large population of tribals/Bhils/Santals etc. like India does.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Indian_states_and_union_territories_by_GDP_per_capita

If you do a comparison between India and Pakistan, the gap is large (with the Indian per cap PPP GDP being around 35% higher). If you do a comparison between ethnically similar India and Pakistan, the gap is even larger. The fact that India economy and politics are not dominated by the military is the only reasonable explanation.
 
How is this an India vs Pak thing :facepalm:


Those with attitudes like these are the biggest culprits in keeping their societies behind
 
How is this an India vs Pak thing :facepalm:


Those with attitudes like these are the biggest culprits in keeping their societies behind

Welcome to the sub continent, where we are happy to live a pathetic life as long as our neighbours are worse.
 
Can we focus on the issue at hand in our country and how to fix it for our country and peoples own future sake. Forget what the neighbors are doing and going on, because this is a domestic issue that will effect us in all types of ways for many years.
 
Frankly, better than 1 in 2 in India.

Honestly, we need to get out of the habit of comparing everything to India. Realistically, our progress as a nation shouldn't be based upon how we are out doing relative to India.

Frankly, India is a very low standard to strive for.

Isn't there that popular pop culture, feel-good, motivational quote that goes like: "Aim for the moon and even if you miss you'd end up among the stars".

For Pakistan's case I have a cautionary quote: "Don't aim for India because even if you hit the bullseye you will remain in the gutter."

Ideally, our standard to strive for should be based on giving our best to match the top countries in the world, like Scandinavian countries. At first this thought might sound bizarre, funny and out of touch with the reality, however if we arent even able to humor such a goal in our thoughts, no wonder we will be stuck at a low spot and prefer a low standard as a matter of convenience.
 
Why does 1 in 2 or 1 in 5 matter? It should be 1 in 25 if you want to achieve something positive. You're talking about 690M people, nearly 10% of the world's population being malnourished and somehow either number is something to celebrate?

Fix the economy, improve trade, and modernize and quit comparing negative statistics.
 
Maybe we could spend less on defence and more on healthcare? Just a thought.

That's a red herring, we spend a lot more on corruption by mostly left leaning liberal/secular political parties. Let's start with them.
 
Can we focus on the issue at hand in our country and how to fix it for our country and peoples own future sake. Forget what the neighbors are doing and going on, because this is a domestic issue that will effect us in all types of ways for many years.

Exactly this.

It is not even a ground breaking philosophy to not have a low standard. Just like throughout our lives, we are told that when preparing for an exam aim to get an 'A' grade. With this attitude the chance of success is much higher. While, when preparing for the exam with a mindset of "just get the passing grade" you are more likely to end up failing the exam.

I dont see why the same mindset shouldn't be applied when it comes to the progress of our country.
 
should set up local langars for kids, regardless of background, rich poor whatever. im pretty sure if people could see a local langar they would donate to it, rather than mistrusting less direct charities.

it may not be practical to address the entire malnutrition issue in one go, therefore focus must be on kids, as malnutrition in childhood can have long term physical and mental health consequences.
 
Can we focus on the issue at hand in our country and how to fix it for our country and peoples own future sake. Forget what the neighbors are doing and going on, because this is a domestic issue that will effect us in all types of ways for many years.

That was the intention of this thread, sad to see it went off track but not entirely unexpected.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">For the first time in history, under the visionary leadership of PM Imran Khan, Inter-Ministerial Pakistan National Nutrition Coordination Council (PNNCC) has been institutionalised to tackle malnutrition & stunting in children. <a href="https://t.co/dNJY5S584Q">pic.twitter.com/dNJY5S584Q</a></p>— Govt of Pakistan (@pid_gov) <a href="https://twitter.com/pid_gov/status/1313472904282152960?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 6, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">In his first address to the nation, Prime Minister <a href="https://twitter.com/ImranKhanPTI?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ImranKhanPTI</a> discussed stunted growth which affects 4 in 10 Pakistani children. 2 years on <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Nashonuma?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Nashonuma</a>, a comprehensive program to fight stunting & malnutrition has been launched by <a href="https://twitter.com/Ehsaas_Pk?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Ehsaas_Pk</a> in 9 districts. <a href="https://t.co/GWFJxMAK5E">pic.twitter.com/GWFJxMAK5E</a></p>— Govt of Pakistan (@GovtofPakistan) <a href="https://twitter.com/GovtofPakistan/status/1318560100555120642?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 20, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Malnourishment and stunted development are rampant in Indian kids. So many kids look a lot younger than their age. Girl children are the worst effected.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">In his first address to the nation, Prime Minister <a href="https://twitter.com/ImranKhanPTI?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ImranKhanPTI</a> discussed stunted growth which affects 4 in 10 Pakistani children. 2 years on <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Nashonuma?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Nashonuma</a>, a comprehensive program to fight stunting & malnutrition has been launched by <a href="https://twitter.com/Ehsaas_Pk?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Ehsaas_Pk</a> in 9 districts. <a href="https://t.co/GWFJxMAK5E">pic.twitter.com/GWFJxMAK5E</a></p>— Govt of Pakistan (@GovtofPakistan) <a href="https://twitter.com/GovtofPakistan/status/1318560100555120642?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 20, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Amazing initiative. Hopefully, this is expanded to cover whole of Pakistan.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">In his first address to the nation, Prime Minister <a href="https://twitter.com/ImranKhanPTI?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ImranKhanPTI</a> discussed stunted growth which affects 4 in 10 Pakistani children. 2 years on <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Nashonuma?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Nashonuma</a>, a comprehensive program to fight stunting & malnutrition has been launched by <a href="https://twitter.com/Ehsaas_Pk?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Ehsaas_Pk</a> in 9 districts. <a href="https://t.co/GWFJxMAK5E">pic.twitter.com/GWFJxMAK5E</a></p>— Govt of Pakistan (@GovtofPakistan) <a href="https://twitter.com/GovtofPakistan/status/1318560100555120642?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 20, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

These are the things that will go unnoticed amidst all the hue and cry about petty issues. It's also good to know that this program isn't named Prime Minister Imran Khan program.
 
Malnourishment and stunted development are rampant in Indian kids. So many kids look a lot younger than their age. Girl children are the worst effected.

The problem of malnutrition in India seems to be not due to the lack of food but the quality. There's too much carbohydrate intake (rice , wheat and potatoes) and too less of everything else. It's better to have a smaller, balanced meal than a big one with lots of rice and chapaties.

Almost every middle-aged Indian I know has a potbelly and a host of health problem, diabetes being the most rampant.
 
Last edited:
Almost every middle-aged Indian I know has a potbelly and a host of health problem, diabetes being the most rampant.

That’s probably a self selecting group and hence can be disregarded for making generalizations about the country as a whole though since you may not know many people from the lower socioeconomic Stratas. If you look at Indians in rural villages or the ones who were were walking thousands of miles in migrant crisis they were usually stick thin
 
Should gov really be in the business of providing food?

I don't think welfare should be the job of the state if a religious/ private organization does it ok or even from zakaat collections but welfare by gov doesn't seem right to me..
 
These are the things that will go unnoticed amidst all the hue and cry about petty issues. It's also good to know that this program isn't named Prime Minister Imran Khan program.

Can't recall any government-initiated social programs that are named after PM Imran Khan.
 
Should gov really be in the business of providing food?

I don't think welfare should be the job of the state if a religious/ private organization does it ok or even from zakaat collections but welfare by gov doesn't seem right to me..

Spending on Human development which will translate into the development of Pakistan is the job of any government.
 
Back
Top