What's new

Pak Ambassador Malik Nadeem Breaks Down on Kashmir UN International Human Rights Commission Session

KingKhanWC said:
Do you smile when you see your army kill innocent people in Kashmir?


Pakistan needs to keep this in the spotlight, the crimes by the Indians are getting worse as days go by.
Click to expand...

Why doesn't the rest of the world speak a word on it?
 
Hitman said:
Why doesn't the rest of the world speak a word on it?
Click to expand...

Ill take that as a yes.

When it's raised in the UN they do speak, it's normal protocol to discuss it. Human rights organstions and many other groups around the word speak of this too. Your media of course will feed you what makes you smile.
 
KingKhanWC said:
Ill take that as a yes.

When it's raised in the UN they do speak, it's normal protocol to discuss it. Human rights organstions and many other groups around the word speak of this too. Your media of course will feed you what makes you smile.
Click to expand...

Watch this -

 
Pakistan need to concentrate on their country. J&k is and will always be part of india. These crocodile tears wont do good when we know how they radicalized and how lashk e taiba .,UN recognized terrorists supporting terrorism other side of the border.
UN is no foolish they know that these are only crocodile tears otherwise pakistan would have take action against dozens of world over and UN recognized terrorists living in pakistan.
 
Hitman said:
Watch this -
Click to expand...

This retarted women is only spouting the same foolishness your mates on here do. It's very simple, Paksitan will move out it's troops as soon as India confirms there will be a vote of self determination. It would be daft if Pakistan moves it's forces but then waits for India to make this call, which it wont and then has to bring it's troops back. Please pass this on to this clown
 
For better or worse, India wouldn't mind the status-quo in Kashmir.

Pakistan should solve the problem once and for all, if they believe they are in the right. Dragging this out for decades hasn't helped in any way has it?

And not through hair-brained shooting themselves in the foot schemes like Kargil, mind you.
 
Hermoine Green said:
Just think about Asifa Bano.

Am sure you will forget to smile (obviously if you have heart)
Click to expand...

Yes we think about asima and that rape which happened in U.p by MLA and his father was killed as well. Almost 99 percent of indians want the most horrible death to the culprits. Kashmir is different issue.
 
akki said:
Yes we think about asima and that rape which happened in U.p by MLA and his father was killed as well. Almost 99 percent of indians want the most horrible death to the culprits. Kashmir is different issue.
Click to expand...

Different rules for Kashmiris :) Where rapist and murderer are being saved by politicians, even by Lawyers.
 
KingKhanWC said:
She's retarted because of what I have pointed out. Feel free to refute this on her behalf but you cant, just like her.

They should have stayed and waited for the vote too.
Click to expand...

So that they too could have been killed like the rest? There was ethnic cleansing of the Kashmiri Pundits. And now after they have been chased out of their home land, Kashmiris want plebiscite?
 
Hermoine Green said:
Different rules for Kashmiris :) Where rapist and murderer are being saved by politicians, even by Lawyers.
Click to expand...

Those are animals. If its in my hands ,i swear i would love to send them to the same place as i want to send those culprits who did that.it has becoming now a new trend that you do crime against someone and give religious angle and there are enough stupids in india to support that.
Many many indians ,celebraties and others have shown anger against both rape cases. And i am sure they are not doing any favor by doing that.
 
Hitman said:
So that they too could have been killed like the rest? There was ethnic cleansing of the Kashmiri Pundits. And now after they have been chased out of their home land, Kashmiris want plebiscite?
Click to expand...

Religious tensions existed due to your army but pandits were protected not picked up tortured, raped or murdered. You seem to enjoy pain inflicted on certain victims but tears for others. Strange chap you are.
 
Does this forum never tire of Kashmir? It's only 1 state. There are 28 others.

It's not like anything new has happened either. Same old recycled stuff since the 1940s, literally.
 
KingKhanWC said:
Religious tensions existed due to your army but pandits were protected not picked up tortured, raped or murdered. You seem to enjoy pain inflicted on certain victims but tears for others. Strange chap you are.
Click to expand...

Really? That's why they were butchered and chased away from their home land for centuries by the Muslims in Kashmir?
 
Chances of 'Kashmir Banega Pakistan' are just as much as 'Amreeka Banega Hindustan'.
 
Hitman said:
And what about those Kashmiri Pundits who were butchered and driven away from their home land? What about their descendants? What about their votes?

BTW, she is retarted because she showed you the mirror :))
Click to expand...

All 219 Pandits?
 
KingKhanWC said:
This retarted women is only spouting the same foolishness your mates on here do. It's very simple, Paksitan will move out it's troops as soon as India confirms there will be a vote of self determination. It would be daft if Pakistan moves it's forces but then waits for India to make this call, which it wont and then has to bring it's troops back. Please pass this on to this clown
Click to expand...

India believes J and K is all theirs as per their constitution. Therefore Pakistan can’t vacate unless India agrees to a referendum because it would otherwise invade AJK sand fulfil its constitution.

If India agrees to referendum then Pakistan must vacate. Until then, India has to take the first step.

Mehboob Makhdoomi a Harvardian from Srinagar explains this: http://m.greaterkashmir.com/news/opinion/for-the-sake-of-argument/196402.html
 
Wasim_Waqar said:
India believes J and K is all theirs as per their constitution. Therefore Pakistan can’t vacate unless India agrees to a referendum because it would otherwise invade AJK sand fulfil its constitution.

If India agrees to referendum then Pakistan must vacate. Until then, India has to take the first step.

Mehboob Makhdoomi a Harvardian from Srinagar explains this: http://m.greaterkashmir.com/news/opinion/for-the-sake-of-argument/196402.html
Click to expand...

Of course this is common sense, unless you're Indian or one of their supporters.
 
Watch this. Worth it. This is from a Pakistani show, so don't blame it on Indian propagenda -

 
How can you expect anything but a stalemate between two religious entities? Hindu government in India and a Muslim country Pakistan. Same case with Palestine between Jews and Muslims. These will never be resolved unless the issues are resolved through logic and pragmatism. It is absolute stupidity to assume that in the modern age a local entity can engage violently with a Nation with much bigger resources. Best way is for these people to shun violence and hopefully in a few decades reach at a solution. Why will Pakistan move it's army out if China is now involved through CPEC? These tears and any additional religious drama will not serve any purpose.
 
rhony said:
How can you expect anything but a stalemate between two religious entities? Hindu government in India and a Muslim country Pakistan. Same case with Palestine between Jews and Muslims. These will never be resolved unless the issues are resolved through logic and pragmatism. It is absolute stupidity to assume that in the modern age a local entity can engage violently with a Nation with much bigger resources. Best way is for these people to shun violence and hopefully in a few decades reach at a solution. Why will Pakistan move it's army out if China is now involved through CPEC? These tears and any additional religious drama will not serve any purpose.
Click to expand...
Comic relief though.
 
Real or glycerin? Did he shed any tears for the families of people butchered by Pakistani terrorists in Mumbai? Does he have any plans to bring Hafeez Saeed to justice?

He should perhaps audition for one of those saas-bahu dramas on TV.
 
That was just cringeworthy to watch and deserves a razzie. How low can these diplomats stoop to put forward this phoney narrative about Kashmir ? :13:
 
Last warning for some people. You know who you are as you have been personally warned.
 
Wasim_Waqar said:
India believes J and K is all theirs as per their constitution. Therefore Pakistan can’t vacate unless India agrees to a referendum because it would otherwise invade AJK sand fulfil its constitution.

If India agrees to referendum then Pakistan must vacate. Until then, India has to take the first step.

Mehboob Makhdoomi a Harvardian from Srinagar explains this: http://m.greaterkashmir.com/news/opinion/for-the-sake-of-argument/196402.html
Click to expand...

India will invade PoK when its protected by UN forces? Lol. Thats the most preposterous thing ever heard.

Pakistan has no right to be in Kashmir. They invaded a free country and occupied its land.
 
Lonewarrior said:
Indian Army tops the World Militaries with highest suicide rate



https://www.dawn.com/news/1374411

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/over-100-military-personnel-commit-suicide-every-year/articleshow/57579464.cms
Click to expand...

"Indian Army tops the World Militaries with highest suicide rate"? It appears you made up the "tops the World Militaries" bit as none of the sources say that. For example Dawn says "one of the highest", not "top". The US Army is about the same size of the Indian Army and has about the same number of suicides every year.
 
cricketjoshila said:
India will invade PoK when its protected by UN forces? Lol. Thats the most preposterous thing ever heard.

Pakistan has no right to be in Kashmir. They invaded a free country and occupied its land.
Click to expand...

There are only a few UNMOGIP peolle and recently Indian troops shot at people shot at UN in AJK so the presence of a few troops isn’t going to stop blood-thirsty psychopathic Indian army from invading. These are the same guys you kicked out of Kashmir (UNMOGIP).

Ps Poonchis of Kashmir launches the rebellion in 1947...read some history including Christopher Snedden’s book. I feel sorry for you you sound so brainwashed and deluded. I am Kashmiri so I know our history thank you.
 
Last edited:
Wasim_Waqar said:
There are only a few UNMOGIP peolle and recently Indian troops shot at people shot at UN in AJK so the presence of a few troops isn’t going to stop blood-thirsty psychopathic Indian army from invading. These are the same guys you kicked out of Kashmir (UNMOGIP).

Ps Poonchis of Kashmir launches the rebellion in 1947...read some history including Christopher Snedden’s book. I feel sorry for you you sound so brainwashed and deluded. I’m kashmiri so I know our history.
Click to expand...

O Bhai when Pakistan vacates PoK UN peace keeping forces will occupy it. UNMOGIP are not troops. Learn the difference.

Poonchis or whoever revolted, why did Pakistanis entered Kashmir? On what basis?
 
cricketjoshila said:
O Bhai when Pakistan vacates PoK UN peace keeping forces will occupy it. UNMOGIP are not troops. Learn the difference.

Poonchis or whoever revolted, why did Pakistanis entered Kashmir? On what basis?
Click to expand...

Yes they’re peace keeping people but principle remains India has no regard for the UN or humanity in Kashmir.

Do some reading yourself and do some work; I’m not going to go through the history of it but see if you can buy the Christopher Snedden main book about Kashmir. Poonchi rebellion is the key part of how it all started and that totally nullifies the delusional Indian theories about Kashmir.
 
Wasim_Waqar said:
Yes they’re peace keeping people but principle remains India has no regard for the UN or humanity in Kashmir.

Do some reading yourself and do some work; I’m not going to go through the history of it but see if you can buy the Christopher Snedden main book about Kashmir. Poonchi rebellion is the key part of how it all started and that totally nullifies the delusional Indian theories about Kashmir.
Click to expand...

They are a monitoring group. Not peace keeping force. No legitimate govt has ever attacked a UNPKF knowingly. Thats like attacking each country from where the UNPKF had sourced the troops.

Bhai i have read enough. Pakistan had no job invading a then free and sovereign country. If poonchis had revolted it was between the Kashmiris. Pakistan illegally entered Kashmir and now has occupied PoK for decades.
 
cricketjoshila said:
They are a monitoring group. Not peace keeping force. No legitimate govt has ever attacked a UNPKF knowingly. Thats like attacking each country from where the UNPKF had sourced the troops.

Bhai i have read enough. Pakistan had no job invading a then free and sovereign country. If poonchis had revolted it was between the Kashmiris. Pakistan illegally entered Kashmir and now has occupied PoK for decades.
Click to expand...

You haven’t because you know nothing about Kashmir. Here’s a book review.

https://www.outlookindia.com/magazi...nd-suspicion/300055?__twitter_impression=true

Buy it yourself and read a neutral source!
 
Wasim_Waqar said:
You haven’t because you know nothing about Kashmir. Here’s a book review.

https://www.outlookindia.com/magazi...nd-suspicion/300055?__twitter_impression=true

Buy it yourself and read a neutral source!
Click to expand...
http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/47(1948)

Plz refer page 4 and 5 of the resolution of UNSC which is so dear to Pakistanis. There was a set sequence to the referendum for which Pakistan refused to adhere to the very first step and hence none of the sequence took place.

I know the truth will be hard to digest here and you will simply move on harping about other things.
 
Wonderwoman said:
http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/47(1948)

Plz refer page 4 and 5 of the resolution of UNSC which is so dear to Pakistanis. There was a set sequence to the referendum for which Pakistan refused to adhere to the very first step and hence none of the sequence took place.

I know the truth will be hard to digest here and you will simply move on harping about other things.
Click to expand...

Maybe Malik Nadeem was crying also because Pakistan hasn't adhered to their side of the bargain by vacating Kashmir. He had his Kapil Dev tearful moment for the Kashmiris hating India and Pakistan..
 
barah_admi said:
So let me get this straight, are you trying to claim there is nothing going on in Kashmir and that Pakistan is just making it up?
Click to expand...

No he is saying no one cares about how Pakistan feels about Kashmir and that nothing will change...
 
Hitman said:
Why doesn't the rest of the world speak a word on it?
Click to expand...

All of them tells India and Pakistan to solve the issue bilaterally. Countries having efficient intelligence agencies are well informed about state of affairs in JK
 
Last edited:
Wasim_Waqar said:
India believes J and K is all theirs as per their constitution. Therefore Pakistan can’t vacate unless India agrees to a referendum because it would otherwise invade AJK sand fulfil its constitution.

If India agrees to referendum then Pakistan must vacate. Until then, India has to take the first step.

Mehboob Makhdoomi a Harvardian from Srinagar explains this: http://m.greaterkashmir.com/news/opinion/for-the-sake-of-argument/196402.html
Click to expand...

Pakistan can do a referendum in AJK and if Kashmiris want Independence then make AJK a separate country and support it in UN.

If India invade an independent country after that then it will be shown in negative lights in the UN and won't be supported by other countries.
 
Romali_rotti said:
Thats not for you to decide unfortunately, if you dont like my posts dont reply to it....
Click to expand...

That is for me to decide because I asked a question aimed at a specific person. Unless you can prove you can read that person's mind I will assume you have no idea what you're talking about.
 
Wasim_Waqar said:
There are only a few UNMOGIP peolle and recently Indian troops shot at people shot at UN in AJK so the presence of a few troops isn’t going to stop blood-thirsty psychopathic Indian army from invading. These are the same guys you kicked out of Kashmir (UNMOGIP).

Ps Poonchis of Kashmir launches the rebellion in 1947...read some history including Christopher Snedden’s book. I feel sorry for you you sound so brainwashed and deluded. I am Kashmiri so I know our history thank you.
Click to expand...

If you know your history, then you should also know how grateful the Kashmiris were for the Indian intervention in 1948, which saved the Kashmiris from the rampaging hordes of looters and rapists unleashed by Pakistan.
 
Garuda said:
Pakistan can do a referendum in AJK and if Kashmiris want Independence then make AJK a separate country and support it in UN.

If India invade an independent country after that then it will be shown in negative lights in the UN and won't be supported by other countries.
Click to expand...

A dog can't take a poo in "Azaad Kashmir" without the approval of Pakistani military. In fact, from a legal perspective Kashmiris on the western side of the LOC have fewer rights than those on the eastern side.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Anyone who has heard about Asifa would ball their eyes out while talking about Kashmir and Human Rights. Lets not act as if the perpetrators of such a heinous crime were arrested or spoken against...instead they were supported and protected. Anyone with an ounce of morality would cry thinking about Asifa and what happened to her.
 
It’s interesting that the same people who cry about alleged war crimes in Kashmir and beg for U.N involvement don’t want U.N. involvement when it comes to war crimes elsewhere.

Why so selective when it comes to human rights?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Despite intense Saudi pressure, UN Human Rights Council renews UN investigation of the ongoing war crimes in Yemen, including Saudi-led bombing and blockading of civilians. Vote is 21 in favor, 8 against, 18 abstain, rejecting Saudi effort to buy its way out of scrutiny. <a href="https://t.co/MrZYquzXPl">pic.twitter.com/MrZYquzXPl</a></p>— Kenneth Roth (@KenRoth) <a href="https://twitter.com/KenRoth/status/1045651715901575169?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 28, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Gabbar Singh said:
It’s interesting that the same people who cry about alleged war crimes in Kashmir and beg for U.N involvement don’t want U.N. involvement when it comes to war crimes elsewhere.

Why so selective when it comes to human rights?

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Despite intense Saudi pressure, UN Human Rights Council renews UN investigation of the ongoing war crimes in Yemen, including Saudi-led bombing and blockading of civilians. Vote is 21 in favor, 8 against, 18 abstain, rejecting Saudi effort to buy its way out of scrutiny. <a href="https://t.co/MrZYquzXPl">pic.twitter.com/MrZYquzXPl</a></p>— Kenneth Roth (@KenRoth) <a href="https://twitter.com/KenRoth/status/1045651715901575169?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 28, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Click to expand...

Never mind Pakistan, it’s interesting to see China backing any country indulging in HR violations. I am sure it was not arm twisted into voting no by SA
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

BouncerGuy
  • Poll Poll
Will India and Pakistan go to war over the Pahalgam incident?
13 14 15
Replies
1K
Views
33K
straighttalk
S
MenInG
India Abstains From Voting On Rights Situation In China's Xinjiang At UN
Replies
7
Views
1K
GreenBee
G
MenInG
OIC expresses 'deep concern' over India's delimitation exercise in occupied Kashmir
Replies
20
Views
2K
ex-q-zit
E
MenInG
G20 Summit in Indian Occupied Kashmir - How should Pakistan respond?
2
Replies
97
Views
6K
FearlessRoar
FearlessRoar
transparent opacity
UK police asked to probe Indian officials’ alleged war crimes in occupied Kashmir
Replies
2
Views
1K
MenInG
MenInG
Back
Top