Bhaijaan
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Runs
- 72,620
- Post of the Week
- 1
I saw some people comparing our neighbour’s trophy cabinet with ours.
What many fail to understand is how different the structure of international cricket was in earlier eras. Today, the proliferation of ICC tournaments means teams get far more opportunities to win championships. In the modern game, a dominant side can realistically win three trophies within three years.
That simply wasn’t the case in the past.
Back then, major tournaments were far less frequent. Sometimes only three global championships were played across an entire decade. For many cricketers, that meant the window of their entire peak could pass with only one real shot at a world title.
In earlier eras, even a 4–5 year period of dominance would typically translate into just one trophy, if that.
Compare that with today. India and New Zealand, for instance, reached around five major finals within a span of six or seven years. Teams in the past rarely had that many opportunities at global titles.
Coming to Pakistan: our golden phase began in the late 1980s.
We reached the World Series finals in 1985, won the Nehru Cup in 1989 (which, frankly, should be recognized by the ICC as a Champions Trophy equivalent), and then capped that era by winning the ultimate prize in 1992.
Throughout the 1990s, Pakistan arguably possessed the most exciting and formidable pool of talent in world cricket. Our fast bowlers redefined pace bowling, with the two Ws standing well above the rest.
Records fell one after another. Saeed Anwar broke the world record for the highest ODI score. Shahid Afridi smashed the fastest century. Saqlain Mushtaq became the fastest to 50 and 100 ODI wickets. Ijaz Ahmed produced one of the most brutal centuries ever seen against India. Even our so-called fringe players had the ability to dismantle top bowling attacks.
Had the current frequency of ICC tournaments existed in the late 80s and 90s, Pakistan could very realistically have accumulated four or five major championships during that era.
What many fail to understand is how different the structure of international cricket was in earlier eras. Today, the proliferation of ICC tournaments means teams get far more opportunities to win championships. In the modern game, a dominant side can realistically win three trophies within three years.
That simply wasn’t the case in the past.
Back then, major tournaments were far less frequent. Sometimes only three global championships were played across an entire decade. For many cricketers, that meant the window of their entire peak could pass with only one real shot at a world title.
In earlier eras, even a 4–5 year period of dominance would typically translate into just one trophy, if that.
Compare that with today. India and New Zealand, for instance, reached around five major finals within a span of six or seven years. Teams in the past rarely had that many opportunities at global titles.
Coming to Pakistan: our golden phase began in the late 1980s.
We reached the World Series finals in 1985, won the Nehru Cup in 1989 (which, frankly, should be recognized by the ICC as a Champions Trophy equivalent), and then capped that era by winning the ultimate prize in 1992.
Throughout the 1990s, Pakistan arguably possessed the most exciting and formidable pool of talent in world cricket. Our fast bowlers redefined pace bowling, with the two Ws standing well above the rest.
Records fell one after another. Saeed Anwar broke the world record for the highest ODI score. Shahid Afridi smashed the fastest century. Saqlain Mushtaq became the fastest to 50 and 100 ODI wickets. Ijaz Ahmed produced one of the most brutal centuries ever seen against India. Even our so-called fringe players had the ability to dismantle top bowling attacks.
Had the current frequency of ICC tournaments existed in the late 80s and 90s, Pakistan could very realistically have accumulated four or five major championships during that era.
- 
