What's new

Pakistan’s T20I wicketkeeping issue – Who’s the answer?

mango_bite77

Local Club Regular
Joined
Jan 24, 2017
Runs
1,487
It’s becoming a real problem that Pakistan still don’t have a proper wicketkeeper-batsman for white-ball cricket.

Mohammad Haris was hyped as the next big thing, but in 35 T20Is he’s only managed 1 fifty and 1 hundred – and those came against Oman and Bangladesh. His overall record is avg 17.9, SR 137, which looks flashy, but it shows he can’t score consistently against quality opposition. Most of the time he throws his wicket away trying to slog.

Mohammad Rizwan is reliable option numbers-wise (avg 47.4, SR 125), Strike rate is too low for a modern day opener and this gets even bad against top 4 teams. Even if we ignore SR issue, still he’s effective only at the top. He can’t bat at 4-7 – his whole game is built around opening or anchoring. If the top order is already settled with Farhan scoring runs and expecting Ayub to regain form, Rizwan doesn’t add much value down the order.

So who else is there?

Haseebullah
Khan – looks tidy, but plays too slow. With his tempo he won’t survive at 5 or 7 where you need instant acceleration.

Khawaja Nafay – some promise in PSL, but very limited exposure to top-level cricket. Could be a big risk if thrown in too early.

Azam Khan – the power is there, but fitness and consistency always let him down. Given few chances not only failed to impress but left himself in embarrassing situations

Rohail Nazir – was rated highly as a junior but has completely stagnated. Don't know if he stills plays cricket ?

Saad Baig - Under 19 captain, looked good in U-19 WCs , but not sure if PCB can groom him for national side. They have been horrible in grooming cricketers especially batters.

I have also, Irfan Niazi keeps wickets, not sure if this is true, then he can be better option than all those names barring Nafay.

In nutshell, at the moment it feels like we either have keepers who can’t bat at the required modern tempo, or batters who aren’t reliable keepers.

What’s the way forward? Do we just stick with Rizwan at the top and forget about grooming a middle-order keeper, or gamble on someone like Nafay?
 
Haris numbers are skewed.

Haris at home

5 innings 186 runs 46.50 average 189.79 strike rate thanks to that one century vs BD

Haris away or neutral

29 innings 369 runs 13.17 average 119.4 strike rate 1 fifty

It is essentially the same as Rizwan

Rizwan away or neutral

71 innings 2435 runs 42.71 average 120.06 strike rate 21 fifties


Rizwan at home

22 innings 979 runs 65.26 average 140.86 strike rate 1 century 9 fifties

If you are comparable with Rizwan then you are mediocre too.
 
Haris numbers are skewed.

Haris at home

5 innings 186 runs 46.50 average 189.79 strike rate thanks to that one century vs BD

Haris away or neutral

29 innings 369 runs 13.17 average 119.4 strike rate 1 fifty

It is essentially the same as Rizwan

Rizwan away or neutral

71 innings 2435 runs 42.71 average 120.06 strike rate 21 fifties


Rizwan at home

22 innings 979 runs 65.26 average 140.86 strike rate 1 century 9 fifties

If you are comparable with Rizwan then you are mediocre too.
Agreed, forget about home vs Away for Haris. His only 50 and 100 against minnows reflects how poor he is.
 
Rizwan looks like the best option at the moment. We can also give Haseebullah a go to see how good he is at this level like we did with Haris.
 
Rizwan looks like the best option at the moment. We can also give Haseebullah a go to see how good he is at this level like we did with Haris.
But where do you play him? With Babar back most probably, he will have no place in top 3. And we all know how bad and underskilled he is in middle.
 
But where do you play him? With Babar back most probably, he will have no place in top 3. And we all know how bad and underskilled he is in middle.
In the middle order. Our current top 3 are not bad. It is unfortunate that Saim isn't performing up to his potential.
 
Haris numbers are skewed.

Haris at home

5 innings 186 runs 46.50 average 189.79 strike rate thanks to that one century vs BD

Haris away or neutral

29 innings 369 runs 13.17 average 119.4 strike rate 1 fifty

It is essentially the same as Rizwan

Rizwan away or neutral

71 innings 2435 runs 42.71 average 120.06 strike rate 21 fifties


Rizwan at home

22 innings 979 runs 65.26 average 140.86 strike rate 1 century 9 fifties

If you are comparable with Rizwan then you are mediocre too.
How is it comparable big differences in averages both home and away?
I know strike rates are higher for Haris, but that is because the few balls he faces he just slog them for big hits, you need to last longer time for better average. Playing fit is a problem with many Pakistan payers including Rizwan.
 
Rizwan is a quality keeper, but he can only play in the top 3 spots as a batsman and he takes his time

Azam Khan is easily the best option for lower order hitting keeper, but he has no clue on how to bat and playing the FC tournament would have helped him

Haseebullah is not a T20 batsman

Khawja Nafay flopped in the Darwin series and is definitely not ready

It should only be between M. Haris or Usman Khan - both can play at a fast rate, but need to bat in the top 3

Usman Khan might work in these conditions at no. 4 though
 
I think someone other than Rizwan and Haris should be tried.

Farhan can keep. Why not make him the keeper? I remember Umar Akmal (a part-time keeper) used to keep in T20.
 
Rohail Nazir is reserve keeper in Pakistan squad, perhaps he could be tried in future of he improves his batting.
 
Okay bro. Please continue to be fixated on individuals. That will solve all our problems.
That’s exactly what you and people with your mindset have always done. You’ve been fixated on individuals instead of the team’s requirements. Practice what you preach!
 
That’s exactly what you and people with your mindset have always done. You’ve been fixated on individuals instead of the team’s requirements. Practice what you preach!

Lol youre one to talk. You've been on a 'vendetta' ever since Rizwan came into the team. You can't even comprehend the mindset of posters that genuinely wants to see improvement because of your blind hate for Rizwan.
 
Haris is rubbish right now at keeping and batting. But he might not always be, he’s young and can improve. He has performance in PSL. And has more potential to slog down the order where he will likely play. I don’t think there are other realistic options right now but when they present themselves we can relook. I think best just to persist now at 6 with Haris who shouldn’t bat higher. We’ve moved on from Rizwan now who isn’t long term. Especially if we’re not batting him as opener.

Usman khan however is an interesting option if he can keep properly. If he’s a worse keeper than Haris not worth it. I would have liked for him to have been given a shot opening.
 
You need a proper Keeper (a bad keeper) or part timer can cost you a match with drop cash or missed stumping/ run out. Need to have a solid keeper.
 
It’s becoming a real problem that Pakistan still don’t have a proper wicketkeeper-batsman for white-ball cricket.

Mohammad Haris was hyped as the next big thing, but in 35 T20Is he’s only managed 1 fifty and 1 hundred – and those came against Oman and Bangladesh. His overall record is avg 17.9, SR 137, which looks flashy, but it shows he can’t score consistently against quality opposition. Most of the time he throws his wicket away trying to slog.

Mohammad Rizwan is reliable option numbers-wise (avg 47.4, SR 125), Strike rate is too low for a modern day opener and this gets even bad against top 4 teams. Even if we ignore SR issue, still he’s effective only at the top. He can’t bat at 4-7 – his whole game is built around opening or anchoring. If the top order is already settled with Farhan scoring runs and expecting Ayub to regain form, Rizwan doesn’t add much value down the order.

So who else is there?

Haseebullah
Khan – looks tidy, but plays too slow. With his tempo he won’t survive at 5 or 7 where you need instant acceleration.

Khawaja Nafay – some promise in PSL, but very limited exposure to top-level cricket. Could be a big risk if thrown in too early.

Azam Khan – the power is there, but fitness and consistency always let him down. Given few chances not only failed to impress but left himself in embarrassing situations

Rohail Nazir – was rated highly as a junior but has completely stagnated. Don't know if he stills plays cricket ?

Saad
Baig - Under 19 captain, looked good in U-19 WCs , but not sure if PCB can groom him for national side. They have been horrible in grooming cricketers especially batters.

I have also, Irfan Niazi keeps wickets, not sure if this is true, then he can be better option than all those names barring Nafay.

In nutshell, at the moment it feels like we either have keepers who can’t bat at the required modern tempo, or batters who aren’t reliable keepers.

What’s the way forward? Do we just stick with Rizwan at the top and forget about grooming a middle-order keeper, or gamble on someone like Nafay?
If i am not wrong this is the same Rohail Nazir who was hyped as much better than Rishab Pant by resident expert @Junaids. Lol at that
 
Haris is rubbish right now at keeping and batting. But he might not always be, he’s young and can improve. He has performance in PSL. And has more potential to slog down the order where he will likely play. I don’t think there are other realistic options right now but when they present themselves we can relook. I think best just to persist now at 6 with Haris who shouldn’t bat higher. We’ve moved on from Rizwan now who isn’t long term. Especially if we’re not batting him as opener.

Usman khan however is an interesting option if he can keep properly. If he’s a worse keeper than Haris not worth it. I would have liked for him to have been given a shot opening.
I think I am on the same page as you.

Its hard though because he is very poor. His keeping was shocking.

But it just seems too soon to press reset. and I agree wish you about Usman, should try him in bilaterals.
 
By Default it’s Rizwan, no one is even in the same league from the keeper-bats I have seen. I heard Shahibzada can keep, so maybe a good option.

Having said that Shahibzada looks better and has a better balance striking unlike Rizwan’s unorthodox technique. Also I know he hit Bumrah for a couple of slogs which makes him the flavor of the season but his returns in terms of s/r and avg are similar to Rizwan’s and if he was as good as a keeper as Rizwan he would be keeping already so don’t think so.

Riz it is.
 
If we are selecting Haris or Azam Khan, then we are essentially promoting mediocrity. One is incapable of battling with any intelligence and the other is so overweight that it's unprofessional and an embarrassment to the nation.

There aren't a lot of options so until someone better comes along Rizwan is the best wicketkeeper batsman in Pakistan currently so must play.
 
Azam when he sorts out his fitness is the best option and most suitable . Since he can bat at that 5th number and can strike big . Till then Pakistan have to deal with Harris , Usman Khan.
 
Azam when he sorts out his fitness is the best option and most suitable . Since he can bat at that 5th number and can strike big . Till then Pakistan have to deal with Harris , Usman Khan.
Azam hasn't played international cricket yet. The sample size is too small. Even Haris looked destructive in PSL, but is not even close to international standard.

So don't think, weight loss is the only barrier for Azam khan to enter into national side.
 
Haseebullah and Rohail Nazir are not even in the picture here.


It’s Khwaja Nafay who the PCB instructed to get his keeping skills up to notch.
 
By Default it’s Rizwan, no one is even in the same league from the keeper-bats I have seen. I heard Shahibzada can keep, so maybe a good option.

Having said that Shahibzada looks better and has a better balance striking unlike Rizwan’s unorthodox technique. Also I know he hit Bumrah for a couple of slogs which makes him the flavor of the season but his returns in terms of s/r and avg are similar to Rizwan’s and if he was as good as a keeper as Rizwan he would be keeping already so don’t think so.

Riz it is.
I'm not in favour of Sahibzada. He has done well but barely established himself as a batter. Not sure adding keeping will help his long term career

Pakistan are in a real conundrum at the moment.

If the coaches have seen something in Haris then may as well stick with him. But his keeping really let him down recently.
 
Should try him or Usman Khan as back up options for sure.
Harris, Usman and Nafay

This pool of keepers is fine.

Rizwan needs to work really really hard to improve his power+strike rate game to become a viable option as a keeper.

There is 0 proof he is useful if he doesn’t get to play some deliveries in the powerplay.
 
Haseebullah and Rohail Nazir are not even in the picture here.


It’s Khwaja Nafay who the PCB instructed to get his keeping skills up to notch.
If that is the case, then it is good for PCT. Nafay is pretty good , proper grooming would make him a player who can play at least for a decade.
 
What issue? There is no world where a WK batsman who averages 47 @125 and also happens to be extremely reliable with the gloves is not good enough.

WK is the least of Pakistan’s worries but unfortunately, Pakistan cricket is run by a bunch of idiots.
 
What issue? There is no world where a WK batsman who averages 47 @125 and also happens to be extremely reliable with the gloves is not good enough.

WK is the least of Pakistan’s worries but unfortunately, Pakistan cricket is run by a bunch of idiots.
To be fair, Rizwan has overachieved given his limited skillset and shot range. His contributions from 2019-2022 is undeniable, and only a fool would dismiss them. However we cant even ignore the fact that he has regressed in last 2 years, his strike is as low as 110 vs top 6 teams. T20 cricket has evolved rapidly, England recently scored 300, and players like Salt or Abhishek can dismantle attacks within the powerplay. The real question is: can Rizwan transform into that kind of explosive batter? The answer is no—and expecting that from him is unfair. His strength lies in holding one end while others attack. However, in a modern T20 lineup, you can only afford 2–3 anchors at most. That’s why Pakistan needs to groom a dependable replacement who can adapt across positions and provide the team with the firepower it currently lacks.
 
Rizwan prime years are being wasted by clowns at the helm of PCB, shameful specially the lot he is competing with Haris Usman Azam (laughable)
 
His strength lies in holding one end while others attack. However, in a modern T20 lineup, you can only afford 2–3 anchors at most.

The thing is we are playing inferior anchors and more of them.

In the ACC

Sahibzada's strike rate was 116
Fakhar's was 120

We also played Hussain Talat as a middle over spin specialist. Same thing with the captain who is also an anchor. Nawaz also played the anchor role in the super 4 match vs India.

How many anchors are we going to play in the absence of Rizwan?
 
How many anchors are we going to play in the absence of Rizwan?
Since when do Fakhar and Sahibzada consciously play as anchors?

Fakhar was anchoring in some games because he’s woefully out of form, lost some of his reflexes and is likely injured

Rizwan being fully fit is a T20 nuisance as an opener everywhere in the world!
 
What do you call someone striking at less than 120?
Someone who isn’t striking the ball as he should

Is that Fakhar and Sahibzada’s actual strike rate? They strike at 150 in the PSL

Is Rizwan not the one who openly proclaims to be an anchor??
 
Someone who isn’t striking the ball as he should

Is that Fakhar and Sahibzada’s actual strike rate? They strike at 150 in the PSL

Is Rizwan not the one who openly proclaims to be an anchor??

Bas kar de yaar.

Rizwan strikes at 120 so he's an anchor.

Sahbzada and Fakhar do the same thing and they're not playing up to their potential.

Why the double standards bro
 
I would continue with Haris.

He is a good prospect

Of course he failed with the bat because he is an opener.

Unfair to evaluate him as a lower order batsman.

Saim got enough chances. Haris should get his number.
 
Bas kar de yaar.

Rizwan strikes at 120 so he's an anchor.

Sahbzada and Fakhar do the same thing and they're not playing up to their potential.

Why the double standards bro
"Difficult to play an anchor role in T20s & sometimes it looks very embarrassing": Mohammad Rizwan

Mohammad Rizwan, who is playing for Comilla Victorians in the ongoing Bangladesh Premier League, feels that everywhere he is picked in the franchise-based T20 cricket tournament, he is asked to stay at the wicket without taking too much risk in order to make sure other batters can play in their natural free-flowing style without worrying too much about what is happening at the other end.

"It is very difficult role (anchor role in shortest format) and sometimes it looks very embarrassing," Rizwan told reporters. "What my experience says and what I know is that whenever someone hires me, they demand me to play the anchor role like the way I do in Pakistan.

"I always assess the condition, assess the opponent and do these kinds of things (anchoring the innings) and sometimes it is embarrassing because in T20 everyone knows we love sixes and they want me to score 60-70 runs from 35-45 balls, but for me to win the match.

The number two T20I batter added that he chose to travel the path of anchoring the innings due to the fact he is well aware he can accelerate the run rate at the later part of the innings.

Unlike some other leading T20 batters in the world who can get going from the word go, Rizwan holds back from playing over-the-top shots.

"You can look at the scoreboard and see what the team demand from you. Basically for me, my cricket idol is AB De Villiers and I look at him very closely and his performances in Test cricket and T20 as well and that's why I also try to play according to the demand of the team.

"In T20 cricket, sometimes you can go with slow strike rate because sometimes in T20 you are in a position where they (opposition) are looking to take wickets. You can go slow (when you've lost a couple of wickets) but when the team needs you to hit the long ball, you can go with the momentum. For me, assessing the time is important (when to break free) and thankfully, most of the time, I am successful."


Who said this nonsense?

Who also said “me and Babar used to look after the 5th bowler to cash in later”

????

Who said this b.s??
 
Who said this nonsense?

Who also said “me and Babar used to look after the 5th bowler to cash in later”

????

Who said this b.s??


So he's an anchor, that's already established.

The question is whether the replacements are any better? If they're going to be doing the same job, 'anchoring' then what's the point of keeping the best one out
 
People need to understand and stop giving Rizwan as solution . The WK who fits Pakistan currently should be able to bat at 5 or 6 . So Rizwan is not a answer
 
I heard Hesson was trying to convert Babar into a keeper lol I think purely on merit no keeper deserves to play. So they have to look into converting someone.
 
Anchors in t20 :vk2 .

Oh bhai please take a look at my 2nd team and see what brand of cricket they are playing. Aus is in a different league.

Its a shame nostalgia is the only thing yhat forces me to support PK at this point and AU has to be no2
 
Pakistan should give Azam Khan one last chance.
There are multiple better options than him at the moment. Maybe, he can get his chance after the 2026 World Cup and by then he should improve his fitness and perform in PSL and other T20 leagues in the world.
 
Back
Top