What's new

Pakistan Armed Forces ranked 13th most powerful on Global Firepower military strength index

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
Pakistan Armed Forces have been ranked the 13th most powerful in the world on the Global Firepower Military Strength Index 2017, according to data released by the group on its official website.

The list by Global Firepower (GFP) relies on more than 50 factors to assign the 133 countries included in the survey an individual Power Index (PI) score, based upon their conventional war-making capability across land, sea and air.

Taking into account the diversity of weapons possessed by each nation, the published results include values related to the resources, finances and the particular geographical position of each country.

Each military power is judged on an individual as well as collective factors. The method used for calculating the final power index score has not been made public, although the official website of GFP outlines that “our formula allows smaller, more technologically advanced countries, to compete with larger, lesser developed ones”.

The GFP has cautioned that the PI score should be viewed in the context of certain basic assumptions that were made before it was calculated.

For example, the score does not rely on the “number of weapons each nation has, but on their relative diversity”, nuclear stockpiles are “not taken into account but recognised in the form of bonus points”, geographical factors and manpower are “key considerations” in the final score, landlocked nations are “not docked points for lack of naval forces”, and political and military leadership of individual countries does not have any bearing on the PI.

As political tensions heat up the arms race across the world, a lot of countries are in the process of modernising their existing weaponry, both conventional and nuclear. According to Business Insider, between 2012 and 2016, more weapons were delivered to countries seeking them than during any five-year period since 1990. GFP aims to provide a rare military-to-military comparison of where nations stand in relation to each other, the US-based publication highlights.

“Balance is the key – a large, strong fighting force across land, sea and air backed by a resilient economy and defensible territory, along with an efficient infrastructure – such qualities are those used to round out a particular nation’s total fighting strength on paper,” the GFP ranking states.


Pakistan Armed Forces

The armed forces of the country have been ranked 13th out of a list of 133 countries based on their capability on land, sea and air, as well as their financial dexterity, and the size of the geographical boundaries of Pakistan with other states.

In the annual GFP review of 2017, Pakistan Armed Forces scored 0.3287, 0.000 being the perfect score in the list, on the Military Strength Power Index. Currently, the country dedicates $7 billion from its annual budget for defence purposes.

Manpower is an important part of the PI score, and GFP notes that “wars of attrition usually favour those with more manpower”. Pakistan has 919,000 total military personnel, out of which 637,000 are on active duty, the GFP database reveals. With a total population of 201,995,540 people, there are approximately 95,000,000 men available for duty in the country, 75,325,000 of which are “fit-for-service”.

An assessment of the air power of the country, which include “both fixed wing and rotary wing (helicopters)” types, has put the total aircraft strength of Pakistan Armed Forces at 951. The list includes aircraft from all branches of the forces. According to GFP, Pakistan has 301 fighter aircraft, 394 attack aircraft, and 316 helicopters, 52 of those which are attack choppers.

The evaluation of the strength of land forces in Pakistan classifies the number of combat tanks, armoured vehicles, and rocket projectors, among other equipment, that the military has. GFP data have put the total number of combat tanks owned by the country at 2,924. In addition to these, Pakistan has 2,828 armoured fighting vehicles and 134 rocket projectors.

Another important consideration in the total PI score is naval assets, and the GFP notes that Pakistan has a total of 197 naval assets, of which 17 are patrol crafts, eight are submarines, and 10 frigates.


Indian Armed Forces

The armed forces of arch-rival India are ranked 4th on the Power Index, with a score of 0.1593. According to the GFP, India currently spends $51 billion from its annual budget on the military, which is almost seven times more than what Pakistan does.

With a population more than 5 times that of Pakistan, it has 4,207,250 total military personnel, and 1,362,500 are on active duty. Compared to Pakistan’s 951, India has 2,102 total aircraft; 676 interceptors, 809 attack aircraft, and 666 helicopters. India also has double the number of battle tanks, armoured vehicles, naval assets, submarines included, as compared to Pakistan.


Most powerful military in the world

The United States military has been ranked the most powerful armed force in the world, closely followed by Russia and China.

US has a PI score of 0.0857, Russia comes in second on the list with 0.929, and China is third with 0.0945. The US spends almost $600 billion annually on defence, while China spends close to $161 billion. The Russian Federation, surprisingly, only spends about $45 billion on its armed forces.

In terms of total military personnel, China beats US and Russia. The rising superpower has a total military strength of 3,712,500, compared to 3,371,027 of Russia and 2,363,675 of the US.

Another astonishing statistic highlights the wide disparity in the aerial strength of world countries on the list, wherein the US, according to GFP, is revealed as possessing an astounding 13,762 aircraft, 6,065 of which are helicopters. Russia has a total of 3,794 aircraft, while China only 2,955.

When it comes to land forces, Russia beats its rivals in terms of military equipment. Russia owns close to 20,216 combat tanks, 31,098 armoured vehicles. The US, on the other hand, only has around 5,000 combat tanks, but 41,062 armoured fighting vehicles. China, compared to both, has only 6,457 combat tanks and 4,788 armoured vehicles.

Naval assets, increasingly viewed as the ‘strength benchmark’ of a nation’s armed forces, are also indicative of the global clout of US, Russia and China. In terms of overall numbers, the assets of all three countries are not all that different from each other. However, the US has 19 aircraft carriers, and Russia and China each have just one.

https://tribune.com.pk/story/164902...ful-global-firepower-military-strength-index/
 
Such rankings don't matter when they are greatly flawed. Pakistani military has done a great job in bringing peace to the country with their many recent operations. I have read many articles praising this incredible achievement. I still remember just a few years back blasts were occurring every day in various parts of the country. The most powerful army in the world with all their modern weaponry can't even defeat the ragtag Taliban travelling on horseback:)) The rankings don't consider one crucial factor that makes a great army, bravery. Cricket rankings are far more accurate then such military ones.
 
India spends more on it's armed forces than Russians ����
Talk about priorities :/
 
Such rankings don't matter when they are greatly flawed. Pakistani military has done a great job in bringing peace to the country with their many recent operations. I have read many articles praising this incredible achievement. I still remember just a few years back blasts were occurring every day in various parts of the country. The most powerful army in the world with all their modern weaponry can't even defeat the ragtag Taliban travelling on horseback:)) The rankings don't consider one crucial factor that makes a great army, bravery. Cricket rankings are far more accurate then such military ones.

There is peace in pakistan country ? So no more daily blasts inside moseques,public places,jihadis and no more UN recognized terrorists now operating from pakistan ?
 
Playground for rich and powerful who run the world.. These rankings are not for commoners like us
 
Playground for rich and powerful who run the world.. These rankings are not for commoners like us

But we have to. Should learn from history. Suffered unimaginable losses in history due to foreign invasions.
 
There is peace in pakistan country ? So no more daily blasts inside moseques,public places,jihadis and no more UN recognized terrorists now operating from pakistan ?

Its actually relatively peaceful in Pakistan now, especially compared to five or six years ago.Bomb blasts are pretty rare, relative to before.
 
Its actually relatively peaceful in Pakistan now, especially compared to five or six years ago.Bomb blasts are pretty rare, relative to before.

Good to hear that. I guess situation will only keep on improving now future....
 
There is peace in pakistan country ? So no more daily blasts inside moseques,public places,jihadis and no more UN recognized terrorists now operating from pakistan ?

Ever since the military operation against Indian-funded terrorism, the situation has been stable in Pakistan lately.
 
Such rankings don't matter when they are greatly flawed. Pakistani military has done a great job in bringing peace to the country with their many recent operations. I have read many articles praising this incredible achievement. I still remember just a few years back blasts were occurring every day in various parts of the country. The most powerful army in the world with all their modern weaponry can't even defeat the ragtag Taliban travelling on horseback:)) The rankings don't consider one crucial factor that makes a great army, bravery. Cricket rankings are far more accurate then such military ones.

We'll leave aside the small matter that the Pakistani military are partly responsible for the fires they are supposedly putting out. It's akin to certain editions of Kaspersky a few years ago - introduced potentially harmful cookies to then take them out and claim credit.
 
But we have to. Should learn from history. Suffered unimaginable losses in history due to foreign invasions.


That’s the reason used to justify.. End of the day Indians are living a very mediocre life and rather than asking for clean air to breathe for their kids or unadulterated food for their kids they want to
Top such lists it seems..

Go collect data about consumption of various type of food in Delhi (capital city) then search the supply and understand 60% deficiency between demand and supply means we are fed chemicals in name of food.. Anyways you won’t get it no point talking about such stuff..
 
That’s the reason used to justify.. End of the day Indians are living a very mediocre life and rather than asking for clean air to breathe for their kids or unadulterated food for their kids they want to
Top such lists it seems..

Go collect data about consumption of various type of food in Delhi (capital city) then search the supply and understand 60% deficiency between demand and supply means we are fed chemicals in name of food.. Anyways you won’t get it no point talking about such stuff..

I am doing job in cyber city gurgaon and living near mg road,so i know all about this.
What you want to say ? What should we do ? We should not spend money on this ?
 
There is peace in pakistan country ? So no more daily blasts inside moseques,public places,jihadis and no more UN recognized terrorists now operating from pakistan ?

UN is recognising nothing. Peace compared to some years back, yes! It is much more peaceful now as compared to before. You worry about yourself, not us. I hear the Moaists have been giving your army the run around just yesterday.
 
We'll leave aside the small matter that the Pakistani military are partly responsible for the fires they are supposedly putting out. It's akin to certain editions of Kaspersky a few years ago - introduced potentially harmful cookies to then take them out and claim credit.

Not the military but Musharraf's policy's. Same can be said about your army in IoK who are paying the price for their own cruelty, No point blaming Pak for it like your media keeps on doing. We are putting the flames out in our country, time is a great equaliser. I don't see any let up in IoK, you have trouble with the Moaists as well. I keep an eye out on what is happening in India as well. You deserve what is happening to you.
 
I am doing job in cyber city gurgaon and living near mg road,so i know all about this.
What you want to say ? What should we do ? We should not spend money on this ?


It’s not in our hands my friend, but depends on entire neighbourhood who got their priorities wrong..
 
Pakistani military is doing remarkably well given the sad state of country's economy. Well done.
 
Such rankings don't matter when they are greatly flawed. Pakistani military has done a great job in bringing peace to the country with their many recent operations. I have read many articles praising this incredible achievement. I still remember just a few years back blasts were occurring every day in various parts of the country. The most powerful army in the world with all their modern weaponry can't even defeat the ragtag Taliban travelling on horseback:)) The rankings don't consider one crucial factor that makes a great army, bravery. Cricket rankings are far more accurate then such military ones.

Beautifully put.
 
India spends more on it's armed forces than Russians ����
Talk about priorities :/

How do you think India should guard against powerful enemies like China? Perhaps just surrender and become their client state like a certain neighboring country has become?
 
The American army has a high suicide rate as well. This is the world's most powerful army for you with veterans fighting massive depression on their return home after killing million's of innocents. They don't even know what and who the enemy is!
 
Ever since the military operation against Indian-funded terrorism, the situation has been stable in Pakistan lately.

Who do you think started this cycle of funding terrorism in the other country, India or Pakistan?
 
I think India did it in Bangladesh.

I think Bangladeshis would disagree that "Mukti Bahini" was terrorism. Factually the killing of civilians by the Pakistani Army meets the criteria for state terrorism.

"An academic consensus prevails that the atrocities committed by the Pakistani military were a genocide."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bangladesh_Liberation_War

All this would not have happened if the West Pakistani Army generals were ready to accept the results of the elections.
 
Last edited:
I think Bangladeshis would disagree that "Mukti Bahini" was terrorism. Factually the killing of civilians by the Pakistani Army meets the criteria for state terrorism.

"An academic consensus prevails that the atrocities committed by the Pakistani military were a genocide."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bangladesh_Liberation_War

All this would not have happened if the West Pakistani Army generals were ready to accept the results of the elections.

West Pakistani generals and Bhutto made many mistakes and Bengali people had every right to be independent but what were Indians doing there ?
 
West Pakistani generals and Bhutto made many mistakes and Bengali people had every right to be independent but what were Indians doing there ?

If there is a genocide in progress, then it is morally incumbent on everyone to provide help to the victims. Estimates of Bangladeshi civilians killed range from 300,000 to 3 million. Helping them defend themselves is not funding terrorism.

Besides, there were 10 million Bangladeshi refugees in India at that point.
 
Last edited:
If there is a genocide in progress, then it is morally incumbent on everyone to provide help to the victims. Estimates of Bangladeshi civilians killed range from 300,000 to 3 million. Helping them is not funding terrorism.

Besides, there were 10 million Bangladeshi refugees in India at that point.

No, that was just an excuse to take advantage of a situation and break your adversary into half. Genocide is also happening in Mayanmar, I don't see India invading there.
And are we justified to say that Pakistan is helping Kashmiri people who want independance ?
 
Nuclear bhaiya evens out everything.

And even nuclear is becoming obsolete now with the rise of AI guided micro and mini weapons.
 
No, that was just an excuse to take advantage of a situation and break your adversary into half. Genocide is also happening in Mayanmar, I don't see India invading there.
And are we justified to say that Pakistan is helping Kashmiri people who want independance ?

The difference between Kashmir and Bangladesh is that:

1) Kashmiris enjoy the democratic rights to vote like other Indians.

2) Kashmiris enjoy greater civil rights than other Indians due to Article 370.

3) The Indian Army is not conducting mass killings of Kashmiris like the Pakistani Army did.

As for Myanmar, yes India should provide aid to the Rohingya victims to defend themselves. Most of the violence seems to be happening in the region that border Bangladesh rather than India.
 
The difference between Kashmir and Bangladesh is that:

1) Kashmiris enjoy the democratic rights to vote like other Indians.

2) Kashmiris enjoy greater civil rights than other Indians due to Article 370.

3) The Indian Army is not conducting mass killings of Kashmiris like the Pakistani Army did.

As for Myanmar, yes India should provide aid to the Rohingya victims to defend themselves. Most of the violence seems to be happening in the region that border Bangladesh rather than India.

:))) good one.

wait, you serious?
 
The difference between Kashmir and Bangladesh is that:

1) Kashmiris enjoy the democratic rights to vote like other Indians.

2) Kashmiris enjoy greater civil rights than other Indians due to Article 370.

3) The Indian Army is not conducting mass killings of Kashmiris like the Pakistani Army did.

As for Myanmar, yes India should provide aid to the Rohingya victims to defend themselves. Most of the violence seems to be happening in the region that border Bangladesh rather than India.

I disagree with your point 3.
India invaded then East Pakistan on the premise that genocide is happening there. Now why is India not invading Myanmar or at least supporting Rohingya victims militarily like they did with Mukti Bahni ?
 
I disagree with your point 3.
India invaded then East Pakistan on the premise that genocide is happening there. Now why is India not invading Myanmar or at least supporting Rohingya victims militarily like they did with Mukti Bahni ?

While the extent of what was happening in Bangladesh and Myanmar does differ, I agree that if they were consistent the Indians should have provided more aid to the Rohingyas. I am not sure that the Rohingyas are in regions that border India, they seem more to the south of Mizoram.
 
West Pakistani generals and Bhutto made many mistakes and Bengali people had every right to be independent but what were Indians doing there ?

Sir 10million East Pakistanis poured into India with more arriving each day. Pakistan was not bothered about taking them back. We had two choices either keep taking them in and end up with millions of refugees or help them go back.We also had the small issue of payback to the Pak Army for trying to do OP Gibraltar.

The choice was easy.

If Pakistan had kept its issues inside its borders India wouldnot have bothered. Even then the war was started by Pakistan with OP Chengiz Khan.
 
I disagree with your point 3.
India invaded then East Pakistan on the premise that genocide is happening there. Now why is India not invading Myanmar or at least supporting Rohingya victims militarily like they did with Mukti Bahni ?

India didnot invade. Pakistan started the war with OP Chengiz Khan.

India did support the muktis but we had no choice. 10mn plus were in India. And we had to find a way to send them back.
 
Who do you think started this cycle of funding terrorism in the other country, India or Pakistan?

That has been set the moment India chose not to accept Pakistan as reality. As for funding terrorism, if your definition of terrorizing by killing innocent people including children and women, then India has been long ahead whereas Pakistan has been accused for terrorism which both Pakistan and USA are responsible for using Afghan resistance as tool to resist against USSR in Afghanistan. Ajit Doval boasts about promoting terrorism that has claimed the lives of more than 100,000 including children and women which he has been appointed by Modi whose background set on the genocide of Muslim people including children and women, also his communal party to this day still slaughter Muslims, children and women included, to death in the name of beef laws.

One side wants everyone related to Islam removed from the facet of the earth while the other side is tired of maintaining diplomatic ties from General Musharraf to Nawaz Sharif but no to avail since Indian people electing Genocidal Modi showed that they chose hatred over humanity. The same land where women are disrespected/dishonored and daughters are considered as burden signals the devoid of humanity.
 
That has been set the moment India chose not to accept Pakistan as reality. As for funding terrorism, if your definition of terrorizing by killing innocent people including children and women, then India has been long ahead whereas Pakistan has been accused for terrorism which both Pakistan and USA are responsible for using Afghan resistance as tool to resist against USSR in Afghanistan. Ajit Doval boasts about promoting terrorism that has claimed the lives of more than 100,000 including children and women which he has been appointed by Modi whose background set on the genocide of Muslim people including children and women, also his communal party to this day still slaughter Muslims, children and women included, to death in the name of beef laws.

One side wants everyone related to Islam removed from the facet of the earth while the other side is tired of maintaining diplomatic ties from General Musharraf to Nawaz Sharif but no to avail since Indian people electing Genocidal Modi showed that they chose hatred over humanity. The same land where women are disrespected/dishonored and daughters are considered as burden signals the devoid of humanity.

You guys have been brain washed to the core. I will ask you figiures and you will run away.
Tell me figures about muslims killed in india due to beef related issues in last even 5 years data combined . Its not even in hundred out of 125 crore populated country.
Ajit doval said that india should also do what pakistan does. He didnt say india does all the bombing and all in pakistan. Whereas whole world recognized hafiz saeed ,and many UN recognized terrorist operating from pakistan.
 
Last edited:
As much as i feel ashamed of India's fascist government lead by an illiterate chaiwala and its pathetic treatment of minorities, there is no doubt India possesses the most deadly army in the world proven by its track record.

Ironically the one and only battle India lost to China remains the one where its army was at its ferocious best in my opinion. One Indian soldier fought with 10 Chinese in that war with little back end support.

Nehru may be India's greatest ever PM by far but loss to China in 1962 was largely due to his lack of concern for enhancement of India's defense preparedness.
 
The difference between Kashmir and Bangladesh is that:

1) Kashmiris enjoy the democratic rights to vote like other Indians.

2) Kashmiris enjoy greater civil rights than other Indians due to Article 370.

3) The Indian Army is not conducting mass killings of Kashmiris like the Pakistani Army did.

As for Myanmar, yes India should provide aid to the Rohingya victims to defend themselves. Most of the violence seems to be happening in the region that border Bangladesh rather than India.

Hasn't Indian Army committed crimes against humanity in Kashmir?
 
That has been set the moment India chose not to accept Pakistan as reality.

Let me assure you that Indians completely accept Pakistan as a reality and have no desire to take over the country. There is nothing to be gained for Indians, no economic or political advantage only a multiplication of headaches.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Must be painful for Indians to have such a larger force, larger budget, more toys, and international support....yet still fail to achieve anything vis-a-vis Pakistan. Shows where the mighty Indian military stands.
 
You guys have been brain washed to the core. I will ask you figiures and you will run away.
Tell me figures about muslims killed in india due to beef related issues in last even 5 years data combined . Its not even in hundred out of 125 crore populated country.
Ajit doval said that india should also do what pakistan does. He didnt say india does all the bombing and all in pakistan. Whereas whole world recognized hafiz saeed ,and many UN recognized terrorist operating from pakistan.

Ajit Doval boasted about terrorism that specifically targeted civilians; innocent people including children and women. Whereas for Pakistan, both Pakistan and USA collaborated and formed resistance groups to resist USSR invasion in Afghanistan.

Not the quite same definition of terrorism. If your definition of terrorism is to resist the invasion army to protect the native land, then what is the word you are looking are that kills civilians; children and women included?

USA was terrorist [resistance] in the eyes of British Kingdom. Bhagat Singh [resistance] was terrorist in the eyes of British Kingdom. And Pakistan/USA [resistance] are the terrorist in the eyes of India.

What about real terrorist that is known for killing innocent people including children and women, and not resistance against the invading army that has no business right to invade in the first place?

Indian-funded Terrorist-outfit aka TTP, as boasted by Ajit Doval in-charge of Indian NSA, is responsible for the death of more than 100,000 including children and women. Of course, you are not all concerned about that. Why would you and the rest of India be concerned about the morality since they deemed to elect Genocidal Modi [set on the genocide of Gujarat] to send clear message all over the world?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top