Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
With batting like this, why would anyone watch test cricket? Dull pitches, minnow opposition, glacial batting. Recipe for complete boredom.
A low RR does not mean boredom. And by excitement, I don't mean boundaries galore. Look at England vs Bangladesh or the recent pitches in Sri Lanka. The batsmen had to play slow because the pitches challenged them. Even then, some struck out and got runs which increased the excitement.
Pakistan's approach works for them and it wins them series after series which is good and should be the priority but they are not drawing a dime buddy.
No matter who the opposition is, no matter what the situation is, no matter how the pitch is.
Pakistanis batters will always continue to bat at a constant rate of 2.75-3 rpo.
I am constantly amazed by the inability of some to understand how Test cricket works
Idea is to win each game and not to please T20 fans
See this is the blatant elitist attitude that drives fans away. I understand what you are saying and I totally agree with you. But face the facts. Pakistan plays very boring but safe cricket which works for them. It does not mean it draws fans.
Test fans have such a giant chip on their shoulder that any time someone calls out a boring match, that person is called out for being a T20 fan when in fact, he might be a genuine test fan criticizing a particular style. Sorry buddy but that's not gonna bring more eyeballs to the format which is already ailing. Now, it may so happen that Pakistan might trip on a banana peel (like in the first test) and end up making the match close on the 4th/5th day but is it worth sitting through 3 days of sluggish, boring "action" for like 30 minutes of excitement? That's not the "beauty" of test cricket. That's just the teams making a meal out of a simple situation.
Test cricket fans pride themselves for being insightful, intelligent and patient but their reaction to anyone questioning the format suggests otherwise.
Who cares? Haters just need something to criticise the team for since they're not losing.
I am constantly amazed by the inability of some to understand how Test cricket works
Idea is to win each game and not to please T20 fans
Well fans certainly don't care because no one is coming to the stadium to see these borefests.
See this is the blatant elitist attitude that drives fans away. I understand what you are saying and I totally agree with you. But face the facts. Pakistan plays very boring but safe cricket which works for them. It does not mean it draws fans.
Test fans have such a giant chip on their shoulder that any time someone calls out a boring match, that person is called out for being a T20 fan when in fact, he might be a genuine test fan criticizing a particular style. Sorry buddy but that's not gonna bring more eyeballs to the format which is already ailing. Now, it may so happen that Pakistan might trip on a banana peel (like in the first test) and end up making the match close on the 4th/5th day but is it worth sitting through 3 days of sluggish, boring "action" for like 30 minutes of excitement? That's not the "beauty" of test cricket. That's just the teams making a meal out of a simple situation.
Test cricket fans pride themselves for being insightful, intelligent and patient but their reaction to anyone questioning the format suggests otherwise.
^Windies are a boring Test team no doubt about that. Sri Lanka too.
Lol its not the teams that make the contest boring its the level of competition .^Windies are a boring Test team no doubt about that. Sri Lanka too.
The dullness of the series has been amplified by two boring teams coming together on the worst wickets in the world.
That's what you get when you let some forty plus FTBs with defensive mindset prolong their career on road like wickets. Its contagious and younger ( relatively in case of Azhar ) players follow them. Players with positive mindset, Babar and Umar Akmal are not encouraged in this culture.
See this is the blatant elitist attitude that drives fans away. I understand what you are saying and I totally agree with you. But face the facts. Pakistan plays very boring but safe cricket which works for them. It does not mean it draws fans.
Test fans have such a giant chip on their shoulder that any time someone calls out a boring match, that person is called out for being a T20 fan when in fact, he might be a genuine test fan criticizing a particular style. Sorry buddy but that's not gonna bring more eyeballs to the format which is already ailing. Now, it may so happen that Pakistan might trip on a banana peel (like in the first test) and end up making the match close on the 4th/5th day but is it worth sitting through 3 days of sluggish, boring "action" for like 30 minutes of excitement? That's not the "beauty" of test cricket. That's just the teams making a meal out of a simple situation.
Test cricket fans pride themselves for being insightful, intelligent and patient but their reaction to anyone questioning the format suggests otherwise.
I think in NZ and Aus, it will be more clear whether Pak slow batting is due to pitches or else. Comparison with other teams will be easier
I think the batting confidence is down slightly and it's something that's been going on from the West Indies series also I don't agree with babar Azam playing ahead of sharjeel and putting him up at number 3 that too in New Zealand

Yes. Please justify this approach. I would love to hear your views, so-called test experts. It's one thing to play slow. But you up a gear after you have settled and rotate the strike if you cannot score runs quickly. Not only are Pakistan boring as a test side, they go completely into their security blanket which works fine in the desert because bowlers tire on a flat pitch. But they do not get this luxury on a pitch with some juice in it.
It's staggering that these "experts" are blaming Sarfraz even a bit. He got an unplayable ball first up. It swung in and then moved away a bit. No way to play that. Same goes for YK. Azhar and Misbah deserve much of the blame. Misbah totally gave it away. Azhar played one of the worst innings I have seen. He came and left having done nothing for 30 odd overs.
All in all, Pakistan still have the chance to make a match out of it if they somehow take this lead to 150. But they are the ones to blame for not even putting the bad balls away for whatever reason.
Yes. Please justify this approach. I would love to hear your views, so-called test experts. It's one thing to play slow. But you up a gear after you have settled and rotate the strike if you cannot score runs quickly. Not only are Pakistan boring as a test side, they go completely into their security blanket which works fine in the desert because bowlers tire on a flat pitch. But they do not get this luxury on a pitch with some juice in it.
It's staggering that these "experts" are blaming Sarfraz even a bit. He got an unplayable ball first up. It swung in and then moved away a bit. No way to play that. Same goes for YK. Azhar and Misbah deserve much of the blame. Misbah totally gave it away. Azhar played one of the worst innings I have seen. He came and left having done nothing for 30 odd overs.
All in all, Pakistan still have the chance to make a match out of it if they somehow take this lead to 150. But they are the ones to blame for not even putting the bad balls away for whatever reason.
Yes. Please justify this approach. I would love to hear your views, so-called test experts. It's one thing to play slow. But you up a gear after you have settled and rotate the strike if you cannot score runs quickly. Not only are Pakistan boring as a test side, they go completely into their security blanket which works fine in the desert because bowlers tire on a flat pitch. But they do not get this luxury on a pitch with some juice in it.
It's staggering that these "experts" are blaming Sarfraz even a bit. He got an unplayable ball first up. It swung in and then moved away a bit. No way to play that. Same goes for YK. Azhar and Misbah deserve much of the blame. Misbah totally gave it away. Azhar played one of the worst innings I have seen. He came and left having done nothing for 30 odd overs.
All in all, Pakistan still have the chance to make a match out of it if they somehow take this lead to 150. But they are the ones to blame for not even putting the bad balls away for whatever reason.
With batting like this, why would anyone watch test cricket? Dull pitches, minnow opposition, glacial batting. Recipe for complete boredom.
A low RR does not mean boredom. And by excitement, I don't mean boundaries galore. Look at England vs Bangladesh or the recent pitches in Sri Lanka. The batsmen had to play slow because the pitches challenged them. Even then, some struck out and got runs which increased the excitement.
Pakistan's approach works for them and it wins them series after series which is good and should be the priority but they are not drawing a dime buddy.
I think in NZ and Aus, it will be more clear whether Pak slow batting is due to pitches or else. Comparison with other teams will be easier
Its clear now. Epic "kut" of Pakistan bowlers while pakistan batsmen played slowI think in NZ and Aus, it will be more clear whether Pak slow batting is due to pitches or else. Comparison with other teams will be easier
and then people wonder why we have long list of people who despise Misbah's personality and can't wait before he is out of the team and out of influencing the youngsters more.
To be honest Pakistan has not evolved with the modern day cricket..and we are still behind the other top test playing nations..and Misbah does have a large portion of blame to share..because he was captain and leader of ODI,test teams all these years and neither he himself improved his game nor asked juniors instead he was too happy with his defensive approach.
Just a few people who have some personal issues with Misbah in the media. Pls dont generalize.
not everyone has a personal agenda against him. Those people you are talking about I'm well aware of them but there is genuine hate for Misbah amongst Pakistani fans including me.
There is a strong argument about Misbah's captaincy and his skills as a batsman and the kind of influence he has passed to the junior players during his stay in ODIs and tests. Ever since Misbah has left the ODI side things have started looking improved,with our team scoring 260+ on regular basis. Plus the captain who is thought to be the most defensive player himself leads from the front and bats at a strike rate of 80+. Imagine Misbah's strike rate batting at no.5 in the 60s during his captaincy. same is the case with the test team. Pakistan need to move on from defensive mindset and I don't think it's possible under Misbah.
There's a quite a few if one actually looks the facts. Since the start of the decade, the batsmen who've played more than 10 Tests at #5 and have batted at a lower SR than Misbah include Virat Kohli, Faf du Plessis, Marlon Samuels, Shiv Chanderpaul and Thilan Samaraweera.Misbah himself bats at no.5 in test matches and his strike rate is 45. Tell me any player in the top test teams with such a pathetic strike rate batting at 5?
There's a quite a few if one actually looks the facts. Since the start of the decade, the batsmen who've played more than 10 Tests at #5 and have batted at a lower SR than Misbah include Virat Kohli, Faf du Plessis, Marlon Samuels, Shiv Chanderpaul and Thilan Samaraweera.
http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/en...0;spanval2=span;template=results;type=batting
It is true Misbah's SR is towards the lower end but bear in mind the openers we've had over the last six years - Hafeez (walking wicket against swing/seam), Shan Masood, Khurrum Manzoor, Imran Farhat etc. Often at 5 he's had to do rebuilding job. Now its true other teams will counterattack even if they lose early wickets, but Misbah knows his limitations and works around them. Look at what's happened in this series when Misbah has tried to take the attack to the bowler.
We'll been bailed out many times from poor starts by Younis-Misbah partnership even though their methods may seem ugly or attritional. Since the start of 2010, the Younis-Misbah partnership average 75 with 14 century stands so you can argue about style but the results are clear unless you want to dispute fact. And please don't give argument about flat tracks as if no other Test batsman has batted on flat tracks before. The number of runs they've scored as a partnership is 3205 which's higher than any other pairing in Pakistan Test history.
If you think there are a bunch of fluent strokemakers sitting in domestic cricket and its only Misbah guilty of tuk tuk then you don't watch domestic cricket. Sadly, with crappy damp pitches and the FC season being played during Oct-Jan which is most favourable time for seamers due to overhead conditions, especially in Northern Pakistan - you see batsmen doing nothing but tuk tuk.
Constructive criticism fine but anti-Misbah lobby really goes overboard. I cannot understand why you use the words "hatred" and "despise" for Misbah - as if you're describing a spot or match fixer like Salman Butt or Salim Malik. We've had far worse captains in the past. How many captains can match Misbah's W/L record as captain ?
Criticism of Misbah is for different reason - he is bullying everyone to prolong his career, which is been exposed now. If he retires after SCG, everything will be forgotten & people will remember him for his great contribution - now frustration is coming out of every angle.
What will you do, if he accepts SK's request for one more tour in WI & averages 25 as specialist bat at No. 5?
Unacceptable.
But I think Markhor's post was aimed at a) the usual suspects in the media and b) a few posters who failed to give him credit when the team was doing well but have suddenly appeared now that we're losing and are making slightly OTT arguments.

There's a lot of self-preservation at the moment with some of the Pakistan batters. It's a case of scoring enough runs to keep their place for the next series and nothing else.
There's a lot of self-preservation at the moment with some of the Pakistan batters. It's a case of scoring enough runs to keep their place for the next series and nothing else.
I think that is a very convenient assessment and not one that I agree with.
I think this team just does not know how to play test matches. Our players think that test matches are all about staying at the crease for as long as possible. There is no session by session planning. There is no strategy. Test cricket, unlike ODIs and T20s, requires strong tactical thinking which our players, especially the captain, do not posses.
We've seen Azhar Ali play this brand of cricket since his first test match. Has he always been under the pump for his place? Same case with Asad Shafique; till he was part of the team... and now we're seeing the same with Abdullah, Imam, and sometimes Babar.
Point is, there is lack of guidance and strategy when it comes to how to play test cricket. Batsmen believe that they need to show "discipline" at the crease and runs are secondary.
Also, we're seeing a clear lack of strategy when it comes to our bowling too. Shaheen, who in my opinion is more skilled than Cummins, has no idea about test match bowling. He looks for a wicket on every single ball which results in 6 different deliveries being bowled in each over. There is no plan to set up batsmen, challenge their temperament or bowl to your field.
and I think the biggest blame for the above goes to Babar. The captain is in-charge of providing the vision and strategy for the team. Just the way Kohli did for India.