What's new

Pakistan says troops killed by 'non-state actors' in Kashmir

Gabbar Singh

Test Debutant
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Runs
15,550
Who are these 'non-state actors' who are present in Pakistani-administered Kashmir?


Islamabad, Pakistan - Pakistani officials say "non-state actors" crossed the de-facto border between India and Pakistan in the divided region of Kashmir to kill three Pakistani soldiers.

The troops were killed on Monday in the Rakhchikri area of Pakistani-administered Kashmir, the military said in a brief statement at the time.

One Pakistani soldier was also wounded.

On Tuesday, a Pakistani foreign ministry statement claimed that Indian forces initiated firing across the Line of Control (LoC) in order to provide cover for unidentified "non-state actors" to place an improvised explosive device to kill the three soldiers.

LoC is the demarcation line between the separate Indian- and Pakistani-administered portions of disputed Kashmir.

"The unprovoked ceasefire violations by Indian occupation forces in the Rakhchikri sector on the (LoC) … provided a cover for the planting of IEDs by non-state actors, resulting in the martyrdom of three soldiers and injuring another," said the statement.

The Pakistani foreign ministry "categorically rejected" some reports in the Indian news media that Indian soldiers had crossed the boundary.

"The false claims by India about the alleged cross-LoC adventures are a figment of their imagination and counterproductive for peace and tranquillity on the LoC," said the foreign ministry statement.

Nonetheless, the statement is a rare admission by Pakistani officials that armed fighters - whether Indian soldiers or "non-state actors" - crossed the heavily militarised LoC.

Despite a 2003 ceasefire, India and Pakistan regularly trade fire across the LoC. India regularly accuses Pakistan of aiding fighters in crossing the LoC to attack Indian targets.

Pakistan denies the charges.

In September of last year, India claimed to have launched "surgical strikes" on bases used by armed groups in Pakistan-administered Kashmir to fight Indian security forces.

Pakistan denied any Indian soldiers were ever on Pakistani-administered soil.

The two nuclear-armed neighbours have fought two of their three wars since independence in 1947 over Kashmir, which both countries claim in full.

The incident on Monday came after India said four of its soldiers had been killed by Pakistani fire in the Rajouri area of Indian-administered Kashmir on Saturday.

In 2017, Pakistan has claimed India opened fire across the LoC more than 1,300 times, killing at least 54 civilians, according to data released by the foreign ministry.

The previous year, Pakistan said India violated the ceasefire 382 times, marking a significant increase from the previous year.

India maintains that Pakistan has violated the ceasefire at least 724 times this year, killing 12 civilians and 17 security personnel, according to local media reports.

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/...cross-border-indian-fire-171226092503055.html
 
Does it mean India is infiltrating Dharmic Terrorists into the land of Pak?
 
Does it mean India is infiltrating Dharmic Terrorists into the land of Pak?

Indian Army hit back for killing of 4 Indian soldiers by Pakistan.Now Pak Army with its history of chest thumping cannot except that Indian Army came inside LoC and hit them.So weave a new story.
 
If it wasn’t so tragic (the loss of life on both sides) it would hilarious. Both sides have fired across the LoC 1000s of times yet not once, not even once, has either side admitted that they fired first. They always say it was unprovoked and then they utter the most overused phrase in Indi-Pak relations - “we gave a befitting reply to.......”.
 
If it wasn’t so tragic (the loss of life on both sides) it would hilarious. Both sides have fired across the LoC 1000s of times yet not once, not even once, has either side admitted that they fired first. They always say it was unprovoked and then they utter the most overused phrase in Indi-Pak relations - “we gave a befitting reply to.......”.

and chest thumping nationalist fell for it every time.
 
If one analyze it coldly, it doesn't make much sense for Pakistan to send shells across the Indian border. I mean what would Pakistan gain out of it, more headache? Its hands are already full with the western border. But it does makes sense for India to do this because this is becoming their political necessity. Sentiments in India have always been anti-Pak, but BJP goes an extra mile to cash out of it. The more this conflict remain, the more BJP would chest thump about the so-called strikes and more political mileage it gains. I sometimes feel sorry for parties like congress, even though it proved to be a nightmare for Pakistan since 2006 onward (when they decided to commence insurgencies in Pak), it didn't barked as high as BJP that could make it attractive for the public.

India isn't a major (not even minor) issue in Pakistan when it comes to electoral battles, same can't be said for the other side.
 
R.I.P. This exactly what’s expected from a hostile country. We need to stop complaining to various international entities, next time be prepared and send the infiltrators to hell.
 
‘What would Pakistan gain out of it’?

Cross border firing provides cover for militants to cross the LoC into the Indian side of Kashmir. Numerous Pakistani army men and politicians (including General Musharaff) have admitted to sending such people across the LoC.

Agree with you about the political situation though - just recently Modi used Pakistan as an issue when he was campaigning in Gujarat for the state elections. He even went as far as accusing the former Indian PM and former Vice President of conspiring with Pakistan to influence the outcome of the Gujarat elections - something which is quite frankly preposterous.


If one analyze it coldly, it doesn't make much sense for Pakistan to send shells across the Indian border. I mean what would Pakistan gain out of it, more headache? Its hands are already full with the western border. But it does makes sense for India to do this because this is becoming their political necessity. Sentiments in India have always been anti-Pak, but BJP goes an extra mile to cash out of it. The more this conflict remain, the more BJP would chest thump about the so-called strikes and more political mileage it gains. I sometimes feel sorry for parties like congress, even though it proved to be a nightmare for Pakistan since 2006 onward (when they decided to commence insurgencies in Pak), it didn't barked as high as BJP that could make it attractive for the public.

India isn't a major (not even minor) issue in Pakistan when it comes to electoral battles, same can't be said for the other side.
 
If one analyze it coldly, it doesn't make much sense for Pakistan to send shells across the Indian border. I mean what would Pakistan gain out of it, more headache? Its hands are already full with the western border. But it does makes sense for India to do this because this is becoming their political necessity. Sentiments in India have always been anti-Pak, but BJP goes an extra mile to cash out of it. The more this conflict remain, the more BJP would chest thump about the so-called strikes and more political mileage it gains. I sometimes feel sorry for parties like congress, even though it proved to be a nightmare for Pakistan since 2006 onward (when they decided to commence insurgencies in Pak), it didn't barked as high as BJP that could make it attractive for the public.

India isn't a major (not even minor) issue in Pakistan when it comes to electoral battles, same can't be said for the other side.


Your media shows one side our media shows other side.. This attack was revenge for Pakistani forces violating ceasefire a week ago and martyring 4 Indian soldiers.. I doubt your media showed that..

I agree with your post about political mileage but to just blame India is incorrect.. Pakistani army is no saint and has been playing dirty for decades whether you chose to believe that or not is upto you..
 
Back
Top