What's new

Pakistan Vs Sri Lanka | Jaipur|match 1 !

Poor stuff from Razzaq. Now is not the time to be bowling noballs.

As I'm typing he bowls him so well done Pakistan.
 
Razzaq!

Great comeback by Pakistan, 4 for Razzi!
 
Fantastic comeback from Pakistan. Cant blame the bowlers now.

Down to the batsmen. Come on boyzzzz
 
imo SL should have had 60 to 70 runs more if they played well after their awesome start but wonderful fightback by Pakistan.
 
inzidabest said:
The extras might hurt
Click to expand...
by no means, an easy target, keeping wickets in hand, will be the key, if we dont lose too many wickets in the first 15 overs, we should be ok.
 
Sri Lanka only got 64 off the last 15 overs. Thanks to the spinners a Razzaq pulling his socks up we arent going to be looking a 300+ total which was very much on.
 
abdul9383 said:
imo SL should have had 60 to 70 runs more if they played well after their awesome start but wonderful fightback by Pakistan.
Click to expand...


Thats what we're known for..its our special quality..even when the whole world of pakistan cricket was blown up in the space of a few weeks..we didn't lose our unique quality..we always figt back! :19:
 
abdul9383 said:
Isn't PPs favorite Yasir Arafat in the squad
Click to expand...
we have lost, 2 fast bowlers, makes no sense to get a spinner as their replacement, arfat is fine, i have no problem with that, its rehman which worries me!
 
This has been a pretty decent performance by our bowlers and fielders. They have given us a fighting chance of winning this game. What was at one stage looking like a target of 320+ is now only 254, which is very very gettable......provided we keep our heads.

This is a very important match for Pakistan. To win this game despite all that has happened off the pitch in the last month would be a very positive reflection of our teams strength, unity and spirit.

We can do this.......COME ON PAKISTAN.
 
cavin420 said:
we have lost, 2 fast bowlers, makes no sense to get a spinner as their replacement, arfat is fine, i have no problem with that, its rehman which worries me!
Click to expand...

cavin old buddy old pal.

It makes perfect sense. They have seen the pitches and seen that they are taking spin and so called for a spinner......simple as that. When the original squad was announced they had no idea how the pitches were going to be playing. A very bold decision taken by the selectors and one which I back 150% :19:
 
cavin420 said:
we have lost, 2 fast bowlers, makes no sense to get a spinner as their replacement, arfat is fine, i have no problem with that, its rehman which worries me!
Click to expand...


blessing in disguise me thinks because these wickets seem to help out the spinners more
 
Hash said:
cavin old buddy old pal.

It makes perfect sense. They have seen the pitches and seen that they are taking spin and so called for a spinner......simple as that. When the original squad was announced they had no idea how the pitches were going to be playing. A very bold decision taken by the selectors and one which I back 150% :19:
Click to expand...
we already have 3 more than decent spinners, how many more do you want, all 11 of em ? :|
 
Hash said:
cavin old buddy old pal.

It makes perfect sense. They have seen the pitches and seen that they are taking spin and so called for a spinner......simple as that. When the original squad was announced they had no idea how the pitches were going to be playing. A very bold decision taken by the selectors and one which I back 150% :19:
Click to expand...


excellent post Hash bhai, my point exactly
 
look at todays performance, we dont need more spinners, we need a decent pacer, 1 more pacer at least who can get us wickets, in the first 10 overs, some how Ranaldinho has lost his way, so i says bring back sami, even though he goes for runs, at least he picks you a wicket or 2, which matters , really!
 
Plus sami can hang around with the bat, and is a more than decent fielder, and no more spinner please!
 
cavin420 said:
look at todays performance, we dont need more spinners, we need a decent pacer, 1 more pacer at least who can get us wickets, in the first 10 overs, some how Ranaldinho has lost his way, so i says bring back sami, even though he goes for runs, at least he picks you a wicket or 2, which matters , really!
Click to expand...



I think Yasir Arafat would be more handy than sami
 
anyways dont wanna turn this into a sami topic, mistake has been made by the PCB, they should admit it .


Sky now showing the Shoaib akhtar saga again, asif as well, them arriving in lahore , malcom speed e.t.c
 
abdul9383 said:
I think Yasir Arafat would be more handy than sami
Click to expand...
He already is there, with his selection no probs i have, thats spot on! would have been an automatic selection for me as well!
 
Muyazzim Khan said:
Yeah Sami is a MUST NOT pick.
Click to expand...
haha, clever boy you! No really, Sami is a damn good one day bowler. Try to remember ODI's and tests are different. Sami was very good last time in India.
 
i dont know why they judge sami on his test performances

he's a better odi bowler than most of the current bowlers we have apart from asif and shoaib
 
Srilanka is making it harder and harder for every run. This is where great fielding helps. 3 or 4 outsanding work in the field in quick succession.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

BouncerGuy
Sri Lanka tour of Zimbabwe (2025)
Replies
0
Views
75
BouncerGuy
BouncerGuy
BouncerGuy
Bangladesh tour of Sri Lanka (2025)
2 3 4
Replies
275
Views
5K
sweep_shot
sweep_shot
FearlessRoar
Pakistan Shaheens (306/7) defeat Sri Lanka A (198) convincingly by 108 runs to take a 1-0 lead in the 3-match series
Replies
23
Views
2K
BouncerGuy
BouncerGuy
sweep_shot
Illegal Israeli businesses in Sri Lanka
Replies
20
Views
432
sweep_shot
sweep_shot
FearlessRoar
Second Four-Day match between Pakistan Shaheens (287 & 156/3) and Sri Lanka 'A' (310 & 260/4d) end in a draw as Pakistan Shaheens win series 1-0
Replies
65
Views
3K
shah_1
shah_1
Back
Top