What's new

Pakistan's historic 1987 Tour of England

Junaids

Senior T20I Player
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Runs
17,956
Post of the Week
11
Most Pakistan cricket fans know that 1987 was the summer when they won their first series in England, after coming within 3 wickets of series victory on the previous tour in 1982. Few recall that it was the first of three consecutive series victories in England for Pakistan. Virtually none recall that the vanquished England team had just won The Ashes. In Australia!

The social background
Like the West Indians a decade earlier, Pakistani cricket fans in England were starting to see cricket as an expression of cultural identity.

Margaret Thatcher’s Conservative government was in its ninth year in power, and won re-election a day after the First Test ended. Her government was loved by the Pakistanis who ran small businesses or whose sons and daughters were at medical school, but was despised by the tens of thousands of Pakistanis in northern cities like Bradford who had watched helplessly as she destroyed the miners’ union and then the mining industry and drove the north of England over an economic cliff.

That mattered in this Test series. The First and Third Tests were at Old Trafford (Manchester) and Headingley (Leeds) and at both grounds there were large and vocal Pakistani contingents which were outnumbered by completely silent English spectators. There was no English nationalism on view at all.

The cultural context
For the record, the hit songs of the summer were “It’s a Sin” by the Pet Shop Boys, “La Bamba” from the movie of the same name, “I Wanna Dance With Somebody” by Whitney Houston and, amazingly, “Under The Boardwalk” by Bruce Willis, who still had hair and was the leading man in TV’s top rating romantic comedy!

At the movies the big hits were “Fatal Attraction”, a pair of Cher movies and “Wall Street” which was prescient as when the World Cup took place a couple of months later the world went into the economic meltdown of “Black Monday”.

The cricketing context
The West Indies was in its tenth year of dominance of world cricket.

England had won The Ashes and two ODI series in Australia the previous winter and were considered to be a powerful unit, even though the previous summer they had lost home series to India (the 6th best Test side out of 7) and New Zealand. Those series losses were discounted as being a legacy of having been thrashed 5-0 in the West Indies two months earlier.

Australia was neck-and-neck with India for 6th place out of 7 in Test cricket, with only the new boys Sri Lanka considered to be even worse than Australia and India.

Just four years earlier, Pakistan had been everybody’s pick as the second best side in the world. “The Cricketer” in England had as its 1983 World Cup cover feature a picture of Imran Khan captioned “Can Pakistan Topple the Champions?” But Imran Khan then had two years in which stress fractures of the shin had stopped him from bowling and Pakistan’s reputation plummeted as its pace attack was exposed as Imran Khan and not much else.

There were signs of a resurgence. Imran returned to bowling at the start of 1985 and was joined by Wasim Akram, who at 17 years of age took 10 wickets in his second Test away to New Zealand, who were widely recognised as the number 2 Test side behind the West Indies. Then, eight months before the tour of England, Pakistan drew a home series with the West Indies in which they won the First Test by bowling the unbeatable Windies out for 53 at Faisalabad.

It is a sign of the lack of standing that India had in Test (but certainly not ODI) cricket at the time that nobody in England thought anything of the fact that 6 weeks before arriving in England, Pakistan had won the Fifth Test at Bangalore and with it the series in India.

But between the return of Imran Khan to the bowling crease, the rise of Wasim Akram and the victory in India, there were clear signs that Pakistan should be taken seriously. But they weren’t....

The ODIs before the Tests
Pakistan played 14 – yes, fourteen – matches in England before the First Test, including a 3 ODI series. This was crucial: whereas previous Pakistan touring teams had had 6-8 players used to county cricket, the 1987 tourists had only Imran Khan and Javed Miandad with domestic English experience.

England’s Apartheid tourists were back from their bans, but Graham Gooch was in a strange state of mental fragility and after the second ODI could not continue.

Imran Khan, as in 1982, was sucked in by Mansoor Akhtar’s batting technique and blind to his mental vulnerability, and it was only after he fell for a cheap duck in the 3rd ODI that his place came under pressure. Pakistan managed to collapse from 168-3 to 170-8 that day, and Imran learned that his batting was going to need a lot of buttressing by the lower order – he could not just pick the best 4 bowlers. That lesson ruled Saleem Jaffer out of the whole Test series. For the younger amongst you, Saleem Jaffer was a lot like Rahat Ali. An excellent tall left-arm fast medium bowler, but he couldn’t bat to save his life.

Meanwhile Abdul Qadir was yet to arrive in England as he had family health issues, and the English media had concluded that if you could see off the almost-35 year old Imran Khan, the Pakistani bowling was innocuous.

The Test tour
Imran Khan was unfit to bowl in the First Test at Old Trafford – and Abdul Qadir was still AWOL - but fortunately for Pakistan it was ruined by rain. England hit 447 and then reduced Pakistan to 140-5 before the final day was washed out. The absence of Graham Gooch was barely noticed, and Foster, De Freitas and Botham looked like a very good attack with Emburey providing off-spin variation.

The Second Test at Lords was also rain ruined. The entire match consisted of England scoring 368 while Imran Khan and the recently-arrived Abdul Qadir looked very listless. Fortunately for them, England’s poorest batsman – Bill Athey - scored a century and cemented his place in the team.

The Third Test is remembered for Pakistan dismissing England for 136 and 199 at Headingley to win by an innings, with the wickets shared in the First Innings before Imran Khan took 7-40 in the second innings. What tends to be forgotten is that the voluble Pakistan manager Haseeb Ahsan managed the rare double act of defending the keeper Saleem Yousuf for claiming a catch that he had dropped and also attacking the umpire Ken Palmer in a way which set the tone for the Shakoor Rana incident three months later at Faisalabad. In addition, Abdul Qadir used the 2 side games between Tests to regain some form and Imran gave himself 27 overs in the second of those to lift his form to where it needed to be. No such luck for Pakistan in 2016.

The Fourth Test managed in its final session to leap from being one of the worst tests of all time to one of the greatest. England by now had united Graham Dilley with Neil Foster as the opening bowlers, and that partnership was arguably better than Anderson and Broad, especially with Botham for medium-paced back-up and Edmonds and Emburey as England’s best off-spin/slow left-arm pair between Laker and Lock and finally Swann and Panesar 25 years later.

Pakistan crawled to 439 all out before England replied with 521 all out to lead by 82 after Tea on Day 4. By the end of Day 4 Pakistan had knocked off half the arears (38-0) but then the excellent English pace attack gradually chipped out the batsmen to leave Pakistan dismissed 40 minutes after Tea for 205, setting England 124 to win in 18 overs.

Imran Khan’s refusal to select Saleem Jaffer because he could not bat had paid off. Pakistan had been 156-7 when Wasim Akram came in at number 9 and then 165-8 when Abdul Qadir came in at number 10 to replace Imran Khan and score a crucial 20 in 46 minutes.

In effect, Pakistan’s short tail saved the Test. Imran and Wasim proceeded to bowl wide down the leg and off-sides to restrict England to 109-7 in 17.4 overs. But Imran learned two lessons that he never forgot.

Firstly, he had to keep the tail as short as possible, even if it meant dropping a better bowler. Long tails lose Tests.

Secondly, he could not risk a player like Mansoor Akhtar at number 3, however elegant he was. He needed to ensure that his number 4 would never come to the crease inside the first 20 overs, and for the rest of Imran’s Test career after Mansoor Akhtar failed at The Oval he played with three opening batsmen, with Shoaib Mohammad as the “third” opener at number 3. In the four remaining years of Imran’s Test career he lost only one series, by a margin of 1-0.

The Fifth Test was played on a dead track at The Oval. Pakistan batted for half the match to compile 708, and then bowled England out for 232 thanks to 7-96 by Abdul Qadir. They then reduced England to 139-4, only for Wasim Akram to get appendicitis and Imran Khan to break down, leaving Mike Gatting and Ian Botham to save the game. Haseeb Ahsan again made a fool of himself, this time calling umpire David Constant “a disgraceful person”. The Shakoor Rana incident was now only weeks away........

Conclusions
The 1987 tour was a triumph for the Pakistanis. The hosts were considered to be a strong unit and were convincingly beaten by the end.

The lessons to learn were:

1. Pakistan can do well in England even if their players have limited county experience.
2. The longer the tour, the better the preparation, the better the results.
3. Three openers is usually a good way for Pakistan to go in alien conditions outside Asia.
4. Pakistan lose more matches that they can draw if they simply pick the best 4 bowlers. The “Saleem Jaffer decision” saved the Fourth Test. The 3rd and 4th choice bowlers need to be competent with the bat to save Test matches.
5. If a batsman keeps failing, he’s probably going to keep failing.
 
Informative post, thanks. The Pakistan side that lasted between 1982-1993 ranks as the greatest in our history IMO. We had a respected leader in Imran Khan, a world-class batsman in Javed Miandad, the experience of Mudassar Nazar who's one of the best openers we've ever had (and a capable part-timer), the talented Saleem Malik and Ijaz Ahmed, a keeper in Saleem Yousuf who could hold his own with the bat, and a potent bowling unit consisting of Imran, a young Wasim Akram and the wily Abdul Qadir. This was a team that would then tour the West Indies the following year, going toe to toe against a team that hadn't lost a home series in 15 years or a Test in 10.

Watching the old clips, Saleem Malik's 99 at Headingley stands on. In seaming conditions and with the top order dismissed, he produced an innings of the highest quality and arguably one of the best overseas innings by a Pakistani batsman.

1980s Britain was a fascinating time in every aspect whenever I read and hear about it. The political, economic and social climate (especially pertaining to race relations) was tense - and was reflected in some of the incidents in the stands. Didn't someone get stabbed at the 1987 Edgbaston ODI ?

Obviously there was no lack of drama on the field. Another England-Pakistan series and another umpiring controversy - thank goodness for DRS eh ? The acrimony on this tour laid the foundations for the further bad blood that was to follow between the two sides in the winter series in Pakistan and the 1992 tour. There's also a YouTube video documenting the tensions.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/QXUitSQTmLs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
[MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION]

Excellent read; worthy of the time spent.

I was just confused with 1 part - the batting of tail & picking bowlers on bowling merit, by Imran.

I actually don't agree with your logic - Khan never sacrificed bowling depth for few runs by no 10 & 11. I can prove that straight -

Jafar wasn't selected because of his fitness, more than anything else. Imran did play Mohsin Kamal, who wasn't the Gavaskar at 10, you know. I would rather say opposite - injury to bowlers actually cost PAK Oval Test, which Imran never forgot; in his later stages, he played 3 of Jafar, Tausif, Aaquib, Waquar & Qadir + himself & Wasim. In AUS, NZ & even in WI.

Before that ENG tour, at Bangalore Test, despite the brown colour, Imran picked Jafar with Tausif, Qasim & Akram, as he wasn't sure of own fitness (didn't bowl a single ball in that Test), but wanted a proper pair of new ball bowlers. And 2 years later, at Neheru Cup, Imran played 6 bowlers throughout - himself, Wasim, Aaquib/Waquar, Qadir, Tausif & Akram Raja.

Later in 1990 AUS tour, all 3 test, he played 5 bowlers - combination between Himself, Was, Aaquib, WY, Mushi & Tausif.

In NZ as well Jafar, Wasim played both Test & Aaquib made debut at official 16 years of age.

In WI, wickets were low scoring, yet he played Was, Jafar & Qadir - for his advantage, that was the last series Mudassar was playing & on those wickets he was good enough for 20 overs. PAK also played Ijaz Faqih, if I am not wrong. That made a 5 or even 6 bowling option - not 2 bowlers & 3 dibley-dobley.

I have always seen, you try to promote bits & pieces bowlers in Test for their 10-15 runs extra contribution; which is fine, England is trying that for 140 years & often been bunnied by Aussies, who 'll go strictly with 4 bowlers on bowling merit - be it Gillespie or McDermott batting at 8; unless off course you have a Kieth Miller to bat at 5 or a Davidson at 7 or a Raynond Russel Lindwall or Richici Benuad to bat at 8 - I am sure, you know who they were & what I am hinting here.

But, please don't try to sell that by the name of Khan - I also have read All Round View. Khan is someone who always had gone for attacking bowling - even in 87 WC, he picked Jafar over Manzoor Elahi & never played bits & pieces all rounder like Naveed Anjum in Test.

The Birmingham Test you mentioned is exactly opposite of what happened - PAK backed Mudassar to bowl lot (partially for the type of bowler he was & for his heroics on Lords in last tour) which he failed for his age & the wicket - which almost ruined the Test for PAK. On that Edgbadton wicket, PAK posted more than formidable 440+; but lack of bowling options allowed England to reach 520+. Imran was over burdened, still took 6 wickets from almost 40 overs at that age & he realized the mistake in those 2 Test at Birmingham & Oval. A fit Jafar or Tauseef would have given PAK at least 50 runs lead - then your equation of 20 runs in 46 minutes would have a nose dive in opposite - PAK defending 240+ with a fresher Imran, Wasim, Qadir, Jafar/Tausif + the golden arm of Mudassar on day 5 wicket.

This is something Imran seriously noticed - so he brought 2 changes in his team - promoted himself at 5 to take more batting responsibility & play 4 specialist bowlers. For his benifit his 2 bowlers Wasim & Qadir were good enough to bat at 7 & 8 in this current lot, Wasim may be even higher. You can check the IND series of 89, WI series of 90 - always 4 bowlers + Imran.

Imran is a Captain who played ODI with a tail like Yousuf, Wasim, Qadir, Tausif & Jafar - and you think that he'll pick 2 dibley-doblies in Test, who would add 10-12 more than Jafar or Tauseef? He actually realized that in ODI, you need batting from WK - that's why Aamir Malik played under him & he often promoted Yousuf up. But, Kgan never played Naveed Anjum or Shahid Saeed ahead of Jafar, Waquar, Aaquib or Tausif.

Rest part of you post is awesome read.
 
[MENTION=79064]MMHS[/MENTION] thanks for your kind words.

Salim Jaffer only played one Test in the West Indies - the final Test which Pakistan lost in low-scoring circumstances. In the first two Tests the attack was Imran Khan, Wasim Akram and Abdul Qadir backed up by Ijaz Fakih, who was in the Mohammad Hafeez class as a bowler. The only later Tests that I recall Salim Jaffer playing were when Wasim Akram was injured in New Zealand in 1988-89.

Imran generally batted at number 7, with Salim Yousuf at 8, Wasim Akram at 9 and Abdul Qadir at 10. That meant that Waqar Younis or Aaqib Javed or Salim Jaffer was the only batting bunny in the side.
 
[MENTION=79064]MMHS[/MENTION] thanks for your kind words.

Salim Jaffer only played one Test in the West Indies - the final Test which Pakistan lost in low-scoring circumstances. In the first two Tests the attack was Imran Khan, Wasim Akram and Abdul Qadir backed up by Ijaz Fakih, who was in the Mohammad Hafeez class as a bowler. The only later Tests that I recall Salim Jaffer playing were when Wasim Akram was injured in New Zealand in 1988-89.

Imran generally batted at number 7, with Salim Yousuf at 8, Wasim Akram at 9 and Abdul Qadir at 10. That meant that Waqar Younis or Aaqib Javed or Salim Jaffer was the only batting bunny in the side.


I agree, but that was because Imran was someone whom you could fit in as a bowler or batsman. It's not that part of a strategy to strengthen the tail. He would never sacrifice the bowling depth - otherwise those days there were several options like Akram Raja, Sohail Fazal, Shahid Mehboob, Shahid Saeed, Navid Anjum .... whom he could have played in Test.

The 3rd Test at Bridgetown, Faquih was a last minute call as Jafar broke down in previous Test. Jafar was made of glass - never could complete a full Test. He was chosen for 1989-90 IND Series, broke down after 2nd spell the only Test he was picked (Faisalabad?). And at 1st Test he was in the squad (The famous Test where Tendulkar & WY debuted), but again failed fitness on Test morning & Shahid Saeed got the chance to play his only Test. Those days, PAK pacers were made by China glass - Imran & Wsim played 4 Tests, but WY, Jafar, Aaquib all were frequently injured, therefore Khan had to go for Shahid Saeed, Anjum or Shahid Mehboob. In 4th & final Test, series was 0-0 & any other PAK Captain would have gone for "All-rounders", to ensure they don't lose - Imran went with a bowling option of Wasim, Waquar, Zakir Khan, Qadir & Himself.

As I explained - there were always 2 & sometimes 3 batting bunnies in that team - BUT, that was not because Imran opted with "all-rounders" who could contribute with bat, RATHER - that generation had 3 bowlers, who would walk into World XV on bowling merit (aka Imran, Wasim & Qadir), and was good enough to bat at 3, 7 & 8 in many teams. This could have been the same story with current PAK Team if Aamir, Wahab & Yasir had the hunger - but they didn't play in County & current PAK Management didn't think out the way Imran or Allen Border thought - improve batting of bowlers, who makes the team on bowling merit. In 1987 tour of India, Imran specifically instructed Tauseef & Iqbal Qasim to practice batting & improve their contribution - it would have been much easier for his to pick Ijaz Faqih over Tauseef on a rank turner & justify his inclusion with his batting average.

Instead of playing Iftekhar, Yamin & Anwar Ali + Yasir & Aamir; I would have made Aamir, Wahab, Yasir, Rahat & Sohail spends couple of hours in nets on their batting & improve batting average from <10 to 15+. Which one do you think is easier - Wahab, Yasir, Aamir, Rahat, Sohail adding 5-10 runs to their Test batting average or Anwar Ali, Yamin, Imad ...... bringing their bowling average down to 45, from 85 (perceived)?
 
Last edited:
[MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION] bro excellent, really nice to read. Just one question, as you have mentioned in your lessons that if longer the preparations, better the results. Do you believe Pakistan will produce better results as compared to 2010, as this time players and looks serious and has done a brilliant job so far.
 
I agree, but that was because Imran was someone whom you could fit in as a bowler or batsman. It's not that part of a strategy to strengthen the tail. He would never sacrifice the bowling depth - otherwise those days there were several options like Akram Raja, Sohail Fazal, Shahid Mehboob, Shahid Saeed, Navid Anjum .... whom he could have played in Test.

The 3rd Test at Bridgetown, Faquih was a last minute call as Jafar broke down in previous Test. Jafar was made of glass - never could complete a full Test. He was chosen for 1989-90 IND Series, broke down after 2nd spell the only Test he was picked (Faisalabad?). And at 1st Test he was in the squad (The famous Test where Tendulkar & WY debuted), but again failed fitness on Test morning & Shahid Saeed got the chance to play his only Test. Those days, PAK pacers were made by China glass - Imran & Wsim played 4 Tests, but WY, Jafar, Aaquib all were frequently injured, therefore Khan had to go for Shahid Saeed, Anjum or Shahid Mehboob. In 4th & final Test, series was 0-0 & any other PAK Captain would have gone for "All-rounders", to ensure they don't lose - Imran went with a bowling option of Wasim, Waquar, Zakir Khan, Qadir & Himself.

As I explained - there were always 2 & sometimes 3 batting bunnies in that team - BUT, that was not because Imran opted with "all-rounders" who could contribute with bat, RATHER - that generation had 3 bowlers, who would walk into World XV on bowling merit (aka Imran, Wasim & Qadir), and was good enough to bat at 3, 7 & 8 in many teams. This could have been the same story with current PAK Team if Aamir, Wahab & Yasir had the hunger - but they didn't play in County & current PAK Management didn't think out the way Imran or Allen Border thought - improve batting of bowlers, who makes the team on bowling merit. In 1987 tour of India, Imran specifically instructed Tauseef & Iqbal Qasim to practice batting & improve their contribution - it would have been much easier for his to pick Ijaz Faqih over Tauseef on a rank turner & justify his inclusion with his batting average.

Instead of playing Iftekhar, Yamin & Anwar Ali + Yasir & Aamir; I would have made Aamir, Wahab, Yasir, Rahat & Sohail spends couple of hours in nets on their batting & improve batting average from <10 to 15+. Which one do you think is easier - Wahab, Yasir, Aamir, Rahat, Sohail adding 5-10 runs to their Test batting average or Anwar Ali, Yamin, Imad ...... bringing their bowling average down to 45, from 85 (perceived)?

Love your posts
 
[MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION]

Your conclusion is absolutely spot on apart from No. 4. I also, think PAK'll use basically 3 openers - MoHa, Shaan/Sami & Azhar.

I wrote it several times that, to PAK's benefit, they are going in 2nd half of English summer, it should make easier.

And I do think, if ENG can exploit weakness of any batsman, time & again if they find any individual target - so he'll fail always. This is one acid Test for Arthur - previous PAK "Coach" couldn't fix batting issues in 5 years on repetitive weakness; but I back Arthur to have some impact.

You have missed one critical point, which I'll emphasise MOST - catching. PAK MUST take their catches, if possible better than ENG, or at least at per, otherwise absolutely NO Chance. This is basically a 2 men English batting, with a good batting depth & hitting power - if Root or Cook is allowed to play 2/3 times; they'll take the total beyond 400 every time & at around 4/over allowing enough time to take 20 wickets.

Regarding No. 4 - that'll be biggest blunder, if PAK sacrifices the bowling for "batting depth" - it'll be suicidal. Without bowling penetration, ENG 'll tire out Aamir & Yasir won't come in to count before Day 3; which means either Misbah 'll burn Aamir out or he 'll go for easy option - pick Babar over Yasir & ask him to dart 58 overs at 2.75 in a Test in UK.

I had lots of post regarding this "Tail wagging" during ENG's last tour of UAE & SAF - I am sure you have gone through those. It never works that way - never; you can't sacrifice your penetration capability as an extra protection to save Test. That's a disastrous negative mentality - you are selecting a team to bail out a draw. That's a strategy for Bangladesh or SRL (or IND till 90s), who doesn't have the bowling to take 20 wickets, so better try to put score board pressure by lengthening the tail - if it works somehow.

Batting contribution from tail comes from the top 7
- you can pick Anwar Ali, Imad & Hammad at 7, 8 & 9 - but if they come to bat at 151/5 with the bowlers still fresh, it'll be always 230 all-out & then PAK 'll defend that with Aamir, Yasir + lots of options. Some of the best lower-half partnerships has come when a set batsman has guided the tail - several times SWaugh/Gilly/Panta had converted 333/8 to 450+ with Mac & Mac (gill) - same I can say about Lloyd or Richards with Garner, Holding & Roberts. Even, in that 153*, a set Lara added 200+ with last 5 wickets - 4 of them were Perry, Ambi, Walshi & Pedro Collins. How many times have you seen No. 8 or 9 has added 100+ with No. 10 & 11? It's always the same - someone well set from top 7 & an intelligent & dedicated tail, who wouldn't throw the towel easily.

PAK is a bowling dominated team - you put 11 batsmen, PAK won't score 600 on a sporting wicket & then put score board pressure - that's recipe for disaster. PAK's strategy MUST be to knock 20 Pom wicket at lower than what their batsmen can put. For that, you need to play 4 full fit & attacking bowlers AND drop as minimum as possible. Off course, there are strategies to add valuable runs for last 4 wickets - make the bowlers work hard on their defence, make players run better, so that they can convert doubles in 1st 4 balls & steal single in last 2, when a set top order is batting with tail; make selective hitting capacity - Gilly was a monster with that; even against ZIM YK added almost 100 with Rahath.

More or less - WI, AUS & PAK are the 3 most successful Test sides ever - for a reason, there are least number of Test "All-rounders" from them - only few of the likes of Giffen, Monty Noble, Jack Gregory, Kieth Miller, Constatine, Goddard, Sobers, Mushtaq, Imran ...............

But what they had was a separate breed - William (Bill) O'Reily, Ray Lindwall, Richie Benaud, Johnstone, Allen Davidson, Shane Warne, Malcolm Marshall, Wasim, Intekhab, Qadir, Saqlin ....... cricketers most of whom has Test/FC hundreds in their credit, but even without that, they would have been 1st pick in XI for bowling - & if they are to bat at 11, so it be.

Aamir, Yasir, Sohail & Rahat at 8, 9, 10 & Jack for me, for 1st Test - unless it's gloomy Lord's morning for 4/5 days - Poms 'll end the 1st Test with red face - someone please mark this post.
 
Informative post, thanks. The Pakistan side that lasted between 1982-1993 ranks as the greatest in our history IMO. We had a respected leader in Imran Khan, a world-class batsman in Javed Miandad, the experience of Mudassar Nazar who's one of the best openers we've ever had (and a capable part-timer), the talented Saleem Malik and Ijaz Ahmed, a keeper in Saleem Yousuf who could hold his own with the bat, and a potent bowling unit consisting of Imran, a young Wasim Akram and the wily Abdul Qadir. This was a team that would then tour the West Indies the following year, going toe to toe against a team that hadn't lost a home series in 15 years or a Test in 10.

Watching the old clips, Saleem Malik's 99 at Headingley stands on. In seaming conditions and with the top order dismissed, he produced an innings of the highest quality and arguably one of the best overseas innings by a Pakistani batsman.

1980s Britain was a fascinating time in every aspect whenever I read and hear about it. The political, economic and social climate (especially pertaining to race relations) was tense - and was reflected in some of the incidents in the stands. Didn't someone get stabbed at the 1987 Edgbaston ODI ?

Obviously there was no lack of drama on the field. Another England-Pakistan series and another umpiring controversy - thank goodness for DRS eh ? The acrimony on this tour laid the foundations for the further bad blood that was to follow between the two sides in the winter series in Pakistan and the 1992 tour. There's also a YouTube video documenting the tensions.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/QXUitSQTmLs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


It is interesting to see the JM-Gatting incident. Funny thing last week I ordered Mike Gatting's leading from the front (1988) to learn more about his captaincy experiences in 85 Ashes and he mentioned the JM incident...I got the book Saturday and Acc to Gatting...JM was not happy with the LBW decision so he was not walking so mike just put his hand around JM's waist and JM punched him on his face.

From the clip it looks like even though JM was not happy but he was walking back to the pavilion when this incident took place and stopped when someone from english team made a remark to JM (I personally would have commented to JM if this is the first time ever he has been given LBW in PAk, considering that it did not happen very often when there were no neutral umpires). JM took offense and walked over to them (If I was JM - I would have just walked away) and at that point Mike put his arm around JM's waist and JM just tried to push him away (Instead of punching him) which he should not have as it looked ugly.


in 87 tour, IK after being playing in England for over decade and a half at that point had seen how more talented Pak teams had not produced the results that they should have and possibly he concluded that it was due to mental weakness or an inferiority complex among Pak team. So to overcome that he instructed his men (well....mostly inexperienced boys TBF) to act tough and not to be intimidated by English cricketers and to give it back to them.

Yousuf took it too far with Ian and IK was very mad at him for doing it but overall it was an IK's way of toughing up his boys and asking them to throw a punch way above their weight...which they did.
 
What a wonderful thread. Great contributions by Junaids, MMHS, Bouncer and Markhor.

I remember that series. We were under the cosh first 2 tests, very much like we were in India that year for the first 4 tests if I remember correctly.

But we gradually acclamatized and pounced when it mattered. Imran was monumental in that series, but there were contributions from everyone.

You can see Sri Lanka team doing so much better late in the 2nd test and the last test - but it was too late for them.

Inzi has done a good thing - sending Pakistan early.
 
The Headingley Test match was my first proper taste of international cricket.

I went to the first day's play and I remember I was so excited the night before that I couldn't sleep all night. The memories of watching Imran Khan running down the hill and tearing apart the England batting still linger and I didn't want the day's play to end.

I remember waiting around after the day's play just to catch a glimpse of Imran Khan and co.

Amazing and brilliant memories.
 
Last edited:
wonderful thread. Good contributions by everyone.
Great analysis by MMHS
 
Most Pakistan cricket fans know that 1987 was the summer when they won their first series in England, after coming within 3 wickets of series victory on the previous tour in 1982. Few recall that it was the first of three consecutive series victories in England for Pakistan. Virtually none recall that the vanquished England team had just won The Ashes. In Australia!

The social background
Like the West Indians a decade earlier, Pakistani cricket fans in England were starting to see cricket as an expression of cultural identity.

Margaret Thatcher’s Conservative government was in its ninth year in power, and won re-election a day after the First Test ended. Her government was loved by the Pakistanis who ran small businesses or whose sons and daughters were at medical school, but was despised by the tens of thousands of Pakistanis in northern cities like Bradford who had watched helplessly as she destroyed the miners’ union and then the mining industry and drove the north of England over an economic cliff.

That mattered in this Test series. The First and Third Tests were at Old Trafford (Manchester) and Headingley (Leeds) and at both grounds there were large and vocal Pakistani contingents which were outnumbered by completely silent English spectators. There was no English nationalism on view at all.

The cultural context
For the record, the hit songs of the summer were “It’s a Sin” by the Pet Shop Boys, “La Bamba” from the movie of the same name, “I Wanna Dance With Somebody” by Whitney Houston and, amazingly, “Under The Boardwalk” by Bruce Willis, who still had hair and was the leading man in TV’s top rating romantic comedy!

At the movies the big hits were “Fatal Attraction”, a pair of Cher movies and “Wall Street” which was prescient as when the World Cup took place a couple of months later the world went into the economic meltdown of “Black Monday”.

The cricketing context
The West Indies was in its tenth year of dominance of world cricket.

England had won The Ashes and two ODI series in Australia the previous winter and were considered to be a powerful unit, even though the previous summer they had lost home series to India (the 6th best Test side out of 7) and New Zealand. Those series losses were discounted as being a legacy of having been thrashed 5-0 in the West Indies two months earlier.

Australia was neck-and-neck with India for 6th place out of 7 in Test cricket, with only the new boys Sri Lanka considered to be even worse than Australia and India.

Just four years earlier, Pakistan had been everybody’s pick as the second best side in the world. “The Cricketer” in England had as its 1983 World Cup cover feature a picture of Imran Khan captioned “Can Pakistan Topple the Champions?” But Imran Khan then had two years in which stress fractures of the shin had stopped him from bowling and Pakistan’s reputation plummeted as its pace attack was exposed as Imran Khan and not much else.

There were signs of a resurgence. Imran returned to bowling at the start of 1985 and was joined by Wasim Akram, who at 17 years of age took 10 wickets in his second Test away to New Zealand, who were widely recognised as the number 2 Test side behind the West Indies. Then, eight months before the tour of England, Pakistan drew a home series with the West Indies in which they won the First Test by bowling the unbeatable Windies out for 53 at Faisalabad.

It is a sign of the lack of standing that India had in Test (but certainly not ODI) cricket at the time that nobody in England thought anything of the fact that 6 weeks before arriving in England, Pakistan had won the Fifth Test at Bangalore and with it the series in India.

But between the return of Imran Khan to the bowling crease, the rise of Wasim Akram and the victory in India, there were clear signs that Pakistan should be taken seriously. But they weren’t....

The ODIs before the Tests
Pakistan played 14 – yes, fourteen – matches in England before the First Test, including a 3 ODI series. This was crucial: whereas previous Pakistan touring teams had had 6-8 players used to county cricket, the 1987 tourists had only Imran Khan and Javed Miandad with domestic English experience.

England’s Apartheid tourists were back from their bans, but Graham Gooch was in a strange state of mental fragility and after the second ODI could not continue.

Imran Khan, as in 1982, was sucked in by Mansoor Akhtar’s batting technique and blind to his mental vulnerability, and it was only after he fell for a cheap duck in the 3rd ODI that his place came under pressure. Pakistan managed to collapse from 168-3 to 170-8 that day, and Imran learned that his batting was going to need a lot of buttressing by the lower order – he could not just pick the best 4 bowlers. That lesson ruled Saleem Jaffer out of the whole Test series. For the younger amongst you, Saleem Jaffer was a lot like Rahat Ali. An excellent tall left-arm fast medium bowler, but he couldn’t bat to save his life.

Meanwhile Abdul Qadir was yet to arrive in England as he had family health issues, and the English media had concluded that if you could see off the almost-35 year old Imran Khan, the Pakistani bowling was innocuous.

The Test tour
Imran Khan was unfit to bowl in the First Test at Old Trafford – and Abdul Qadir was still AWOL - but fortunately for Pakistan it was ruined by rain. England hit 447 and then reduced Pakistan to 140-5 before the final day was washed out. The absence of Graham Gooch was barely noticed, and Foster, De Freitas and Botham looked like a very good attack with Emburey providing off-spin variation.

The Second Test at Lords was also rain ruined. The entire match consisted of England scoring 368 while Imran Khan and the recently-arrived Abdul Qadir looked very listless. Fortunately for them, England’s poorest batsman – Bill Athey - scored a century and cemented his place in the team.

The Third Test is remembered for Pakistan dismissing England for 136 and 199 at Headingley to win by an innings, with the wickets shared in the First Innings before Imran Khan took 7-40 in the second innings. What tends to be forgotten is that the voluble Pakistan manager Haseeb Ahsan managed the rare double act of defending the keeper Saleem Yousuf for claiming a catch that he had dropped and also attacking the umpire Ken Palmer in a way which set the tone for the Shakoor Rana incident three months later at Faisalabad. In addition, Abdul Qadir used the 2 side games between Tests to regain some form and Imran gave himself 27 overs in the second of those to lift his form to where it needed to be. No such luck for Pakistan in 2016.

The Fourth Test managed in its final session to leap from being one of the worst tests of all time to one of the greatest. England by now had united Graham Dilley with Neil Foster as the opening bowlers, and that partnership was arguably better than Anderson and Broad, especially with Botham for medium-paced back-up and Edmonds and Emburey as England’s best off-spin/slow left-arm pair between Laker and Lock and finally Swann and Panesar 25 years later.

Pakistan crawled to 439 all out before England replied with 521 all out to lead by 82 after Tea on Day 4. By the end of Day 4 Pakistan had knocked off half the arears (38-0) but then the excellent English pace attack gradually chipped out the batsmen to leave Pakistan dismissed 40 minutes after Tea for 205, setting England 124 to win in 18 overs.

Imran Khan’s refusal to select Saleem Jaffer because he could not bat had paid off. Pakistan had been 156-7 when Wasim Akram came in at number 9 and then 165-8 when Abdul Qadir came in at number 10 to replace Imran Khan and score a crucial 20 in 46 minutes.

In effect, Pakistan’s short tail saved the Test. Imran and Wasim proceeded to bowl wide down the leg and off-sides to restrict England to 109-7 in 17.4 overs. But Imran learned two lessons that he never forgot.

Firstly, he had to keep the tail as short as possible, even if it meant dropping a better bowler. Long tails lose Tests.

Secondly, he could not risk a player like Mansoor Akhtar at number 3, however elegant he was. He needed to ensure that his number 4 would never come to the crease inside the first 20 overs, and for the rest of Imran’s Test career after Mansoor Akhtar failed at The Oval he played with three opening batsmen, with Shoaib Mohammad as the “third” opener at number 3. In the four remaining years of Imran’s Test career he lost only one series, by a margin of 1-0.

The Fifth Test was played on a dead track at The Oval. Pakistan batted for half the match to compile 708, and then bowled England out for 232 thanks to 7-96 by Abdul Qadir. They then reduced England to 139-4, only for Wasim Akram to get appendicitis and Imran Khan to break down, leaving Mike Gatting and Ian Botham to save the game. Haseeb Ahsan again made a fool of himself, this time calling umpire David Constant “a disgraceful person”. The Shakoor Rana incident was now only weeks away........

Conclusions
The 1987 tour was a triumph for the Pakistanis. The hosts were considered to be a strong unit and were convincingly beaten by the end.

The lessons to learn were:

1. Pakistan can do well in England even if their players have limited county experience.
2. The longer the tour, the better the preparation, the better the results.
3. Three openers is usually a good way for Pakistan to go in alien conditions outside Asia.
4. Pakistan lose more matches that they can draw if they simply pick the best 4 bowlers. The “Saleem Jaffer decision” saved the Fourth Test. The 3rd and 4th choice bowlers need to be competent with the bat to save Test matches.
5. If a batsman keeps failing, he’s probably going to keep failing.

Fantastic post junaid bhai.
Thank you for bringing back great memories of a great series.
Eng should of nicked the fourth test because of our calamitous batting. I remember Imran and Wasim bowling unchanged - Imran looking all flustered and vexed !
But we prevailed , as you said because of his leadership and sheer will to win
 
Last edited:
A lot of things that I had to say have been said by MMHS.

One thing remains - Broad and Anderson are by no way any less bowlers than Dilley and Foster.

Although I still love the angling long run-up of Dilley. At par with Whitney - I'd so like to watch them bowl in tandem. If only IPL existed back in the days.
 
Imran Khan was unfit to bowl in the First Test at Old Trafford – and Abdul Qadir was still AWOL - but fortunately for Pakistan it was ruined by rain. England hit 447 and then reduced Pakistan to 140-5 before the final day was washed out. The absence of Graham Gooch was barely noticed, and Foster, De Freitas and Botham looked like a very good attack with Emburey providing off-spin variation.

I clearly remember this - I had finished my final exams at Bradford and sat in the TV room in halls of residence waiting to the rain to stop, but it rained, and rained, and rained.....

The Third Test is remembered for Pakistan dismissing England for 136 and 199 at Headingley to win by an innings, with the wickets shared in the First Innings before Imran Khan took 7-40 in the second innings.

I graduated while the match continued. As I recall I had a vicious sunburn across my shoulders from when it finally stopped raining, and it hurt to put my gown on!

IIRC, Foster got eight wickets in Pakistan's only innings. Phil Edmonds got someone out on 99.

The Fourth Test managed in its final session to leap from being one of the worst tests of all time to one of the greatest. England by now had united Graham Dilley with Neil Foster as the opening bowlers, and that partnership was arguably better than Anderson and Broad, especially with Botham for medium-paced back-up and Edmonds and Emburey as England’s best off-spin/slow left-arm pair between Laker and Lock and finally Swann and Panesar 25 years later.

Botham was innocuous as a test bowler by then - he should have been playing ODIs only.


In effect, Pakistan’s short tail saved the Test. Imran and Wasim proceeded to bowl wide down the leg and off-sides to restrict England to 109-7 in 17.4 overs.

It was effectively a T20 by then and England should have got over the line but Imran and Wasim were able to bowl a lot of bouncers too. I remember thinking that Botham should have opened the batting. He might have smashed a quick 40 and won it for England.

Or if Gooch had been there - who was a master at the LO stuff. But his confidence had gone and he sat out the series, returning to get a century in the Bicentenary Test against Imran and Qadir!

The Fifth Test was played on a dead track at The Oval. Pakistan batted for half the match to compile 708,

Foster broke down altogether, Dilley also picked up an injury and could only bowl medium pace, Botham was past it, so E&E were the only credible bowlers and even they could do nothing on that ultrapancake. Javed got 260 IIRC.


and then bowled England out for 232 thanks to 7-96 by Abdul Qadir. They then reduced England to 139-4, only for Wasim Akram to get appendicitis and Imran Khan to break down, leaving Mike Gatting and Ian Botham to save the game.

They batted the whole day. Gatting must have been dropped six times, but he kept hitting fours. Botham blocked and blocked, scoring just 50 all day.

It was an interesting series and as you said, set up the awful return series which must have been the most acrimonious ever, with both aggressively partisan and pathetically incompetent umps, batsmen on both sides refusing to walk for the supposed "catch" and "lbw" decisions, and the second test coming to a crashing halt restarted only when the Foreign Office forced Gatt to apologise to Shakoor. The TCCB gave every England player a "hardship bonus" - basically hush money.
 
Top thread, [MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION]

Thanks for sharing, a lot of what you wrote is new for me.

That's another POTW right there! Make it three.
 
[MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION] bro excellent, really nice to read. Just one question, as you have mentioned in your lessons that if longer the preparations, better the results. Do you believe Pakistan will produce better results as compared to 2010, as this time players and looks serious and has done a brilliant job so far.
I just don't know about 2016.

Pakistan won two of their six Tests in England in 2010 but lost the other four because Younis Khan and, initially, Mohammad Yousuf were excluded.

But the long preparation in 2016 still isn't as good as the two Tests v Australia in England last time.

And whereas last time novices kept being bowled out cheaply, this time there are two deteriorating batsmen aged over 40 plus a 35 year old opener who is a serial failure outside Asia.

Then add to that the absence of the only good right-arm quick and the omission of two very good quick bowling all-rounders.

Mind you, Pakistan is lucky that half the England batting order are beginners, three of the four pitches will be flat, England's support bowling is ordinary and the weather should be drier than when Sri Lanka toured!
 
Great post but disagree that imran went for bowlers who can bat , he used to play his best bowlers.
 
He preferred combative players with less skill to skillful players who were not so aggressive.
 
Great post but disagree that imran went for bowlers who can bat , he used to play his best bowlers.
We will have to agree to disagree.

Imran at 7, keeper at 8, Wasim Akram 9 and Abdul Qadir 10 keeps the tail short.

I might do a similar post about the '88 West Indies tour, when he moved them all down one position even lower!
 
Great post but disagree that imran went for bowlers who can bat , he used to play his best bowlers.
After the First Test defeat in Australia in 89-90 Imran dropped Aaqib Javed on the basis that with him and Waqar Younis he had two number elevens, which the batting wasn't good enough to carry.

Now you've got four number elevens in the side!
 
After the First Test defeat in Australia in 89-90 Imran dropped Aaqib Javed on the basis that with him and Waqar Younis he had two number elevens, which the batting wasn't good enough to carry.

Now you've got four number elevens in the side!


He dropped Aaquib not to increase 10 runs from tail, rather went for an additional spinner for Adelaide & SCG. Mushtaq debuted in 2nd Test & Nadim Ghouri in 3rd Test. In both cases - 9, 10 & Jack was
Tauseef
Waquar
Mushi/Ghouri

As I said, his team had 3 bowlers who were capable batters, but when Qadir missed the Aussie tour for injury; he didn't pick Faquih or Akram Raza - he picked Mushi - a like to like replacement, but genuine No. 11.

Bro, you are trying to establish a non-existing logic, spoiling your excellent post - rest part of it is a gem.
 
Oval test match was the 1st ever match i got to see live as a very young child, but great memories of pakistan earning a draw in match and winning the series :)
 
I watched the ODI match at Edgebaston whilst fasting. A brilliant game finished by Defreitas with incredible hitting, A match also famous for the crowd trouble with some guy having his throat cut.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/OnThisDay?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#OnThisDay</a> 1987. A crushing win by an innings and 18 runs for Pakistan against England at Headingley with the legend Imran Khan having match figures of 10 for 77 <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Cricket?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Cricket</a> <a href="https://t.co/g4VDKv5PhI">pic.twitter.com/g4VDKv5PhI</a></p>— Saj Sadiq (@Saj_PakPassion) <a href="https://twitter.com/Saj_PakPassion/status/1015128893639020545?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 6, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Those were the days.

Wonderful and unforgettable memories, great times.
 
Most Pakistan cricket fans know that 1987 was the summer when they won their first series in England, after coming within 3 wickets of series victory on the previous tour in 1982. Few recall that it was the first of three consecutive series victories in England for Pakistan. Virtually none recall that the vanquished England team had just won The Ashes. In Australia!

The social background
Like the West Indians a decade earlier, Pakistani cricket fans in England were starting to see cricket as an expression of cultural identity.

Margaret Thatcher’s Conservative government was in its ninth year in power, and won re-election a day after the First Test ended. Her government was loved by the Pakistanis who ran small businesses or whose sons and daughters were at medical school, but was despised by the tens of thousands of Pakistanis in northern cities like Bradford who had watched helplessly as she destroyed the miners’ union and then the mining industry and drove the north of England over an economic cliff.

That mattered in this Test series. The First and Third Tests were at Old Trafford (Manchester) and Headingley (Leeds) and at both grounds there were large and vocal Pakistani contingents which were outnumbered by completely silent English spectators. There was no English nationalism on view at all.

The cultural context
For the record, the hit songs of the summer were “It’s a Sin” by the Pet Shop Boys, “La Bamba” from the movie of the same name, “I Wanna Dance With Somebody” by Whitney Houston and, amazingly, “Under The Boardwalk” by Bruce Willis, who still had hair and was the leading man in TV’s top rating romantic comedy!

At the movies the big hits were “Fatal Attraction”, a pair of Cher movies and “Wall Street” which was prescient as when the World Cup took place a couple of months later the world went into the economic meltdown of “Black Monday”.

The cricketing context
The West Indies was in its tenth year of dominance of world cricket.

England had won The Ashes and two ODI series in Australia the previous winter and were considered to be a powerful unit, even though the previous summer they had lost home series to India (the 6th best Test side out of 7) and New Zealand. Those series losses were discounted as being a legacy of having been thrashed 5-0 in the West Indies two months earlier.

Australia was neck-and-neck with India for 6th place out of 7 in Test cricket, with only the new boys Sri Lanka considered to be even worse than Australia and India.

Just four years earlier, Pakistan had been everybody’s pick as the second best side in the world. “The Cricketer” in England had as its 1983 World Cup cover feature a picture of Imran Khan captioned “Can Pakistan Topple the Champions?” But Imran Khan then had two years in which stress fractures of the shin had stopped him from bowling and Pakistan’s reputation plummeted as its pace attack was exposed as Imran Khan and not much else.

There were signs of a resurgence. Imran returned to bowling at the start of 1985 and was joined by Wasim Akram, who at 17 years of age took 10 wickets in his second Test away to New Zealand, who were widely recognised as the number 2 Test side behind the West Indies. Then, eight months before the tour of England, Pakistan drew a home series with the West Indies in which they won the First Test by bowling the unbeatable Windies out for 53 at Faisalabad.

It is a sign of the lack of standing that India had in Test (but certainly not ODI) cricket at the time that nobody in England thought anything of the fact that 6 weeks before arriving in England, Pakistan had won the Fifth Test at Bangalore and with it the series in India.

But between the return of Imran Khan to the bowling crease, the rise of Wasim Akram and the victory in India, there were clear signs that Pakistan should be taken seriously. But they weren’t....

The ODIs before the Tests
Pakistan played 14 – yes, fourteen – matches in England before the First Test, including a 3 ODI series. This was crucial: whereas previous Pakistan touring teams had had 6-8 players used to county cricket, the 1987 tourists had only Imran Khan and Javed Miandad with domestic English experience.

England’s Apartheid tourists were back from their bans, but Graham Gooch was in a strange state of mental fragility and after the second ODI could not continue.

Imran Khan, as in 1982, was sucked in by Mansoor Akhtar’s batting technique and blind to his mental vulnerability, and it was only after he fell for a cheap duck in the 3rd ODI that his place came under pressure. Pakistan managed to collapse from 168-3 to 170-8 that day, and Imran learned that his batting was going to need a lot of buttressing by the lower order – he could not just pick the best 4 bowlers. That lesson ruled Saleem Jaffer out of the whole Test series. For the younger amongst you, Saleem Jaffer was a lot like Rahat Ali. An excellent tall left-arm fast medium bowler, but he couldn’t bat to save his life.

Meanwhile Abdul Qadir was yet to arrive in England as he had family health issues, and the English media had concluded that if you could see off the almost-35 year old Imran Khan, the Pakistani bowling was innocuous.

The Test tour
Imran Khan was unfit to bowl in the First Test at Old Trafford – and Abdul Qadir was still AWOL - but fortunately for Pakistan it was ruined by rain. England hit 447 and then reduced Pakistan to 140-5 before the final day was washed out. The absence of Graham Gooch was barely noticed, and Foster, De Freitas and Botham looked like a very good attack with Emburey providing off-spin variation.

The Second Test at Lords was also rain ruined. The entire match consisted of England scoring 368 while Imran Khan and the recently-arrived Abdul Qadir looked very listless. Fortunately for them, England’s poorest batsman – Bill Athey - scored a century and cemented his place in the team.

The Third Test is remembered for Pakistan dismissing England for 136 and 199 at Headingley to win by an innings, with the wickets shared in the First Innings before Imran Khan took 7-40 in the second innings. What tends to be forgotten is that the voluble Pakistan manager Haseeb Ahsan managed the rare double act of defending the keeper Saleem Yousuf for claiming a catch that he had dropped and also attacking the umpire Ken Palmer in a way which set the tone for the Shakoor Rana incident three months later at Faisalabad. In addition, Abdul Qadir used the 2 side games between Tests to regain some form and Imran gave himself 27 overs in the second of those to lift his form to where it needed to be. No such luck for Pakistan in 2016.

The Fourth Test managed in its final session to leap from being one of the worst tests of all time to one of the greatest. England by now had united Graham Dilley with Neil Foster as the opening bowlers, and that partnership was arguably better than Anderson and Broad, especially with Botham for medium-paced back-up and Edmonds and Emburey as England’s best off-spin/slow left-arm pair between Laker and Lock and finally Swann and Panesar 25 years later.

Pakistan crawled to 439 all out before England replied with 521 all out to lead by 82 after Tea on Day 4. By the end of Day 4 Pakistan had knocked off half the arears (38-0) but then the excellent English pace attack gradually chipped out the batsmen to leave Pakistan dismissed 40 minutes after Tea for 205, setting England 124 to win in 18 overs.

Imran Khan’s refusal to select Saleem Jaffer because he could not bat had paid off. Pakistan had been 156-7 when Wasim Akram came in at number 9 and then 165-8 when Abdul Qadir came in at number 10 to replace Imran Khan and score a crucial 20 in 46 minutes.

In effect, Pakistan’s short tail saved the Test. Imran and Wasim proceeded to bowl wide down the leg and off-sides to restrict England to 109-7 in 17.4 overs. But Imran learned two lessons that he never forgot.

Firstly, he had to keep the tail as short as possible, even if it meant dropping a better bowler. Long tails lose Tests.

Secondly, he could not risk a player like Mansoor Akhtar at number 3, however elegant he was. He needed to ensure that his number 4 would never come to the crease inside the first 20 overs, and for the rest of Imran’s Test career after Mansoor Akhtar failed at The Oval he played with three opening batsmen, with Shoaib Mohammad as the “third” opener at number 3. In the four remaining years of Imran’s Test career he lost only one series, by a margin of 1-0.

The Fifth Test was played on a dead track at The Oval. Pakistan batted for half the match to compile 708, and then bowled England out for 232 thanks to 7-96 by Abdul Qadir. They then reduced England to 139-4, only for Wasim Akram to get appendicitis and Imran Khan to break down, leaving Mike Gatting and Ian Botham to save the game. Haseeb Ahsan again made a fool of himself, this time calling umpire David Constant “a disgraceful person”. The Shakoor Rana incident was now only weeks away........

Conclusions
The 1987 tour was a triumph for the Pakistanis. The hosts were considered to be a strong unit and were convincingly beaten by the end.

The lessons to learn were:

1. Pakistan can do well in England even if their players have limited county experience.
2. The longer the tour, the better the preparation, the better the results.
3. Three openers is usually a good way for Pakistan to go in alien conditions outside Asia.
4. Pakistan lose more matches that they can draw if they simply pick the best 4 bowlers. The “Saleem Jaffer decision” saved the Fourth Test. The 3rd and 4th choice bowlers need to be competent with the bat to save Test matches.
5. If a batsman keeps failing, he’s probably going to keep failing.

I still think that the lessons of 1987 remain valid.

This year’s Pakistan team has acclimatised for a month. Now Misbah needs to pick his best eleven - and that means not picking four Number 11 batsmen!
 
Best Pakistan Test team of all time. Whereas the 90s side relied heavily on star individuals, the late 80s side was a proper team unit with clearly defined roles.

There was no question who the boss was (Imran) unlike the 90s teams.

Mudassar and Shoaib had limitless patience and could blunt the new ball. Then in comes Javed Miandad, Saleem Malik and a young Ijaz Ahmed. A gutsy wicketkeeper in Saleem Yousuf.

Two world class pacers in Imran Khan and Wasim Akram, and leggie Abdul Qadir though a home bully.

And unlike the 90s side, these guys stood up to the best team of their era.
 
Back
Top