What's new

Pakistan's impressive progress in the field of ballistic missiles

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,907
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Pakistan successfully carried out night training launch of surface to surface ballistic missile Ghaznavi, capable of delivering multiple types of warheads upto 290 KMs. CJCSC & Services Chiefs congrat team. President & PM conveyed appreciation to team & congrats to the nation. <a href="https://t.co/hmoUKRPWev">pic.twitter.com/hmoUKRPWev</a></p>— DG ISPR (@OfficialDGISPR) <a href="https://twitter.com/OfficialDGISPR/status/1166955085924130816?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 29, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
RAWALPINDI: Pakistan has successfully carried out night-training launch of surface-to-surface ballistic missile ‘Ghaznavi’, Director-General of Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) Major General Asif Ghafoor said on Thursday.

The ballistic missile is capable of delivering multiple types of warheads up to 290km, the military’s media spokesperson wrote on Twitter.

President Dr Arif Alvi and Prime Minister Imran Khan conveyed their appreciation to the team, and congratulated the nation on the feat, he added.

The DG ISPR also shared a video of the launch in his tweet.

https://www.geo.tv/latest/246095-pa...training-launch-of-ballistic-missile-ghaznavi
 
Nice one. Need to tell the enemy that we are serious as sin if they dare attack us. No beating around the bush here!
 
Let the haters hate.

Let the whiners whine.

Pakistan Zindabad.
 
Do you think Ghaznavi was Calling world leaders and tweeting every day?, no He went and conquered India, despite the enemy being far more numerous and Wealthier than him.
 
india must be really burning, a smaller country, smaller economy, smaller population is intimidating them and they cant do nothing.

Nuclear weapons even it out. Thank you Abdul Qadeer Khan...
 
It is because of our Nuclear capabilities Pakistan will always be relavent in South East Asia.

India may well be more powerful but the Nuclear capabilities puts Pakistan on equal footing and no one can change this. It is about time India should swallow its ego and come to the table for betterment of both country and region.

I am hopeful something positive will come out of the two countries eventually.

The people of both Nations need to come out in force and demand Peaceful resolution.
 
It is because of our Nuclear capabilities Pakistan will always be relavent in South East Asia.

India may well be more powerful but the Nuclear capabilities puts Pakistan on equal footing and no one can change this. It is about time India should swallow its ego and come to the table for betterment of both country and region.

I am hopeful something positive will come out of the two countries eventually.

The people of both Nations need to come out in force and demand Peaceful resolution.

What about both countries ignore each other and mind their own business?
 
india must be really burning, a smaller country, smaller economy, smaller population is intimidating them and they cant do nothing.

Nuclear weapons even it out. Thank you Abdul Qadeer Khan...

What intimidation?

Your PM is ranting on twitter everyday. Tgats some intimidation.
 
It is because of our Nuclear capabilities Pakistan will always be relavent in South East Asia.

India may well be more powerful but the Nuclear capabilities puts Pakistan on equal footing and no one can change this. It is about time India should swallow its ego and come to the table for betterment of both country and region.

I am hopeful something positive will come out of the two countries eventually.

The people of both Nations need to come out in force and demand Peaceful resolution.

Reasons why Indians will never support this.

Most Indian believe they are superior to Muslims and Pakistani.

Most Indian believe they can assert their hegemony in the region.

Most Indian make demands, like open this route, do this, that or else, India is still 3rd world country and will remain to be one for time being.

Most Indian believe they have military superiority over Pakistan, in terms of equipment and numbers of soldier, India do, but in battlefield, numbers do not really matter, as Pakistan displayed it again on feb 27th.

And the worse, most Indian believe, the life of a Muslim of India, Kashmir and Pakistani worth less than the life of Hindu.
 
Last edited:
Reasons why Indians will never support this.

Most Indian believe they are superior to Muslims and Pakistani.

Most Indian believe they can assert their hegemony in the region.

Most Indian make demands, like open this route, do this, that or else, India is still 3rd world country and will remain to be one for time being.

Most Indian believe they have military superiority over Pakistan, in terms of equipment and numbers of soldier, India do, but in battlefield, numbers do not really matter, as Pakistan displayed it again on feb 27th.

And the worse, most Indian believe, the life of a Muslim of India, Kashmir and Pakistani worth less than the life of Hindu.

There are Indians who think they are better, there are who don't care. Pakistan is not a benchmark for India to feel lesser or greater or equal. The comparison is to the Chinese or the west. The Chinese because India is where China was 15 to 20 years ago. The west because middle class is westernized in India due to cultural influence or even due to friends or family living in the west. So when they see Pakistan in the news blaming or fighting India, there is only one reaction in unison. It is anger and irritation and a feeling that Pakistan is trying to pull India back. You will state 250 mil in poverty but they don't have a voice or opinion. They are fighting for their lives. The vocal population is the middle class that considers itself on an upswing and rightly so. As far as Kashmir goes, Indians have been drilled since birth that Kashmir is part of India like you have been drilled otherwise.
 
Do you think Ghaznavi was Calling world leaders and tweeting every day?, no He went and conquered India, despite the enemy being far more numerous and Wealthier than him.


Reason for enemity was what? His "enemies" never attacked him despite being wealthier.
 
There are Indians who think they are better, there are who don't care. Pakistan is not a benchmark for India to feel lesser or greater or equal. The comparison is to the Chinese or the west. The Chinese because India is where China was 15 to 20 years ago. The west because middle class is westernized in India due to cultural influence or even due to friends or family living in the west. So when they see Pakistan in the news blaming or fighting India, there is only one reaction in unison. It is anger and irritation and a feeling that Pakistan is trying to pull India back. You will state 250 mil in poverty but they don't have a voice or opinion. They are fighting for their lives. The vocal population is the middle class that considers itself on an upswing and rightly so. As far as Kashmir goes, Indians have been drilled since birth that Kashmir is part of India like you have been drilled otherwise.

The comment above highlight my previous comment, which was most Indians believe they are better than Pakistani and have every right to demand whatever they want to.

Indians don’t want peace they are demanding hegemony in the region that used to be part of India.
 
The comment above highlight my previous comment, which was most Indians believe they are better than Pakistani and have every right to demand whatever they want to.

Indians don’t want peace they are demanding hegemony in the region that used to be part of India.

So how are tiny countries like Nepal, Bhutan, Maldives, SL etc still independent if India is such a rogue nation ?
 
Ghaznavi pledged to Raid India every year, This was his pledge to the Abbasids.

How does that make India an enemy ? Just because they were wealthier ? What wrong was committed here by India that makes you categorize them as an Enemy ?
 
What intimidation?

Your PM is ranting on twitter everyday. Tgats some intimidation.

The fact that you are mentioning his tweets in every other post is itself a sign of his goal achieved as you are not ignoring it. Well done Imran!
 
There are Indians who think they are better, there are who don't care. Pakistan is not a benchmark for India to feel lesser or greater or equal. The comparison is to the Chinese or the west. The Chinese because India is where China was 15 to 20 years ago. The west because middle class is westernized in India due to cultural influence or even due to friends or family living in the west. So when they see Pakistan in the news blaming or fighting India, there is only one reaction in unison. It is anger and irritation and a feeling that Pakistan is trying to pull India back. You will state 250 mil in poverty but they don't have a voice or opinion. They are fighting for their lives. The vocal population is the middle class that considers itself on an upswing and rightly so. As far as Kashmir goes, Indians have been drilled since birth that Kashmir is part of India like you have been drilled otherwise.

I live in the West and ve been to both India and China.

There is no comparison and India is a 3rd world nation by a Laaarge country mile. Sure Indian middle class may ve a high view of themselves but it doesn’t necessarily matches reality. That’s one reason why Indians are dime a dozen in all western countries.

So they are rightly compared with other poor and backward nations like Pakistan and Bangladesh.
 
I live in the West and ve been to both India and China.

There is no comparison and India is a 3rd world nation by a Laaarge country mile. Sure Indian middle class may ve a high view of themselves but it doesn’t necessarily matches reality. That’s one reason why Indians are dime a dozen in all western countries.

So they are rightly compared with other poor and backward nations like Pakistan and Bangladesh.

Half or what you said is right. India ain't China yet. India can't get into people's bedrooms and implement a one child policy for decades and scratch it. Thats even though the poorest are the ones without population control. They go at their pace. They can focus on education, poverty alleviation and cleanliness drives. Thats all democracies can do as they can't dictate people's private lives. The comparison with China is because of the similar high population. Also, Chinese economy in 2005 is where India's economy is now. While Chinese focussed on cheap blue collar jobs, Indians did the same with white collar. The next revolution can be a great opportunity for all countries and some are poised better than others.

As far as your travel goes, you will go to places in China where they want you to go. In India it's a different story. The entire central and western China is a big dump. A country like China can do that. They can focus on just a few parts of a country like the east and ignore large chunks of their own country. India can't do that because of democratic federal system. Entire India goes almost at the same pace. So there will be a disparity when you compare parts of China with India. And finally, No. Nobody compares India with Pakistan or Bangladesh. Maybe this will put it into perspective. The size of Indian economy is almost 5 times the combined economies of Pakistan and Bangladesh. They are not in the same league. While the rest of the world looks at 600 mil Indian middle class and their potential, others look at 300 mil in poverty. People in the know realize one number is going to go up and the other is going down. It's a matter of a few decades.
 
What has 1 child policy gotta do with this discussion? (Afterall Chinas population is greater than India’s)

I ve been to rural china outside the big cities and also India (UP, Delhi). There is dire poverty and 3rd world feel (uncleanliness, chaos) in India (even in Dilli) that i didnt spot anywhere in China. As for India’s white collar jobs, i dont agree that low level backoffice work can be classified as such.

In terms of GDP and industrialization, infrastructure there is no match between China and India. Also the general attitude and demeanour of ppl, that I could observe felt just like in Pakistan. Also not just visual wealth, ordinary chinese were more civilised, cleaner and disciplined than Indians.

And yes ofcourse, everybody in West compares India with other 3rd world nations because thats what it is. In US many native people cant even distinguish between Indians and Pakistanis..Its only Indians who dont wanna get down from their high horse.
 
It is because of our Nuclear capabilities Pakistan will always be relavent in South East Asia.

India may well be more powerful but the Nuclear capabilities puts Pakistan on equal footing and no one can change this. <b>It is about time India should swallow its ego and come to the table for betterment of both country and region.</b>

I am hopeful something positive will come out of the two countries eventually.

The people of both Nations need to come out in force and demand Peaceful resolution.

This is the fundamental problem with the thinking of many Pakistanis, and the reason why the country is bankrupt and no modern industries have developed.

Betterment of Pakistan is in the hands of Pakistanis. It is not being held back by India. This idea that if India changed its behavior, then Pakistan would improve is what is holding Pakistan back.

Your economy is being held back by the domination of the feudal/military elite. If you can't even understand that, there is no hope for you.
 
This is the fundamental problem with the thinking of many Pakistanis, and the reason why the country is bankrupt and no modern industries have developed.

Betterment of Pakistan is in the hands of Pakistanis. It is not being held back by India. This idea that if India changed its behavior, then Pakistan would improve is what is holding Pakistan back.

Your economy is being held back by the domination of the feudal/military elite. If you can't even understand that, there is no hope for you.

Tell me what is better, having a decent economy but having near 45% of population living in poverty or having a economy surviving but poverty is only 12% of population.

As of 2017, the Asian Development Bank reports that there are approximately 210 million people living in Pakistan. In 2011, 12.4% of Pakistanis live below in Pakistan's definition of poverty.[10] Statistics vary due to the definition of poverty. According to the World Bank, poverty in Pakistan fell from 64.3% in 2002 to 29.5% in 2014.[11] Pakistan has made substantial progress in reducing poverty giving it the second lowest headcount poverty rate in South Asia.[12]
 
Tell me what is better, having a decent economy but having near 45% of population living in poverty or having a economy surviving but poverty is only 12% of population.

As of 2017, the Asian Development Bank reports that there are approximately 210 million people living in Pakistan. In 2011, 12.4% of Pakistanis live below in Pakistan's definition of poverty.[10] Statistics vary due to the definition of poverty. According to the World Bank, poverty in Pakistan fell from 64.3% in 2002 to 29.5% in 2014.[11] Pakistan has made substantial progress in reducing poverty giving it the second lowest headcount poverty rate in South Asia.[12]

Like you wrote "Statistics vary due to the definition of poverty". According to the World CIA Factbook, India is at 21.9% and Pakistan at 29.5%.

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/221.html#IN

I believe the ranking flips in Word Bank tables.

Note that it is fallacious to compare the poverty rates of Pakistan to all of India. In 1947, Punjab and Sindh in Pakistan was similar to Punjab and Haryana in India. So if you have to compare relative economic you should compare Pakistan to Indian Punjab and Haryana rather than the whole of India which includes tribal areas in Bihar and Uttarakhand.

Beyond poverty, if you look at the development of technology and modern industries then Pakistan has fallen far behind.

Anyway, there is something fundamentally indecent about comparing poverty rates, even a poverty rate of 1% is too much. If Pakistan's poverty rate is falling, it is a good thing. Certainly given the abilities of the Pakistani people, they can do much much better economically and certainly can develop modern industries (which provide taxes to the government for poverty alleviation) which they currently lack.
 
Tell me what is better, having a decent economy but having near 45% of population living in poverty or having a economy surviving but poverty is only 12% of population.

As of 2017, the Asian Development Bank reports that there are approximately 210 million people living in Pakistan. In 2011, 12.4% of Pakistanis live below in Pakistan's definition of poverty.[10] Statistics vary due to the definition of poverty. According to the World Bank, poverty in Pakistan fell from 64.3% in 2002 to 29.5% in 2014.[11] Pakistan has made substantial progress in reducing poverty giving it the second lowest headcount poverty rate in South Asia.[12]

It's always the same answer. Decent economy with poverty. Poverty alleviation is a process. A country needs constant growth to pull people out of poverty. That's how Europeans did it post world war, that's how Chinese did it and that's how Indians are doing it. India pulled more people out of poverty than anyone barring the Chinese in the last 2 decades. The way Bangladeshis have been doing this is in the last decade is an inspirational story. Moving people out of poverty is just the first step. The goal is to next move them into middle class at least by the next generation. You need education, health for their kids. All of this requires constant growth and a strong economy.
 
What has 1 child policy gotta do with this discussion? (Afterall Chinas population is greater than India’s)

I ve been to rural china outside the big cities and also India (UP, Delhi). There is dire poverty and 3rd world feel (uncleanliness, chaos) in India (even in Dilli) that i didnt spot anywhere in China. As for India’s white collar jobs, i dont agree that low level backoffice work can be classified as such.

In terms of GDP and industrialization, infrastructure there is no match between China and India. Also the general attitude and demeanour of ppl, that I could observe felt just like in Pakistan. Also not just visual wealth, ordinary chinese were more civilised, cleaner and disciplined than Indians.

And yes ofcourse, everybody in West compares India with other 3rd world nations because thats what it is. In US many native people cant even distinguish between Indians and Pakistanis..Its only Indians who dont wanna get down from their high horse.

What has 1 child policy got to do with the discussion? At least read about how population explosion can hamper a country's resources economy instead of being ignorant.

Yes, there is no match to GDP and industrialization between India and China now. I already indicated that India is 15 to 20 years behind China. Couldn't care less about general demeanor and attitude. Indians are not drones like Chinese controlled by their government. Every country has it's USP, attitude and it's preposterous to assume everybody should behave the same.

People not being able to distinguish between Indians or Pakistanis based on looks is not a benchmark. It's the same race. Can people distinguish between Vietnamese and Chinese in the west? Doesn't mean People don't know the individual standing of Vietnam or China. India's white collar jobs are valued added with high margin. That's services jackpot. Back office jobs are just part of the spectrum. Again, read about it. People will behave how they want to behave. If you don't like the attitude, steer clear. China is still a developing country as few cities in the East are not indicative enough of a nations prosperity. India is too. Based on the large populations, it will take decades before their per capitas reach acceptable level for "developed" status.
 
What high value is added from providing IT support, Code writing and Call centers? Never heard of any major patented research of any significance or any well known IT product coming out India’s “White collar” jobs.

Also if u wanna be a first word country you can’t just dismiss peoples attitude, language, demeanour and manners. The way Indians (and Pakistanis) treat each other in their own countries is not something to be proud of. You cant be oblivious of all the rampant human right abuses in India day in day out. Intolerance, open hatred of minorities....

Lastly, I myself am an ‘Indian Origin’ Pakistani, have still got relatives in India. So i dont look down on indians just for the sake of argument. I genuinely think that its a very long way to go for Indians to catch up with China (west is much further ahead in terms of evolution of their society)..
 
What high value is added from providing IT support, Code writing and Call centers? Never heard of any major patented research of any significance or any well known IT product coming out India’s “White collar” jobs.

Also if u wanna be a first word country you can’t just dismiss peoples attitude, language, demeanour and manners. The way Indians (and Pakistanis) treat each other in their own countries is not something to be proud of. You cant be oblivious of all the rampant human right abuses in India day in day out. Intolerance, open hatred of minorities....

Lastly, I myself am an ‘Indian Origin’ Pakistani, have still got relatives in India. So i dont look down on indians just for the sake of argument. I genuinely think that its a very long way to go for Indians to catch up with China (west is much further ahead in terms of evolution of their society)..

Whoa. Maybe subscribe to LinkedIn and techcrunch. I think you are out of the loop on the startups and innovation happening in India. I have been fortunate to work with young tech workers and companies in both Shenzhen and Bangalore and these silicon valleys of the east both have a lot going for them. I have no idea what you are talking about seems like you are still stuck in the 90s with call center and BPO
 
Then just enlighten us with some examples of these innovations!

No point beating around the bush...
 
Then just enlighten us with some examples of these innovations!

No point beating around the bush...

So you will make some random claim that has no factual evidence then you use your uninformed opinions as a reason for me to educate you? How about you just take my advice and subscribe to some feeds that will bring you up to date to 2019
 
Lol, your tall claims fizzled out quickly. You are the one who made random claims about Silicon valley of Banglore.

Thing is that are NO major, IT inventions or Products out of India.

Obviously if you have a population of over 1 billion, there will be some capable of following the instructions properly. That’s what Indian IT industry is good for.
 
Last edited:
Lol, your tall claims fizzled out quickly. You are the one who made random claims about Silicon valley of Banglore.

Thing is that are NO major, IT inventions or Products out of India.

Obviously if you have a population of over 1 billion, there will be some capable of following the instructions properly. That’s what Indian IT industry is good for.

Ok if you say so. Obviously you know more about this than I do. Carry on.
 
Pakistan on Thursday conducted a successful training launch of surface to surface ballistic missile (SSBM) Ghaznavi, a press release from Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR).

According to the press release, this launch was carried out as part of a training exercise of Army Strategic Forces Command “aimed at rehearsing operational readiness procedures during day and night.”

Director General Strategic Plans Division Lieutenant General Nadeem Zaki Manj appreciated the operational preparedness of the Army Strategic Forces Command. He commended them for displaying a very high standard of proficiency in handling and operating the weapon system.

“Troops displayed full confidence in the robust strategic command and control system,” said Director General Strategic Plans Division, was quoted as saying by ISPR.

The president, prime minister, chairman joint chiefs of staff committee and services chiefs have congratulated the nation on this landmark achievement.

As per the military’s media wing, missile Ghaznavi is capable of delivering multiple types of warheads up to a range of 290 kilometres.

In November 2019, Pakistan carried out a successful training launch of ballistic missile Shaheen-I which was also an SSBM.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1530095/p...o-surface-training-launch-of-missile-ghaznavi
 
The Pakistan Army conducted a successful flight test of the Fatah-II missile system, said a statement released by the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) on Wednesday.

The missile is equipped with "state of the art avionics" and a sophisticated navigation system, enabling a unique flight trajectory.

The military's media wing added that the weapon system can engage targets with precision out to a distance of 400 kilometres.

The test was witnessed by senior officers from the tri-services, scientists and engineers, said the ISPR.

Earlier in October, a successful flight test of the Ababeel weapon system was conducted.

The test of the ballistic missile system was aimed at "re-validating various designs, technical parameters, and performance evaluations of different sub-systems," a press release stated.

"The missile system is aimed at strengthening deterrence and enhancing strategic stability in the region through the operationalization of full-spectrum deterrence in the overall construct of credible minimum deterrence," it added.

Source: Express Tribune

 
It's definitely added value to our security, and there's no doubt that our missile systems are among the best in the world.
 
The US has imposed sanctions on three Chinese companies and one from Belarus for secretly supplying missile-applicable items for Pakistan's ballistic missile programmes, including its long-range missile programme, the State Department has announced.

The names of the companies are Xi'an Longde Technology Development, Tianjin Creative Source International Trade and Granpect Co. Ltd from China and Minsk Wheel Tractor Plant from Belarus.

These entities "have engaged in activities or transactions that have materially contributed to, or pose a risk of materially contributing to, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction or their means of delivery, including any efforts to manufacture, acquire, possess, develop, transport, transfer or use such items, by Pakistan," State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said on Friday.

Mr Miller said the US is committed to strengthening the global nonproliferation regime by taking action to disrupt procurement networks supporting proliferation activities of concern.

China, an all-weather ally of Pakistan, has been the main supplier of arms and defence equipment to Islamabad's ambitious military modernisation programme.

The Minsk Wheel Tractor Plant in Belarus supplied special vehicle chassis to Pakistan's long-range ballistic missile programme.

Such chassis are used as launch support equipment for ballistic missiles by Pakistan's National Development Complex (NDC), which is responsible for the development of Missile Technology Control Regime Category (MTCR) I ballistic missiles, according to a State Department Factsheet.

China's Xi'an Longde Technology Development Company Limited, supplied missile-related equipment, including a filament winding machine, to Pakistan's long-range ballistic missile programme that the US said was destined for Pakistan's NDC.

Filament winding machines can be used to produce rocket motor cases.

Tianjin Creative Source International Trade Co Ltd supplied missile-related equipment to Pakistan's long-range ballistic missile programme, including stir welding equipment (which the United States assesses can be used to manufacture propellant tanks used in space launch vehicles), and a linear accelerator system (which the United States assesses can be used in the inspection of solid rocket motors).

Tianjin Creative's procurements were likely destined for Pakistan's Space and Upper Atmosphere Research Commission (SUPARCO), which develops and produces Pakistan's MTCR Category I ballistic missiles, the US state department said.

Granpect Company worked with Pakistan's SUPARCO to supply equipment for testing large-diameter rocket motors.

In addition, Granpect Co. Ltd. also worked to supply equipment for testing large-diameter rocket motors to Pakistan's NDC.


What possible reaction do you expect from China for US sanctions on three Chinese firms?
 

Pakistan rejects 'political use' of export controls, says FO after US sanctions suppliers​


The Foreign Office (FO) rejected on Saturday the "political use" of export control measures after the United States imposed sanctions on four entities for allegedly supplying “missile-applicable items” to Pakistan’s ballistic missile program.

"It is a reality that the same jurisdictions, which claim to exercise strict non-proliferation controls, have waived off licensing requirements for advanced military technologies for some countries," said FO Spokesperson Mumtaz Zahra Baloch.

The spokesperson added that such behaviour is leading to an "arms build up; accentuating regional asymmetries, and undermining the objectives of non-proliferation and of regional and global peace and security".

The US State Department, a day earlier, claimed that one Belarussian and three Chinese companies were particularly assisting Pakistan's long-range ballistic missile programme.

"The Department of State is designating four entities pursuant to Section 1(a)(ii) of Executive Order 13382, which targets proliferators of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery.  These entities have supplied missile‐applicable items to Pakistan’s ballistic missile program, including its long-range missile program," said the US State Dept.

The spokesperson said Islamabad was not "aware of the specifics" of the latest measures, but there have been many instances in the past "where listings have been made on mere suspicion or even when the involved items were not on any control lists but were deemed sensitive."

Baloch said Pakistan has repeatedly pointed out that such items have legitimate commercial uses and therefore it is important to avoid arbitrary application of export controls.

“Pakistan has always been ready to discuss end-use and end-user verification mechanisms so that legitimate commercial users are not hurt by discriminatory application of export controls," the spokesperson added.

Late last year, Pakistan conducted a successful flight test of the Fatah-II missile system. Earlier in October, a successful flight test of the Ababeel weapon system was also conducted.

The test of the ballistic missile system was aimed at "re-validating various designs, technical parameters, and performance evaluations of different sub-systems," a press release stated.

"The missile system is aimed at strengthening deterrence and enhancing strategic stability in the region through the operationalization of full-spectrum deterrence in the overall construct of credible minimum deterrence," it added.

 
Iran goes head to head with Israel and the U.S. decides to sanction Pakistan lol. What’s worse is our foreign minister is Uncle Ishaq Dar. The U.S. and Saudi are clearly trying to put pressure on Pakistan for various reasons. Hearing they want all access to Gwadar including for Israeli companies, visa free.
 
I'd read this more as an anti-China thing than anything much to do with Pakistan. They've not sanctioned any Pakistan-side entities - military or semi-military.
 
I'd read this more as an anti-China thing than anything much to do with Pakistan. They've not sanctioned any Pakistan-side entities - military or semi-military.
This is anti- Pakistan considering they are clearly able to slap Pakistani Establishment around inspite of Establishment putting the actual elected leader behind bar due to West.
 
Nokar ki the Nakhra ki.
When you sell you sould to satan you expect to be treated like a slave
 
Pakistan successfully tests Fatah-II rocket system

Pakistan Army on Wednesday conducted successful training launch of Fatah-II Guided Rocket System with a range of 400 kilometres, said the military’s media wing in a statement.

The rocket is equipped with state-of-the-art navigation system, unique trajectory and manoeuvrable features. Fatah-II is capable of engaging targets with high precision and defeating any missile defence system.

“Fatah -II is being inducted in Pakistan’s Artillery Divisions for stand-off, precision engagement of deep targets. The rocket system will significantly upgrade the reach and lethality of Pakistan Army’s conventional arsenal,” said the ISPR.

Flight test was witnessed by Chief of the General Staff Pakistan Army, senior officers from the three services and dedicated scientists and engineers.

President Zardari, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee, Chief of Army Staff Asim Munir and all services chiefs congratulated participating troops and scientists on this excellent achievement.

 


Pakistan Navy has successfully tested the indigenously developed P282 Smash ballistic missile. This state-of-the-art missile boasts a range of 350 km and is capable of precisely hitting land and sea targets. Equipped with advanced navigation and maneuvering technology, the P282 Smash represents a leap in Pakistan’s defensive capabilities, demonstrating both precision and power.
 


Pakistan Navy has successfully tested the indigenously developed P282 Smash ballistic missile. This state-of-the-art missile boasts a range of 350 km and is capable of precisely hitting land and sea targets. Equipped with advanced navigation and maneuvering technology, the P282 Smash represents a leap in Pakistan’s defensive capabilities, demonstrating both precision and power.

Let's get it verified by chief "Jack of all trades " @cricketjoshila. Once he gives the thumbs up, only then our Desi Pakistanis can breath a sigh of relief.
 
Pinpoint accuracy

Obviously with a payload it may not be pinpoint

But large enough warhead or nuclear payload it won't matter.

This will hit aircraft carriers and destroyers
 
Congratulations however Pakistani missiles are basically Chinese missiles with green stickers and name of Arab invadors whom the Hindu ancestors of modern day Pakistanis fought for centuries.
 
US imposes more sanctions over Pakistan's missile program

The United States said on Wednesday it was imposing new sanctions related to nuclear-armed Pakistan's long-range ballistic-missile program, including on the state-owned defense agency that oversees the program.

State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said in a statement that the measures slapped on the National Development Complex and three firms were imposed under an executive order that "targets proliferators of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery."

The sanctions freeze any U.S. property belonging to the targeted entities and bars Americans from doing business with them.

The Pakistani embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

A State Department factsheet said the Islamabad-based NDC has sought to obtain components for the country's long-range ballistic-missile program and missile-testing equipment.

It said the NDC "is responsible for the development of Pakistan's ballistic missiles," including the Shaheen family of missiles.


 
That’s ok you can move it to Bangladesh as their minister said friendly nations can launch nuclear bomb from Bangladesh towards India.
 
Pakistan developing missiles that eventually could hit US, says White House official

A senior White House official on Thursday said nuclear-armed Pakistan is developing long-range ballistic missile capabilities that eventually could allow it to strike targets outside of South Asia, including the United States.

Deputy national security adviser Jon Finer said Islamabad's conduct raised "real questions" about its intentions.

"Candidly, it's hard for us to see Pakistan's actions as anything other than an emerging threat to the United States," Finer said in a speech to the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

The latest statement comes only a day after the US State Department said it was imposing additional sanctions related to Pakistan's ballistic missile programme, targeting four entities that it said were contributing to the proliferation or delivery of such weapons.

The statement, issued on the State Department's website, said that the decision was taken “in light of the continuing proliferation threat of Pakistan’s long-range missile development”.

It added that the four entities were being designated for sanctions pursuant to Executive Order (EO) 13382, which targeted proliferators of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery.

"Pakistan’s National Development Complex – which is responsible for Pakistan’s ballistic missile program and has worked to acquire items to advance Pakistan’s long range ballistic missile program – and Affiliates International, Akhtar and Sons Private Limited, and Rockside Enterprise – which have worked to supply equipment and missile‐applicable items to Pakistan’s ballistic missile program, including its long range missile program – are being designated pursuant to E.O. 13382 Section 1(a)(ii) for having engaged, or attempted to engage, in activities or transactions that have materially contributed to, or pose a risk of materially contributing to, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction or their means of delivery (including missiles capable of delivering such weapons), including any efforts to manufacture, acquire, possess, develop, transport, transfer, or use such items, by Pakistan," read the statement.

However, Islamabad reacted strongly to the development, terming the the decision as "biased" and stressing that the step from the US has "dangerous implications for strategic stability of our region and beyond".

"Pakistan’s strategic capabilities are meant to defend its sovereignty and preserve peace and stability in South Asia. The latest installment of sanctions defies the objective of peace and security by aiming to accentuate military asymmetries. Such policies have dangerous implications for strategic stability of our region and beyond," Foreign Office spokesperson Mumtaz Zahra Baloch said in a statement.

The Foreign Office stressed that the county's strategic programme is a sacred trust bestowed by 240 million people upon its leadership, adding that the sanctity of this trust, held in the highest esteem across the entire political spectrum, cannot be compromised.

In September this year, Washington targeted five entities and one individual with sanctions, which were involved in the expansion of ballistic missiles and controlling missile equipment and technology to Pakistan.

Department spokesperson Matthew Miller alleged that the Beijing Research Institute of Automation for Machine Building Industry had worked with Pakistan to procure equipment for testing rocket motors for the Shaheen-3 and Ababeel systems and potentially for larger systems.

However, Pakistan categorically dismissed "unilateral" US sanctions on technology companies allegedly linked to the country's ballistic missile programme, calling them "unfair, unfounded, and uncalled-for".

"Pakistan considers this action as biased and politically-motivated. Similar listings of commercial entities in the past were based on mere suspicion; involved items not listed under any export control regime and yet were considered sensitive under broad, catch-all provisions," said Mumtaz Zahra Baloch, Spokesperson for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Mofa) had said.

Similarly, the US — in October 2023 — imposed sanctions on three Chinese companies for supplying missile-applicable items to Pakistan.

The sanctions also affected China-based firms Hubei Huachangda Intelligent Equipment Co, Universal Enterprise, and Xi’an Longde Technology Development Co. Pakistan-based Innovative Equipment and a Chinese national were sanctioned for knowingly transferring equipment under missile technology restrictions.  


GEO TV
 
Made in China.
Boasted in Pakistan.

Remember it’s not scary if it ain’t pointy :yk
 
US imposes more sanctions over Pakistan's missile program

The United States said on Wednesday it was imposing new sanctions related to nuclear-armed Pakistan's long-range ballistic-missile program, including on the state-owned defense agency that oversees the program.

State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said in a statement that the measures slapped on the National Development Complex and three firms were imposed under an executive order that "targets proliferators of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery."

The sanctions freeze any U.S. property belonging to the targeted entities and bars Americans from doing business with them.

The Pakistani embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

A State Department factsheet said the Islamabad-based NDC has sought to obtain components for the country's long-range ballistic-missile program and missile-testing equipment.

It said the NDC "is responsible for the development of Pakistan's ballistic missiles," including the Shaheen family of missiles.


Getting the right kind of publicity @offstump
 
US sanctions won’t impact Pakistan’s missile programme: ex-envoy

Dr Maleeha Lodhi, Pakistan’s former envoy to the United States, said on Friday that the recent US sanctions on Pakistani firms for their alleged involvement in the country’s ballistic missile programme will not impact or slow it down.

On Wednesday, the US said it was imposing additional sanctions related to Pakistan’s ballistic missile programme, targeting four entities that it alleged were contributing to the proliferation or delivery of such weapons.

The US Department of State said in a statement that the White House will continue to act against proliferation and associated procurement activities of concern.

Speaking to Geo News today, Lodhi highlighted that the recent sanctions were nothing new and that the Biden administration in the past four years had imposed sanctions six or seven times.

“But one thing we need to remember is that these kinds of sanctions don’t impact the health of Pakistan; Pakistan’s nuclear policy, or missile policy, will not slow down or stop.

“History has told us that ever since Pakistan began its nuclear programme, the US has been imposing restrictions. They were trying to shut down Pakistan’s nuclear programme or weaken it, or try that Pakistan doesn’t develop missiles,” she said.

The former ambassador also emphasised that the sanctions were “discriminatory” since the US had never applied them to India, whose missile programme was more advanced than Pakistan’s.

“They have what we call D&D (decontamination and decommissioning) systems, which are ballistic missile defence systems, which they have taken from America, developed on their own, taken from Israel as well.

“America has never sanctioned them,” she said. “This is a discriminatory policy of theirs, but the impact on Pakistan will be zero.”

When asked by Geo News if she anticipated a significant shift in Pak-US relations after President-elect Donald Trump took office, Lodhi emphasised that Pakistan was not on the list of priorities for America’s foreign policy.

“Trump’s biggest foreign policy focus will be China, and then the war in Ukraine, the conflict in Gaza, what’s happening in Syria.

“Pakistan is not the priority. I don’t think nuclear nonproliferation is an important issue for Trump,” she said. “But naturally, it will have to be seen what foreign policies he actually focuses on.”

She noted that historically, the Republicans had not put as much emphasis on nuclear nonproliferation as Democrats.

“But as far as our mutual relationship is concerned, we must keep in mind that our relationship with the US is at a crossroads ever since they pulled out of Afghanistan.”

‘Biased’ US sanctions endanger regional, global peace: FO

Responding to the sanctions on Thursday, the Foreign Office (FO) had said they were “biased” and “endanger regional and international peace”.

“Pakistan considers the US decision to impose sanctions on NDC and three commercial entities as unfortunate and biased,” the FO said in a press release.

“Such double standards and discriminatory practices not only undermine the credibility of non-proliferation regimes but also endanger regional and international peace and security,” it added.

Asserting that Pakistan’s strategic capabilities were meant to “defend its sovereignty and preserve peace and stability in South Asia”, the FO said the latest instalment of sanctions “defies the objective of peace and security by aiming to accentuate military asymmetries”.

“Such policies have dangerous implications for strategic stability of our region and beyond,” the statement stressed.

Regretting the imposition of sanctions on the three Karachi-based private commercial entities, the FO said: “Similar listings of commercial entities in the past were based on mere doubts and suspicion without any evidence whatsoever.

“While claiming strict adherence to non-proliferation norms, licensing requirements for advanced military technology to other countries have been waived off in the past,” it noted.

The FO stated that Pakistan’s strategic programme was a “sacred trust bestowed by 240 million people upon its leadership”.

“The sanctity of this trust, held in the highest esteem across the entire political spectrum, cannot be compromised,” it asserted.

 

Pakistan rejects US allegations on missile capabilities as 'perplexing'​


The Foreign Ministry has strongly dismissed recent comments by a senior US official regarding the country’s missile capabilities, labelling the allegations as baseless and devoid of historical context.

In a statement issued in response to media queries, the Foreign Office spokesperson expressed regret over the remarks, describing them as unhelpful for the longstanding, positive, and broad-ranging Pakistan-US relationship.

The spokesperson emphasised that Pakistan’s strategic program is solely defensive, aimed at preserving sovereignty and maintaining peace in South Asia.

'Unfounded allegations'

"The alleged threat perception from Pakistan’s missile capabilities and delivery means, raised by the US official are unfortunate. These allegations are unfounded, devoid of rationality and sense of history," the FO statement said. It highlighted that Pakistan, a major non-NATO ally, has never harboured ill intentions toward the US and called for a balanced understanding of the country’s strategic objectives.

“Concerns over Pakistan’s capabilities appear to be raised at the behest of others, while more potent missile developments in our eastern neighbourhood are ignored,” the statement read, referring to India’s growing arsenal.

Defence of strategic program

The Foreign Office reiterated that Pakistan’s strategic program is designed to ensure credible minimum deterrence and respond to evolving regional threats. It noted that Pakistani leadership has consistently engaged with the US since 2012 to address any concerns, but the recent allegations risk undermining trust.

“Our strategic program reflects the profound commitment of the Pakistani people and the country’s defence priorities. Any attempt to intrude into it is neither thinkable nor possible,” the spokesperson said, adding that the country’s political and social spectrum unanimously supports this resolve.

Call for constructive engagement

Pakistan expressed disappointment over being compared to countries perceived as adversaries of the US and stressed the importance of building on the positive history of Pakistan-US relations, which began in 1954.

Highlighting Pakistan’s sacrifices in regional stability, the statement underscored the need for constructive dialogue and a balanced approach to security issues. “Pakistan has always sought cooperative engagement with the US and hopes to strengthen this legacy,” it concluded.

 
US sanctions on Pakistani firms have ‘no justification’, PM Shehbaz asserts

Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Tuesday asserted that the recent sanctions placed by the United States on four Pakistani firms for their alleged involvement in the country’s ballistic missile programme had “no justification”.

Addressing a federal cabinet meeting in Islamabad, the premier said, “The sanctions placed upon our National Development Complex and other entities have no justification.

“Pakistan has absolutely no intention for our nuclear system to be aggressive. It is 100 per cent for Pakistan’s defence; nothing else,” he added.

Last week, the US said it was imposing additional sanctions related to Pakistan’s ballistic missile programme, targeting four entities that it alleged were contributing to the proliferation or delivery of such weapons.

Responding to the sanctions, the FO had said they were “biased” and “endanger regional and international peace”.

Later, Deputy National Security Adviser Jon Finer accused Pakistan of developing long-range ballistic missile capabilities that could eventually allow it to strike targets “well beyond South Asia, including in the United States”.

However, showing caution, Pentagon press secretary Maj Gen Pat Ryder refrained from direct criticism when asked about the US sanctions on Pakistan, adding that the US valued Pakistan as a partner in the region, having “worked closely” with the country on counterterrorism efforts in the past.

Responding to Finer’s claims of Pakistan being capable of striking the US, the FO had termed them as “unfounded, [and] devoid of rationality and sense of history”.

DAWN NEWS
 
Pakistan being a politically unstable and a historically irresponsible member of the international community must be under strictest scrutiny when it comes to the proliferation of its weapons programs as it endangers the global community.

We don’t want to be in a situation where these weapons of mass destruction fall in the wrong hands if there is ever a Bangladeshi like coupe led by Islamist extremists given that we have Shia and Sanatani dominant populations in Pakistan’s neighbourhood.
 
So Pakistan has missiles to target anywhere in India and Israel, now they're getting their range to USA, if that's true mighty impressive specially for a country debt ridden and poverty stricken
 
So Pakistan has missiles to target anywhere in India and Israel, now they're getting their range to USA, if that's true mighty impressive specially for a country debt ridden and poverty stricken
That's your measure of "impressive" success?

No. Seriously.
 
Back
Top