What's new

Pakistan's stale approach to Test cricket

shariqnoor

First Class Captain
Joined
Jul 14, 2016
Runs
4,555
Post of the Week
5
If it wasn't apparent to anyone before, it should be visibly apparent now that Pakistan's approach to Test cricket is not only outdated but it is match-losing.

Every time Pakistan takes to the field, it seems that if the opposition scores 370 plus in the first innings, the default option of the team is to look to secure the draw first and then if all the stars align perfectly would they ever go for the win.

Let's just dissect the 2022/2023 home season of Pakistan starting with the Australian series:

1) 2nd Test at Karachi:
Pakistan required 506 runs in 172 overs at a run rate of 2.94 on one of the flattest pitches of all time ala Pindi a match earlier. All they needed to do was score 250 per day. They only score 192 in the whole of Day 4. And 251 on day 5. Losing only 7 wickets in the process. It was clear from the outset that the team had only one goal in mind and that was to play for the draw. The draw was somehow lapped up and presented to the public as an escape of biblical proportions. Any self-respecting team who has ambitions of becoming a top side would never have drawn the Test match. Either they would've won it or lost it. Draw was an abomination but the team and Babar were so happy about it.

3rd Test at Lahore:
Set a target of 351 in about 120 overs at a run rate of 2.92. Not an absolute road like Karachi but still a beautiful batting wicket where Australia racked up almost 400 in the 1st innings and 227/3 in the 2nd innings at close to 4 RPO. What does Pakistan intend to do from the outset? Play for a draw. What happened? A loss.

To the England series now,

1st Test at Pindi:
Require 263 on Day 5 in about 80 overs (I'll take bad light into account). They only scored 177 runs in the first two sessions. On any other pitch where there may have been some assistance to the bowlers, I could've understood that 177 runs is decent. But this was one of the flattest wickets of all time. Their approach of saving wickets till the last session to somehow score 100 in 20 overs was never going to work if at all their approach was this. In the end, ended up scrambling for a draw which they couldn't achieve anyways.

Against NZ:

2nd Test at Karachi:
NZ score 450 in the first innings and Pakistan started Day 3 at 154/3. Added only 253 runs in the whole day. They had only lost 2 wickets till the last half hour of the day. It seems like the whole plan is to play out another draw. If the mindset was to play for a win, then the team would've reach parity to NZ's total by now. Saud Shakeel may have scored a ton but he has left at least 60 runs to his own credit out there by batting at a snail's pace.

There are other teams who have the mindset of trying to win a match from any situation while Pakistan's approach is always safety first. Cast your mind to the Pakistan vs Australia test match in Melbourne where Azhar Ali scored a double hundred. That match was marred by rain on the first two days and Pakistan ended up declaring at about 450 just after lunch on the third day. There was absolutely no chance of a win had Pakistan been the second team batting. But Australia knew they wanted to win and they thought of what is the best possible way of winning the Test. It was to bat only once and have a lead so big that they could put pressure on the opposition on Day 5. So they ended Day 3 on 278 in 58 overs playing at an astonishing 4.8 RPO. They were forcing the game forward and ultimately gave Pakistan 64 overs to bat to draw the game with a lead of 181 runs. Pakistan ultimately caved in and lost the Test match.

If Pakistan continues with this stale approach of trying to secure a draw first, every time the opposition racks up 370 plus, then history tells us that they will end up on the losing side more often than they will end up drawing.

The buck stops with the captain. If he cannot show the mindset that the players need to play the game to win, regardless of the match situation in the first innings, then the reasonable option is to change the captain.
 
A lot of fans continually refer to Pakistan playing a 1990s brand of cricket - across tests and limited overs.

This is so far from the truth. All of the 1990s teams would hang their heads in shame looking at Pakistan's intent and attitude on the field. Pakistan's 1990s team itself would smoke the current lot any day of the week.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A lot of fans continually refer to Pakistan playing a 1990s brand of cricket - across tests and limited overs.

This is so far from the truth. All of the 1990s teams would hang their heads in shame looking at Pakistan's intent and attitude on the field. Pakistan's 1990s team itself would smoke the current lot any day of the week.

The 90s team starting from 1-6 would make the T20 team on merit. Ijaz Ahmed would be a bonafide giant of Pakistan T20 game.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A lot of fans continually refer to Pakistan playing a 1990s brand of cricket - across tests and limited overs.

This is so far from the truth. All of the 1990s teams would hang their heads in shame looking at Pakistan's intent and attitude on the field. Pakistan's 1990s team itself would smoke the current lot any day of the week.

Exactly right — I can only assume that the posters are very young and think of the 1990s as ancient history :-).
As the saying goes, the past is a foreign country….
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A lot of fans continually refer to Pakistan playing a 1990s brand of cricket - across tests and limited overs.

This is so far from the truth. All of the 1990s teams would hang their heads in shame looking at Pakistan's intent and attitude on the field. Pakistan's 1990s team itself would smoke the current lot any day of the week.

there was a period in the late 90s where pak were opening in tests with afridi and anwar, lol. 90s pak team was very exciting.

most fans who are post-2000 dont really get how volatile that team was. from losing at home to zim to winning in india.

this team could not even compete in india.
 
Sigh, we will be talking about the same issues in 2030 as well.
 
Saud shaqeels innings sums up pakistans confused approach to test match batting

They just dont know how to approach an innings What was the need to go on blockathons putting pressure on yourself and the scorecard

Bizarre approach
 
Pakistan have no idea how to pace an innings. Playing patiently is a part of test cricket yes, but there has to be some reason for it. The bowling is amazing or the pitch is tough or the situation is tough.

Sometimes we bat slow just for the sake of batting slow for no apparent reason.

And to succeed as one of these anchors and make a difference to the side you have to make the opposition pay at some point in your innings and make some big scores like Kallis and Dravid used to.

Our players just play slow - there’s no plan, there’s just “let’s bat slow”
 
Also to add to the above - there’s no payoff either. A lot of them bat slow and eventually just get out without achieving anything.
 
Also to add to the above - there’s no payoff either. A lot of them bat slow and eventually just get out without achieving anything.

This is the most frustrating thing for me. That 3rd session Shakeel did absolutely nothing, then we collapsed with 4 wickets at the end anyway. What did it achieve? 0 payoff.

Why not continue batting as we were in the previous session? Would we have seriously lost more wickets? Someone needs to explain it to me, I just don't get it.
 
there was a period in the late 90s where pak were opening in tests with afridi and anwar, lol. 90s pak team was very exciting.

most fans who are post-2000 dont really get how volatile that team was. from losing at home to zim to winning in india.

this team could not even compete in india.

Imagine if this team has to play a 5 match test series against India lol. Massacre. Carnage!
 
Pakistan is not missing out in 2nd inning of the test, rather they are losing it in first inning.

Pakistan v Aus 2nd test Karachi

Aus scored 556 and Pakistan scored 148. Match was lost here itself. When you're playing at home and opposition scored 500+, then home should not be scoring less than 450. It was flattest pitch on offer.

Pakistan v Aus 3rd test Lahore

Aus scored 391. They were 206-5 at one stage and Carey and Green got into big partnership. Tail added 40-50 runs. Compared to that Pakistan were 248-3 and just got blown away by reverse swing in 20 runs. Home team should have scored 400+ here.
 
I keep referring to Kohli's first game as captain where he decided that India were going to chase 360 on Day 5 in Adelaide. He laid the marker down for his captaincy in that Test match. Went to chase in away conditions.

Here, Pakistan decide to shut up shop at anything close to 250 on Day 5 in home conditions on the flattest wickets of all time.
 
Shahid Afridi's approach of setting SR targets for selection can also work for Test and ODI cricket. Batsmen who have scored at 50 SR for their entire FC career cannot just magically pivot and start playing at 5 rpo. The culture needs to change first and then performance will follow.
 
By playing blockathons you allow bowler to settle in rhythm and give him a chance. Unless you are defensively very strong like Rahul Dravid and Kallis, the approach will not work more than half of the times.
 
Attritional cricket has its merits and we seem to have forgotten that in our love for T20.
 
Attritional cricket has its merits and we seem to have forgotten that in our love for T20.

Attritional cricket works in the UAE where playing at even 2.5 is ok in the first innings because the game really takes off on Day 4 and Day 5.

In the rest of the world, nowadays, batting at 3.5 is a minimum. 3.5 RPO does not mean you love T20. If you are struggling to score 250 runs in a day, you cannot escape by calling it attritional cricket. The correct name for it is coward cricket especially when it is being done in home conditions.
 
Shahid Afridi's approach of setting SR targets for selection can also work for Test and ODI cricket. Batsmen who have scored at 50 SR for their entire FC career cannot just magically pivot and start playing at 5 rpo. The culture needs to change first and then performance will follow.

A strike rate of 50 is pretty good.
Let’s take as an example the ongoing test between Aus and SA. Aus have scored a mammoth 475-4 on a pretty flat pitch.
Khawaja 195 runs at SR 53
Labuschagne 79 at SR 52
Smith 104 at SR 54.

SR of 50 was also pretty much what Indian batters were going at against Bangladesh

So any posters on here watch too much T20 and think Tests around the world are played that way.
There is a reason why India and Australia are the best sides in the world
 
90s' team had multiple match winners. Can't name one match winner in this team.
 
I keep referring to Kohli's first game as captain where he decided that India were going to chase 360 on Day 5 in Adelaide. He laid the marker down for his captaincy in that Test match. Went to chase in away conditions.

Here, Pakistan decide to shut up shop at anything close to 250 on Day 5 in home conditions on the flattest wickets of all time.

Yes, trying to win all games may result in losing some which could be have been draw , but you win more often by playing for win. Indians winning so much with Kohli in 5-6 years was mainly due to them trying to win each game.
 
This is why Kohli is the GOAT Asian Test captain. Not once in his captaincy tenure did he ever play for a draw.

He kept asking for result-oriented wickets at home & won 40 matches as Test captain while scoring thousands of runs.

Absolutely incredible record.
 
This is why Kohli is the GOAT Asian Test captain. Not once in his captaincy tenure did he ever play for a draw.

He kept asking for result-oriented wickets at home & won 40 matches as Test captain while scoring thousands of runs.

Absolutely incredible record.

For all of Dhoni's greatness, he was a very mediocre Test captain and it showed in the makeup of his team and ultimately in his results away from home.

Kohli completely changed the mindset of the Test team starting from Adelaide 2014.

Pakistan needs a captain who is firstly astute enough to realize what needs to be done to win a Test match and secondly to go out there and execute that without worrying about the blowback if the plan fails.
 
For all of Dhoni's greatness, he was a very mediocre Test captain and it showed in the makeup of his team and ultimately in his results away from home.

Kohli completely changed the mindset of the Test team starting from Adelaide 2014.

Pakistan needs a captain who is firstly astute enough to realize what needs to be done to win a Test match and secondly to go out there and execute that without worrying about the blowback if the plan fails.

The Indian Test team under Dhoni completely regressed. Poor fitness & fast bowlers that lacked bite.

Kohli transformed the mindset. People who say he only won so much because he had good players need to look at the performance of players like Ishant Sharma & Yadav & how he revived their careers.

Unbelievable captain. Attacking captaincy is a bit of a cliche but you cannot win Tests if your intention is to draw the match as soon as the opposition gets their nose ahead.
 
The Indian Test team under Dhoni completely regressed. Poor fitness & fast bowlers that lacked bite.

Kohli transformed the mindset. People who say he only won so much because he had good players need to look at the performance of players like Ishant Sharma & Yadav & how he revived their careers.

Unbelievable captain. Attacking captaincy is a bit of a cliche but you cannot win Tests if your intention is to draw the match as soon as the opposition gets their nose ahead.

350-370 is the limit for this team. Anytime the opposition scores that many in the 1st innings, it's apparently game over for Pakistan. It's a draw or a loss for them.

If there were draws in ODIs, believe me, Babar would've opted to draw the game by batting 50 overs against Australia when they scored 350. A result oriented format is the only reason why Pakistan actually managed to chase as there was no other option but to chase.

England scored about 500 against India in Chennai in 2016. India responded to score 750 batting at 4 RPO and consequently won by an innings. All because Kohli wanted to win. The only way they could've won was by batting that quickly. What would have Babar done? Batted at snails pace to get to parity and then hope that England collapsed in the second innings.

The captain sets the benchmark. Should be clear by now.
 
350-370 is the limit for this team. Anytime the opposition scores that many in the 1st innings, it's apparently game over for Pakistan. It's a draw or a loss for them.

If there were draws in ODIs, believe me, Babar would've opted to draw the game by batting 50 overs against Australia when they scored 350. A result oriented format is the only reason why Pakistan actually managed to chase as there was no other option but to chase.

England scored about 500 against India in Chennai in 2016. India responded to score 750 batting at 4 RPO and consequently won by an innings. All because Kohli wanted to win. The only way they could've won was by batting that quickly. What would have Babar done? Batted at snails pace to get to parity and then hope that England collapsed in the second innings.

The captain sets the benchmark. Should be clear by now.

Agreed, its time to change the captain
 
I saw the dismissal of Shan today and, well, that was interesting. A sudden change and the adaptation of the T20-like approach has left me somewhat scratching my head. In general, some of the shot-making too has been rather interesting.

I´m here reminded of a story which my father often tells me about. A sardar visited a jatt as the latter got him served with lassi and himself drank it alongside as well. A few drops of it or its froth got stuck in the hosting jatt´s moustache. In a most decent, elegant, and poetic manner, his servant remarked, "There´s a parrot in the garden.... There´s a parrot in the garden." The jatt understood immediately as he right away wiped his moustache and lips. The sardar was most impressed by it as he ran home and taught his servants phrases of similar speech and oversaw his full training, preparing him for another similar encounter. Days later, he visited the jatt again and requested to be served with lassi again. This time around, the sardar got its drops stuck in his moustache on purpose and then looked at his servant for a reaction. The servant panicked, couldn´t think of any great poetic phrase, and uttered, "There´s a pig in the bush!", bringing upon his sardar master utter embarrassment!

The point is, stay original if you can´t emulate what others are doing. England play the way that they do due to the players that they´ve in their ranks. With the players that Pakistan have, their so-called aggressive approach might end up bringing upon only further embarrassment. I´m not saying that they should bat at a strike-rate of 50; definitely not. They should and must stay positive, but just don´t overdo the mimicry with those aerial strokes and dismissals by skying the ball in the air.
 
It’s an understatement to say Pakistan have an identity crisis.

We all want them to play quicker, but they seem intent on continuing this dour safety first approach.

But one thing worth noting is that it’s been 12 years since Misbah instilled this safety first mindset. If some people believe that was the need of the time to counter flashy players who flattered to deceive like Afridi, Akmals etc etc. Ok fine.

But in 12 years - where is the evolution? Surely there’s got to be some attempt at improvement.

As I said in another thread, if you want to say well we prefer to play risk free cricket - ok fine, but why can’t you evolve. Why can’t you learn to rotate the strike? Surely over 12 years, someone somewhere should have seen this and started preparing these players to find gaps, rotate the strike, manoeuvre the field. Default for every new player is just to block block block. Too much pressure and they play a silly shot and get out.

The country where you had Asif Iqbal and Miandad running the opponents ragged in the 1970s, this should not be something new or something alien to us. These two were rotating strike and running like hares before the rest of the world considered it an essential part of cricket.

I don’t get these dour and lazy cricketers.
 
Unfortunately, history continues to repeat.

Opposition scores more than 350 in the first innings and it's time to shut up shop for all the Pakistani batters.

Pakistan played roughly 10 overs less than Australia in the first innings at Perth but scored 216 runs less. For all of Hafeez's chest-thumping about fans seeing an intent to win from Pakistan, it was all bluster.

Captains impose their own style of play on the team. It seems that Shan while positive himself while batting, has no credibility or the ability to impose his style of play on the rest of the team.

I was hugely surprised by commentators praising Abdullah Shafique's innings. It was nothing but mediocre just like his Karachi innings against Australia. Same goes for Imam. I have never seen a more timid player than Shafique in the entire Pakistan's test batting history. For a guy who has all the shots in the book, he's just so scared of playing freely that it inhibits all his talent. What Shafique needs is a mentor like Kohli/Shastri or a captain like Ben Stokes.

If Australia scores 150 in the first session and gives Pakistan a target of 450 in 5 sessions, rest assured Pakistan will play for a draw. No self-respecting team that wants to evolve itself into a great team will look to draw a game where you are required to score only 90 runs per session. You can either lose the game or win the game. Drawing the game is loathsome in that scenario.
 
Another factor is that Pakistan is not playing enough Test matches. If you look at our future and past fixtures, we are more focused on T20 cricket. Franchise cricket is also impacting Pakistan cricket, as evidenced by Imad's retirement. There is not enough glamour in first-class cricket in Pakistan, with insufficient sponsors. Consequently, we are likely to witness a further decline in our Test cricket.
 
This is why Kohli is the GOAT Asian Test captain. Not once in his captaincy tenure did he ever play for a draw.

He kept asking for result-oriented wickets at home & won 40 matches as Test captain while scoring thousands of runs.

Absolutely incredible record.
That approach is so much better than putting super dead wickets and having intention to draw the game even before 1st ball is bowled.
 
Pakistan is still playing cricket from the 80s. Most of the time it seems like they are just trying to draw a Test match even from day 1. Even on this Australia tour their main priority seems to be getting a draw somehow.
 
Pakistan are playing each format one step behind the other.

They are playing modern ODI cricket in T20 (and fans justify it to protect Babar and Rizwan)

They are playing modern Test cricket in ODI (once again fans justify it to protest favourites)

They are playing 80s Test in Modern Test Cricket
 
Pakistan's never been interested in test cricket since T20's came in f you check the amount of tests Pakistan's played is atrocious.

They rather play 5 tests in a year and play 50 T20 matches which they mostly do anyway for the last few years and will carry on doing so.

This is why they'll never be able to develop players or have the likes of Babar and Shaheen play 100 tests in their careers.
 
Pakistan's never been interested in test cricket since T20's came in f you check the amount of tests Pakistan's played is atrocious.

They rather play 5 tests in a year and play 50 T20 matches which they mostly do anyway for the last few years and will carry on doing so.

This is why they'll never be able to develop players or have the likes of Babar and Shaheen play 100 tests in their careers.
Yep good point and that is also the reason behind the downfall of Pakistan cricket. By emphasizing on T20 stuff we are not selecting and producing quality players with good and solid techniques. If we kept on ignoring test format then no wonder our fate would become that of West Indies Cricket.
 
Pakistan's never been interested in test cricket since T20's came in f you check the amount of tests Pakistan's played is atrocious.

They rather play 5 tests in a year and play 50 T20 matches which they mostly do anyway for the last few years and will carry on doing so.

This is why they'll never be able to develop players or have the likes of Babar and Shaheen play 100 tests in their careers.
Also players like Shaheen and Babar can never reach their maximum potential unless they play great no. Of test matches.
 
This is not an anomaly. These collapses happen not because of batters playing attacking shots but because they go with the mindset of playing for a draw.

Personally, the draw at Karachi was one of the most shameful result in Pakistan's history. Babar's 196 was lapped up as something glorious. It was a pathetic knock because the intent was never to win the match. I will never let anyone tell me that the Karachi test was a glorious escape.

The Bangladesh defeat is a norm because that's what Pakistan does. It didn't surprise me one bit.
 
The way things were going, this defeat was always on the cards and TBH Pakistan could lose the series as well.

This team will win 4 days of the test match but they will perform so pathetically on that remaining 5th day that all you would say is that this team is worse than a minnow.
 
Attritional cricket has its merits and we seem to have forgotten that in our love for T20.
Pujara did that in 2018 Australian series. PUjara faced 1258 balls Strike rate 41.41
Khawaja last year in England faced 1263 balls 39.27 strike rate


Last time a Pakistani faced 1000 balls in a series was way back in 2007 by Misbah


Since 2010 - 1000 balls in a series

Strike rate 55 plus only following guys scored at that rate), Rest if the guys are below 55. COuple of them above 50. Majority 50 or below.

Smith - 4 times ( strike rates 64.71 67.75, 49.21, 48.51)
Kohli - 3 (strike rates 60.87, 63.31, 57.85)
Amla - 2
Cook - 2
Pujara - 2
Hussey - 1
Khawaja - 1
Mitchell - 1
Sangakkara - 1
Jo Root - 1 (64.71)
M Vijay - 1
Ian Bell - 1
 
Back
Top