What's new

[PICTURE] Sarfaraz Ahmed OUT or NOT OUT?!

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,993
Screenshot_20181008-153927_Twitter.jpg

Was Sarfaraz really out? Incompetence ?

Not the first time he's pleased Pakistan fans!
 
even he wasn't he should be declared out with the way he was jogging
 
Out! :asadrauf

Line belongs to upmire they say, from the picture it loooks out not seen the video footage though.
 
Out! :asadrauf

Line belongs to upmire they say, from the picture it loooks out not seen the video footage though.

Clearly out from the image.

Looks out because no part of the bat is inside the line.

Nothing behind the line, on the line is out. Right call made.

Glad our parosis have sharp enough eyes to see where the bat is but unfortunately their eyes betrayed them when it came to seeing the bails being dislodged or not.
 
Glad our parosis have sharp enough eyes to see where the bat is but unfortunately their eyes betrayed them when it came to seeing the bails being dislodged or not.

You should share an image with bat inside the crease and bails not being dislodged. I don't see either of them here.
 
Glad our parosis have sharp enough eyes to see where the bat is but unfortunately their eyes betrayed them when it came to seeing the bails being dislodged or not.

Brother... Touch and Go decision at the max, doesn't warrant this reaction on Umpire. What if same deceision was given by SENA umpire?

This kind of reaction from BD fans on umpiring errors was not received well by most here in Asia Cup !
 
Last edited:
Glad our parosis have sharp enough eyes to see where the bat is but unfortunately their eyes betrayed them when it came to seeing the bails being dislodged or not.

It isn't eyes but the image. If you believe that you are seeing things clearly amidst all the fuzz, then you are lying to yourself.
 
On a lighter note, even it was given Not Out, on current form how many more runs :sarf would have added?
 
That looks out.

Bails were off and the bat is still on the line. Good decision.
 
View attachment 84526

Was Sarfaraz really out? Incompetence ?

Not the first time he's pleased Pakistan fans!

In the pic, you can see the bails have already moved. How do we know that the bails hadn't already moved a fraction of a second before this pic was taken, in which case the bat would have been farther back.
 
I have Sarfaraz in my fantasy team. I claim not out. Fire the Umpire.
 
Rather than blame the ump we need to qs the players on why we had 2 runouts in the innings

Its unforgiveable in tests tbh
 
Bails completely dislodged?

Glad our parosis have sharp enough eyes to see where the bat is but unfortunately their eyes betrayed them when it came to seeing the bails being dislodged or not.

Lighted bails give an idea of when bails are considered to be disloged. An example here

images (1).jpeg
 
Pakistan should demand ICC not to appoint Indian umpires in thier matches.
 
Seems clear out based upon the image posted. Even the bail seems dislodged from one end so really not sure what exactly the issue is. Either the OP should post an image which at least shows bat is inside and bails not dislodged, else the decision seems fine
 
Seems clear out based upon the image posted. Even the bail seems dislodged from one end so really not sure what exactly the issue is. Either the OP should post an image which at least shows bat is inside and bails not dislodged, else the decision seems fine

You must have good eyes as I dont see the bail completely dislodged.
 
Glad our parosis have sharp enough eyes to see where the bat is but unfortunately their eyes betrayed them when it came to seeing the bails being dislodged or not.

Well, no need to focus on something which is obvious as daylight :bucknor
 
You must have good eyes as I dont see the bail completely dislodged.

One needs to define what "completely dislodged" means. With lighted bails and wickets, the umpire looks at where the bat is when the bails/wickets light up. Here in the pic, you can see one wicket is bent backwards, so obviously it would have lighted up. In fact it likely lighted up a fraction of a second earlier when the bat was even farther back.
 
it was out

Below is a picture of Misbah from the 2015 world cup, where the ball hit the wicket, the bails moved very slightly and they light up. But Misbah was not out as they were not completely dislodged, and were just slightly uprooted, veryyy veryyy slightly. The ball was being bowled here.

zing-bails.jpg





However, had this been a runout attempted, and the moment the lights went up on the bails he would had been out. The falling of the bails would had carreid on afterwards.

I think the rules state that the moment the bails lit up, its clear indication that its out. The fails falling back in is very rare though and would be not out.



In the OP pic, you could clearly see one side of the bail uprooted from its position while the bat is on the line and not over it. The bails didnt come back on the wickets did they

Had this been the zing bails, it would had lit up
 
Last edited:
You must have good eyes as I dont see the bail completely dislodged.

Bhai even if I take your argument, how do you expect us to pass a judgement on a runout when the bat was outside the crease ? Pls put a pic which atleast shows bat inside the crease and then people can give opinions on whether or not the bail is dislodged.
 
Bhai even if I take your argument, how do you expect us to pass a judgement on a runout when the bat was outside the crease ? Pls put a pic which atleast shows bat inside the crease and then people can give opinions on whether or not the bail is dislodged.

here are 2 frames

cap1.JPG

cap2.JPG
 
This is clearly out. Don't know what mig is trying to do.

I am not trying to do anything - just putting it out there as a lot of people felt that the decision was too close too call. Benefit of the doubt should have gone to the batsman.
 
anyone remember the England tour of Pakistan in 2005

Salman butt was nearing his 100 and was in a run out incident that was called up. The third umpire gave him not out because the bails weren't completely dislodged.
 
I am not trying to do anything - just putting it out there as a lot of people felt that the decision was too close too call. Benefit of the doubt should have gone to the batsman.

Umpiring isn't based on audience poll.

This was not a 50-50 call do there is no "benefit of doubt" factor involved. It's a straightforward decision.
 
Theb at has to be BEHIND the line...in those pictures I can't tell if the bails are entirely dislodged or not but the umpire would have been watching on a HD display, so I'd take his word for it in something so close.
 
That was out and he deserved to be out for over complicating a simple run. Sums up his non serious taken for granted approach to the game of late
 
Look out to me from posted pictures in this thread.
 
What a lazy piece of running.

Did not dive or fully stretch his arms or slide the bat properly.

Schoolboy error.
 
Looking at the picture in OP it’s clearly out. Don’t know what the fuss is about considering we are not talking about Indian fans here:)
 
What a lazy piece of running.

Did not dive or fully stretch his arms or slide the bat properly.

Schoolboy error.

And that too from the captain, a guy supposed to lead from front. All he has left now is yelling at his team mates.
 
That is out.

You need to have some part of bat or foot inside the line, NOT ON the line.
 
I saw the highlights. In the highlight they also show the frontal view of the wickets and you can clearly see the bails getting dislodged.
 
Looks out to me! I know what MIG is saying but that picture shows that the bails have been dislodged. The only scenario that would save him is if the bails landed back in their place - which didn't happen.
 
I am not trying to do anything - just putting it out there as a lot of people felt that the decision was too close too call. Benefit of the doubt should have gone to the batsman.

Mods can we have Poll for this decision, let the PPers decide :)
 
Should have been given out anyway. Very disappointed with the way he was taking that run. Jogging the whole thing. I think it was more a case of the fielder surprising him, but still, bad attitude. Exactly what he didn't need judging by the way things were going for him.
 
Back
Top