What's new

[PICTURES/VIDEOS] James Anderson retires from Test cricket with 704 wickets to his name

One of the true greats of the game. The quality of bowling that he is producing at this stage of his career is madness.

People can obsess with his aggregate away averages all they want, but it takes a truly special bowler to do what he is doing and has done over the past decade.

Definitely England’s greatest bowler. Called it in 2012-13, it was obvious for years. His skill-level is incredible and he keeps proving people wrong with his longevity.

Many thought, including myself, that he would call it a day after the 2019 Ashes, which seemed like the ideal occasion. However, here he is in 2021, scything through on a day 5 pitch under scorching sun against the GOAT Asian Test team.

Considering the rotation policy employed by England these days, he could actually be producing stellar performances into his 40s and take 700+ wickets.

I see no reason why he should be thinking about retiring any time soon. He is still hungry and motivated and his workload is properly managed these days.
 
If not him, then who? If not now, when?

Champion bowler.

Count down the posts now until someone comes in and says that a guy from black-and-white YouTube videos who played 30 Tests in the 1950s was better.
 
The benchmark for ATG is performing against India in India for the bowlers of this generation.

After Steyn, Anderson is the only fast bowler to have done that.

Cummins and Rabada will also have to do it to be considered ATG.
 
Forget the 1950s, there are some who hold the view that Anderson is no better than Gough, Caddick, Fraser, Hoggard, and Graham Dilley.
 
Last edited:
He has played more tests than the 3 spinners above him. That is an unbelievable achievement for a pace bowler. I guess his fielding in front of the wicket and at slips showed what a natural athlete he is. So isn't that shocking that he's outlasted any other pace bowler.

As far as his bowling skills, nothing much to say. Look at the number of wickets.
 
The most skilled bowler since Wasim era.

He has more skill than Steyn, if only he was a little quicker.

Steyn had a brilliant out-swinger but he couldn’t move the ball both ways like Anderson does. His in-swinger was average.
 
The most skilled bowler since Wasim era.

He has more skill than Steyn, if only he was a little quicker.

Steyn had a brilliant out-swinger but he couldn’t move the ball both ways like Anderson does. His in-swinger was average.

Rate Steyn above him in India as he has terrorized some of our best batsmen without the help of scoreboard pressure.


Disagree on the skills thing too. Mohammad Asif was better. Don't want to take away anything from Anderson because it's not his fault that Asif threw it all away. But during the 2009-10 or whenever (the spot fixing tour), remember Anderson spending time with Asif and even learning a couple of tricks from him :smith Pretty sure I remember Nasser talking about Asif teaching him the wobbly seam trick and one more...
 
He's just kept improving right into his late 30s. Much respect for the man.
 
:)) He's great. Unbelievable how that kid from the 2003 WC I saw knock over our batting lineup is still chugging along.
 
Rate Steyn above him in India as he has terrorized some of our best batsmen without the help of scoreboard pressure.


Disagree on the skills thing too. Mohammad Asif was better. Don't want to take away anything from Anderson because it's not his fault that Asif threw it all away. But during the 2009-10 or whenever (the spot fixing tour), remember Anderson spending time with Asif and even learning a couple of tricks from him :smith Pretty sure I remember Nasser talking about Asif teaching him the wobbly seam trick and one more...

Asif was damn good.

Brilliant with his seam.

Makingn a fool out of bats.

Anderson's swing is pure magic tho.

Anderson is the true heir to Wasim Akram in tests.
 
Anderson is a top bowler. McGrath is a GOAT but I love watching Jimmy. He swings it, seams it, and it’s absorbing to watch him set up the batsmen ... I agree he is the true heir to Waz.
A great swing bowling phenom. Will probably end up with ~650 wickets, the most for a quick and third on all time highest wicket takers.

Bravo!
 
Imagine Anderson with the type of balls Wasim, Waqar and Imran bowled with in the 80s and early 90s.

Wasim and waqar created havoc with doctored balls in the 92 series in England. Anderson with the same ball against the Pakistani lineup in that series could have turned the series around.

He is far more skilled than Waqar and on par with Wasim. However, Wasim was superior because he could bowl much quicker than him.
 
Imagine Anderson with the type of balls Wasim, Waqar and Imran bowled with in the 80s and early 90s.

Wasim and waqar created havoc with doctored balls in the 92 series in England. Anderson with the same ball against the Pakistani lineup in that series could have turned the series around.

He is far more skilled than Waqar and on par with Wasim. However, Wasim was superior because he could bowl much quicker than him.

When the reverse swing or the art of it become doctored.....not expected from a doctor atleast
 
Imagine Anderson with the type of balls Wasim, Waqar and Imran bowled with in the 80s and early 90s.

Wasim and waqar created havoc with doctored balls in the 92 series in England. Anderson with the same ball against the Pakistani lineup in that series could have turned the series around.

He is far more skilled than Waqar and on par with Wasim. However, Wasim was superior because he could bowl much quicker than him.
Imagine Imran, Waz, Waq bowling while sucking in those wonderful mints.

My oh my .. England batsmen would have never crossed 50 in an innings!
 
Good old Jimmy use to get out bowled by Dimi masceranous in odis.. you have to excel in all formats.

This is why McGrath Akram Marshall make it on most peoples all time xi & not Jimmy
 
Good old Jimmy use to get out bowled by Dimi masceranous in odis.. you have to excel in all formats.

This is why McGrath Akram Marshall make it on most peoples all time xi & not Jimmy

He wasn’t a bad ODI bowler at all. In fact, had he played ODIs in the 80s and 90s, he would be legendary.

He is still England’s all time leading wicket taker in ODIs and he lost his place in the format after the 2015 World Cup when England changed their playing style.

They went for bowlers who could bat. It was between Woakes and Anderson and Woakes got the preference because of his batting.
 
He is truly a legend. Not only he is a great bowler but also thoroughly professional maintaining his quality and fitness standards at this age as well. He is definitely an ATG and an example for youngsters to follow.
 
Anderson is a top bowler. McGrath is a GOAT but I love watching Jimmy. He swings it, seams it, and it’s absorbing to watch him set up the batsmen ... I agree he is the true heir to Waz.
A great swing bowling phenom. Will probably end up with ~650 wickets, the most for a quick and third on all time highest wicket takers.

Bravo!

Wasim was 10 times better than Anderson.
 
I don't think James Anderson will find a place in top 10 test bowlers of all-time.

Top 20? Maybe, not sure.
 
Wasim was 10 times better than Anderson.
That he was! No denying that but after Waz in terms of consistency and skill and longevity I don’t think any bowlers comes close. Steyn.. maybe. But he himself has admitted Anderson is more skilled than he was.
 
What a bowler. That spell with the reverse swing was astonishing and completely blew India away.

<div style="width: 100%; height: 0px; position: relative; padding-bottom: 56.805%;"><iframe src="https://streamable.com/e/n1yiuw" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="100%" allowfullscreen style="width: 100%; height: 100%; position: absolute;"></iframe></div>
 
He now has the record for the most Test wickets (343) by a fast bowler after turning 30.

He passed Courtney Walsh in this game, who had 341.
 
Good old Jimmy use to get out bowled by Dimi masceranous in odis.. you have to excel in all formats.

This is why McGrath Akram Marshall make it on most peoples all time xi & not Jimmy

He’s England’s highest ever wicket taker in ODIS and his record is actually very good
 
It's important to understand that anderson had 2 different careers.

Until the end of 2009, he had 148 wickets in 44 tests averaging 35.
That horrible ishant sharma like record is the reason his overall away averages are so bad.

Since 2010, he has 463 wickets in 116 tests averaging 23.8.
In the 2010s, his record in all countries is very similar to steyns. Jimmy since 2010 is an ATG

Overall, pollock, Walsh, McGrath, Donald may have been better bowlers,
But none of them reached their peak so late into their career like anderson

Today, he bowled the best over in Asia by any seamer in a long time at the age of 38, Which is freakish for a fast bowler to say the least.
 
Wasim was 10 times better than Anderson.

If it’s 10 times then why did he last longer then Wasim did / also took more wickets and in doing so bowling magical spells like these in harsh conditions ?
 
No one calls him Clouderson anymore. All his haters are now lovers.
 
Absolute respect for this English team esp James.

England has the best turn around since 2005 in tests and now in LOI... hopefully the trajectory continues.
 
[MENTION=46929]shaz619[/MENTION] is finally becoming a full on English cricket fan.. I wonder if other desis too are changing now due to refreshing play by English team across formats!
 
I don't think James Anderson will find a place in top 10 test bowlers of all-time.

Top 20? Maybe, not sure.

Only the following bowlers are clearly ahead of Anderson for me:

Warne
McGrath
Steyn
Hadlee
Pollock
Wasim
Ambrose
Marshall
Imran
Lillee
Donald
Trueman

The order can be debated, but for me he makes the top 20 easily.
 
[MENTION=46929]shaz619[/MENTION] is finally becoming a full on English cricket fan.. I wonder if other desis too are changing now due to refreshing play by English team across formats!

He’s only half Pakistani anyway in terms of parents so I think that plays a role
 
After 2010 season; how many tests have India lost at home? I remember only 4. 3 to England and 1 to Aus? Is that true or am I missing a loss?
 
After 2010 season; how many tests have India lost at home? I remember only 4. 3 to England and 1 to Aus? Is that true or am I missing a loss?

1 test to SA in 2010. But after 2010, yeah only 4.
 
1 test to SA in 2010. But after 2010, yeah only 4.

So Anderson’s been involved in 3 of those!!

Don’t think any other England player was involved in both of the 2012 wins
 
Only the following bowlers are clearly ahead of Anderson for me:

Warne
McGrath
Steyn
Hadlee
Pollock
Wasim
Ambrose
Marshall
Imran
Lillee
Donald
Trueman

The order can be debated, but for me he makes the top 20 easily.

That's 12. There are the likes of Roberts, Garner, Holding, Waqar and Walsh too but I understand if someone picks Anderson ahead of them.

All in all, certainly a top 15- 20 level bowler unless we start considering folks from the 40s and 50s era like Davidson, Lindwall, Barnes, Laker etc.
 
That's 12. There are the likes of Roberts, Garner, Holding, Waqar and Walsh too but I understand if someone picks Anderson ahead of them.

All in all, certainly a top 15- 20 level bowler unless we start considering folks from the 40s and 50s era like Davidson, Lindwall, Barnes, Laker etc.

None of those are clearly ahead for me, but I'd understand if someone picks 4-5 other bowlers ahead of Anderson.

However, at some stage, 600 test wickets and the sheer watchability factor with Anderson can't be ignored. Longevity is all too often considered as something to be sneered at, when it's a rare trait in practice.

The likes of Waqar and Walsh are demonstrably below Anderson now. There is no compelling argument picking them in preference whatsoever. He is more skilled than Waqar and has shown greater longevity than Walsh.
 
None of those are clearly ahead for me, but I'd understand if someone picks 4-5 other bowlers ahead of Anderson.

However, at some stage, 600 test wickets and the sheer watchability factor with Anderson can't be ignored. Longevity is all too often considered as something to be sneered at, when it's a rare trait in practice.

The likes of Waqar and Walsh are demonstrably below Anderson now. There is no compelling argument picking them in preference whatsoever. He is more skilled than Waqar and has shown greater longevity than Walsh.

Walsh’s longevity is good enough no issues. Anything over 125 tests for a fast bowler is no joke.
 
Count down the posts now until someone comes in and says that a guy from black-and-white YouTube videos who played 30 Tests in the 1950s was better.
[MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION] [MENTION=7774]Robert[/MENTION] @HarshThakur
 
If not him, then who? If not now, when?

Champion bowler.

It's him and Fred Trueman towering above all other English quicks. Trueman with the better average, but obviously played in a very different era and never toured the sub-continent, so hard to really compare the two.
 
Walsh’s longevity is good enough no issues. Anything over 125 tests for a fast bowler is no joke.

The point was that the only conceivable advantage that Walsh had over Anderson was longevity, that argument is now blown out of the water.
 
A statue of Sir Jimmy Anderson outside Burnley cc awaits where we have seen on a number occasions jimmy attending with some of his past England team mates to participate in a friendly game to raise funds for the club, have coaching sessions with the kids at the club, the man is so down to earth which has been rewarded with all the success hes having.
 
It's him and Fred Trueman towering above all other English quicks. Trueman with the better average, but obviously played in a very different era and never toured the sub-continent, so hard to really compare the two.

Trueman went to India. There was the diplomatic incident when he said “Hey Gunga Din, pass t’salt.” He didn’t make every tour after that, due to his capacity for such gaffes.

I think he was probably the best of all time in English conditions but curiously didn’t travel so well.

Best England quick I have seen was Bob Willis. He was effective everywhere.

Starting to think Anderson is #2 as his overseas figures slowly improve. His terrible start is a drag on his away numbers overall.
 
Trueman went to India. There was the diplomatic incident when he said “Hey Gunga Din, pass t’salt.” He didn’t make every tour after that, due to his capacity for such gaffes.

I think he was probably the best of all time in English conditions but curiously didn’t travel so well.

Best England quick I have seen was Bob Willis. He was effective everywhere.

Starting to think Anderson is #2 as his overseas figures slowly improve. His terrible start is a drag on his away numbers overall.

I didn’t get the “gunga din” part.
 
Trueman went to India. There was the diplomatic incident when he said “Hey Gunga Din, pass t’salt.” He didn’t make every tour after that, due to his capacity for such gaffes.

I think he was probably the best of all time in English conditions but curiously didn’t travel so well.

Best England quick I have seen was Bob Willis. He was effective everywhere.

Starting to think Anderson is #2 as his overseas figures slowly improve. His terrible start is a drag on his away numbers overall.

Ah, my mistake, that remark was when India played in England.

Doubtless the remark held up his career though.
 
I didn’t get the “gunga din” part.

It was a racist stereotype by Trueman. It refers to a poem by Kipling (in which, curiously, a British soldier regrets the death of an Indian water-carrier with the line "You're a better man than I am, Gunga Din".
 
It was a racist stereotype by Trueman. It refers to a poem by Kipling (in which, curiously, a British soldier regrets the death of an Indian water-carrier with the line "You're a better man than I am, Gunga Din".

Oh ok. Never heard of that one before.
 
England head coach Chris Silverwood says he is not against resting seamer James Anderson for the second Test against India in Chennai despite his superb form in the first game at the same venue.

Anderson, 38, starred with three wickets for six runs in a superb five-over spell of reverse-swing on day five as Silverwood's side won by 227 runs on Tuesday to inflict a first home Test defeat on India since 2017.

However, the rotation policy England are adopting during a bumper year of international cricket means Anderson could be given a break during the second game of the four-match series from Saturday.

He blew the game open for us, it was quite remarkable to watch. He went a long way to helping us win that game. For aspiring young fast bowlers to see an over like that is inspirational. He is in the best shape of his life and that hasn’t gone unnoticed. He has worked extremely hard on his fitness and is bowling beautifully.

Silverwood says he has contemplated playing Anderson and Stuart Broad - Anderson's probable replacement should the paceman sit out the second Test - in the same game, though that would seem most likely the third Test, a day-night fixture in Ahmedabad from February 24.

Asked whether it would be difficult to omit Anderson after his excellent display in the series opener, Silverwood told reporters: "Yes, he is a class act, but you'll have to wait and see.

"We have got many bowlers here that we could play at any given point. I feel very lucky that I have an abundance of talent.

"Has it crossed my mind [to play both Broad and Anderson]? Yes, they are both class acts, but things are working at the moment and we have to look after our players.

"I am not reluctant to change a winning team if it's the best thing to do for the players and the team and our longevity over a long period.

"You run the risk of the result being different, but you could play the same team and the result be different because we know India are a very good team and are going to come back hard."

On the dilemma over whether to rest Anderson, Sky Sports Cricket expert and former England captain Michael Atherton said: "Root is going to find it hard to leave Anderson out.

"I know the rotation policy is such that they are talking about Broad and Anderson rotating every other game but the way Anderson is bowling, you still have to think about winning that next game.

"They will have to see how Anderson rocks up after five toughish days in Chennai but, in these conditions, it is the spinners who are doing the majority of the donkey work".

We stuck to our game-plan, which is not rocket science. Big first-innings runs and putting the opposition under pressure with the ball and it paid off. I thought Joe Root's captaincy was excellent as well and what he has done with the bat is phenomenal. When he is getting big runs, it helps us immensely and gives confidence to the team.

England will make at least one change for the second Test, with Ben Foakes returning to the side as wicketkeeper in place of Jos Buttler, who is being rested for the final three games of the series.

Foakes was named Player of the Series when England won 3-0 in Sri Lanka in late 2018, with his 277 runs including a century on debut in Galle.

Silverwood also gave his backing to Dom Bess, who picked up four wickets in India's first innings in Chennai but went at over six runs an over from eight overs during the hosts' second knock amid a series of full tosses.

"Ben [Foakes] is looking good and has been training hard. Having this opportunity coming his way has given him a great focus," said Silverwood.

"I don't see it as weakening, I see it as an opportunity for people to come in and show what they can do. Last time he was in the subcontinent he was very successful."

On Bess, the head coach added: "I'm not worried, he is still in good spirits. Everyone has a bad day every now and again, I can accept that. It's not through a lack of effort.

"We will get to the nets and find him some rhythm. He has shown he can get us wickets so I'm sure he will be fine."

Root’s footwork against the spinners has been excellent – for any aspiring batsman who wants to play spin he has given a few masterclasses over the last month. The way he has been positive, the way he has swept, has been excellent, hence the results that have followed.

Crowds of up to 15,000 per day are to be permitted at the 50,000 capacity MA Chidambaram Stadium for the second Test, with spectators required to wear facemasks and maintain social distancing.

Silverwood says he has no fears about the bio-secure bubble being breached and is looking forward to supporters providing a "buzz".

He added: "I have no concerns. We feel safe and I am sure things will be done properly. Since we have been here we have been very well looked after and we feel safe in the environment.

"To get some noise in the ground again is going to be fantastic. Some sort of normality will give the lads a lift and make more of a buzz. It will be great."

https://www.skysports.com/cricket/n...-for-englands-second-test-vs-india-in-chennai
 
Had my doubts earlier but not any more, this guy is a legit ATG.
He won't rip through batting line-ups in unfriendly conditions but will keep it tight and give breakthroughs from time to time.
Also at an age of 38 he outperformed all other pacers in this series including Bumrah!. He is still the best bowler in England, Archer isn't anywhere near him even at this age.
 
One can only laugh at the ludicrous assertion that he is not one of the greatest ever.
 
He has been the best fast bowler in this series from both sides and was able to make an impact even when other pacers were treated like just spectators.

Undoubtedly, an ATG and England's greatest test bowler in last 50 years.
 
congratulations to Jimmy...once again proved, he's not just a clouderson....definitely an ATG
 
He has dropped pace but remains accurate and bowls intelligently.
ATG English bowler and an excellent cricketing history. No mean feat to keep continuing at the highest form of cricket. Liked his attitude, bowled his heart out in simmering heat of Ahmedabad today.
 
One can only laugh at the ludicrous assertion that he is not one of the greatest ever.
Brute weight of wickets yes, longevity too. No arguments on skills especially with the Duke. Other than that, lacks the fear factor that is associated with the greatest.
 
Brute weight of wickets yes, longevity too. No arguments on skills especially with the Duke. Other than that, lacks the fear factor that is associated with the greatest.

Fear factor does come when he’s playing in England or NZ etc.

Even guys like Murali didn’t have fear factor in every country
 
Fear factor does come when he’s playing in England or NZ etc.

Even guys like Murali didn’t have fear factor in every country

Murali was average in two countries, Australia and India. A wrecking ball everywhere else.

Anderson with his average of mid 30s hasn't been much of a factor in NZ. Or Aus, India, SAf, Lanka. When I think of the greatest quicks, I think of guys like Ambrose and McGrath and Steyn who would not only consistently run through sides in alien conditions but also indisputably be the top bowler from either sides.

How often did Anderson outbowl quicks from other sides when playing away in Aus, NZ, SAf....or even India? Got outbowled by Umesh and Shami last time.
 
Murali was average in two countries, Australia and India. A wrecking ball everywhere else.

Anderson with his average of mid 30s hasn't been much of a factor in NZ. Or Aus, India, SAf, Lanka. When I think of the greatest quicks, I think of guys like Ambrose and McGrath and Steyn who would not only consistently run through sides in alien conditions but also indisputably be the top bowler from either sides.

How often did Anderson outbowl quicks from other sides when playing away in Aus, NZ, SAf....or even India? Got outbowled by Umesh and Shami last time.

He was the best fast bowler in Australia in 2010-11, the best in India in 2012-13, and been miles ahead of any other seamer in the present series too.

Yes, his away record isn't as impressive as Steyn or any of the greats from the 90s, but he's still a legitimate great in his own right. The ones denying it now are only being churlish.
 
He was the best fast bowler in Australia in 2010-11, the best in India in 2012-13, and been miles ahead of any other seamer in the present series too.

Yes, his away record isn't as impressive as Steyn or any of the greats from the 90s, but he's still a legitimate great in his own right. The ones denying it now are only being churlish.

Not counting the present series because the best Indian quicks - Bumrah, Shami, and above all Umesh have been missing. And Anderson hasn't looked miles ahead of Siraj in the current one.

Like I said, he's been tremendous for England. I personally rate longevity so he ticks that box. But to me he does not get a seat at the highest table of greatest quicks.
 
Like I said, he's been tremendous for England. I personally rate longevity so he ticks that box. But to me he does not get a seat at the highest table of greatest quicks.

Oh, in that case I agree. He's not in the top tier of greats (Marshall, McGrath, Steyn, Ambrose et al), but definitely in the second tier.
 
Flawless record when it swings( read only Eng).
Middling records in Sa, Nz where conditions suit him(some wickets have more swing than Eng, still avg. close to 34 in both where Srinath, Zaheer, Sreesanth etc averaged in low 20s).
Avg 33 in Sl and 29 in Ind looks decent but SR of 65+ in both(close to 70 in Sl where avg. reduced due to 6/40 spell against a scoreboard pressure). Also 52 wickets in 20 matches in Ind+Sl. 2.5 WPM wont win you tests even in you average respectable 30.
Imagine how guys like Kumble were criticised for performances outside Asia where they had simillar avg.but with close to 4WPM and some matchwinning spells.
Surely an Eng ATG though.
 
His ability to perform outside England being tested again in Australia - will he come through with flying colours?
 
For almost two decades, James Anderson has created a habit of breaking one record after another with the ball. With 634 Test wickets to his name, Anderson is the third-highest wicket-taker in Test cricket history and also holds the distinction of being the fast-bowler with the most wickets in the history of cricket's oldest format.

However, on the third day of play in the pink-ball Test at the Adelaide Oval, Anderson created a unique record with the bat. In fact, he became the first player to achieve this feat in the history of the sport.

After staying unbeaten on the crease as England were bowled out for a meager 236 runs, Anderson became the first batter to stay not-out in a Test inning 100 times. After Anderson, Courtney Wash is second on the list having stayed unbeaten 61 times while Muttiah Muralitharan is third having not been dismissed in an innings on 56 occasions. Former England pacer Bob Wills is next with 55 not-out innings to his credit.

Most not-outs in an innings

James Anderson-100

Courtney Wash-61

Muttiah Muralitharan- 56

Bob Wills-555

https://www.timesnownews.com/sports...y-to-achieve-feat-england-vs-australia/841709
 
His ability to perform outside England being tested again in Australia - will he come through with flying colours?

He’s only ever been a stock bowler in most overseas nations.
 
Through being able to stay on the field for five tests.

But remember he had a mountain of runs at his back.

He never took a fivefer on that tour.

Took a few 4-fers though, which in Australia is still good.
 
Through being able to stay on the field for five tests.

But remember he had a mountain of runs at his back.

He never took a fivefer on that tour.

No five for doesn't mean it wasn't a good performance. Pat Cummins didn't take a 5 for in the 2019 ashes but was easily the best bowler on either side.
 
I just wish he would retire. He’s blocking the next generation. Mahmood should have come through by now.
 
No five for doesn't mean it wasn't a good performance. Pat Cummins didn't take a 5 for in the 2019 ashes but was easily the best bowler on either side.

One decent series in five Australian tours isn’t really tearing up trees.
 
He was pretty good in India earlier this year, but he looks out of place in Australia with England's overall performance adding to it. It was pretty inevitable. Think it's his last series.
 
This tour has been a bridge too far for Anderson and Broad. England needed wickets from him, not economy and lack of penetration
 
Back
Top