So you're entire point of the 2 essays you wrote is to prove that I'm lying? Like seriously how petty can you be? I understand though, I've exposed your lies multiple times now so you just want to get back. No problem, but you're clutching at straws and really need to up your game. Word salads aren't helping.
IMO Babar will be our best all format batter when he hangs up his boots. If he wins us a WTC he will be a greater batter than many of our legends in tests. This line of reasoning is same to you claiming Sarfraz is better than Rizwan cause he won us an ICC tournament.
Again though, it's my opinion. Doesn't make it a lie
If he wins us a WTC he will be a greater batter than many of our legends in tests.
No he won't. Travis head won a wtc for his country but that doesn't mean he's a better test batter then hayden, gilly, Pointing and many others.
Again though, it's my opinion. Doesn't make it a lie
An opinion is different from being factually incorrect. Claiming things such as 2 + 22is 3 because It's my opinion doesnt make it an opinion.
Babar doesn't even avg 45 in tests, has a clown record in multiple countries, only 2 away centuries and his all time best innings is a medicore 196 in karachi which led to a draw.
YK has 10K+ test runs, 34 test centuries, a century in every country he's played in, His worst test record is in sa at avg 31 which is miles > Babar 25 avg in aus, and at the same age he was miles ahead of Babar in test despite playing 58 test games while Babar has now played 59.
Yousaf, Miandad, inzi follow a similar trajectory granted they are nowhere near Younis Khan in tests.
Winning a wtc doesn't qualify him to be > them by any means. If Shan scores a 100 and wins wtc all that'll entail is that it was his all time best innings but it wouldn't put him > younis. It's utterly madness to put a 30 avg batter > yk even if he hypothetically wins wtc.
This line of reasoning is same to you claiming Sarfraz is better than Rizwan cause he won us an ICC tournament.
No it isn't. No one compares sarfi to rizwan as batters, only as captains in which case Sarfraz is ahead atm in whiteball due to t20 dominance and one icc win. Rizwan is a better batsmen then Sarfaraz lol.
Your line of reasoning is as moronic as they come.
IMO Babar will be our best all format batter when he hangs up his boots
Thats misleading because the sample size is non existent. In the same way warner is AAustrali's best ever all format batsmen however his competition is only Travis head as the rest aren't all formats.
Pak legends never played t20 as it didn't exist and by the time it existed they weren't accustomed to the format in the same lara and Sachin couldn't adjust.
Far cry from batters being born into the format.
Fakhar zaman doesn't play tests, And Ahmed shehzad was God awful.
Babar's only completion on this list is Ahmed shehzad, rizwan and now saim ayub.
Claiming he's the best from a sample size of 4 when 2 of these players haven't even finished their careers is comical.
All format metrics only applies to international players like David Warner vs Kevin Pieterson, or chris gayle vs Virat kohli etc etc.
It doesn't apply incountry due to the horrifically small sample size.
