- Joined
- Oct 2, 2004
- Runs
- 217,286
An excellent and detailed analysis of PSL 7 tactics in a reply to a post is this week's POTW
Congratulations to [MENTION=135338]cricketerB94[/MENTION]
http://www.pakpassion.net/ppforum/s...acts-exposed-by-PSL-7&p=11419797#post11419797
In terms of numbers, how many domestic or U19 events had Babar won before getting the national team captaincy? In terms of numbers, how many matches have Shadab and Shaheen won in their first season as captain when compared to Babar? I think this will be fair analysis if we are comparing numbers. But I am not comparing their numbers to judge their captaincy. I don't care how many matches have they won when we compare their numbers as captain. For me, the captain is defined by his tactics, not his number of wins. I have seen the tactics from Babar which you would expect that even Umar Akmal can use to win matches and be that successful captain.
Ok I am going to state some of his tactics that I observed.
1- Over reliance on seniors. We all know that Malik was his call in the T20 WC squad. We all know that Malik have not retired from T20Is yet, because he knows that Babar is the captain of the T20I team.
2- Not trying anything out of the box. He did not use the emerging players or local players in his KK squad very well. Not giving bowling to Qasim, not giving bowling to Taha, not dropping himself to middle order, not giving Sahibzada Farhan any batting confidence even when he was domestic cricketer of the year. Meanwhile, Shaheen has given proper chances to Abdullah and Kamran (even in bowling) and he has given a lot of confidence to even Zaman Khan. Rizwan has made Khushdil a proper all-rounder and giving his emerging players proper chances.
3- Scripted captaincy. He is that type of captain that if Pakistan wins ugly, he'll not address the mistakes and play the same team in next match, just because Pakistan won. You can see this pattern the whole T20 WC. He did not change the team the whole tournament when everyone knew that Hasan was out of form. In all the matches, he had this tactic of bowling last 6 overs by pacers even when spinners were doing good in Aus game and Imad could easily bowl the overs of Hasan in that match as Wade and Stoinis were struggling against him.
I'll not mix up his batting with his captaincy. He is a very good batter and should focus on that. Sachin was a very good batter, but he accepted that he was not a good captain. I think Babar should do the same in favour of Rizwan because when we see the leadership skills - and in your case, numbers - then Rizwan emerge as a better option. Babar was made captain in the circumstances when there was no choice for captaincy available, Rizwan was not doing well in LOIs, Shadab and Shaheen were too young. But now Babar should know himself that there are better choices who can serve Pakistan better in that role. That will not take away the legendary batter status from Babar.
Again you are more concerned about numbers instead of analyzing what's the actual problem with Hasan. Yes, his breakthrough into Pakistan was through white ball cricket but you need to observe the difference between Hasan of previous PSL seasons or CT17 and Hasan of now. Previously, Hasan had the sharp seam movement of ball through which he used to move the ball into right hand batters and away from left hand batters after pitching it. That movement always troubled the batters in previous PSL seasons and CT17. Now I don't remember the last time that I saw that movement. He is not able to do that with new ball or old ball. Previously, he was much quicker. He used to bowl normally around 145 kph mark, but now his speed has seriously declined. He mostly bowls around 138 kph mark now with occasional ball over 140 kph. This has made him a medium pacer instead of fast bowler, that's why he bowls a lot of very slow and hit me balls now. The only variety he has left is cutters, which too he does not pitch in the right areas more often and they become a gift to hit him towards fine leg or square leg boundary.
Yes, that's why I have not written him off. He is just not that bowler which we need for depth overs in T20Is. He can definitely improve in that area, but he is not there currently. What we are missing in the T20I team is a specialist depth overs bowler and Waseem is not that currently.
So, if having highest score in a competition is the goal instead of winning it, then people rightly call him statpadder. But I don't believe that he does it on purpose. He used to have this ability before this PSL to pierce the gap in off-side or cover on will. He just needed a little bit of width and the bowl always used to go out of the boundary. That was the difference in him and Shahzad. Shahzad also used to play those shots but was not good enough to pierce the fielders on off-side, and that converted a boundary ball into a dot ball. He has been doing the same this PSL because I can't believe that in a domestic tournament, the bowlers are bowling so tight in power play that he is not getting any width on off-stump bowls. That is why I am saying that he needs to work on that off-side game to pierce the fielders before he becomes Shehzad 2.
As I mentioned above, if Babar wants to be the opener, he needs to improve his power play game and get back that strength in those off-side drives to pierce the fielders. But if he is not able to do it, then Fakhar is better suited for power play overs. When you look at other top T20I teams, they have players like Finch, Warner, Roy, Buttler, Guptill, Rohit, KL Rahul e.t.c. to take full advantage of power play overs, but Pakistan have two accumulators as openers. I believe that Babar should be used as a floater in the T20I team like Aus does with Smith. If the score is 100-1, then other batters should come in. But if the score is 20-1, then Babar should come in.
Congratulations to [MENTION=135338]cricketerB94[/MENTION]
http://www.pakpassion.net/ppforum/s...acts-exposed-by-PSL-7&p=11419797#post11419797
In terms of numbers, how many domestic or U19 events had Babar won before getting the national team captaincy? In terms of numbers, how many matches have Shadab and Shaheen won in their first season as captain when compared to Babar? I think this will be fair analysis if we are comparing numbers. But I am not comparing their numbers to judge their captaincy. I don't care how many matches have they won when we compare their numbers as captain. For me, the captain is defined by his tactics, not his number of wins. I have seen the tactics from Babar which you would expect that even Umar Akmal can use to win matches and be that successful captain.
Ok I am going to state some of his tactics that I observed.
1- Over reliance on seniors. We all know that Malik was his call in the T20 WC squad. We all know that Malik have not retired from T20Is yet, because he knows that Babar is the captain of the T20I team.
2- Not trying anything out of the box. He did not use the emerging players or local players in his KK squad very well. Not giving bowling to Qasim, not giving bowling to Taha, not dropping himself to middle order, not giving Sahibzada Farhan any batting confidence even when he was domestic cricketer of the year. Meanwhile, Shaheen has given proper chances to Abdullah and Kamran (even in bowling) and he has given a lot of confidence to even Zaman Khan. Rizwan has made Khushdil a proper all-rounder and giving his emerging players proper chances.
3- Scripted captaincy. He is that type of captain that if Pakistan wins ugly, he'll not address the mistakes and play the same team in next match, just because Pakistan won. You can see this pattern the whole T20 WC. He did not change the team the whole tournament when everyone knew that Hasan was out of form. In all the matches, he had this tactic of bowling last 6 overs by pacers even when spinners were doing good in Aus game and Imad could easily bowl the overs of Hasan in that match as Wade and Stoinis were struggling against him.
I'll not mix up his batting with his captaincy. He is a very good batter and should focus on that. Sachin was a very good batter, but he accepted that he was not a good captain. I think Babar should do the same in favour of Rizwan because when we see the leadership skills - and in your case, numbers - then Rizwan emerge as a better option. Babar was made captain in the circumstances when there was no choice for captaincy available, Rizwan was not doing well in LOIs, Shadab and Shaheen were too young. But now Babar should know himself that there are better choices who can serve Pakistan better in that role. That will not take away the legendary batter status from Babar.
Again you are more concerned about numbers instead of analyzing what's the actual problem with Hasan. Yes, his breakthrough into Pakistan was through white ball cricket but you need to observe the difference between Hasan of previous PSL seasons or CT17 and Hasan of now. Previously, Hasan had the sharp seam movement of ball through which he used to move the ball into right hand batters and away from left hand batters after pitching it. That movement always troubled the batters in previous PSL seasons and CT17. Now I don't remember the last time that I saw that movement. He is not able to do that with new ball or old ball. Previously, he was much quicker. He used to bowl normally around 145 kph mark, but now his speed has seriously declined. He mostly bowls around 138 kph mark now with occasional ball over 140 kph. This has made him a medium pacer instead of fast bowler, that's why he bowls a lot of very slow and hit me balls now. The only variety he has left is cutters, which too he does not pitch in the right areas more often and they become a gift to hit him towards fine leg or square leg boundary.
Yes, that's why I have not written him off. He is just not that bowler which we need for depth overs in T20Is. He can definitely improve in that area, but he is not there currently. What we are missing in the T20I team is a specialist depth overs bowler and Waseem is not that currently.
So, if having highest score in a competition is the goal instead of winning it, then people rightly call him statpadder. But I don't believe that he does it on purpose. He used to have this ability before this PSL to pierce the gap in off-side or cover on will. He just needed a little bit of width and the bowl always used to go out of the boundary. That was the difference in him and Shahzad. Shahzad also used to play those shots but was not good enough to pierce the fielders on off-side, and that converted a boundary ball into a dot ball. He has been doing the same this PSL because I can't believe that in a domestic tournament, the bowlers are bowling so tight in power play that he is not getting any width on off-stump bowls. That is why I am saying that he needs to work on that off-side game to pierce the fielders before he becomes Shehzad 2.
As I mentioned above, if Babar wants to be the opener, he needs to improve his power play game and get back that strength in those off-side drives to pierce the fielders. But if he is not able to do it, then Fakhar is better suited for power play overs. When you look at other top T20I teams, they have players like Finch, Warner, Roy, Buttler, Guptill, Rohit, KL Rahul e.t.c. to take full advantage of power play overs, but Pakistan have two accumulators as openers. I believe that Babar should be used as a floater in the T20I team like Aus does with Smith. If the score is 100-1, then other batters should come in. But if the score is 20-1, then Babar should come in.
