Rana
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2006
- Runs
- 87,952
I think this is a very important discussion to be had. Hitting a six isn’t just two more runs than hitting a 4, it’s a clear sign of intent and telling the opposition that you mean business. Currently:
Top 3 from Pakistan
1. Fakhar Zaman, 16x6 in 113 bf. (7 balls per six)
2. Imad Wasim, 12x6 in 102 bf. (8.5 balls per six)
3. Azam Khan, 11x6 in 90 bf. (8.2 balls per six)
Pakistan’s current openers and number 3:
1. Mohammad Rizwan, 7x6 in 253 bf. (36 balls per six)
2. Babar Azam, 2x6 in 136 bf. (68 balls per six)
3. Shan Masood, 1x6 in 114 bf (what a joke)
Absolutely ridiculous if I’m honest.
Notable lesser performers:
1. Asif Ali, 7x6 in 42 bf (6 balls per six)
2. Abdullah Shafique, 5x6 in 41 bf (8 balls per 6)
3. Muhammad Harris, 5x6 in 60 bf (12 balls per 6)
-going by some of these numbers, what exactly was the previous chief selector basing his selection on for T20s and especially the T20 World Cup? Why are the top 3 positions occupied by guys who clearly have no intent to take risk in the powerplay?
Top 3 from Pakistan
1. Fakhar Zaman, 16x6 in 113 bf. (7 balls per six)
2. Imad Wasim, 12x6 in 102 bf. (8.5 balls per six)
3. Azam Khan, 11x6 in 90 bf. (8.2 balls per six)
Pakistan’s current openers and number 3:
1. Mohammad Rizwan, 7x6 in 253 bf. (36 balls per six)
2. Babar Azam, 2x6 in 136 bf. (68 balls per six)
3. Shan Masood, 1x6 in 114 bf (what a joke)
Absolutely ridiculous if I’m honest.
Notable lesser performers:
1. Asif Ali, 7x6 in 42 bf (6 balls per six)
2. Abdullah Shafique, 5x6 in 41 bf (8 balls per 6)
3. Muhammad Harris, 5x6 in 60 bf (12 balls per 6)
-going by some of these numbers, what exactly was the previous chief selector basing his selection on for T20s and especially the T20 World Cup? Why are the top 3 positions occupied by guys who clearly have no intent to take risk in the powerplay?