1) Again, the nature fallacy, iphones and ipad aren't natural either, I don't get the nature argument at all, humans have evolved to a point that we don't need meat in our diet. There are also many studies refuting the omnivore arguments but I won't go into it just yet.
2) Again, I did the maths, I eat 130 grams of protein every day, Your knowledge about vegan diet and protein requirements is laughable. Tell your protein argument to Patrik Baboumian vegan strongman who is breaking world records and countless other vegan bodybuilders. And how does supplements come into this? I am talking about ethics, whether or not supplements are supposed to be part of natural diet or not is another debate, but they are more ethical for sure, even junk food shouldn't be part of primary diet but people still eat it.
3) Here's some analysis for ya
http://www.worldwatch.org/node/6294
4. Ethics is
NOT always subjective. Ethics can be subjective sometimes, but in this case it is clearly not.
Code:
Objectively, you are destroying plant life, capturing animals for milk, they can be seen as cruelty. [B]Ethics are always subject to the cultures and times, there is no objectivity in them.[/B]
I never said it was ethical, I said vegans diet is
more Ethical learn the difference, Ethics do have objectivity, killing someone for no reason is seen as objectively wrong everywhere, or is it subjective to you? Answer this
Your knowledge on these subjects is low, trust me I am short on time becasue I have an exam coming up, I will give you a detailed reply backed with reports in 2 weeks because I can't waste my time searching for all the reports.
I am currently studying climate change, ethics and I have many reports to back up my claim. So you'll have to wait because I can't continue this argument just yet. See you in 2 weeks