Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Someone told me more than 80% of his wickets are on home/Asia? and his away record is one of the worst?
Can someone dig up the numbers.
Someone told me more than 80% of his wickets are on home/Asia? and his away record is one of the worst?
Can someone dig up the numbers.
Someone told me more than 80% of his wickets are on home/Asia? and his away record is one of the worst?
Can someone dig up the numbers.
Someone told me more than 80% of his wickets are on home/Asia? and his away record is one of the worst?
Can someone dig up the numbers.
He will get there. If he has a crazy aus series he will get atleast 25-30 wickets in that series itself.
Not worse than yasir, murali
Averages outside Asia:
Aus - 54 (6 tests)
Eng - 33 (2 tests)
SA - wicketless (1 test)
WI - 23 (4 tests)
Barring Aus and WI, Ashwin bowled got to bowl "properly" in just 2 innings (1 in Eng and 1 in SA). Went wicketless in SA and took 3 wickets in that Eng innings.
Next series is vs. Aus, he'll probably make the record of highest number of wickets taken in a Test series by any bowler. All time.
He played 1 match in sa, 2 in eng, 7 in aus. His numbers at this stage are better than murali, yasir in aus and in eng he has better average than yasir and comparable to murali.
Someone told me more than 80% of his wickets are on home/Asia? and his away record is one of the worst?
Can someone dig up the numbers.
Amla's 7,000 ODIs runs were very soft. de Villiers has carried their ODI team over the last 5-6 years and from 2013 onwards, de Kock has been much more impactful than Amla. He is already a better Limited Overs batsman and he hasn't even hit his peak yet.
Ashwin on the other hand has had a massive impact on the Indian team. He is a pure match-winner, who has made India the most dominant and feared team at home. Also won them a series in Sri Lanka, and although he hasn't taken many wickets overseas yet, he hasn't been smashed either.
Ashwin is India's best Test cricketer at the moment and will probably end up as their best ever. A greater cricket than Amla without a doubt.
Don't forget how the pitches become rank turners and green mambas when Amla bats on them, and when Ashwin bowls they become rank turners .![]()
In addition, the same pitch becomes a road when Kohli bats, but becomes a rank-turner a couple of sessions later when Ashwin bowls, and then it becomes a road again when Kohli arrives at the crease.![]()
Awww someone's at it again)
Ashwin's performances in tests is not as good as Amla's performances in ODI?
I guess the whole world is speaking about Amla the ODI batsman right now.
Since Ashwin's debut, India has lost a grand total of 3 tests in Asia. Just 3 in almost 6 years time.
Out of that, 2 came in the fated 2012 series where he was pure garbage. The other loss came in Galle where he took a 10fer. DRS issue and an ATG Chandimal knock denied India the victory.
If you are going to help your team destroy everyone in 75% of the tests, its more than enough. The rest is for all time greatness where the jury is still out reg Ashwin.
As for poor LOI bowler, I guess these are Ashwin's paltry achievements:
ODIs:
Performer in WC 2011 (played an important role in QF win against Aus) - had to make way for a pacer even though he was the 2nd best bowler in that team (long story)
Performer in CT 2013 (including a game changing spell in the final)
Performer in WC 2015
Success in ALL 50 over knockout games he has played till date.
T20s:
Took India to finals in World T20 2014
Him and Bollinger were the architect of CSK win in 2010.
He bettered his performance the next year and helped CSK win the title again in 2011 (killed the finals in 3 balls lol).
Man of the tournament in Champion's League held in SA 2010
---
Its always fun responding to Bilal ji's points.
Let Amla ji achieve atleast 50% of what Ash did in LOIs in important games. Hehe.
Also if Ashwin gets 30/100 in Australia, Yasir Shah should get 2/100. Ashwin figures doesn't do justice to the way he bowled. He did a pretty good containing job and the Australian batsmen actually showed some respect to him whereas they smashed Yasir as though he was a park cricket trundler. Going at more than 5 runs an over, he absolutely humiliated me at work. Told everyone that he would pick up a couple of four-fers at least and he did me in like that,
Ashwin is probably crickets biggest matchwinner right now. When he performs India wins and in India he always performs. India's home streak is mostly due to Ashwin imo. You can criticise that he's not as good away but still no other bowler dominates like he does at home.
What's interesting is that you even compared them as players, lol. Come on, SIF.
My bad dude.
That comparison is as bad as Ashwin vs Ajmal.
Legal Ajmal.![]()
That tells you more about Indian pitches, than Ashwin. I'm not sure what the huge deal is. Bedi and his compatriots, Kumble and Bhajjan have all been great match-winners in India. Jadeja himself has a mind-boggling average in India.
It's clear that any good spinner will rack up incredible numbers in India, if given enough games.
Ashwin is well on his way to beome India's best bowler ever.
His impact in Asia is unmatchable.Already won more games/series than what others do in their whole career.
I am sure he wil do well in ENg and SA.If he doesnt then its understandable but as of now he is probably the best test cricketer in the world.
Ashwin is well on his way to beome India's best bowler ever.
His impact in Asia is unmatchable.Already won more games/series than what others do in their whole career.
I am sure he wil do well in ENg and SA.If he doesnt then its understandable but as of now he is probably the best test cricketer in the world.
What has he won in Asia as a whole, other than that one series against a weak Sri Lanka team? Hasn't played Pakistan.
Has won every series for his team in Asia barring one back in 2012..Not his fault he didn't played Pakistan.
Ashwin is great atm, but imo he is overrated.
Lol at some people comparing him to an ATG like Amla.
Not his fault for sure but if all he has done in Asia till now is HTB-ing and winning one series in Sri Lanka, it really doesn't make him any better than Bedi, Kumble or Bhajjan. Forget about Murali, Saqlain, etc.
8 tests 46 wickets needed. Will need to have a massive series vs Aussies. Can he take 25-30 wickets? Looks doable, hopefully we will have spicier wickets with turn and bounce.
Unlike Amla's upcoming record of the fastest man to 7000 ODI runs, Ashwin's record (if he gets there) will be meaningless and completely manufactured. Given the same number of home games on comparable pitches, any spinner would have done just as well, if not better. Yasir already showed this when he almost broke Sydney Barnes record of the fastest bowler to 100 wickets.
He's a great bowler in India and a good one in Asia, but totally devoid of any impact once he's out of his comfort-zone. A pretty poor ODI and T20 bowler as well.
Yasir Shah won two matches in England. Ashwin didn't even win a bag of chips from a vending machine the last time he was in that country. There is absolutely no comparison, Shah outbowled him by a mile in England.
In Australia, Ashwin was the kid who got 30/100 in his exam while Yasir was the kid who got 20/100.
Absolutely pathetic.
Nice attention seeking postAshwin-Yasir comparison is no longer relevant, the former has left the latter in his dust.
Very soon, it will look like the Kohli-Umar comparison. Ashwin is far ahead.
India's best match winner (in tests) though I'd still put Kumble ahead as the better bowler (in tests) atm, people underestimate the kind of batters he bowled to & no DRS, with the latter we'd be even more dominant at home especially when Kumble was at his peak.Ashwin is well on his way to beome India's best bowler ever.
His impact in Asia is unmatchable.Already won more games/series than what others do in their whole career.
I am sure he wil do well in ENg and SA.If he doesnt then its understandable but as of now he is probably the best test cricketer in the world.
That tells you more about Indian pitches, than Ashwin. I'm not sure what the huge deal is. Bedi and his compatriots, Kumble and Bhajjan have all been great match-winners in India. Jadeja himself has a mind-boggling average in India.
It's clear that any good spinner will rack up incredible numbers in India, if given enough games.
Unlike Amla's upcoming record of the fastest man to 7000 ODI runs, Ashwin's record (if he gets there) will be meaningless and completely manufactured. Given the same number of home games on comparable pitches, any spinner would have done just as well, if not better. Yasir already showed this when he almost broke Sydney Barnes record of the fastest bowler to 100 wickets.
He's a great bowler in India and a good one in Asia, but totally devoid of any impact once he's out of his comfort-zone. A pretty poor ODI and T20 bowler as well.
Yasir Shah won two matches in England. Ashwin didn't even win a bag of chips from a vending machine the last time he was in that country. There is absolutely no comparison, Shah outbowled him by a mile in England.
In Australia, Ashwin was the kid who got 30/100 in his exam while Yasir was the kid who got 20/100.
Absolutely pathetic.
So if pitches are sooo bowler friendly when Ashwin bowls then Virat Kohli's batting records need to be looked at in a completely different context ..... Right ?
And the reason why you have left out Yasir's failure against WI that too at home where you lost a Test and came close to losing a series to the mighty Windies is ........ ?
BTW The next important landmark of fastest to 400 wkts is held by Murali - in 72 Tests. If Ashwin even gets there in under 80 Tests will be a fabulous achievement and will go a long way in him being labelled a ATG.
BTW Murali only took 21 Tests to go from 250 to 400 wkts. Thats 7+ Wkts per test. Incredible.
IF ashwin needs 80 tests for 400 wickets, India would be losing half the matches.
Nice attention seeking post
While I think Ashwin is slightly ahead the fact remains he failed in Australia like Yasir did but to a lesser extent
But Yasir won his team a match in England and Ashwin hasn't done that in England or other tough tours such as Aus,SA
Yasir cannot ride on that Lord's Test forever. Ashwin is simply well ahead as a bowler, and he has come a long way in the last 2-3 years. Yasir is comparable or perhaps better than Ashwin of old, but these days, Ashwin is simply the finished article while Yasir looks to have regressed in the last 6 months.
Nonetheless, I expect their careers to go in the opposite direction now. I feel Yasir has had his moment in the sun.
Let's see
But the fact right now is that Ashwin has nothing of note in the major modern test centres outside Asia and WI
Ajmal was always legal and always the better bowler than Ashwin. Dude averaged a full 10 points lower than Ashwin did in ODIs, lol. Legend.
Both Yasir and Ashwin are a cut below the previous generation of spinners, Ajmal, Swann and Herath.
This way over the top...Yasir does not even turn the ball, he was badly exposed in southern hemisphere just a month ago....
Ashwin, like Ajmal was first helped by relaxed laws and then by turning pitches and teams that cannot play spin...Swann beat India in India in his last tour, if my memory serves me right, Ashin and Jadeja were both playing that series... I don't think Ashwin was/is better than Swann, and Jedeja is no where near as good as Herath was, forget about Herath, Monty out perform both of them in India...Ajmal, was exposed badly by chucking...
If Ashwin keep on playing 15 test a year in India, he will definitely collect lot of wickets, that too against teams who cannot play spin, lets see what he does on the road...In ODIs and T20s, his graph came down as soon as he has to bowl without straightening in last couple of years![]()
Unlike Ajmal Ashwin was never called.Ashwin has and had a clean action so lol at bowling without straightening.Ajmal was a chucker and caught chucking and banned from bowling and when he came back he was useless and discarded.Ashwin is still a top 3 test bowler.
Jadeja didnot play versus England in 2012Do not lie please..Ashwin did and his partners were Harbhajan and Ojha.Jadeja is a different quality altogether.Monty is nowhere near.
The same Herath cannot do anything on the same "helpful" pitches where Ashwin is picking a lot of wickets.What happened?
Ashwin has gone past Swann.
Just because Ajmal chucked doesnt mean everyone does.
Unlike Ajmal Ashwin was never called.Ashwin has and had a clean action so lol at bowling without straightening.Ajmal was a chucker and caught chucking and banned from bowling and when he came back he was useless and discarded.Ashwin is still a top 3 test bowler.
Jadeja didnot play versus England in 2012Do not lie please..Ashwin did and his partners were Harbhajan and Ojha.Jadeja is a different quality altogether.Monty is nowhere near.
The same Herath cannot do anything on the same "helpful" pitches where Ashwin is picking a lot of wickets.What happened?
Ashwin has gone past Swann.
Just because Ajmal chucked doesnt mean everyone does.
Ashwin like many others (Ajmal, Harbajan, Narine etc) was not a clean bowler. Let me put it another way, when you teach kids how to bowl off-spin, you show them Action of Swann not Murli/Ajmal/Ashwin, there is fundamental kink in there action, design to bowl those mystery balls, if you understand Cricket, you could see why those awkward action exists in the first place...There is a reason Murli and all these questionable off spinners don't get universal respect...
Even on those helpful wickets, When Ashwin does not get wickets, he start bowling legspin...Ashwin is already out of ODI team, since under pressure he cannot chuck his way out anymore, that is problem with Narine and Ajmal too...In test, lets see what he does in ENG/SA, can he out perform Swann there?? - I still don't consider him better Off spinner than Swann...He was much cleaner bowler, with beautiful action and was not helped by pitches to perform...
What is your basis of saying Ashwin's action was not clean?Was he ever called? Murali or Ajmal were called and tested.Murali's doosra was banned for a while.Ajmal was caught chucking and was banned.None of this happened.Except for a couple of months where Ashwin openly declared that he will now use his elbow like some others and started copying Narine's action,Ashwin's action is as classical as it gets and no one has ever questioned it except posters on PP.
Ashwin bowl's legspin as a variation and his performance speaks for itself.He is taking wickets by buckets. Ashwin isnt in ODI team as there are the likes of Kuldeep and Chahal who are being groomed as the next line of spinners for India.At 31 years Ashwin needs rest.You have no proof of Ashwin being a chucker.
Why should Swann's home performance in England be compared to Ashwin's in a England?
In helpful conditions. Jadeja is better than Ashwin though in all formats.Outstanding bowler. The best spinner in the world alongside Jadeja.
In helpful conditions. Jadeja is better than Ashwin though in all formats.
In helpful conditions. Jadeja is better than Ashwin though in all formats.
The biggest reason we lost in AUS wereNo spinner since Swann has bowled at a high level in non-helpful conditions, but Ashwin is able to bowl tight overs even when he is not taking wickets. That is where Yasir struggles - he was the biggest reason why we got whitewashed in Australia in spite of putting up some very good totals.
On the contrary, Ashwin bowled unfruitful but dry spells in Australia which allowed India to draw a couple of games.
Yasir did well at Lord's and The Oval, but he got some pretty decent wickets. Ashwin will do a fine job if he gets similar pitches next year.
I rather agree on Jadeja - I am undecided over who is better in Tests, but at times I see some magic in Jadeja that I don't in Ashwin. At times, he reminds me of a young Saqlain in some strange way.
Here we go. Just done a bit of digging.
So Ash has bowled 1,766 out of 2,606 (85%) of his overs in India
He has 216 out of 300 wickets (72%) of his wickets in India
He bowls on average 52 over per game with an average of 22 in India vs 42 overs per game with an average of 32 abroad
Little comparison to Jimmy Anderson.
Bowled 60% of his overs in England
Had 66% of his wickets in England
Just shows how skewed towards home achievements Ashwins record his - staggering stats