What's new

Reham Khan releases controversial book ahead of 2018 Pakistan General Elections [Update #203]

Literally no one takes her opinion seriously anymore.Except for a bunch of twitter trolls but they don’t count.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">You claim that Imran Khan takes drugs.. but it seems ke un drugs ka asar ap pe ho raha hai. <a href="https://t.co/YDKf4xE5XE">https://t.co/YDKf4xE5XE</a></p>— Zaid Ali (@Za1d) <a href="https://twitter.com/Za1d/status/1025046765270167553?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 2, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

:sendoff
 
So now that we're a fair way out, I think it's fair to ask what her motivation was all along?

Did she meticulously plan the wedding (and the divorce), or did she burn the highway without a plan?
 
So now that we're a fair way out, I think it's fair to ask what her motivation was all along?

Did she meticulously plan the wedding (and the divorce), or did she burn the highway without a plan?

Mostly likely the latter, doesn't seem bright enough to plan the former.
 
Lol at the stuff Sheikh Rasheed has said about her
 
Now she is finding it hard to even live in UK? I am not even feeling sorry for her and her son because she deserve whatever is coming her way

<iframe width="853" height="480" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/OE3cBQRv0FQ" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Look what I found while organising. Caller ID pey check kerain who was texting Bunny Gala back in 2015? <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ElementaryWatson?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#ElementaryWatson</a> <a href="https://t.co/FQ9kMzirmX">pic.twitter.com/FQ9kMzirmX</a></p>— Reham Khan (@RehamKhan1) <a href="https://twitter.com/RehamKhan1/status/1027500339849846784?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 9, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="und" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/HumApkeHainKon?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#HumApkeHainKon</a> <a href="https://t.co/Lqqo6x0Upo">https://t.co/Lqqo6x0Upo</a></p>— Reham Khan (@RehamKhan1) <a href="https://twitter.com/RehamKhan1/status/1027509695576268801?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 9, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

:29:::J:37:
 
She is so desperate now calling awam buzdil and beghairet. I have a feeling she will do suicide the day she see IK taking oath.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="in" dir="ltr">Agar awaam buzdili chor dey. Ghairat mund ho jaye tu mulq k haalat budal jayen. Ashrafia sey tawaqu rakhna bewaqoofi hai.</p>— Reham Khan (@RehamKhan1) <a href="https://twitter.com/RehamKhan1/status/1028242480939061249?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 11, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
She’s obsessed with all kinds of scenarios that middle age housewives go through.

Please do not insult the poor lady.

She’s going through a tough phase. :shaq
 
She’s obsessed with all kinds of scenarios that middle age housewives go through.

Please do not insult the poor lady.

She’s going through a tough phase. :shaq

No bro no. Middle aged housewives run families, societies, countries and humanity.

She's in league of Paris Hiltons and Kim Kardashians. Heck I can assure you both Hilton and Kardashian are way classier than this "lady".
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Truth had to rise above falsehood of <a href="https://twitter.com/RehamKhan1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@RehamKhan1</a>, as oil above water. <br><br>For how long you'd be hiding <br><br>Mr <a href="https://twitter.com/mubasherlucman?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@mubasherlucman</a> finding her to make her answerable to what crazy stuff she been upto. <a href="https://t.co/xeT4P1AwgL">pic.twitter.com/xeT4P1AwgL</a></p>— Fatimah Kajal Manshad (@FatimahLove92) <a href="https://twitter.com/FatimahLove92/status/1028312616404430848?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 11, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


Mubashar Luqman files Lawsuit against Reham
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Reham Khan should not come down to the level of her haters. She should remain classy and stop giving attention to her haters.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">This by far was the most impressive oath taking by a PM in our history.<br>Also well deserved after Zia.<br>The best man is usually a woman. <a href="https://t.co/0hMKF04yA2">https://t.co/0hMKF04yA2</a></p>— Reham Khan (@RehamKhan1) <a href="https://twitter.com/RehamKhan1/status/1030765122124492801?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 18, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

giphy.gif
 
Now that IK has been sworn in - is Reham K getting any airtime in Pak or has the dust now settled?
 
Now that IK has been sworn in - is Reham K getting any airtime in Pak or has the dust now settled?

She's getting more coverage abroad since election

Well she was getting. Now she's mostly forgetten
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Happy Holi to everyone. <a href="https://t.co/6nKKu4GlHA">pic.twitter.com/6nKKu4GlHA</a></p>— Reham Khan (@RehamKhan1) <a href="https://twitter.com/RehamKhan1/status/1108272802237480960?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 20, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
LONDON: Former journalist Reham Khan has tendered an unconditional apology in the UK Court for allegations related to British businessman Aneel Mussarat that he was involved in the secret purchase of the PIA-owned Roosevelt Hotel.

The former journalist had claimed that Mussarat got an undue advantage in the alleged sale of the hotel due to his close links with Prime Minister Imran Khan.

In the apology sent to Geo.tv, Reham Khan said: “I am the operator of Youtube channel Reham Khan official and in a video posted on December 6, 2019, I made reference to Aneel Mussarat and I made a number of comments and insinuations regarding Aneel Mussarat.”

“In seeking to make amends, I have removed the video and I wholly retract my comments and apologise to Mr. Mussarat for any damage or harm which may have been caused to Mr. Mussarat, his businesses, or to the charitable causes he supports. I will not be making any further comment about this matter”.

It’s understood that Mussarat issued court proceedings around six months ago asking Reham to retract her allegations or present proof.

Moreover, both sides confirmed that the matter was settled out of court after Reham agreed to issue a clarification and an apology.

Speaking to Geo.tv, Mussarat confirmed that he had settled the defamation case with Reham and was happy to move on.

“I never had anything to do with the sale or purchase or any kind of dealing with the Roosevelt Hotel. I have done all businesses in the UK and Europe and I have done so through fair competition," he said.

The businessman said that he had "never done anything unethical and never tried to use my friends or networks to gain [an] undue or unfair advantage, he said.

"My friendship with PM Imran Khan has nothing to do with any businesses I am involved in. I have not done any business in Pakistan to avoid conflict of interest issues and I will continue to maintain this position," he said.

Mussarat expressed that he was glad that Reham had issued a clarification in this regard and settled the issue.

https://www.geo.tv/latest/323468-reham-khan-apologises-to-aneel-musarrat-in-defamation-case
 
LONDON: Prime Minister Imran Khan’s former special assistant for Overseas Pakistanis Zulfi Bukhari has won the first round of defamation case against Reham Khan, the broadcaster and former wife of PM Imran Khan.

At a trial of preliminary issues before the London High Court, Justice Karen Steyn determined the meaning of the eight publications submitted by Zulfi Bukhari in his complaint, including a YouTube video on Roosevelt Hotel by Reham Khan carrying four allegations as well as four Tweets/Retweets.

Justice Steyn did not accept Reham Khan’s assessment of the publications’ meaning and accepted Zulfi Bukhari’s submission instead.

The defamation claim started over a YouTube broadcast made by Reham Khan on December 6, 2019, from the UK’s jurisdiction in which she alleged that Zulfi Bukhari had a personal interest in the sale of Manhattan’s Roosevelt Hotel, owned by Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) and that Pakistan’s national assets were being sold to help people like Zulfi Bukhari in an act of “robbery”.

Seeking Chase Level 1 determination, Barrister Claire Overman for Zulfi Bukhari had argued that her client had been defamed at the highest level as he had been declared guilty of corruption and dishonesty while Reham Khan argued that the claim merited Chase Level 3 at the most, Zulfi’s reputation was not harmed and that the publications were in the public interest.

In the claim papers filed in July last year at the London High Court, the PM’s former advisor had alleged Reham Khan specifically targeted him in reference to the sale of Roosevelt Hotel.

The judge heard that in the first publication dated December 6, 2019, via YouTube, the broadcaster had made allegations of corruption and favouritism declaring that Imran Khan’s government wanted to favour Zulfi Bukhari through the shady hotel sale.

The second publication was a promotion of the same YouTube video on Twitter alleging favouritism granted to Zulfi; the third publication was the publication of the same YouTube video on Twitter; the fourth publication was the promotion of the same video with the allegation of “plunder” of Roosevelt Hotel.

The fifth publication was a retweet by another user condemning “nepotism” in relation to the same video; the sixth publication was a retweet by Reham by the same Twitter user with the words “”shocking claims & revelations” and “Zulfi needs to STOP Lying and NAB needs to investigate his father's REAL money trail”; the seventh publication was a retweet by a Pakistani journalist containing the words “notices sent to journalists & anchors who dared to raise the issue of containment of coronavirus in Pakistan” and that “Zulfi Bukhari took refuge behind PEMRA by serving” notices to two anchors. Meanwhile, the eight publication was a retweet of a tweet in which Zulfi Bukhari was “blamed for the #coronavirus spread in Pakistan” and “putting millions of Pakistani lives at risk”.

In her deference, Reham Khan told the court that her December 6, 2019, vlog was an effort to raise an alert in the public interest about the government's plans about the iconic Roosevelt Hotel in Manhattan. She said her broadcast was based on the information that the Aviation ministry had objected to the creation of a task force on Roosevelt.

Reham Khan maintained she only wanted to save Roosevelt Hotel and had a right to raise questions about the “performance or buffoonery of the government”.

She told the judge she had not used derogatory language and that her comments were not a personal attack to defame the claimant. She further said that her objective was achieved and that the sale of Roosevelt had been stopped.

Judge Karen Steyn found that the natural and ordinary meaning of all eight publications contained a Chase Level 1 imputation; the natural and ordinary meaning of all eight publications were statements of facts apart from a part of the seventh publication which is an opinion (the rest of the seventh publication is a statement of fact); and that all eight publications were defamatory of Zulfi Bukhari at common law.

In her decision, the judge mentioned the libel victory of Jang and Geo’s Editor-in-Chief Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman against a private Pakistani broadcaster five years ago and said that the ruling made in the meaning trial of MSR’s case had set the precedent for Urdu language broadcast cases related to the UK’s jurisdiction.

In a statement, Reham Khan said: “I have no reason to harbour any personal vendetta against Zulfi. We parted on cordial terms. This, however, does not mean that I will not criticise the PTI government’s performance and plans that make no sense.”

Barrister Claire Overman, it’s understood, will be taking further instructions.

GEO
 
Federal Minister for Communications and Postal Services Murad Saeed on Sunday sent a legal notice to Prime Minister Imran Khan’s ex-wife and Journalist Reham Khan on charges of propaganda and slander against him.

The minister stated that while the Ministry of Communications was awarded the top position for its performance recently, the accolade was made controversial by quotes from Reham Khan’s book, which not only discredited the petitioner but also discouraged the officials attached to the ministry.

According to the notice, Saeed claimed that all his achievements were made controversial due to “slander and dirty propaganda” taken from the book while a “draft was leaked which you [Reham] have not denied till today and published later.”

Referring to the draft, the minister expressed that he was slandered and demanded an explanation, and apology from Reham within 14 days or else he would proceed with legal action.

Furthermore, various TV programmes, speeches and social media posts have been attached to the notice, while an explanation has also been sought.

Murad stated, “in all the slander, not only is there a reference to your [Reham's] writing but you have also been retweeting it. In case of non-apology, the court will be requested to award severe punishment and one billion rupees in damages.”

https://tribune.com.pk/story/2345511/murad-saeed-takes-legal-action-against-reham-khan
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="zxx" dir="ltr"><a href="https://t.co/LqB0jMZDZe">pic.twitter.com/LqB0jMZDZe</a></p>— Reham Khan (@RehamKhan1) <a href="https://twitter.com/RehamKhan1/status/1606155475149811712?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 23, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Back
Top