What's new

Rohan Kanhai or Graeme Pollock. The better batsman?

zabalestmsm

ODI Debutant
Joined
Mar 31, 2013
Runs
9,620
I haven't seen both play in their times but I recently saw their batting videos!

I found their batting very stylish! Full of elegance!

Also their batting stats are great!

The only batsman I think who can match them in terms of style is Saeed Anwar!

What do u guys think?

Who was more stylish?

And,

Who was better?
 
I think Graeme Pollock is rated better from what I have read.

Him and Barry are talked about as unofficial ATGs whereas Kanhai is considered a damn good player only.
 
I think Graeme Pollock is rated better from what I have read.

Him and Barry are talked about as unofficial ATGs whereas Kanhai is considered a damn good player only.
I actually watched them both play.

Kanhai was the more elegant of the two, but was only of roughly the quality of Dean Jones or Mark Waugh or Damien Martyn.

Pollock was absolutely brutal. Once he had got his eye in he hit the ball harder than you can imagine. He is right up in the all-time Top Ten batsmen.

I'd rate Pollock behind only Bradman, Sobers and Viv and Barry Richards.

He would be the second greatest left-hander of all-time, just behind Sobers (narrowly) but clearly ahead of both Lara and Tendulkar.
 
I actually watched them both play.

Kanhai was the more elegant of the two, but was only of roughly the quality of Dean Jones or Mark Waugh or Damien Martyn.

Pollock was absolutely brutal. Once he had got his eye in he hit the ball harder than you can imagine. He is right up in the all-time Top Ten batsmen.

I'd rate Pollock behind only Bradman, Sobers and Viv and Barry Richards.

He would be the second greatest left-hander of all-time, just behind Sobers (narrowly) but clearly ahead of both Lara and Tendulkar.

Your fixation for older ERA players is quite amazing .... Older the ERA better the player ... that seems to be your theory. :))
 
Your fixation for older ERA players is quite amazing .... Older the ERA better the player ... that seems to be your theory. :))

?????????

The thread compares Kanhai and Pollock. Why wouldn't I be talking about them?

Pollock and Barry Richards have the second and third highest averages in history. Pollock's was fully 10% higher than Sachin's and he was still playing international cricket in 1985, 21 years after his debut.
 
A very unfair comparison.

There is no way Pollock, whose brief but bright career was cruelly cut short by the ban, can be compared with Kanhai, who played many more games against many more oppositions.

Granted that Pollock had a much better average after his 20 odd tests, but it never be predicted what his average would have eventually been had he played in Asia against India and Pakistan.
 
?????????

The thread compares Kanhai and Pollock. Why wouldn't I be talking about them?

Pollock and Barry Richards have the second and third highest averages in history. Pollock's was fully 10% higher than Sachin's and he was still playing international cricket in 1985, 21 years after his debut.

Notice the names of Sachin and Lara in your posts ? Where did they come from ? I don't mind you rating these Older players so high but atleast have some rationale and reasoning that is consistent , fair and verifiable. ( Quoting praises from other players is not a rational way of measuring greatness .... for every Pollock accolade I can produce twice as many for SRT )

You want to compare someone who played 20 tests vs someone who played 200 tests ? I will pick the guy with 200 tests every single time. Just the list of Great bowlers faced by Tendulkar will outnumber the entire set of bowlers faced by Pollock.

And BTW Tendulkar was avging 57 after 171 tests and 21 years of ACTUALLY playing Test Cricket + ODI cricket ... Let me know if you still want to do this exercise.
 
?????????

The thread compares Kanhai and Pollock. Why wouldn't I be talking about them?

Pollock and Barry Richards have the second and third highest averages in history. Pollock's was fully 10% higher than Sachin's and he was still playing international cricket in 1985, 21 years after his debut.

On his day or at his best Kanhai could even surpass Bradman.No batsmen ever posessed as much talent as Kanhai who came closest to the batting genius than any other player.Kanhai averaged over 58 in games won and over 53 at one down.If he did justice to his talent he could have averaged around 87.Rohan was like the Wasim Akram of batsmen who could execiute shots no batsmen could ever play.Hi sbatting went into regions overshadowing even the Don.I don't think Lara or Tendulkar played pace bolwing as well as Kanhai and John Woodcock felt that he batted more like Bradman than any batsman he ever saw.Averaging 47.53 with 15 centuries and 6223 runs make him a great player.Statistics s hardly did justice to Rohan who was more complete than Sobers as a batsman.

Overall Pollock is ahead of Kanhai because of consistency but not ahead of Tendulkar or Lara.Polock did not surpass Lara's creative genius,ability to register mammoth scores or single-handedly turn games.Tendulkar's longevity makes him arguably Bradman's greatest rival.
 
I think Graeme Pollock is rated better from what I have read.

Him and Barry are talked about as unofficial ATGs whereas Kanhai is considered a damn good player only.


On his day or at his best Kanhai could even surpass Bradman.No batsmen ever posessed as much talent as Kanhai who came closest to the batting genius than any other player.Kanhai averaged over 58 in games won and over 53 at one down.If he did justice to his talent he could have averaged around 87.Rohan was like the Wasim Akram of batsmen who could execiute shots no batsmen could ever play.Hi sbatting went into regions overshadowing even the Don.I don't think Lara or Tendulkar played pace bolwing as well as Kanhai and John Woodcock felt that he batted more like Bradman than any batsman he ever saw.Averaging 47.53 with 15 centuries and 6223 runs make him a great player.Statistics s hardly did justice to Rohan who was more complete than Sobers as a batsman.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">&#55356;&#57119; 6391 international runs and 54 dismissals<br>&#55357;&#56495; 15 Test hundreds<br>&#55356;&#57285; 1975 <a href="https://twitter.com/cricketworldcup?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@cricketworldcup</a> winner<br><br>Happy birthday to former West Indies player, Rohan Kanhai. <a href="https://t.co/KodyXQV9ZW">pic.twitter.com/KodyXQV9ZW</a></p>— ICC (@ICC) <a href="https://twitter.com/ICC/status/1475157038091194370?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 26, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Rohan Kanhai was a superb batsman, but let's put it this way.

Kanhai played Test cricket for the West Indies from 1957 to 1974 and averaged 47.53.

Garry Sobers was a year younger, and played Test cricket for the West Indies from 1955 to 1974 and averaged 57.78. Plus he took 235 wickets in 93 Tests.

They actually retired in the same Test against England at Port of Spain.

Graeme Pollock was 8 years younger, but on a different level. He played 21 official Tests, averaging a gigantic 60.97 equivalent to around 77 now. But his greatness was shown by how he was still churning out unofficial Apartheid Era Test centuries into the mid-1980's against the likes of Sylvester Clarke and Terry Alderman.

By the way, I strongly encourage anyone to hop onto Cricinfo Archive and look up the Test series played in England in the summer of 1970 and in Australia in the summer of 1971-72.

South Africa were due to tour both times but could not because of Apartheid. They were replaced by Rest of the World teams in which we saw Pollock and Kanhai play as team-mates - unthinkable in South Africa itself.

Some youngster will now try to tell me Rest of the World is not a country so the matches weren't as intense as playing against a real country like Sri Lanka. But these weren't fake Tests like the 2000-era Rest of the World one - these were the only Tests of the summer, and against incredibly strong opposition. And, of course, the West Indies is not a country either!

Anyway, if I'm honest, Pollock and Kanhai were pretty much of a muchness both summers - which is a huge compliment to Kanhai, because I don't think anyone truly places him in the Pantheon of great batsmen, whereas pretty much everyone has Pollock at the Top Table with Bradman, Sobers and Barry and Viv Richards.
 
I actually watched them both play.

Kanhai was the more elegant of the two, but was only of roughly the quality of Dean Jones or Mark Waugh or Damien Martyn.

Pollock was absolutely brutal. Once he had got his eye in he hit the ball harder than you can imagine. He is right up in the all-time Top Ten batsmen.

I'd rate Pollock behind only Bradman, Sobers and Viv and Barry Richards.

He would be the second greatest left-hander of all-time, just behind Sobers (narrowly) but clearly ahead of both Lara and Tendulkar.

Surely not ahead of Lara?

My list of all time great batsmen:

Bradman
Viv Richards
Lara
Sobers
 
?????????

The thread compares Kanhai and Pollock. Why wouldn't I be talking about them?

Pollock and Barry Richards have the second and third highest averages in history. Pollock's was fully 10% higher than Sachin's and he was still playing international cricket in 1985, 21 years after his debut.

The amount of cricket Tendulkar played , and in such diverse conditions , in such competitive Era with much better fielders and also TV umpires , he has to be in the top 3 batters ever
 
Back
Top