Lol wasn't inzamam infamous for his running between the wickets.
Based on what? You can't compare the era inzi played in and the one Rohit is currently playing in.ODI is a tie?
Rohit is 10 times the ODI player that Inzi could ever be.
Inzzy was more horrible when it mattered. Yes, many may cite his one knock in WC, but his overall performance in WC is horrible. We can't say that one knock covers 20-30 failures.
A Prime Rohit on song is 100 times better than Inzi in his prime on song. Inzi cannot hit a double even in flat decks on tiny grounds.
I have watched Inzi bat all through the 90's and 2000's. Inzi cannot hit like Rohit and cannot accelerate at will like Rohit. Inzi is a liability with his running between the wickets too. A horror show in fact.
Again inzi was a middle order bat and so was Rohit where he flopped. Inzi played in an era where 250 was a winning score and Rohit plays in an era where 350 is not safe. Inzi played in an era with bigger boundaries along with 1 ball.
Inzi could not open man. Had he opened, his average would be way down in low 30's.
For all his semi final effort in his debut season he went missing in several matches in the world cups. None better than his final world cup match against Ireland
Not several matches, pretty much the all WCs except 2-3 matches. You can't average 23 after 35 WC matches without failing one WC after another.
Rohit’s numbers are way better regardless in LOI. I don’t think we can attribute that simply to inflated stats or better bowlers. In fact he’s probably the most prolific in his era after Kohli himself. In last few years you could even make the case he has been the best overall. I don’t think at any point Inzi has achieved that.
Inzi was garbage in any crunch games unless it was not a WC and unless not against India. I'd take Babar over him in crunch games anyday. Against India though in bilaterals Inzi was a beast. Although where Babar hasnt had any biltaerals against India even if he did unlike Inzi he'd face a top bowling attack versus the pop tarts Inzi faced vs India.
Much much better. Not even close. Rohit. Just pull up his record in tests outside Asia.
Yea rohit is great at hitting double centuries in pointless bilaterals
Don't agree about better bowlers. Those same bowlers would struggle in current era too with the modern rules.
You have to look at Rohit's centuries in World cups and Champions Trophy too. Rohit is a beast in big tournaments.
I agree it’s never an apples to apples comparison. Yes, different bowlers, different rules, and different conditions changes the equation a lot. But as the game evolves, there are other changes too. In Inzi’s time 250 was a decent score, but now 350 is quite gettable, and so the batting style and approach changes too, aggression becomes very important and hence risks are greater.
Rohit wouldn't have been able to open in that era either. As I am saying you are comparing different eras. In this era he would have no problem averaging 50+ as an opener. Look at some of the players averages in odis you seriously think he wouldn't? The only thing you are coming up is with he's a better hitter which I haven't denied.
