Okay here is the deal, Razzak was an OK all-rounder whose performances were limited to meaningless bi-laterals and Sharjah tournaments. He had no impact at the world stage except for 1999 WC where he was batting at snails pace and was part of a good bowling unit. Only in Pakpassion he is rated so high. If someone comes to this site, they will actually think Razzak was the greatest all-rounder to grace the cricket field. Even during his time there were better bowling all-rounders than him. Heath Streak, Chris Cairns, Shaun Pollock, Lance Klusner were all better. Even Zimbabwe had Neil Johnson who was a better bat than Razzak. So please stop with the hyperboles. Yeah Sachin did not do great in Australia in ODIs but he is a certified GOAT. Does not matter what Razzak did in Australia, he still is an ordinary all-rounder who could have been better. Even Hansie Cronje took Sachin's wicket a lot, does not mean he is better than Ambrose. Yuvraj Singh made Pieterson his bunny, does not make the former a legendary left-arm spinner.
Razzak was no match winner outside of Asian conditions, he had no pedigree outside of Pakistan. Sachin did very well in world tournaments, he was player of the tournament in 2003 WC and averaged 56.95 overall in all World Cups. He averaged 78.95 against Pakistan in 5 World Cup wins against them. Abdul Razzak on the other hand averaged 21 with bat and 31 with the ball in the WCs. In the 3 games he played against India he averaged 8 with the bat and 90 with the ball. So much for big match player. razzaq was the epitome of useless runs and wickets when no one cared. Sachin did very well in multi-nation tournaments all over the world when Razzak was lighting the world on fire in Coca Cola & Kitply cups. I can't remember Razzak winning anything for Pakistan at the world level in major tournaments. He was a Sharjah or Asia specialist and that's about it.
If you want such useless comparisons, here is one for you, Kapil Dev averaged 47 in England at a SR of 107 while Inzi averaged 34 at a SR of 73. You guys consider Inzi a legend but unfortunately he is inferior to Kapil Dev with the bat in England. You can't say Kapil is poor as he led India to a WC win as well, he is clearly better as he was a bowler as well.