What's new

Sarfaraz Ahmed giving ball to Mohammad Hafeez - Isn't it wrong?

Hermoine Green

First Class Star
Joined
Oct 13, 2017
Runs
3,386
Though i didn't watch the match just following cricbuzz but i was shocked to see that Captain is still giving ball to Mohammad Hafeez, and we all know Hafeez action has been reported again.

Personally i think it was very unprofessional of Sarfraz Ahmed to continue with Mohammad Hafeez. If it is so compulsory to go with Hafeez and again giving him 10 overs, then why Imad is in the team?

Simply weird.
 
There is nothing wrong with it as Hafeez is still allowed to bowl.

However, I don't like the move because we have wicket-taking options available aplenty. Hafeez's defensive bowling is not required against this team, the aim should be to bowl them out as soon as possible.
 
Did ICC say Hafeez should immediately stop bowling?
 
I only watched a couple of Hafeez's overs and it seemed to me that he went back to his remodeled action today and wasn't chucking (atleast from the naked eye).

That means he was doing the chucking bit in the last two matches on purpose :srini
 
Nothing wrong with it according to ICC's regulations.

Plus, Hafeez is bowling with a legitimate action today.
 
There is nothing wrong with it as Hafeez is still allowed to bowl.

However, I don't like the move because we have wicket-taking options available aplenty. Hafeez's defensive bowling is not required against this team, the aim should be to bowl them out as soon as possible.

Bro how in the world do you get these awesome avatars
 
I only watched a couple of Hafeez's overs and it seemed to me that he went back to his remodeled action today and wasn't chucking (atleast from the naked eye).

That means he was doing the chucking bit in the last two matches on purpose :srini

Very true. Even his last over he was back to his new action. Its so obvious he chucked his way through the first few games.
 
I didn't notice a noticeable difference tbh in all the matches .

It's touch and go how close he is to the limit.

And to the OPs question well obviously if he doesn't bowl then everyone would be saying he's guilty before he's been proven.
 
Why is this guy still in the team? There is absolutely no use.
[MENTION=133760]Abdullah719[/MENTION] I want answers
 
Last edited:
Back
Top