shariqnoor
First Class Captain
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2016
- Runs
- 4,648
- Post of the Week
- 5
Starting off, I have to say this is a bold and aggressive decision to have both leg spinners playing in the starting XI. So from the outset, my stance is very clear that we need to have two quality spinners playing in the XI at all times (exceptions being when you have a completely grassy pitch or completely overcast conditions). However, I would rather like to have a quality off spinner so that we have two spinners who spin the ball in different directions, just so you have both bases covered whether it is a right hander or a left hander on strike.
Coming to Shadab vs Yasir, Yasir's strengths are obviously unerring accuracy and wicket-to-wicket bowling which allows no room for the batsman to hit him square off the wicket, unless playing a slog sweep. However, Yasir has some limitations too. The foremost being that Yasir is a defensive bowler in ODI cricket. You can see his defensiveness the moment Yasir is being attacked. His lines and lengths begin to waver. I've hardly seen him bowl without long off and long on, again giving the impression he's scared of being hit. But when you are a leg spinner in ODI cricket, you cannot be defensive as you have been picked to take wickets and not to control runs.
Shadab on the other hand, while having the disadvantage of not being accurate, has a lion's mindset. His first instinct is attack but he's not scared to come back and attack the batsmen when the batsmen are taking Shadab on. Priceless trait to have for a leg spinner, especially in ODIs. This is one of the primary reason why Shadab has done well in ODI and T20 cricket much more than Yasir. Other reason is that Shadab has more tools up his sleeve. His wrong 'un is great and can vary his pace from slow to fast quite seamlessly. Yasir is quite limited in this regard.
Overall, I am in love with the idea of having two specialist spinners in the team especially given that apart from India and Sri Lanka, almost every other team will get floored by quality spin. We should pounce on this opportunity before the World Cup. But is Yasir that man who can give Pakistan that extra boost to their attack, I'm not quite convinced.
Coming to Shadab vs Yasir, Yasir's strengths are obviously unerring accuracy and wicket-to-wicket bowling which allows no room for the batsman to hit him square off the wicket, unless playing a slog sweep. However, Yasir has some limitations too. The foremost being that Yasir is a defensive bowler in ODI cricket. You can see his defensiveness the moment Yasir is being attacked. His lines and lengths begin to waver. I've hardly seen him bowl without long off and long on, again giving the impression he's scared of being hit. But when you are a leg spinner in ODI cricket, you cannot be defensive as you have been picked to take wickets and not to control runs.
Shadab on the other hand, while having the disadvantage of not being accurate, has a lion's mindset. His first instinct is attack but he's not scared to come back and attack the batsmen when the batsmen are taking Shadab on. Priceless trait to have for a leg spinner, especially in ODIs. This is one of the primary reason why Shadab has done well in ODI and T20 cricket much more than Yasir. Other reason is that Shadab has more tools up his sleeve. His wrong 'un is great and can vary his pace from slow to fast quite seamlessly. Yasir is quite limited in this regard.
Overall, I am in love with the idea of having two specialist spinners in the team especially given that apart from India and Sri Lanka, almost every other team will get floored by quality spin. We should pounce on this opportunity before the World Cup. But is Yasir that man who can give Pakistan that extra boost to their attack, I'm not quite convinced.
Last edited by a moderator: