What's new

Sharing trophy should be considered - New Zealand coach Gary Stead

Saj

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Jun 1, 2001
Runs
96,141
Cricket chiefs should consider allowing teams to share the World Cup if a final is tied again, says New Zealand coach Gary Stead.

England beat the Black Caps in a dramatic final at Lord's by virtue of scoring more boundaries - after the teams' 50-over scores were tied and also level after a super over.

"I'm sure when they were writing the rules they never expected a World Cup final like that," Stead said.

"I'm sure it'll be reviewed."

On sharing the trophy, he added: "Perhaps when you play over a seven-week period and you can't be separated on the final day then that is something that should be considered."

Both sides scored 241 in their 50 overs on Sunday and were level on 15 when they batted for an extra over apiece.

England were crowned men's world champions for the first time because they had scored more boundary fours and sixes - 26 to New Zealand's 17 - in the match.

"It's a very, very hollow feeling that you can play 100 overs and score the same amount of runs and still lose the game - but that's the technicalities of sport," Stead added.

"It's unfortunate it comes down to one ball right at the end of the tournament when we've been here for seven weeks playing some really good cricket. It will be raw for a long time."

New Zealand were also unfortunate England appeared to be awarded one extra run in the final over of their innings.

England were given six runs when a fielder's throw hit Ben Stokes' bat as he dived to complete a second run and went for four - but laws appears to say that was one too many.

"I didn't actually know that," said Stead when asked about the law.

"The umpires are there to rule and they're human as well - and, like players, sometimes errors are made.

"It's just the human aspect of sport and probably why we all care about it so much as well. We can't change that now. It will go down in history as one that got away from us."

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/49000896
 
I absolutely agree.Been saying this since the final.The way both teams played neither deserved to lose.It should have been a shared trophy.
 
Sharing a trophy is something you do at a primary school sports day - sharing something like the cricket world cup is an absurd idea! What he want to share it if NZ had won under the same circumstances as England won it?
 
Last edited:
Sharing a trophy is something you do at a primary school sports day - sharing something like the cricket world cup is an absurd idea! What he want to share it if NZ had won under the same circumstances as England won it?
Knowing the team, they would have shared it. Losing in boundaries has to be the dumbest way to lose a cricket match in history.

Either way, both teams are on 0 WCs because neither were able to win the Final.
 
Last edited:
Knowing the team, they would have shared it. Losing in boundaries has to be the dumbest way to lose a cricket match in history.

Either way, both teams are on 0 WCs because neither were able to win the Final.

Not in the books :)) England are officially world champions. Acceptance is the first step to recovery lol.
 
Not in the books :)) England are officially world champions. Acceptance is the first step to recovery lol.
Nah, even if we won it like that, we wouldn't have really won it and I would have wanted us to win without all the rubbish.

You can't claim to be world champions without winning the Final. It's really hollow.
 
Trophy should have been shared. Match was tied during the regulation 50 overs as well as Super Over.

Awarding to England was a farce. Both England/NZ should have been crowned as Champs.
 
Nah, even if we won it like that, we wouldn't have really won it and I would have wanted us to win without all the rubbish.

You can't claim to be world champions without winning the Final. It's really hollow.

bruh

It's official.
It's over.

None of these mental gymnastics will change the result. England have the trophy. Get over it.
 
Trophy should have been shared. Match was tied during the regulation 50 overs as well as Super Over.

Awarding to England was a farce. Both England/NZ should have been crowned as Champs.

Sharing the trophy is so lame. That doesn't happen in pro sports.
 
bruh

It's official.
It's over.

None of these mental gymnastics will change the result. England have the trophy. Get over it.
Dude, don't care.

You seem more obsessed with this than anyone else, every thread trying to justify this "win".
 
Sharing the trophy is so lame. That doesn't happen in pro sports.
Yes and how often are world champions crowned without winning a Final? :)))

The reason England are world champions is because the ICC didn't things through and brought over T20 rules over to ODI cricket.
 
Dude, don't care.

You seem more obsessed with this than anyone else, every thread trying to justify this "win".

Lol why can't y'all accept it. It's annoying seeing every thread on here whining about England winning.
 
Lol why can't y'all accept it. It's annoying seeing every thread on here whining about England winning.
Why wouldn't there be? No one deserves to lose a WC like this. If Pakistan lost a WC like this I guarantee you'd be saying the same.
 
Sharing a world cup would've been better than deciding it on boundaries. However now it is done and nothing can be done about it.
 
Eng had higher rankings than NZ during groups stage as well as higher pretournament ranking. Eng also won their game against NZ during group stage.

All in all, a draw would rightfully see Eng through. However, the problem was NZ had ample opportunities to win the game. To be honest any team that keeps scoring 239/241 doesn’t deserve to be a champ.
 
Sharing trophy is nonsense

You only have one winner, one! England had the luck because they were brave enough.
 
Don't really like the idea of sharing a WC. 4 years work and we don't have a clear winner seems unfair. Should have played another super over on Sunday instead of the rules the ICC put in place.
 
Sharing the trophy is so lame. That doesn't happen in pro sports.

Then they should play another super over. Deciding on number of boundaries is pathetic. They should have also considered the number of wickets.

To me it is a farce. Both deserved to win.
 
Then they should play another super over. Deciding on number of boundaries is pathetic. They should have also considered the number of wickets.

To me it is a farce. Both deserved to win.
Should of had a winner.

Wickets would have been hollow for us, and England would have been angry even though it's better than something as arbitrary as boundaries...
 
Then they should play another super over. Deciding on number of boundaries is pathetic. They should have also considered the number of wickets.

To me it is a farce. Both deserved to win.

No, wickets are even more absurd. Eng won the group stage game, had higher group stage rankings, had higher pre tournament rankings. A draw means England rightfully got the trophy.
 
No, wickets are even more absurd. Eng won the group stage game, had higher group stage rankings, had higher pre tournament rankings. A draw means England rightfully got the trophy.
It had to be from the final, going back to results from the past is worse.

Ideally...

Another super over to find a winner > shared > wickets.

Cricket is built runs and wickets, not runs and boundaries. The only reason boundaries was adopted is because it was a tie breaker for tamasha T20s.

Instead we become the first team to not win a WC while not losing the Final and England become world champions without winning the Final.
 
Last edited:
I am against the concept of shared trophy. It devalues the tournament. There should be only one champion.

ICC should come up with reasonable and fair tie-breakers so that teams don't get robbed like NZ.

Also, ICC should get rid of that stupid deflection overthrow rule.
 
Last edited:
No, wickets are even more absurd. Eng won the group stage game, had higher group stage rankings, had higher pre tournament rankings. A draw means England rightfully got the trophy.

Your posts don’t make any sense whatsoever
 
I am against the concept of shared trophy. It devalues the tournament. There should be only one champion.

ICC should come up with reasonable and fair tie-breakers so that teams don't get robbed like NZ.

Also, ICC should get rid of that stupid deflection overthrow rule.
It's an unspoken rule between players forever not to run when the ball hits them ... ICC really should have made it official but they're useless, so it was expecting too much from them.
 
It had to be from the final, going back to results from the past is worse.

Ideally...

Another super over to find a winner > shared > wickets.

Cricket is built runs and wickets, not runs and boundaries. The only reason boundaries was adopted is because it was a tie breaker for tamasha T20s.

Instead we become the first team to not win a WC while not losing the Final and England become world champions without winning the Final.
England won as per rules though. And rules were the same for both teams. NZ need to do some serious soul searching. Guptill was persisted with in the super over despite the fact that he batted like a tail ender throughout the tournament. Santner ducking on the last ball. NZ batsmen batting negatively in semis and finals, it was only their bowling that saved them.

England deserved the luck.
 
Sharing trophy is nonsense

You only have one winner, one! England had the luck because they were brave enough.

Yet If you apply any cricketing knowledge the winner comes out as New Zealand..
Only way England were declared winner is because the principals of the game were thrown in the bin.

Also does “brave” equal umpires mistakes on LBW decisions and giving away an extra run for an overthrow?
 
England won as per rules though. And rules were the same for both teams. NZ need to do some serious soul searching. Guptill was persisted with in the super over despite the fact that he batted like a tail ender throughout the tournament. Santner ducking on the last ball. NZ batsmen batting negatively in semis and finals, it was only their bowling that saved them.

England deserved the luck.

Please explain why they deserved the luck?
 
Your posts don’t make any sense whatsoever
You have to understand the post to make it sense. If I am not mistaken pre tournament ranking is one of the criteria in case of a tie breaker, as well as head to head results.
 
No, wickets are even more absurd. Eng won the group stage game, had higher group stage rankings, had higher pre tournament rankings. A draw means England rightfully got the trophy.

How is wickets worse? I don't agree with having wickets as the tie breaker but it is not worse in any way. Some teams look to score more boundaries, other teams try to score more by running aggressively, which makes this boundaries rule stupid. Nobody wants to lose wickets, so it makes more sense for wickets to be the tiebreaker, even though that is not what I'd want, I'd rather have super overs until there's a result.
 
You have to understand the post to make it sense. If I am not mistaken pre tournament ranking is one of the criteria in case of a tie breaker, as well as head to head results.

You said wickets make no sense whereas wickets are one of the pillars of cricket.
Without wickets in hand you can’t make runs...
If scored are level and one team was all out and the other still had two in hand then logically the winner is the team with wickets in hand.

This is how it used to be decided in ODI’s and this is the only right way of deciding it...
Logic vs nonsense
 
Please explain why they deserved the luck?
Because they were World no.1 before the tournament started which meant they played like champions over the past 2-3 years. Then even throughout the tournament they played like winners (bar a mini hiccup).

In the final NZ batted first in comparatively easier batting conditions and yet they made a mess of it.
 
How is wickets worse? I don't agree with having wickets as the tie breaker but it is not worse in any way. Some teams look to score more boundaries, other teams try to score more by running aggressively, which makes this boundaries rule stupid. Nobody wants to lose wickets, so it makes more sense for wickets to be the tiebreaker, even though that is not what I'd want, I'd rather have super overs until there's a result.


Not only that but by taking wickets out of the equation actually promotes teams to play for the draw when they need 4 off 2 balls but have lost more wickets.....

That’s not ODI cricket...

Honestly I am dumbfounded
 
Because they were World no.1 before the tournament started which meant they played like champions over the past 2-3 years. Then even throughout the tournament they played like winners (bar a mini hiccup).

In the final NZ batted first in comparatively easier batting conditions and yet they made a mess of it.
Please.

England had so much fortune with tosses in the tournament. They probably would have been out if they lost the toss against India.

Bottom line is they weren't the better team on the day and walked away as world champions because of two bogus rules and umpiring errors.
 
Because they were World no.1 before the tournament started which meant they played like champions over the past 2-3 years. Then even throughout the tournament they played like winners (bar a mini hiccup).

In the final NZ batted first in comparatively easier batting conditions and yet they made a mess of it.


Sorry but this is nonsense...

Once you have two finalists that’s it.
What’s happened is history.

Otherwise why play finals in the first place?
Just give it to the number one ranked side....

England batted first against India in a must win game....
Pakistan batted second twice in must win games...

So?
 
I am glad they didn't break tie by determining who hit most sixes. That would've been bigger farce.

I personally think that in the case of a tied game, number of wickets should be first decider. After that, go for Super Over. If still tie, use NRR and then pre-game ranking.
 
How is wickets worse? I don't agree with having wickets as the tie breaker but it is not worse in any way. Some teams look to score more boundaries, other teams try to score more by running aggressively, which makes this boundaries rule stupid. Nobody wants to lose wickets, so it makes more sense for wickets to be the tiebreaker, even though that is not what I'd want, I'd rather have super overs until there's a result.
Wickets lost is a absurd idea because it would mean teams batting first can just relax without scoreboard pressure meanwhile teams batting second may lose wickets while trying to anti up the score.

Remember Eng were 195-4 at one stage. They lost all those wickets because RRR was creeping up.
 
Wickets lost is a absurd idea because it would mean teams batting first can just relax without scoreboard pressure meanwhile teams batting second may lose wickets while trying to anti up the score.

Remember Eng were 195-4 at one stage. They lost all those wickets because RRR was creeping up.

What on earth?

I’m wasting any more time in such stupid posts
 
Wickets lost is a absurd idea because it would mean teams batting first can just relax without scoreboard pressure meanwhile teams batting second may lose wickets while trying to anti up the score.

Remember Eng were 195-4 at one stage. They lost all those wickets because RRR was creeping up.
Do you think England were playing for the tie or win at 195/4 :)))

You're making no sense. And you're not going to if you're justifying boundaries over wickets.

Wickets are next to runs, not the number of boundaries. No one had a clue how many boundaries either team hit.
 
Do you think England were playing for the tie or win at 195/4 :)))

Honestly mate, it’s probably best to steer clear of these threads.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wickets lost is a absurd idea because it would mean teams batting first can just relax without scoreboard pressure meanwhile teams batting second may lose wickets while trying to anti up the score.

Remember Eng were 195-4 at one stage. They lost all those wickets because RRR was creeping up.

I don't think that wickets lost is a good way to split a final, but if you think New Zealand were "relaxing without scoreboard pressure" in their innings, you're joking. They were throwing away wickets left and right in a desperate bid to squeeze a few more runs in the final overs.
 
Here are tie breakers in case of tie in group stage: these are official rules. So what I said was not absurd at all.

If they apply these rules for final, Eng would win all 5 of these categories I think.

1. Most wins
2. NRR
3. Head to head
4. League stage seedings
5. Pre tournament seedings
 
Last edited:
What on earth?

I’m wasting any more time in such stupid posts

You dont make the rules man, ICC does. In every single tie breakers rules Eng would win. What exactly are you trying to argue here before calling others stupid?
 
Sorry but this is nonsense...

Once you have two finalists that’s it.
What’s happened is history.

Otherwise why play finals in the first place?
Just give it to the number one ranked side....

England batted first against India in a must win game....
Pakistan batted second twice in must win games...

So?
You asked me specifically why they deserved luck, and my answer was in response to that question.

You never asked me why I thought England should win.

Of course when there is a final, the team that plays well on the day wins and should win.
 
Wickets lost is a absurd idea because it would mean teams batting first can just relax without scoreboard pressure meanwhile teams batting second may lose wickets while trying to anti up the score.

Remember Eng were 195-4 at one stage. They lost all those wickets because RRR was creeping up.

???

are you 12 years old?

That is literally a huge part of cricket. Both teams lose wickets while trying to score fast.
 
Here are tie breakers in case of tie in group stage: these are official rules. So what I said was not absurd at all.

If they apply these rules for final, Eng would win all 5 of these categories I think.

1. Most wins
2. NRR
3. Head to head
4. League stage seedings
5. Pre tournament seedings
Thank you and some fans dont see the light.
 
Not in the books :)) England are officially world champions. Acceptance is the first step to recovery lol.

Its a five step process starting with denial then Anger, bargaining, depression then acceptance.

Kiwis are just sore losers at the moment but in time the wounds will heal and they will realise it was just a game.
 
Here are tie breakers in case of tie in group stage: these are official rules. So what I said was not absurd at all.

If they apply these rules for final, Eng would win all 5 of these categories I think.

1. Most wins
2. NRR
3. Head to head
4. League stage seedings
5. Pre tournament seedings

In pretty much every time the final game will continue with overtimes until there is a winner. Cricket is the only sport which is stuck with stupid methods of deciding winners. The only good method of determining the winner of the final was to keep going.
 
ICC Responds To World Cup Final Overthrow Controversy

Ever since England won their maiden World Cup on Sunday, many people have questioned the rules set by International Cricket Council (ICC) and its interpretation by the on-field umpires. A major controversy emerged due to perceived misinterpretation of rules by the on-field umpires, which resulted in them awarding England one extra run. ICC for the first time has reacted on the overthrow controversy. Responding to the issue, an ICC spokesperson said it was against the policy to "comment on any decisions (made by the umpires)".

The spokesperson also added that on-field umpires take decisions based on their interpretation of the rules laid in the ICC rule book.

"The umpires take decisions on the field with their interpretation of the rules and we don't comment on any decisions as a matter of policy," an ICC spokesperson was quoted as saying by forxsports.com.au.

The biggest controversy surrounding England's title triumph came to everyone's notice when former umpire Simon Taufel claimed that England were awarded one run extra after the ball had deflected off diving Ben Stokes' bat.

Taufel, a five-time winner of ICC's Umpire of the Year Award, had said that on-field umpires had made a "clear mistake" when they awarded England six runs instead of five.

Taufel was referring to ICC's Law 19.8 which clearly states that batsmen are awarded one run extra only if the batsmen have crossed when the fielder releases the ball.

England batsmen Ben Stokes and Adil Rashid had not crossed when Martin Guptill threw the ball and hence should have only been awarded five runs, including four overthrows.

But on-field umpires Marais Erasmus and Kumar Dharmasena awarded England six runs on the third-last delivery and also brought Ben Stokes on the strike which helped them tie the match in the regulation 50 overs.

England were declared the winners on the basis of their superior boundary count after 102 overs of play couldn't separate the two teams.

https://sports.ndtv.com/world-cup-2...hrow-controversy-2070487?amp=1&akamai-rum=off
 
Lol at the looserish English team with their over the top celebrations of a tainted WC win
 
That's a 6 year old incident, I think they've matured as an organization and adopted new policies.

After decades of governing ICC cant mature so abruptly in last 6 years. Its just double standards imo.
 
ICC and BCCI would have changed the umpires decision had India been playing.NZ being a true team of gentleman did not make a fuss about the extra run.Indian team and BCCI would have gone through the roof forcing umpires to change their decision.
 
This whole problem was created by what the ICC have admitted to in their statement. That is the arbitrary interpretation of rules. Rules in sports should never be left to interpretation. They should always be fixed and clear with no room for any kind of different interpretation.
 
WATUEyI.jpg
 
So the official response of the global governing body is to not respond.

lol you can see why cricket is so frequently laughed at by everyone apart from us loyal followers.
 
The telling thing is I've seen more English people try to defend their win than celebrate it.

Even Shaz who is someone you'd think would go mad is taking shots at us than actually celebrating.

He knows it was bogus and is angry that their win is marred with this.

Of course we are happy that we won. Ecstatic in fact. 8.3 million Britons tuned in to see a fantastic match and England lifting the World Cup in front of a 30,000-strong crowd.

It’s difficult though not to find ourselves defending our win when people like you are so determined to try and take it away from us. I mean all of this “the world knows that England is still on zero World Cups” is just total nonsense, get over it buddy.
So all of this really is just the fault of you and your ilk. Cause and effect.
 
Of course we are happy that we won. Ecstatic in fact. 8.3 million Britons tuned in to see a fantastic match and England lifting the World Cup in front of a 30,000-strong crowd.

It’s difficult though not to find ourselves defending our win when people like you are so determined to try and take it away from us. I mean all of this “the world knows that England is still on zero World Cups” is just total nonsense, get over it buddy.
So all of this really is just the fault of you and your ilk. Cause and effect.
Bottom line is this win is tainted and England won the WC without winning the Final.
 
*your* bottom line. Not mine, and not for many others as well.
What is the world talking about?

England's win or the rules? Exactly.

ICC's social media pages are still being flooded with complaints.

Whenever this win is brought up, there's always going to be a yeah BUT.. You still need to win a WC to get that taint off and deep down you know it.

You may not want to accept it, but it's the truth and the sooner you realize it the better.
 
Last edited:
What is the world talking about?

England's win or the rules? Exactly.

Whenever this win is brought up, there's always going to be a yeah BUT.. You still need to win a WC to get that taint off and deep down you know it.

You may not want to accept it, but it's the truth and the sooner you realize it the better.

Don’t try and tell me what I’m thinking. Thanks.

The only acceptance required here as [MENTION=732]Gilly[/MENTION] mentioned is the final stage of the grieving process, which you will eventually reach along with that minority of viewers who are yet to accept the result.
 
What is the world talking about?

England's win or the rules? Exactly.

Whenever this win is brought up, there's always going to be a yeah BUT.. You still need to win a WC to get that taint off and deep down you know it.

You may not want to accept it, but it's the truth and the sooner you realize it the better.

You are embarrassing yourself now Aman, apologise to James and the England cricket team and let it go man. You are not a teenager.
 
So the official response of the global governing body is to not respond.

lol you can see why cricket is so frequently laughed at by everyone apart from us loyal followers.

They did respond though. Their policy is that they don't comment on in-game decisions made by umpires, it's a respect thing.
 
Don’t try and tell me what I’m thinking. Thanks.

The only acceptance required here as [MENTION=732]Gilly[/MENTION] mentioned is the final stage of the grieving process, which you will eventually reach along with that minority of viewers who are yet to accept the result.
Whatever, I'm just what most of the world are thinking.

If you want to claim a WC on boundaries and umpiring errors, that's on you. But your response to it all has been telling.

Maybe when you win a WC you'll be able to admit it.
 
Last edited:
We need to end this topic now because what is done is done, though i know for NZ fans, they will never forget the miscarriage of justice which has occurred!

The bottom line is :-
England are fortunate to be world chanpions, but THEY ARE the world champions!!!

England fans should not be so shameless and accept that they are fortunate to be world champions

And NZ fans need to accept that they were unfortunate not to be world champions, but england are the world champions!!

My personal anger is towards the icc who are a useless organisation, which are responsible for this entire mess!!!

The reality is that cricket is a village game, not a professional sport!!
 
We need to end this topic now because what is done is done, though i know for NZ fans, they will never forget the miscarriage of justice which has occurred!

The bottom line is :-
England are fortunate to be world chanpions, but THEY ARE the world champions!!!

England fans should not be so shameless and accept that they are fortunate to be world champions

And NZ fans need to accept that they were unfortunate not to be world champions, but england are the world champions!!

My personal anger is towards the icc who are a useless organisation, which are responsible for this entire mess!!!

The reality is that cricket is a village game, not a professional sport!!

Even gully cricket isn't stupid enough to have boundaries as a tie breaker..
 
Even gully cricket isn't stupid enough to have boundaries as a tie breaker..
I know you are hurting, i would be too, if what happened to NZ had happened to the pakistan team.
But like kane and the boys, you have to find the strength to just accept it, no matter how unfair. Kane and the boys must be hurting even more than you, but i believe that they will come back stronger and when they eventually win the world cup, it will be even more sweeter!!
 
Gary Stead and New Zealand Cricket have begun “positive discussions” about extending his contract as Black Caps coach, as he and Kane Williamson insist their captain-coach relationship is solid.

Stead’s initial two-year term as coach was set to expire after October’s Twenty20 World Cup in Australia which was last week postponed one year amid cricket’s Covid-19 hiatus.

The Black Caps’ next assignment is tentatively scheduled as a home series of two tests then limited overs internationals against West Indies starting in late November, pending government approval and quarantine arrangements.

Coach Gary Stead and captain Kane Williamson are likely to continue working together with the Black Caps.

For now the players are back training, with some eyeing travel to the upcoming Caribbean and Indian Premier Leagues. Stead oversaw camps at Lincoln, near Christchurch, and Mount Maunganui over the past fortnight for their first official action since the ODI against Australia in Sydney on March 13.

All indications are that NZC is keen for Stead to continue, and the man himself is optimistic after a pandemic-enforced break to recharge.

“Talks have been pretty positive and, if New Zealand Cricket and the players feel as though I can keep contributing then I’d be interested in continuing on,” Stead told Stuff on Friday.

Stead and Williamson, whose captaincy reign in all formats has ticked into its fifth year, got back on the grass at the Mount after continued speculation about whether they could work effectively together.

A degree of unease and philosophical differences between the pair are widely known in cricket circles, Stuff understands, but not to the point that they can’t work together. The belief is they still get on well and can continue to improve a side ranked second in tests and third in ODIs.

Stead rejected social media speculation in May that he wanted Tom Latham as his test skipper, and there was a discussion to clear the air.

“Kane and I have a really strong relationship, and we spoke about it. There was no basis in truth and the disappointing part is it’s coming from somewhere and someone, but it’s not Kane and it’s not I,” Stead said.

“I really enjoy working with Kane. The discussions we have are robust and always directed at what’s best for the team, which is something I know we are truly aligned on.”

Black Caps fast bowler Lockie Ferguson has developed an app where bowlers can measure their speed on their phone.

The coach said there was trust between them.

“It’s like any business, you always have positive conflict and if there wasn’t, then I’d be worried.”

Williamson also addressed suggestions of tension between the pair last week, and was bemused as to where the Latham speculation originated.

“Gary and I have a very good relationship, and we’re always honest with each other and keen to challenge each other,” Williamson said.

“Ultimately we both share the vision of where we want the team to go and that’s a really positive one. How we get there is a constant discussion like in any organisation with leadership. It’s a positive thing, and we’re happy to have those honest discussions.”

Next month will be two years since Stead succeeded Mike Hesson.

KAI SCHWOERER/GETTY IMAGES

Henry Nicholls and coach Gary Stead at the Black Caps training camp at Lincoln.

Under Stead and Williamson the Black Caps started well with an away test series victory against Pakistan, were pipped by England in that agonising Cricket World Cup final at Lord’s and swept India 2-0 in home tests in February.

But there were also challenges, notably the 3-0 test series hammering in Australia and strong criticism when Stead took a pre-planned break for the one-dayers which followed a 5-0 T20 series loss to India.

Former New Zealand captain Jeremy Coney was livid, saying on Radio Sport if Stead didn’t like the scrutiny and months on the road he could: “Go and get a job in a hardware store and see your family every night”.

Lockdown provided a respite for coaches and players. Stead enjoyed it at home in Christchurch and said time with families had been good for both him and players to get off the intense international cricket treadmill.

“For the most part we’ve had some pretty amazing experiences as a group and I cherish a lot of those. Most of the time it’s an enjoyable job, and there’s always things that are tough which is part of the role as well.

“Selection is always difficult when you know there’s some very good players that miss out, and at times the media side and the extra scrutiny you get is more demanding.”

https://i.stuff.co.nz/sport/cricket...t-extension-vows-to-work-with-kane-williamson
 
Last edited:
Stead reappointed BLACKCAPS coach

Gary Stead has been reappointed head coach of the BLACKCAPS, for a three-year term.

Initially appointed to the role in 2018 following the resignation of Mike Hesson, Stead will continue as head coach in all three formats of the game up until the conclusion of the ICC Cricket World Cup 2023.

His reappointment follows an impressive two years with the BLACKCAPS, during which time they were undefeated in Test series apart from last summer’s tour to Australia, and qualified for their second consecutive World Cup final – against England at Lord’s last year.

The BLACKCAPS currently sit in second place on the ICC Test Rankings (behind Australia); are ranked No.3 in ODI cricket, and No.6 in T20Is.

With two Test series scheduled at home this summer (against the West Indies and Pakistan, respectively) there is an opportunity for the BLACKCAPS to improve their chances of qualifying for the Test Championship final, scheduled for Lord’s in June next year.

Stead, whose pedigree in cricket includes a career as a New Zealand Test batsman, a stint as Canterbury coach and a spell in charge of the WHITE FERNS, said he was looking forward to building on the progress of the past couple of years.

“It’s an honour and a privilege to be re-appointed”, he said. “I think this group of players is growing as a team; there’s an exciting schedule ahead of us and I know everyone is feeling very optimistic about our chances in all three formats.

“I’m very appreciative of the backing I’ve enjoyed from the players, the support staff and NZC and hope I can repay that confidence by helping the BLACKCAPS achieve their goals and objectives over the next three years.”

NZC chief executive David White said Stead’s re-appointment followed a robust and formal process which included consultation with players, NZC high-performance staff, and Major Association high-performance personnel.

He confirmed Stead had been interviewed by an appointments panel last week, following which a recommendation had been made to, and had been approved by, the NZC Board.

“What was immediately clear was that Gary had overseen a particularly successful chapter in New Zealand cricket history, during which time his team had been very strong in the Test and ODI formats,” said Mr White.

“Winning an away Test series against Pakistan and a Test in Sri Lanka was a tremendous effort, as were the home Test series wins against Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, England and India.

“To tie the World Cup final and miss out on winning the trophy through a countback was a gut-wrenching experience, but I think we can all agree on how well the team played during that campaign and, equally, how well they conducted themselves afterwards.”

Mr White said that, now Stead’s re-appointment was confirmed, a process would begin to appoint a new batting coach, following the move from Peter Fulton to take on the head coaching role with Canterbury.
 
Last edited:
you don't even beat india in an ODI GAME during the semi final. It was a 2 day test match. You deserve nothing. Not that England deserves to be winners because they overachieved and fluked a title themselves.
 
Back
Top