What's new

Sharjeel Khan banned: After signs of recovery, Pakistan cricket's reputation suffers major setback

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
In his latest article for FirstPost Sports, Saj discusses how the reputation of Pakistan cricket will need to be rebuilt once again after Sharjeel Khan was handed a five-year ban on spot-fixing charges.


Sharjeel-Khan-AP-380.jpg


Left-handed batsmen have always held a special place in the psyche of Pakistan cricket supporters.

The late Wasim Raja set the stage for this Pakistani fascination with southpaws with his carefree and swashbuckling style of play which would see him stand-up to any bowling attack in the world. A few years later, Saeed Anwar arrived on the scene with his record-breaking 194 against arch-rivals India and raised the bar for left-handed batsmen. While Aamir Sohail did manage to carry the torch with his own unique style of aggression, southpaws Salman Butt and Nasir Jamshed came and went, and the cupboard for left-handed batsmen remained bare for a good few years until early 2016.

In the 3rd qualifying final of the Pakistan Super League’s first edition in 2016, the Islamabad United opener, Sharjeel Khan walked in and put on a destructive display of batting where he scored 117 off just 62 balls to take his team to the final of the tournament. The innings was of such ferocity and aggression that it left no doubt in most fans’ minds that Pakistan were seeing the start of something special with comparisons with Saeed Anwar already starting to flow amongst the fans and media. For Sharjeel, that PSL game against Peshawar Zalmi was a huge break which would catapult his international career that seemed to be in the doldrums to new heights.

Until that evening in Dubai on 21 February, 2016, Sharjeel was a mere name in many minds; one of many who were picked by Pakistan selectors more in hope than conviction to provide that solid opening partnership which could take games away from the opposition. Of course, he had the flair and he could play those shots all lovers of the game expected from a left-hander, but the results were not forthcoming at first. All that changed in February of 2016 and many years after Anwar’s departure from the scene, Pakistan cricket appeared to have discovered a top-order player whom the opposition would fear.

Sharjeel’s reputation at the top of the batting order was starting to build-up nicely as he continued improving in 2016 through the Asia Cup and then further demonstrated his hitting power in the World Twenty20. If there was proof needed of his ability, it was put to the test during Pakistan’s tour of England in 2016 where in the only Twenty20 International, he and Khalid Latif put on a display of aggressive batting that left many in no doubt about the potential of the batsman from Hyderabad.

And just like the dark days of 2010, when Pakistan seemed to have found a young left-arm fast-bowling genius who had the world at his feet and subsequently 'lost' him for five years. Pakistan’s newest rising star Sharjeel went the same horrible way. Fresh from the tour of Australia where his last ODI scores read 50, 74 and 79, Sharjeel began the 2017 PSL campaign for Islamabad United with a lacklustre innings of 1 against Peshawar Zalmi. In itself, it appeared to be an innings to forget but what followed next was something that shook Pakistan cricket to its foundations.

Suspected of spot-fixing during this game, Sharjeel was sent home from the UAE by the PCB and suspended from the game indefinitely pending a resolution of the investigation. In the days that followed, more shocking revelations of involvement of Pakistan players in the seedy world of bookies and corruption were revealed. The seven years of rehabilitation for Pakistan cricket appeared to have come to naught as name after name was mentioned in the investigation.

The reputation of Pakistan cricket once again lay in tatters and the PCB, now caught between a rock and a hard place, had no options but to pursue the suspects with all the legal means at its disposal.

It took almost seven months of protracted legal wrangling but PCB’s anti-corruption tribunal delivered its verdict on 30 August to ban Sharjeel for at least two-and-a-half years with a lengthier five-year ban a distinct possibility if he did not cooperate with PCB’s anti-corruption campaigns.

It had happened before in Pakistan cricket and incredible as it seemed, a career that promised so much was once again sacrificed for short-term greed by an individual. The overwhelming evidence brought to the table by the PCB left the tribunal with not many options but to punish Sharjeel. The PCB legal team may well press for a tougher penalty against the left-hander in the coming days and Sharjeel's career in cricket is now on hold.

There aren't many who will doubt that the firepower that Sharjeel brought to bear at the top of the innings would have made him the envy of many teams and more importantly, provided him great opportunities to earn a legal living.

What drove him to take a route that had been proven to be full of pitfalls is beyond comprehension. How a player with such immense talent could not put a value on his own future earning power is beyond belief. How could a man who had made his way into the Pakistan team in all three formats, had signed a County contract with Leicestershire and would have been a top pick for T20 leagues around the world throw it all away is totally mystifying.

Regardless of his own failings, the damage he and the other accused have done to the reputation of Pakistan cricket cannot be fully estimated. From a purely cricketing point of view, one can only wonder what a Pakistan opening pair consisting of Sharjeel and a Champions Trophy winner like Fakhar Zaman would have done to the opposition’s morale. With the world at his feet, Sharjeel had the chance to etch his name in the hall of fame of Pakistan players, but sadly this is not to be.

The PCB may well have earned kudos for a job well done in exposing corruption but in Sharjeel’s misdemeanours, Pakistan cricket has lost a great opportunity to show the world that the dark days of the past were just an aberration. Sadly, the work to rebuild the reputation of Pakistan cricket begins once again.

http://www.firstpost.com/firstcrick...reputation-suffers-major-setback-3991971.html
 
Last edited:
This pretty much encapsulates the problem for PAk cricket - back to square one!

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Find it incredible despite the events of 2010 some Pak players still get involved in fixing & thinking they'll get away with it <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Cricket?src=hash">#Cricket</a></p>— Saj Sadiq (@Saj_PakPassion) <a href="https://twitter.com/Saj_PakPassion/status/902936546936061953">August 30, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Not sure it's hurt Pakistan's cricket reputation, in fact it may have enhanced it. In the past it was often thought we didn't care too much to pry into the fixing in Pakistan cricket, and in 2010 it wasn't Pakistan who banned the cricketers, it was outside powers. The PCB chairman even accused England of fixing in retaliation. Kaneria and Naved Arif were also charged by the ECB anti-corruption unit, again not caught by the PCB.

This time however was different, PCB caught both the guys who fixed and those failing to report a bookie report early. Then banned them, all were punished in the appropriate way with differing sentences/fines. I think the rest of the world in some ways are rather surprised Pakistan did catch on swiftly and delivered punishments. By some it was felt that Pakistan largely turned a blind eye to fixing activities. So yeah, I think Pakistan's respect has gone up in that regard, seems like they're actively trying to stamp out fixing which I think cricket fans from around the world will appreciate.

Only thing I would say is still 2.5 years with cooperation seems a bit lenient. Should have been five at least. Pakistan need to send a strong message of no tolerance to fixing, and when other boards would have handed out life bans for this, 2.5 seems very lenient. We need to rid that image that Pakistan is sympathetic to fixers, cricketers should be deterred in the strongest way possible not to fix.

All in all a good thing for Pak cricket, with this act more corrupt individuals out of cricket making cricket a cleaner game. I don't judge countries harshly if they catch fixers in this set up, most countries have had their share of fixing related incidents now, what is important is they're punished and removed from cricket.

I honestly think Fakhar would have never played too if Sharjeel wasn't banned, Sharjeel would have opened and I think Azhar would have been drafted in the remaining spot to provide the stable/anchor option. Just like after the trio were banned, we improved not regressed as a team. So there's a silver lining there, who knows if Sharjeel wasn't caught for fixing, Fakhar may not have played and Pakistan may not have won the Champions Trophy.
 
A very well written piece Saj.

That said, I do think you are overly pessimistic about the effect this will have on Pakistan's cricket reputation. If anything the PCB's reputation has been enhanced as it sends a clear message that the PCB is taking the issue seriously as shown by (i) its internal efforts and (ii) its co-ordination with other organisations such as the UK's NCA.

The only thing which could count against them is the "leniency" of the punishment (assuming the tribunal were correct to find him guilty). With that in mind I was happy to see Sethi in his PP interview mention the possibility of appeal:

We will review the judgement in detail and if we think that they are lenient, we will seek stiffer sentences. In our view, the minimum sentence is five years which is also what is prescribed by the ICC. In this case, the sentence is two and a half years ban and the rest is suspended but we will review this and decide if we would like to challenge this decision and get the suspension removed.
 
Not sure it's hurt Pakistan's cricket reputation, in fact it may have enhanced it. In the past it was often thought we didn't care too much to pry into the fixing in Pakistan cricket, and in 2010 it wasn't Pakistan who banned the cricketers, it was outside powers. The PCB chairman even accused England of fixing in retaliation. Kaneria and Naved Arif were also charged by the ECB anti-corruption unit, again not caught by the PCB.

This time however was different, PCB caught both the guys who fixed and those failing to report a bookie report early. Then banned them, all were punished in the appropriate way with differing sentences/fines. I think the rest of the world in some ways are rather surprised Pakistan did catch on swiftly and delivered punishments. By some it was felt that Pakistan largely turned a blind eye to fixing activities. So yeah, I think Pakistan's respect has gone up in that regard, seems like they're actively trying to stamp out fixing which I think cricket fans from around the world will appreciate.

Only thing I would say is still 2.5 years with cooperation seems a bit lenient. Should have been five at least. Pakistan need to send a strong message of no tolerance to fixing, and when other boards would have handed out life bans for this, 2.5 seems very lenient. We need to rid that image that Pakistan is sympathetic to fixers, cricketers should be deterred in the strongest way possible not to fix.

Agreed, the sentence is far too lenient and is no deterrent. Thami Tsolekile got a 12 year ban for contriving to fix in the 2015 Ram Slam and failing to disclose the full details of an approach. There was no evidence that an actual fix in any match was carried out, but he and the other three players who were banned all participated in material discussions about match-fixing.

Whereas in Sharjeel's case, not only was he found guilty of having material discussions about fixing but also of engaging in fixing - yet gets 2.5 years !

This was another missed opportunity for PCB to nip the issue in the bud. In the late 1990s, the Qayyum Inquiry was hampered by a lack of resources and undue political pressure. Then even the mild recommendations that Qayyum (whose own integrity was questionable) wasn't implemented and big names got away scot-free.

That set a terrible precedent which haunts us to this day. I'll be interested to see what the sentences are for Latif and Jamshed.
 
How does this hurt anything? In fact it strengthens our stance against corruption in cricket because we vehemently went after one of our own players who was crucial to the side but was involved in fixing.

It shows we are unbiased and vigilant against fixers.
 
How does this hurt anything? In fact it strengthens our stance against corruption in cricket because we vehemently went after one of our own players who was crucial to the side but was involved in fixing.

It shows we are unbiased and vigilant against fixers.

It also shows that despite so much work, corruption exists at the highest levels of cricket
 
A cheat has been banned. Pakistan deserve credit. This will further deter youngsters from straying. We are talking here about Sharjeel Khan. A good cricketer but by no means a great one. Pakistan cricket has overcome far greater setbacks. Lets not exaggerate this. The removal of a cheat enhances Pakistan cricket.
 
How does this hurt anything? In fact it strengthens our stance against corruption in cricket because we vehemently went after one of our own players who was crucial to the side but was involved in fixing.

It shows we are unbiased and vigilant against fixers.

Yeah we really showed Sharjeel with a 2.5 year ban.

This is not a deterrent, infact Sharjeel and his lawyer shouldn't bother appealing as this is as soft a sentence as you could wish. PCB will have to learn the hard way when the next scandal inevitably erupts.
 
Yeah we really showed Sharjeel with a 2.5 year ban.

This is not a deterrent, infact Sharjeel and his lawyer shouldn't bother appealing as this is as soft a sentence as you could wish. PCB will have to learn the hard way when the next scandal inevitably erupts.

Doesn't matter, to the people around the world we still took a stance and called him out before anyone did it for us like last time. Reputation is still intact.
 
People thinking this is a deterrent need a reality check.

These players are dumb and deluded to think they'll get away with such acts even after witnessing what happened 7 years ago to 2 potential players who could have been greats had they been playing getting jailed and a 5 year ban.

How much more of an example do you need to see what can happen if you cheat!

If that doesn't shame them or out and out put any fear on any of the players in and around the world at any level then nothing will.
 
Agreed, the sentence is far too lenient and is no deterrent. Thami Tsolekile got a 12 year ban for contriving to fix in the 2015 Ram Slam and failing to disclose the full details of an approach. There was no evidence that an actual fix in any match was carried out, but he and the other three players who were banned all participated in material discussions about match-fixing.

Whereas in Sharjeel's case, not only was he found guilty of having material discussions about fixing but also of engaging in fixing - yet gets 2.5 years !

This was another missed opportunity for PCB to nip the issue in the bud. In the late 1990s, the Qayyum Inquiry was hampered by a lack of resources and undue political pressure. Then even the mild recommendations that Qayyum (whose own integrity was questionable) wasn't implemented and big names got away scot-free.

That set a terrible precedent which haunts us to this day. I'll be interested to see what the sentences are for Latif and Jamshed.

I suggest that you read my separate post which lays out from the PCB's own report the evidence which convicted Sharjeel Khan.

1. No evidence of him meeting with the bookie.
2. No evidence of him agreeing to the fix.
3. No evidence of him designating "stretches" as the signal for the fix.
4. No evidence of him being paid for the alleged fix.

You can't punish somebody without proof.
 
Back
Top