What's new

Shoaib Akhtar versus Waqar Younis

Shoaib Akhtar versus Waqar Younis

  • Total voters
    7
Ozeirk

Ozeirk

Tape Ball Captain
Joined
Aug 30, 2010
Runs
1,237
Shoaib Akhtar has been an absolute legend for Pakistan and has come up with some great match winning performances in his time. However, watching him on his vlogs I get the impression that he considers himself and to be a greater player than Waqar Younis with him putting himself next to Wasim and not mentioning Waqar name whenever he talks about Pakistan's greatest fast bowlers.

If we look at the overall record Waqar has played for a lot longer than Shoaib and contributed a lot more than Shoaib did due to the latter's fitness issues.

I think it's time we put this debate to rest and would love people's opinion on this forum as to who they consider to be the greater player and why?
 
This has got to be a joke. Shoaib doesn’t belong to the same ballpark as Waqar.

And no, Shoaib has never been a legend for Pakistan cricket. He has rather been an embarrassment, a primadonna, a destructive influence for his team. Even the late Tony Greig said the same.
 
Hitman said:
This has got to be a joke. Shoaib doesn’t belong to the same ballpark as Waqar.

And no, Shoaib has never been a legend for Pakistan cricket. He has rather been an embarrassment, a primadonna, a destructive influence for his team. Even the late Tony Greig said the same.
Click to expand...

Akhtar's record against Australia and India is better than Waqar's. Akhtar bowled to better Australian and Indian sides as well. Waqar played far too many games towards the end of his career when he was finished.
 
Both are legends.

Stop comparing and taking Akhtar's comments too seriously
 
Savak said:
Akhtar's record against Australia and India is better than Waqar's. Akhtar bowled to better Australian and Indian sides as well. Waqar played far too many games towards the end of his career when he was finished.
Click to expand...

Akhtar’s record against India is better than Waqar’s, not against Australia. Waqar played just 4 matches against India.
 
Waqar Younis was much better, I generally don't mention him as highly as Wasim but there is no doubt he is still an undisputed ATG and enjoys the privilege of having one of the greatest peak ever.

Akhtar was fantastic at his peak as well but declined earlier and had suffered injury, so Waqar was better by a mile.
 
Hitman said:
Akhtar’s record against India is better than Waqar’s, not against Australia. Waqar played just 4 matches against India.
Click to expand...

I don't think Waqar could have delivered the performances Akhtar did against the greatest batting line up of Australia from 1999 to 2005 even at his peak.
 
Considering akhtar had to play pretty much as single man army with likes of below average or about avg bowlers, his performances were taller than Waqarz....

in isolation, waqar was a great great great bowler..much more skilled and amazing ...but he had the greatest bowler of all time on the other side..Also had Mushi and Saqlain to complement him ... so obviously tht helped ....

still Waqar > Shoaib
 
Both are terrific bowlers. Waqar overall is a much better bowler.

Akhtar was impossible to play when he got it right. 155k swinging balls will be a nightmare for any batsman.

Both did not have the longevity though. Waqar retired as a medium pacer. Akhtar retired as an express fast bowler.
 
troodon said:
Both are terrific bowlers. Waqar overall is a much better bowler.

Akhtar was impossible to play when he got it right. 155k swinging balls will be a nightmare for any batsman.

Both did not have the longevity though. Waqar retired as a medium pacer. Akhtar retired as an express fast bowler.
Click to expand...

Lol Ross Taylor retired Akhtar. Akhtar wasn't express consistently at the end of his career. Waqar played on even after the bashing he received from Jadeja
 
Shoaib could've had a similar career to Waqar if he had cartilage left in his knees. But then again, Waqar would've had an even better career if he didn't overplay and injure himself twice.
 
Hitman said:
This has got to be a joke. Shoaib doesn’t belong to the same ballpark as Waqar.

And no, Shoaib has never been a legend for Pakistan cricket. He has rather been an embarrassment, a primadonna, a destructive influence for his team. Even the late Tony Greig said the same.
Click to expand...

Waqar is obviously better but still shoaib is a Pakistan great no doubt about that
 
I think it's time we put this debate to rest and would love people's opinion on this forum as to who they consider to be the greater player and why?
Click to expand...

What debate buddy? :yk :)))

Got nothing but love for Shoaib but Waqar is a legend. Different league altogether.
 
Savak said:
Lol Ross Taylor retired Akhtar. Akhtar wasn't express consistently at the end of his career. Waqar played on even after the bashing he received from Jadeja
Click to expand...

Akhtar was express all the time till his last game against NZ. He was the fastest of all time and was a smart bowler.
 
Waqar for me. Even Shoaib looked upon Waqar as his role model. Thing with Shoaib is he gave far too many runs in every innings. Waqar after his prime when he lost much of his pace remained effective by adapting.
 
I was a kid by the time Shoaib Akhtar retired and even I'll tell you that Waqar is better.
 
Savak said:
Akhtar's record against Australia and India is better than Waqar's. Akhtar bowled to better Australian and Indian sides as well. Waqar played far too many games towards the end of his career when he was finished.
Click to expand...

You're really saying Akhtar played from 2005-2011 in his prime? He was absent half the time
 
Shoaib was only good against tailenders the very few times he played. Most of the time he was an injured donkey burdening the team, nothing else. One of the most incredibly overrated fast bowlers ever.
 
Waqar was better but also believe Shoaib was miss managed

I still would have either of them now!
 
PakLFC said:
Waqar for me. Even Shoaib looked upon Waqar as his role model. Thing with Shoaib is he gave far too many runs in every innings. Waqar after his prime when he lost much of his pace remained effective by adapting.
Click to expand...

4.76 Economy rate is not high in ODI. Bearing in mind that he was an attacking bowler and had express pace.
 
azimiqbal said:
Waqar was better but also believe Shoaib was miss managed

I still would have either of them now!
Click to expand...

He wasn't a kid that needed mothering. It is well known how he was a heavy drinker and would stay up playing cards until late with a match the following day. Would have been sacked had he been an Aussie, we just tolerate this nonsense from our so called stars further inflating their ego.
 
Generally he was always unfit carrying so much extra weight showing a complete lack of respect to the rigours of life as a sportsman. Waqar was never like this, he was never overweight during his career nor was his professionalism ever questioned. I never liked Shoaib Akhtar as a player or person, was glad when he finally retired.
 
Last edited:
Shoaib humbled Teenda, Ponting, Kallis in their primes. What was Waqar's record like against elite batsmen in his prime?
 
PakLFC said:
Waqar for me. Even Shoaib looked upon Waqar as his role model. Thing with Shoaib is he gave far too many runs in every innings. Waqar after his prime when he lost much of his pace remained effective by adapting.
Click to expand...


Waqar was ineffective when he lost his pace. He would never have played in his final years had it not been for the captaincy.
 
Savak said:
Waqar was ineffective when he lost his pace. He would never have played in his final years had it not been for the captaincy.
Click to expand...

No Waqs was good even when nearing the end of his career. I am not having it, stop it.
 
Waqar was FAR MORE talented, he's a legend. Akhtar's legend status is up for debate but what isn't it up for debate is that he is not in the same class as Waqar Younis, periodt.
 
Hitman said:
This has got to be a joke. Shoaib doesn’t belong to the same ballpark as Waqar.

And no, Shoaib has never been a legend for Pakistan cricket. He has rather been an embarrassment, a primadonna, a destructive influence for his team. Even the late Tony Greig said the same.
Click to expand...

Agree , this thread comparing the Waqar with Shoaib belongs to some comedy forum. Shaoib was very very good bowler, but Waqar is a legend, an ATG, not Shoaib.
 
PakLFC said:
No Waqs was good even when nearing the end of his career. I am not having it, stop it.
Click to expand...

Yes, so good that the PCB never picked him again after the 2003 ODI WC. Lets face it, before Waqar got the captaincy, he was battling for a position in the team being picked and dropped from 1999 to 2001 and this would have continued had he not got the captaincy. He was finished as a bowler
 
Pakistanian said:
Waqar was FAR MORE talented, he's a legend. Akhtar's legend status is up for debate but what isn't it up for debate is that he is not in the same class as Waqar Younis, periodt.
Click to expand...


I think Waqar's prime gets to be over rated where he benefited massively from the novelty of reverse swing. Barring the West Indies who were in decline, Waqar mostly fed off England, NZ, Zimbabwe, teams who were not highly rated at all at the time. Besides once Waqar's pace deserted him, unlike Wasim he looked a far more ordinary bowler.
 
Savak said:
Shoaib humbled Teenda, Ponting, Kallis in their primes. What was Waqar's record like against elite batsmen in his prime?
Click to expand...

Yes so humbled was Sachin that he had to knock Shoaib down in 1 over at the world cup.

What did Shoaib say to captain? Wasim bhai mere se bowling nyi ho ryi? :23: :))) :srt
 
For a clear picture,

Wasim = Imran > Waqar > Kapil > Akhtar

Top 5 Asian pace bowlers!
 
Waqar is miles ahead.

Akhtar was an under-achiever and NOT a legend for Pakistan. People who started watching cricket after he retired have this misconception.
 
Top 10 fast bowlers from 1990-2010:-

McGrath
Wasim
Ambrose
Donald
Steyn
Waqar
Pollock
Walsh
Bishop
Bond

that's top 10 fast bowlers and Akhtar nowhere to be found. Add in spinners- Murali, Warne, Kumble AND Saqlain. 14 names!
 
Shoaib had the potential to be great, but no one can be great after playing just 40 tests, he was an underacheiver due to injuries and his own fault too (drugs and other controversies).
 
Ab Fan said:
For a clear picture,

Wasim = Imran > Waqar > Kapil > Akhtar

Top 5 Asian pace bowlers!
Click to expand...

as much as it hurts me to say it but this seems right. I will still choose shoaib over all because I like him personally.

Remember shoaib played with a weak team compared to past greats. He had to carry the entire workload on his shoulders.
 
tyron_woodley said:
as much as it hurts me to say it but this seems right. I will still choose shoaib over all because I like him personally.

Remember shoaib played with a weak team compared to past greats. He had to carry the entire workload on his shoulders.
Click to expand...

The second part would have made sense if he played 100 tests and got 400 wickets. It makes sense for Kapil Dev or Hadlee, not for Shoaib. He played only 40 games and not that he played in a very weak Pak team. They still had Inzy, Yousuf and Younis.
 
Ab Fan said:
The second part would have made sense if he played 100 tests and got 400 wickets. It makes sense for Kapil Dev or Hadlee, not for Shoaib. He played only 40 games and not that he played in a very weak Pak team. They still had Inzy, Yousuf and Younis.
Click to expand...

fair enough. yea I agree about kapil. I wonder how good his figures would be if he played with those great Pakistani bowlers. Would be as good as imran I guess. But imran was a better batsman in terms of technique.
 
If Imran and Kapil had played in same team, IMO Kapil would have ended up becoming a 39-40 averaging batsman with 32-33 bowling avg and new ball specialist + stock 4th seamer role. His Wkts per match also.would be more like 2.7-3 levels

Imran would have been freed up to be a primary strike bowler and improved his hitting skills for LOI cricket. Probably ended up with a 17-18 bowling average and 25-26 batting avg in Tests becoming the undisputed GOAT test bowler
 
Last edited:
Danyaalr01 said:
Shoaib had the potential to be great, but no one can be great after playing just 40 tests, he was an underacheiver due to injuries and his own fault too (drugs and other controversies).
Click to expand...

Shane Bond is regarded as a great in NZ
 
Savak said:
Shane Bond is regarded as a great in NZ
Click to expand...

Bond also had the potential to be great, and he's not considered a great here by the way. He is considered a very good bowler, and for the very few people here that see him as a great the only reason is because NZ didn't have and never anyone to call great at that time, apart from Hadlee.

Bond has an excellent record in the amount of matches he did play, but again, no one can be great in such a short career.
 
Danyaalr01 said:
Bond also had the potential to be great, and he's not considered a great here by the way. He is considered a very good bowler, and for the very few people here that see him as a great the only reason is because NZ didn't have and never anyone to call great at that time, apart from Hadlee.

Bond has an excellent record in the amount of matches he did play, but again, no one can be great in such a short career.
Click to expand...

absolutely not. bond is and never will be a great bowler. He only played like 18 tests. Plus he was beyond mediocre in sub continent. check his record vs sri lanka. He skipped the india tour because he knew his average would rocket up. Hate players like these. philander is another dud fodder outside Sena countries.

Shoaib over bond anyway. shoaib is better than zaheer khan too and broad and Anderson.

only waqar wasim and kapil are better out of the Asian bowlers.

Bumrah has potential to be a GOAT bowler but he has to play for another 7 years. Let's see.

shaheen afridi is another one with serious potential
 
Manunited18 said:
As a pure strike bowler is take akhter over both
Click to expand...

maybe kapil was a better bowler but definitely no my vaas.I would choose shoaib over both too.

Depends on what the team needs.

Bigger question is wasim vs waqar vs mcgrath vs ambrose?

I would say ambrose in tests and wasim in odi.

Ambrose
wasim
mcgrath
waqar?
 
Manunited18 said:
As a pure strike bowler is take akhter over both
Click to expand...

Agreed. But see we have a bowler who started off as a next big thing but couldn't have a full-fledged career due to injury and his own controversies.

And then you have another bowler who started off as a good bowler, kept on improving and learnt with time, led their team for a long period, ended with 400 wickets and had a great career.

I am sure I am gonna pick the latter.
 
tyron_woodley said:
absolutely not. bond is and never will be a great bowler. He only played like 18 tests. Plus he was beyond mediocre in sub continent. check his record vs sri lanka. He skipped the india tour because he knew his average would rocket up. Hate players like these. philander is another dud fodder outside Sena countries.

Shoaib over bond anyway. shoaib is better than zaheer khan too and broad and Anderson.

only waqar wasim and kapil are better out of the Asian bowlers.

Bumrah has potential to be a GOAT bowler but he has to play for another 7 years. Let's see.

shaheen afridi is another one with serious potential
Click to expand...

I didn't say Bond was better than Shoaib, I just said he is considere to be a very good bowler in NZwho's career was cut short. He would have improved over time. I didn't bring the topic of Bond up, I was replying to a comment regarding Bond.
 
Last edited:
tyron_woodley said:
absolutely not. bond is and never will be a great bowler. He only played like 18 tests. Plus he was beyond mediocre in sub continent. check his record vs sri lanka. He skipped the india tour because he knew his average would rocket up. Hate players like these. philander is another dud fodder outside Sena countries.

Shoaib over bond anyway. shoaib is better than zaheer khan too and broad and Anderson.

only waqar wasim and kapil are better out of the Asian bowlers.

Bumrah has potential to be a GOAT bowler but he has to play for another 7 years. Let's see.

shaheen afridi is another one with serious potential
Click to expand...

Now you started judging bowlers by looking stats,there are more factors other than watching stats.
Bumrah hasn't played a match in subcontinent and you started praising him.
 
andy0204 said:
Now you started judging bowlers by looking stats,there are more factors other than watching stats.
Bumrah hasn't played a match in subcontinent and you started praising him.
Click to expand...

bumrah has serious talent. There is no doubting there. Can he sustain this form for another 7 years is the question.
 
tyron_woodley said:
bumrah has serious talent. There is no doubting there. Can he sustain this form for another 7 years is the question.
Click to expand...

Similarly bond also had that talent when he knocked off ATG Australia batting line upso many times,it's due to injuries he can't able to play.Bond hasn't played a test match in England.
You said that bond skipped tours,If you said same about Ryan Harris (if you remove those 2 tests in Srilanka,he hasn't played in subcontinent apart from 2 tests) what will be your opinion?
 
andy0204 said:
Similarly bond also had that talent when he knocked off ATG Australia batting line upso many times,it's due to injuries he can't able to play.Bond hasn't played a test match in England.
You said that bond skipped tours,If you said same about Ryan Harris (if you remove those 2 tests in Srilanka,he hasn't played in subcontinent apart from 2 tests) what will be your opinion?
Click to expand...

he is not an all time great obviously? Ryan Harris was cannon fodder in subcontinent.

All time greats are guys like ambrose waqar mcgrath wasim who played well everywhere. I know some people will bring up wasim and waqar's figures in subcontinent but it only dipped when they were past their peak. At their respective primes waqar and wasim had a terrific average unlike chumps like bond and Ryan Harris who are a mere nothing compared to those Greats.

Cummins if he does well in subcontinent has potential to be an all time great. Same with bumrah. Have to be consistent though.
 
tyron_woodley said:
he is not an all time great obviously? Ryan Harris was cannon fodder in subcontinent.

All time greats are guys like ambrose waqar mcgrath wasim who played well everywhere. I know some people will bring up wasim and waqar's figures in subcontinent but it only dipped when they were past their peak. At their respective primes waqar and wasim had a terrific average unlike chumps like bond and Ryan Harris who are a mere nothing compared to those Greats.

Cummins if he does well in subcontinent has potential to be an all time great. Same with bumrah. Have to be consistent though.
Click to expand...

Harris took a 5-fer in Srilanka and won a test match in subcontinent.
You are just a man who looks only at stats.
 
Last edited:
tyron_woodley said:
he is not an all time great obviously? Ryan Harris was cannon fodder in subcontinent.

All time greats are guys like ambrose waqar mcgrath wasim who played well everywhere. I know some people will bring up wasim and waqar's figures in subcontinent but it only dipped when they were past their peak. At their respective primes waqar and wasim had a terrific average unlike chumps like bond and Ryan Harris who are a mere nothing compared to those Greats.

Cummins if he does well in subcontinent has potential to be an all time great. Same with bumrah. Have to be consistent though.
Click to expand...

Ambrose?
According to your theory Ambrose shouldn't be included because he didn't played a test match in India and played only few test matches in subcontinent.
 
tyron_woodley said:
maybe kapil was a better bowler but definitely no my vaas.I would choose shoaib over both too.

Depends on what the team needs.

Bigger question is wasim vs waqar vs mcgrath vs ambrose?

I would say ambrose in tests and wasim in odi.

Ambrose
wasim
mcgrath
waqar?
Click to expand...

I'd take akhter over kapil any day on a road, mgrath been the most effective test bowler I've seen, as for best pakistan test bowlers il say imran and waqar over wasim
 
Ab Fan said:
Agreed. But see we have a bowler who started off as a next big thing but couldn't have a full-fledged career due to injury and his own controversies.

And then you have another bowler who started off as a good bowler, kept on improving and learnt with time, led their team for a long period, ended with 400 wickets and had a great career.

I am sure I am gonna pick the latter.
Click to expand...

I'm looking towards conditions, if I'm captain and I'm presented with a flat road il take akhter over kapil and vaas
 
I have problems with both bowlers. Both underperformed for different reasons at various times and both led to terrible dressing room environments. Waqar was an awful strategist and captain to boot. Plus he carried on way longer than he should have, diminishing his legacy. Shoaib was the most unreliable bowler a team could have. He would rarely bowl throughout the innings, sat out second innings bowling when up against it and spent half his career huffing and puffing to the wicket, clearly unfit.

Taking out these factors, on the field, both were most amazing assets a team could have. Quick, lethal and armed with unplayable deliveries on all lengths. Shoaib could have reached Waqar's greatness if he carried on long enough and had Waqar's commitment. One can make certain allowances for injuries but Shoaib simply didn't have it in him to work hard for himself and his country. His loss, in the final reckoning.
 
andy0204 said:
Harris took a 5-fer in Srilanka and won a test match in subcontinent.
You are just a man who looks only at stats.
Click to expand...

that's a one off test. did he win a series there? and how did he do against Pakistan or India? I don't think so. he got smashed or dint play.
 
andy0204 said:
Ambrose?
According to your theory Ambrose shouldn't be included because he didn't played a test match in India and played only few test matches in subcontinent.
Click to expand...

in that case waqar and wasim are greater than him. So is imran and so is mcgrath who is the greatest.
 
tyron_woodley said:
he is not an all time great obviously? Ryan Harris was cannon fodder in subcontinent.

All time greats are guys like ambrose waqar mcgrath wasim who played well everywhere. I know some people will bring up wasim and waqar's figures in subcontinent but it only dipped when they were past their peak. At their respective primes waqar and wasim had a terrific average unlike chumps like bond and Ryan Harris who are a mere nothing compared to those Greats.

Cummins if he does well in subcontinent has potential to be an all time great. Same with bumrah. Have to be consistent though.
Click to expand...

Harris played 2 matches in the sub continent adn averages 14 with a 5fer.
 
Savak said:
I think Waqar's prime gets to be over rated where he benefited massively from the novelty of reverse swing. Barring the West Indies who were in decline, Waqar mostly fed off England, NZ, Zimbabwe, teams who were not highly rated at all at the time. Besides once Waqar's pace deserted him, unlike Wasim he looked a far more ordinary bowler.
Click to expand...

Genius!

What were the two strongest batting line ups 1989-1992?
 
Mohammad Asif and Amir are more talented than Akhtar, don't be fooled by the record as he got to play more games but in terms of pure talent the duo is far ahead of him.
 
Shoaib is my favourite bowler but come on you can't compare him with waqar. Waqar had one of the best peaks in history of game where he was ranked #1 for 5-6 years.

He has achieved a lot of more than Shoaib. At the end of the day comparisons are based on performances and not potential or talent and waqar wins this easily.
 
tyron_woodley said:
maybe kapil was a better bowler but definitely no my vaas.I would choose shoaib over both too.

Depends on what the team needs.

Bigger question is wasim vs waqar vs mcgrath vs ambrose?

I would say ambrose in tests and wasim in odi.

Ambrose
wasim
mcgrath
waqar?
Click to expand...

Yeah exclude Vaas!
 
PakLFC said:
He was a show off. Had/s a terrible girly hair cut and looked and still appears like a junky.
Click to expand...

He is a gangsta and backed up his attitude with come crazy on ground performances . It ain't show off if you can back it up.Sachin use to shiver in his pants when he had to face a shoaib in his prime.People like you would call Mohammad Ali a show off . Even now Ponting rates him as the most difficult bowler to face .
 
Peak Waqar was arguably the greatest bowler of all time (only matched in stats by Sydney Barnes). Akhtar was better than post-peak Waqar though.
 
from_da_lost_dim3nsion said:
He is a gangsta and backed up his attitude with come crazy on ground performances . It ain't show off if you can back it up.Sachin use to shiver in his pants when he had to face a shoaib in his prime.People like you would call Mohammad Ali a show off . Even now Ponting rates him as the most difficult bowler to face .
Click to expand...

ponting even rates vernon philander as the most difficult bowler to face,so does it means that philander is a better bowler?
 
On his day Shoaib was a match-winner capable of blowing away any batting line-up, sadly those days were not too often.

With Waqar, he was brilliant for most of his career and a frightening talent.

For me Waqar would be the better choice as he was more reliable and performed on a more regular basis.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

U
No fire, no fight: Is the current bowling lineup the worst in Pakistan cricket history?
Replies
39
Views
853
LordJames
LordJames
Savak
The reluctance of the ex-Pakistani greats, legends to coach Pakistan's grass root stars
Replies
17
Views
430
shamaan
S
FearlessRoar
Salman Butt delivers insightful and constructive cricket analysis, setting him apart from other Pakistan’s former players who lack meaningful insights
Replies
11
Views
758
RyanRyan10
RyanRyan10
M
  • Poll Poll
Would Younis Khan be included in all-time India Test XI if he was from India?
2
Replies
139
Views
6K
Van_Sri
Van_Sri
BouncerGuy
“Virat Kohli is trying to play in Pakistan for the first time”: Shoaib Akhtar
Replies
23
Views
1K
Cricket Warrior
Cricket Warrior
Back
Top